PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J J Hammond

Publications and source records attributed to J J Hammond.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2004

Long-term renoprotection by perindopril or nifedipine in non-hypertensive patients with Type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria.

AIMS: To assess the efficacy of an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (perindopril), a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (sustained release nifedipine) and placebo in preventing the progression of albuminuria and decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in patients with Type 2 diabetes and microalbuminaria. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, open, blinded end point study of 77 patients allocated to three treatment groups (23 perindopril, 27 nifedipine, 27 placebo). Drug doses were adjusted to achieve a decrease in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of 5 mmHg in the first 3 months and additional therapy was given if hypertension developed (supine DBP > 90 mmHg and/or systolic blood pressure (SBP) > 140 mmHg if < or = 40 years; supine DBP > 90 mmHg and/or SBP > 160 mmHg if > 40 years). Median follow-up was 66 months, with 37 patients being followed for at least 6 years. RESULTS: Blood pressure remained within the non-hypertensive range in 83% of perindopril-, 95% of nifedipine- and 30% of placebo-treated patients (P < 0.01). In the first 12 months albumin excretion rate (AER) decreased by 47% only in the perindopril group (P = 0.04). From 12 to 72 months, AER gradients increased by 27% per year only in the placebo group (P < 0.01). After 6 years, macroalbuminuria had developed in 7/15 placebo compared with 2/11 in perindopril and 1/11 nifedipine-treated patients (P = 0.05). GFR did not change in the first 12 months, but thereafter the median GFR gradient (ml/min/1.73 m(2) per year) was -2.4 (P < 0.01) for perindopril-, -1.3 (P = 0.26) for nifedipine- and -4.2 (P = 0.01) for placebo-treated patients. The rate of decline in GFR for the study group as a whole from 12 months to the end of follow-up correlated negatively with mean arterial pressure (MAP) (r = -0.38, P < 0.01). During a 3-month treatment pause in 29 patients AER tended to increase only in the perindopril group (P < 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term control of blood pressure with perindopril or nifedipine stabilizes AER and attenuates GFR decline in proportion to MAP in non-hypertensive patients with Type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Long-term comparison between perindopril and nifedipine in normotensive patients with type 1 diabetes and microalbuminuria.

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor with a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker in preventing progression to macroalbuminuria and/or a decline in renal function in normotensive patients with type 1 diabetes and microalbuminuria. Forty-two patients were randomized to treatment with either perindopril, slow-release nifedipine, or placebo. In the first 3 months, drug dosage was titrated to achieve a decrease in diastolic blood pressure of at least 5 mm HG: Thirty-three patients had a minimum of 24 months' data, and 25 patients were followed up beyond 36 months (mean, 67 +/- 4 months). Patients were studied every 3 months and at the end of the treatment period; those who remained normotensive discontinued therapy and were followed up for an additional 3 months. Baseline geometric mean albumin excretion rates (AERs) were as follows: perindopril, 66 microg/min; nifedipine, 59 microg/min; and placebo, 66 microg/min. During the first 3 years, 7 of the perindopril-treated but none of the placebo or nifedipine-treated patients reverted to normoalbuminuria (P < 0.01). Median AERs at 3 years of treatment in each group were 23 microg/min for perindopril, 122 microg/min for nifedipine, and 112 microg/min for placebo patients (P < 0.01). In patients with more than 3 years' follow-up, median AERs decreased by 45% in the first year and then stabilized in the perindopril group, but increased by 17.6% in the nifedipine group and 27.6% in the placebo group (P < 0.03) in the first year, then increased progressively. In these same patients, there was a significant decline in glomerular filtration rate in the nifedipine group (-7.8 +/- 1.8 mL/min/1.73 m(2)/y), but not in the other two groups (perindopril, -1.0 +/- 1.2 mL/min/1.73 m(2)/y; placebo, -1.3 +/- 1.1 mL/min/1.73 m(2)/y; P = 0.004). At the end of the study, cessation of treatment for 3 months was associated with a doubling of AERs in the perindopril-treated group, but no change in the other two groups (P < 0.001). In conclusion, long-term perindopril therapy is more effective than nifedipine or placebo in delaying the progression of diabetic nephropathy and reducing AER to the normoalbuminuric range (<20 microg/min) in normotensive patients with type 1 diabetes and microalbuminuria.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Protocols and guidelines in critical care: development and implementation.

Variation in clinical management has been associated with suboptimal outcomes and increased costs. Guidelines, protocols, and clinical pathways have evolved as a strategy to standardize care, principally by limiting variation, thereby reducing complications, decreasing length of stay and improving outcomes. However, the nature of critical care makes it difficult to conduct blinded, randomized, and controlled clinical trials, the specific type of science required for evidenced-based medicine and guideline development. Areas in which ICU-based guidelines have been successful include, among others, sedation and neuromuscular blockade use, ventilator management, antibiotic selection, and vascular surgical interventions.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1993

A multicenter comparison of isradipine and felodipine in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension. The Physician's Study Group.

The objective of this study was to compare the tolerability of isradipine and felodipine in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Following a 4-week placebo run-in, 143 patients entered a 12-week double-blind multicenter study. Patients were randomized to receive either isradipine (n = 72) or felodipine (n = 71) at a dose of 2.5 mg twice daily. Dose-doubling and the addition of enalapril (2.5 mg once daily) was permitted if diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was > 90 mm Hg at weeks 4 and 8, respectively. Isradipine reduced blood pressure from 165/104 +/- 13/6 mm Hg at baseline to 144/88 +/- 13/8 mm Hg at week 12 (P < .001) whereas felodipine reduced blood pressure from 171/104 +/- 17/6 mm Hg at baseline to 150/92 +/- 19/9 mm Hg at week 12 (P < .001). Similar incidences of headache, flushing, dizziness and tachycardia were reported in both groups. However, the incidence of ankle edema was significantly lower in the isradipine group (14% v 30%) (P = .028). It is concluded that isradipine represents a practical improvement over felodipine in the treatment of hypertension.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

A comparison of isradipine and felodipine in Australian patients with hypertension: focus on ankle oedema. The Physician's Study Group.

The aim of this study was to compare the tolerability and efficacy of isradipine and felodipine in the treatment of mild-moderate hypertension. After a 4 week placebo period, 143 patients entered a randomized, double-blind, multicentre study of 12 weeks duration. Patients received either isradipine (n = 72) or felodipine (n = 71) 2.5 mg twice daily. Doubling of this dose and the addition of enalapril (2.5 mg once daily) was permitted if DBP was > 90 mmHg at weeks 4 and 8, respectively. Isradipine monotherapy reduced BP from 165/104 +/- 13/6 mmHg at baseline to 149/91 +/- 14/10 mmHg at week 8 (p < 0.001), while felodipine alone reduced BP from 171/104 +/- 17/6 at baseline to 151/92 +/- 19/9 (p < 0.001). Following the addition of enalapril to 35% of patients in the isradipine group BP was further reduced to 144/88 +/- 13/8 mmHg at week 12 (p < 0.001). The addition of enalapril to 24% of the felodipine group further reduced BP to 150/92 +/- 19/9 mmHg at week 12 (p < 0.001). No differences in BP were found between the 2 groups while on monotherapy. However, the isradipine group had a significantly lower DBP than the felodipine group at the conclusion of the study (p = 0.008; 95% CI 0.7 to 6.9 mmHg). Similar incidences of headache, flushing, dizziness and tachycardia were reported in both groups. However, the incidence of ankle oedema was significantly lower in the isradipine group (p = 0.028). Overall, ankle oedema was reported more often by female patients and was not associated with an increase in weight.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMed1986

Theophylline pharmacokinetics in patients from a geriatric hospital: influence of cigarette smoking.

The influence of cigarette smoking on plasma theophylline elimination half-life was examined in a group of elderly in-patients, to determine whether the modifying effect of cigarette smoking is also present in this age-group. The plasma theophylline half-life was determined in five non-smokers and seven smokers aged 66-88 years after administration of 320 mg of theophylline syrup. A wide range of plasma theophylline half-lives was observed in each group. However, there was a significant difference (P less than 0.05) between the mean plasma theophylline half-life in smokers (5.41 h, SEM 0.69 h) and non-smokers (10.40 h, SEM 1.90 h). It was concluded that, although plasma theophylline half-life tends to be longer in this age-group, the modifying influence of cigarette smoking on plasma theophylline half-life can be demonstrated in the elderly, as well as in young adults.

Aged↗
PubMed1982

Pindolol and systolic time intervals in patients with hypertension.

Two studies of systolic time intervals (STIs) in patients with mild to moderate hypertension (HBP) revealed that no mean change in systolic intervals occurred with pindolol therapy, although some patients had significant alterations in their STIs. Pindolol responders with normal pretreatment preejection period to left ventricular ejection time (PEP/LVET) ratios had a significant increase in this ratio following pindolol therapy, whereas those with abnormal pretreatment PEP/LVET ratios had improvement in this ratio on administration of the drug. Patients on propranolol showed no change in PEP/LVET ratio. Propranolol administration slowed heart rate and lengthened Q-S2, S1-S2, and LVET, however, without altering the Q-S2 and LVET index, indicating that the changes were caused by the effect of propranolol on the heart rate alone. Chlorthalidone in high doses significantly reduced the Q-S2 index and the S1-S2 index, indicating that these changes were not caused by alteration of the heart rate. The second study suggests that STIs may provide a predictive clue for clinical response to pindolol. Patients with normal cardiac function (group I) are more likely to respond to pindolol than are those with abnormal cardiac function (group II). Directionally opposite changes in STIs in the two subgroups suggest different mechanisms for changing cardiac function. Pindolol's dual role as a beta-blocking agent with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity is proposed as a possible explanation, beta-blocking effects predominating in group I and sympathomimetic activity balancing the beta effect in group II.

Adult↗
PubMed1982

Morphine-induced immune thrombocytopenia.

Sudden thrombocytopenia that was temporally related to the administration of morphine sulfate developed in a 23-year-old woman. A morphine-dependent platelet antibody was found in her serum by chromic chloride Cr 51 platelet lysis. The antibody was complement dependent, present in the IgG immunoglobulin fraction, and its drug-dependent platelet lytic activity was demonstrable with several narcotic analgesics in addition to morphine. The antibody activity declined over an eight-month period following recovery from thrombocytopenia. To our knowledge, morphine-induced immune thrombocytopenia has not previously been described.

Adult↗
PubMed1980

The captopril-induced eruption. A possible mechanism: cutaneous kinin potentiation.

Captopril, an orally active dipeptidyl-carboxypeptidase inhibitor, is a promising new antihypertensive agent. Cutaneous reactions are the most common side effects of this therapy. The data from 15 previous cases and seven new ones are reviewed. The cutaneous eruptions appear to be pharmacologic. In nature, occurring mostly at higher dosage schedules and resolving at lower dosage levels. Historical data, the results of skin tests, and the known pharmacology of captpril suggest that these captopril-induced eruptions may be the result of potentiation of kinin-mediated cutaneous reactions.

Aged↗
PubMed1980

Hypertension in the elderly.

Hypertensive patients over the age of 60 years clearly are at risk from cardiovascular disease whether their hypertension is systolic or diastolic or both. The higher the blood pressure is and the greater the age, the greater is the morbidity. New studies indicate that elderly patients with diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 90 mm Hg benefit from drug therapy. The few studies of drug treatment in patients with systolic hypertension do not indicate that such therapy is clearly beneficial, although diuretic therapy seems to prevent the occurrence of congestive heart failure. Well-controlled trials of treatment are necessary to indicate the place of antihypertensive drugs in this population. The frequent presence of other disease, changes in liver and kidney function, and unusual responses to drugs are problems that make drug therapy relatively unpredictable in elderly hypertensive patients. Because these patients may respond with blood pressure reduction to weight loss or to a reduction in dietary salt, these measures should be used when feasible in their care.

Aged↗
PubMed1979

Minoxidil therapy for refractory hypertension and chronic renal failure.

Minoxidil, a potent vasodilator antihypertensive agent, was given to 14 patients with severe hypertension uncontrolled by conventional agents. Thirteen patients had elevated serum creatinine levels. Over a period of 20 months (mean duration of administration) minoxidil lowered blood pressure from 194/124 to 147/90 mm Hg (mean values), in combination with furosemide and a sympathetic inhibitor (usually propranolol). Progression of preexisting renal disease was halted in all but three patients. Fluid retention, cardiac failure, and angina were troublesome side effects. The occurrence of hypertrichosis also limited the usefulness of minoxidil, particularly in female patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1978

Prazosin and clonidine for moderately severe hypertension.

In a single-blind comparative study of the cases of 30 moderately hypertensive patients, clonidine hydrochloride and prazosin hydrochloride had similar effectiveness in lowering blood pressure. Neither agent had significant effects on the renin-aldosterone axis. Addition of polythiazide to prazosin and chlorthalidone to clonidine notably increased the antihypertensive effect of both drugs. Serum cholesterol levels were observed to decrease when prazosin and clonidine were given and to rise when the diuretics were added to the regimen. The patients treated with clonidine were troubled by side effects, particularly drowsiness and dry mouth. Prazosin was better tolerated, with side effects tending to diminish with time. The "first-dose" effect was seen in two patients given prazosin, but it did not limit treatment. Both diuretics induced notable hypokalemia.

Adult↗