PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J J Pellegrini

Publications and source records attributed to J J Pellegrini.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

Basic features of phasic activation for reaching in vertical planes.

The purpose of this study was to fully characterize the timing and intensity of the phasic portion of the electromyographic (EMG) waveform for reaching movements in vertical planes. Electromyographic activity was simultaneously recorded from nine superficial elbow and/or shoulder muscles while human subjects made rapid arm movements. Hand paths comprised 20 directions in a sagittal plane and 20 directions in a frontal plane. In order to focus on the more phasic aspects of muscle activation, estimates of postural EMG activity were subtracted from the EMG traces recorded during rapid reaches. These postural estimates were obtained from activity recorded during very slow reaches to the same targets. After subtraction of this postural activity, agonist or antagonist burst patterns were often observed in the phasic EMG traces. For nearly all muscles and all subjects, the relation between phasic EMG intensity and movement direction was a function with multiple peaks. For all muscles, the timing of phasic EMG bursts varied as a function of movement direction: the data from each muscle exhibited a gradual temporal shift of activity over a certain range of directions. This gradual temporal shift has no obvious correspondence to the mechanical requirements of the task and might represent a neuromuscular control strategy in which burst timing contributes to the specification of movement direction.

Adult↗

Force path curvature and conserved features of muscle activation.

This study examined the patterns of muscle activity that subserve the production of dynamic isometric forces in various directions. The isometric condition provided a test for basic features of neuromuscular control, since the task was analogous to reaching movement, but the behavior was not necessarily shaped by the anisotropy of inertial and viscoelastic resistance to movement. Electromyographic (EMG) activity was simultaneously recorded from nine elbow and/or shoulder muscles, and force pulses, steps, and ramps were monitored using a transducer fixed to the constrained wrists of human subjects. The force responses were produced by activating shoulder and elbow muscles; response direction was controlled by the relative intensity of activity in muscles with different mechanical actions. The primary objective was to characterize the EMG temporal pattern. Ideally, synchronous patterns of phasic muscle activation (and synchronous dynamic elbow and shoulder torques) would result in a straight force path; asynchronous muscle activation could result in substantial force path curvature. For both pulses and steps, asynchronous muscle activation was observed and was accompanied by substantial force path curvature. A second objective was to compare phasic and tonic EMG activity. The spatial tuning of EMG intensity was similar for the phasic and tonic activities of each muscle and also similar to the spatial tuning of tonic activity in a previous study where the arm was stationary but unconstrained.

Adult↗

The trigeminally evoked blink reflex. I. Neuronal circuits.

In this study, we characterized the pathways that generate the trigeminal blink reflex in the guinea pig. Blinks were evoked by stimulation of the supraorbital branch of the trigeminal nerve and measured by recording electromyographic activity in the lid-closing orbicularis oculi muscle (OOemg) and, in one case, lid position. Blinks evoked by stimulation of the supraorbital nerve consisted of two bursts of muscle activity ipsilateral to the side of stimulation. The first, R1, had a latency of 6.9 ms and the second, R2, had a latency of 17.25 ms. Increasing stimulus intensity to 3 times threshold for evoking an ipsilateral blink elicited an R1 and R2 response contralaterally, with latencies of 9.2 ms and 19.25 ms, respectively. We investigated the causes for this bipartite response that is seen in the guinea pig, as well as other mammals including humans. The two-component response could arise from different populations of afferents, or from different central circuits, or a combination of these two causes. Multiunit recording in the trigeminal ganglion and simultaneous measurement of the OOemg showed that activation of A beta afferents alone was sufficient to elicit both the R1 and the R2 responses, but that activation of A delta afferents could enhance both responses. Different neural circuits, however, produce the R1 and R2 responses. Transganglionic tracing with wheatgerm agglutin or choleragenoid subunit of cholera toxin bound to HRP revealed that primary afferents from the supraorbital branch of the trigeminal nerve terminated densely in the dorsal horn of spinal cord segment C1 and in the caudalis-interpolaris border region of the spinal trigeminal nucleus. Injections of HRP into the orbicularis oculi motoneuron region of the facial nucleus showed that both of these regions projected to the facial nucleus. Hemisections at the level of C1 eliminated the R2 blink response, but not the R1 response, evoked by stimulation of the supraorbital branch of the trigeminal nerve. Subsequent hemisections at the level of the obex eliminated the R1 response. Microinjections of the GABAB agonist baclofen into the spinal trigeminal nucleus at the level of the obex abolished the R1 but not the R2 response. Thus, the spinal trigeminal nucleus produces the R1 component, whereas the R2 component originates in the C1 region of the spinal cord.

Action Potentials↗

The trigeminally evoked blink reflex. II. Mechanisms of paired-stimulus suppression.

The paired-stimulus paradigm, presentation of a pair of identical reflex-eliciting stimuli to the supraorbital nerve (SO) with an interstimulus interval of less than 2 s, evokes a response to the second, test, stimulus which is less than that elicited by the first, conditioning, stimulus. In this study, we investigated the site of this suppression and its pharmacology in the alert guinea pig. Both the early (R1) and the late (R2) component of the SO-evoked blink reflex exhibited suppression in the paired-stimulus paradigm. Initiation of suppression appeared to be specific to the afferent limb of the reflex rather than the result of motor activity generated by the conditioning stimulus. Neither acoustic conditioning stimuli nor air puffs that elicited blinks via another branch of the trigeminal nerve suppressed the test response. Extremely weak SO shocks, however, that did not directly elicit a reflex, caused suppression of the response to subsequent SO stimuli of normal intensity. Paired stimulus suppression of the R1 component appeared to involve activation of GABAB receptors within the spinal trigeminal nucleus. Both systemic injections and microinjections of baclofen into the spinal trigeminal nucleus enhanced R1 suppression, whereas identical injections of CGP35348, a GABAB antagonist, diminished R1 suppression. Furthermore, single-unit recordings in alert animals revealed that spinal trigeminal neurons exhibited suppression in the paired-stimulus paradigm that resembled that of the R1 component of the blink reflex. These findings showed that sensory gating underlies paired-stimulus suppression of the SO-evoked blink reflex and that activation of GABAB receptors plays an important role in this process.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Not looking while leaping: the linkage of blinking and saccadic gaze shifts.

Many vertebrates generate blinks as a component of saccadic gaze shifts. We investigated the nature of this linkage between saccades and blinking in normal humans. Activation of the orbicularis oculi, the lid closing muscle, EMG occurred with 97% of saccadic gaze shifts larger than 33 degrees. The blinks typically began simultaneously with the initiation of head and/or eye movement. To minimize the possibility that the blinks accompanying saccadic gaze shifts were reflex blinks evoked by the wind rushing across the cornea and eye-lashes as the head and eyes turned, the subjects made saccadic head turns with their eyes closed. In this condition, orbicularis oculi EMG activity occurred with all head turns greater than 17 degrees in amplitude and the EMG activity began an average of 39.3 ms before the start of the head movement. Thus, one component of the command for large saccadic gaze shifts appears to be a blink. We call these blinks gaze-evoked blinks. The linkage between saccadic gaze shifts and blinking is reciprocal. Evoking a reflex blink prior to initiating a voluntary saccadic gaze shift dramatically reduces the latency of the initiation of the head movement.

Blinking↗

Spatial/temporal characteristics of a motor pattern for reaching.

1. Temporal patterns of electromyographic (EMG) activity were related to the direction of fast reaching movements. Reaches were to 20 targets in the sagittal plane of the human arm. 2. The subtraction of EMG levels recorded during very slow movements to each target allowed this study to focus on the phasic aspects of complex EMGs. 3. General features of the phasic spatial/temporal patterns differed across muscles, even across muscles at the same joint. This indicates that future models of cortical to motoneuronal processing must include nonuniform space-time transformations.

Arm↗

A role for the basal ganglia in nicotinic modulation of the blink reflex.

In humans and rats we found that nicotine transiently modifies the blink reflex. For blinks elicited by stimulation of the supraorbital branch of the trigeminal nerve, nicotine decreased the magnitude of the orbicularis oculi electromyogram (OOemg) and increased the latency of only the long-latency (R2) component. For blinks elicited by electrical stimulation of the cornea, nicotine decreased the magnitude and increased the latency of the single component of OOemg response. Since nicotine modified only one component of the supraorbitally elicited blink reflex, nicotine must act primarily on the central nervous system rather than at the muscle. The effects of nicotine could be caused by direct action on lower brainstem interneurons or indirectly by modulating descending systems impinging on blink interneurons. Since precollicular decerebration eliminated nicotine's effects on the blink reflex, nicotine must act through descending systems. Three lines of evidence suggest that nicotine affects the blink reflex through the basal ganglia by causing dopamine release in the striatum. First, stimulation of the substantia nigra mimicked the effects of nicotine on the blink reflex. Second, haloperidol, a dopamine (D2) receptor antagonist, blocked the effect of nicotine on the blink reflex. Third, apomorphine, a D2 receptor agonist, mimicked the effects of nicotine on the blink reflex.

Anesthesia↗

Role of cerebellum in adaptive modification of reflex blinks.

We investigated the involvement of the cerebellar cortex in the adaptive modification of corneal reflex blinks and the regulation of normal trigeminal reflex blinks in rats. The ansiform Crus I region contained blink-related Purkinje cells that exhibited a complex spike 20.4 msec after a corneal stimulus and a burst of simple spike activity correlated with the termination of orbicularis oculi activity. This occurrence of the complex spike correlated with trigeminal sensory information associated with the blink-evoking stimulus, and the burst of simple spike activity correlated with sensory feedback about the occurrence of a blink. Inactivation of the inferior olive with lidocaine prevented all complex and significantly reduced simple spike modulation of blink-related Purkinje cells, but did not alter orbicularis oculi activity evoked by corneal stimulation. In contrast, both acute and chronic lesions of the cerebellar cortex containing blink-related Purkinje cells blocked adaptive increases in orbicularis oculi activity of the lid ipsilateral but not contralateral to the lesion. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that the cerebellum is part of a trigeminal reflex blink circuit. Changes in trigeminal signals produce modifications of the cerebellar cortex, which in turn, reinforce or stabilize modifications of brainstem blink circuits. When the trigeminal system does not attempt to alter the magnitude of trigeminal reflex blinks, cerebellar input has little or no effect on reflex blinks.

Animals↗