PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J J McDade

Publications and source records attributed to J J McDade.

9 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1969

Vacuum probe: new approach to the microbiological sampling of surfaces.

The need for a device to sample large areas that are lightly contaminated with microorganisms motivated the development of the vacuum probe. The intended use of the instrument is to sample clean surfaces in laminar flow clean rooms, but the device could be used for sampling surfaces in other clean environments. Such a device was designed, fabricated, and tested at Sandia Laboratories, Albuquerque, N.M. In these tests, the vacuum probe removed a mean of 89% and assayed a mean of 67% of bacterial spores, approximately 1 mum in length, settled on smooth surfaces which were free from viscous films.

Bacillus subtilis↗
PubMed1969

Glutaraldehyde inactivation of virus in tissue.

High concentrations of influenza virus and T3 coliphage were inoculated into mouse tissue blocks. Exposure of the inoculated tissue blocks to 5% alkaline glutaraldehyde resulted in rapid inactivation of both viral agents.

Aldehydes↗
PubMed1968

Microbiological studies on the performance of a laminar airflow biological cabinet.

Engineering and microbiological tests indicated that a typical, commercial laminar airflow cabinet was not effective in providing either product protection or agent containment. The cabinet was modified and tested through a series of alternate configurations to establish a set of design criteria. A mock-up cabinet was developed from these design criteria. The mock-up unit was evaluated for efficiency in providing both product protection and agent containment. In these evaluations, challenge methods were developed to simulate normal, in-use laboratory operations. Controlled bacterial or viral aerosol challenges were used at higher than normal levels to provide stringent test conditions. Test results indicated that the mock-up unit was considerably better in preventing agent penetration (0.1 to 0.2 particles per 100 ft(3) of air) than the commercial cabinet (5 to 6 particles per 100 ft(3) of air) during product protection tests. Similarly, agent containment was considerably better in the new cabinet (particle escape of 2 to 3 per 100 ft(3) of air at only one of the five test sites) than in the commercial cabinet (particle escape of 2 to 14 per 100 ft(3) of air at three of the five test sites).

Aerosols↗