PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J J Madden

Publications and source records attributed to J J Madden.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

The morphine-binding site on human activated T-cells is not related to the mu opioid receptor.

Mitogen activation of human T-lymphocytes induces a morphine-binding site. Morphine binding is displaceable by beta-endorphin (1--31) and (--)-naloxone but not DAMGO. This site is not stereoselective for (--)-morphine. T-lymphocytes, expressing this binding site, were assayed by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for expression of hMOR-1 mRNA. Several primer sets were used and each assay compared with cells known to express human or mouse MOR-1 mRNA. Neither hMOR-1 nor any homologous receptor was detected in human T-lymphocytes. Therefore, the morphine-binding site on mitogen-activated T-lymphocytes is unlikely to be closely related to hMOR-1.

Binding Sites↗

Opiate binding sites in the cellular immune system: expression and regulation.

The direct actions of opiates on the mammalian immune system depend on the existence of ligand binding sites either on the surface of the affected cell or in the interior of the cell. With the cloning of various opiate receptors from neuronal tissue, numerous researchers have screened leukocyte cDNA libraries for the expression of these receptors with some positive results. However, the pattern of expression of neuronal opiate receptors in the cellular immune system does not completely explain the biological action of opiates there. Several possibilities could account for this non-congruence including differential expression of the receptors as determined by such factors as cell population or prior history of the cells; the existence of sequence modified versions of the neuronal receptors such that the amplification methods miss their presence; or the opiates act by a different, non-receptor mechanism in the cellular immune system.

Animals↗

Identification and localization of huntingtin in brain and human lymphoblastoid cell lines with anti-fusion protein antibodies.

The Huntington disease (HD) phenotype is associated with expansion of a trinucleotide repeat in the IT15 gene, which is predicted to encode a 348-kDa protein named huntington. We used polyclonal and monoclonal anti-fusion protein antibodies to identify native huntingtin in rat, monkey, and human. Western blots revealed a protein with the expected molecular weight which is present in the soluble fraction of rat and monkey brain tissues and lymphoblastoid cells from control cases. In lymphoblastoid cell lines from juvenile-onset heterozygote HD cases, both normal and mutant huntingtin are expressed, and increasing repeat expansion leads to lower levels of the mutant protein. Immunocytochemistry indicates that huntingtin is located in neurons throughout the brain, with the highest levels evident in larger neurons. In the human striatum, huntingtin is enriched in a patch-like distribution, potentially corresponding to the first areas affected in HD. Subcellular localization of huntingtin is consistent with a cytosolic protein primarily found in somatodendritic regions. Huntingtin appears to particularly associate with microtubules, although some is also associated with synaptic vesicles. On the basis of the localization of huntingtin in association with microtubules, we speculate that the mutation impairs the cytoskeletal anchoring or transport of mitochondria, vesicles, or other organelles or molecules.

Animals↗

The use of nonneuronal cells as an in vitro model system for studying the genetic component of cellular response to opiates and other drugs of abuse.

Nonneuronal cells, such as the human T lymphocyte, react directly with opiates in vitro causing significant alterations in the metabolism of these cells. Morphine and cocaine, for example, can modulate the repair of DNA damage caused by ultraviolet light (UVC)--morphine in the negative direction and cocaine in the positive. The mechanism by which these drugs cause these metabolic changes is not yet known, but a simple receptor mechanism such as is found in the central nervous system (CNS) can not be demonstrated. Binding studies using lymphocyte membrane preparations or whole cells do not support the premise that T lymphocytes have opiate binding sites with specificities comparable to those identified in the CNS--the mu, delta and kappa receptors. Even without knowing the mechanism for the opiate-induced metabolic changes, the alterations can be used as the basis for a test of the genetics of opiate metabolism. If the interindividual variation in the opiate-induced repair response is greater than the intraindividual variation as assessed by repeated measures on the same subject, it may be possible to utilize this assay in the classic sorts of family or twin studies to determine the genetic component of the response to opiates.

Cell Line↗

Enhanced assays detect increased chromosome damage and sister-chromatid exchanges in heroin addicts.

To refine previous studies of chromosome damage (CD) and sister-chromatid exchanges (SCE) in heroin addicts, we applied new methods developed in our laboratory to enhance detection of the cytogenetic effects of low-level radiation exposure in hospital workers. For CD analysis, we applied our thymidine-fluorodeoxyuridine-caffeine (TFC) enhancement procedure in which cells at setup receive 1 x 10(-7) M fluorodeoxyuridine to inhibit thymidylate synthetase and 4 X 10(-5) M thymidine to satisfy the induced requirement, and then in G2 receive 2.2 mM caffeine to modulate DNA repair. For SCE enhancement, caffeine treatment was initiated in G1 at 19 h before harvest. Using both standard and enhanced procedures for CD and SCE analysis, blood samples were evaluated from 20 street heroin addicts and 22 controls. Standard 2-day CD and 3-day SCE assays showed small, insignificant genotoxic increases in addicts while the enhanced CD and SCE assays showed highly significant increases. Most CD events were in the form of chromatid and chromosome breaks. There were no rings and only a few dicentrics were observed in the TFC-enhanced cultures. Although quadriradials are rare, 10 were found in addict TFC-cultures and 3 in control TFC-cultures. With the standard CD assay, the mean number of chromosome breaks per 100 cells was 0.727 for controls and 1.056 for addicts (not significant). With the TFC-enhanced assay, the same measure showed 1.483 chromosome breaks for controls and 5.143 for addicts (highly significant, ANOVA: p less than 0.0001). A highly significant difference was also observed for chromatid-type damage with the TFC-enhanced assay (chromatid breaks per 100 cells: 16.793 for controls; 48.191 for addicts). The SCE data also showed significant differences with the enhanced assay. Scoring 25 cells/condition, standard SCE cultures showed 10.892 SCE/cell for controls and 11.732 SCE/cell for addicts (not significant). With CAF enhancement there were 13.08 SCE/cell for controls and 17.05 SCE/cell for addicts (ANOVA: p less than 0.008). These findings indicate that detection of CD and SCE effects can be significantly enhanced by the use of these new procedures. The finding of greatly increased chromatid damage in the addicts with the TFC procedure suggests that at least part of the CD detected occurred in vitro and is not a product of prior in vivo damage. Therefore exposure to this drug and perhaps other environmental agents may not only leave a residue of DNA or chromosome damage but may also induce a sensitivity to further genotoxic damage that is revealed by using the enhanced procedures.

Analysis of Variance↗

Opiate binding sites on cells of the immune system.

Naloxone binding to T lymphocytes seems to occur both at the outer cell surface and in the interior of the cell. The binding sites on the outer membrane appear from previous work to be of low affinity and to be displaced by morphine only at very high concentrations. Permeable cells seem to express both high and low affinity binding sites in their interiors. Morphine readily displaces naloxone from this high affinity site, suggesting that this site may be the long sought after morphine receptor responsible for morphine's naloxone reversible actions on the human T lymphocyte. Do these results suggest that the opiates need to enter the lymphocyte before finding a receptive binding site to initiate their biological activities? Not necessarily. In isolating the lymphocytes, the surface opiate binding sites may be lost because of the exhaustive washing procedures needed for cell purification. The internal receptors may just represent new receptors on their way to the cell surface or used receptors remaining after endocytosis. Or they may indeed represent the true site of action of the opiates on the lymphocyte. Fractionation experiments are currently underway to distinguish between these possibilities.

Animals↗

Cytofluorometric analyses of human T cell CD2/CD4 inter-molecular interactions.

Incubation of human T lymphocytes with saturating concentrations of combinations of certain anti-CD2 and -CD4 mAb results in reciprocal down-regulation of the cell surface density expression of the respective CD molecules. Such reciprocal down-regulation occurs at 0 degrees C in the presence of sodium azide and appears selective for CD2 and CD4 molecules because mAb identifying various other CD T cell surface molecules (anti-Leu2a, -OK-CLL, -W6/32, -beta 2-microglobulin, -4B4) do not modulate CD2 or CD4 R density, and because anti-CD2 mAb (anti-OKT11 and -D66 clone-1) do not alter CD8 R density (anti-OKT8, -Leu2a) and vice versa. Down-regulation of CD2 by mAb specific to CD4 is epitope-specific but does not vary on the basis of the antibody isotype used. The anti-CD4 mAb, Leu3a, was the strongest CD2 down-regulator examined followed by OKT4F. mAb specific to other CD4 epitopes (B, C, D, and E) caused only slight down-regulation of CD2 expression whereas anti-OKT4 and -OKT4A mAb had no significant regulatory effect. Also, mAb specific to the 9.6 (anti-OKT11) and D66 (anti-D66 clone 1) epitopes of the CD2 molecule down-regulated CD4 density detectable with Leu3a, OKT4, and OKT4A anti-CD4 mAb. Down-regulation of CD2 by anti-CD4 mAb also occurred with the transformed T cell line, KE-37, which demonstrates that such effects can occur without mononuclear phagocytic accessory cells. From these data it can be concluded that important T cell immunoregulatory signals may be transmitted intramembranally between CD2 and CD4 glycoproteins.

Adult↗

Binding of naloxone to human T lymphocytes.

Purified T lymphocytes have a specific binding site for naloxone, the opiate antagonist. The KD for the site was 50.6 +/- 2.4 nM, while the Hill coefficient (n) was 1.67 +/- 0.16, indicating a degree of positive cooperativity of ligand binding. The bound naloxone was partially displaceable by various opiate agonists including morphine (56%), beta-endorphin (61%), met5- and leu5-enkephalin (40% each), [D-ala2, D-leu5]-enkephalin (78%) and [D-ala2, D-leu5]-enkephalinamide (66%). Virtually all of the binding capacity was recovered in the particulate membrane fraction after sonic lysis of the cells. There was great interindividual variability in Bmax between samples, suggesting a possible mechanistic basis for the variability in drug action seen between different individuals.

Binding, Competitive↗

Coordinate and independent effects of heroin, cocaine, and alcohol abuse on T-cell E-rosette formation and antigenic marker expression.

Simultaneous and independent use of cocaine and alcohol by heroin addicts was shown to variably modulate the ability of their T cells to form E-rosettes with sheep erythrocytes (E). As reported previously, the percentages of E-rosette-forming T cells of both active and total types were depressed in association with heroin addiction. We show here that the kinetic curve of the rate of E-rosette formation is also depressed by heroin use and that the use of cocaine but not alcohol by heroin addicts reverses depression of E-rosette formation by heroin. The percentages of E-rosette-forming T cells from the bloods of heroin addicts who used both alcohol and cocaine, as well as the kinetic rate curves of E-rosette formation, were intermediate between the essentially normal levels found for heroin addicts who used cocaine and the severely depressed levels evident for users of heroin alone or heroin plus alcohol. Modulation of the levels of E-rosette formation by alcohol used in conjunction with cocaine and/or heroin was variably dose dependent. Polydrug effects evident by analyses of E-rosette formation were not seen when the percentages of lymphocytes reactive with LYT-3 (anti-E-receptor, 9.6 epitope) and OKT-3 (anti-total T cell) monoclonal antibodies were assessed cytofluorometrically, although the data suggested that subnormal percentages of LYT-3+ T cells were present when heroin addicts also used cocaine. These findings are relevant to basic understanding of T-cell physiology from a neuroimmunological perspective and also suggest ways that addictive drugs may modulate the immunocompetence of drug addicts.

Adult↗

Morphine depression of T cell E-rosetting: definition of the process.

Two kinetic assays were developed to assess opiate effects on rates of T cell E-rosetting. The first adopted the thermal conditions of active E-rosetting assays (varying between 37 and 23 C) whereas the second incorporated cooler thermal conditions (varying between 0 and 29 C). In vitro treatment of lymphocytes with morphine depressed E-receptor levels and E-rosetting in both assays. With the 0-29 C procedure early stages of E-rosette formation were characterized by phase transition kinetics indicative of sequential gain and loss of E-rosettes. Assay thermal and erythrocyte (E) to T cell contact conditions, and the inclusion of morphine during E-rosetting, were independent variables that coordinately modulated the expression of phase transitions. Phase transitions were also noted during capping of total T cell E-rosettes at 37 C. The reason for phase transitions appears to be that T cells undergo sequential cycling of E-receptors, increasing because of the new expression of dormant E-receptors as the result of E-receptor microdisplacement and decreasing because E-rosettes are lost owing to patching and capping processes. According to this construction of the E-rosetting process, morphine inhibits E-rosetting and modulates expression of phase transitions by interfering with E-receptor microdisplacement processes. Presumably this interference by morphine is mediated through alteration of membrane fluidity and promotion of E-receptor coupling (and/or inhibition of uncoupling) to a transducer-effector component within the cell membrane. These findings and conclusions are specifically relevant to immunoregulatory processes and are also helpful for understanding the general nature of biological and physiological responses associated with receptor-ligand interactions.

Erythrocytes↗