PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J J Rankine

Publications and source records attributed to J J Rankine.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

Pain drawings in the assessment of nerve root compression: a comparative study with lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective comparative study of pain drawings with findings on lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging. OBJECTIVES: To assess the ability of the pain drawing to predict the presence of nerve root compression. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Most research work has concentrated on the ability of the pain drawing to act as a screening method for psychological distress with less work directed at the influence the anatomic abnormality has on the pain drawing. METHODS: One hundred thirty-four consecutive outpatients attending for lumbar magnetic resonance imaging in the investigation of back and leg pain completed pain drawings and psychological testing immediately before the examination. The pain drawing was analyzed by previously reported criteria, and the magnetic resonance imaging was assessed independently for the presence of nerve compression by three radiologists. Multivariate stepwise discriminant analysis was used to identify patients with nerve compression on the basis of their pain drawing. RESULTS: Nerve compression was predicted by numbness in the anterolateral aspect of the foot. There was considerable overlap in the appearances of the pain drawings between patients with and without nerve compression, and the pain drawing correctly classified only 58% of patients with nerve compression. CONCLUSIONS: The pain drawing is not a good predictor of nerve compression on magnetic resonance imaging in a group of patients investigated for back and leg pain. It should be interpreted with caution and in light of the full clinical picture.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Problem in diagnostic imaging: a patient with sciatica.

This article presents the imaging findings in a patient with sciatica. The reader is invited to identify the labeled anatomical structures and the lesions present. The discussion focuses on the anatomy of the lumbar spine and the relative merits of the various methods of imaging a patient with sciatica.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

The therapeutic impact of lumbar spine MRI on patients with low back and leg pain.

UNLABELLED: The influence of lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on the management of patients with low back and leg pain, with a clinical diagnosis of neural compression, has been investigated by a controlled prospective observational study. The clinical features of the patients at the time of request for MRI have been compared with the subsequent management in order to define the clinical indications for lumbar spine MRI. METHODS: Clinical history, physical examination findings and tests of functional and psychological disability were all recorded at the time of request for MRI. Following MRI, patients were assessed without knowledge of the MRI findings and a diagnosis and management plan recorded. Immediate access to the MRI report and hard copy films was then provided and a revised diagnosis and management plan made. The clinical features and MRI findings were compared with the subsequent management. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were examined, 65 (90.3%) had leg pain as a predominant feature and abnormalities in neurological examination were found in 31 (43%). Twenty-three of 48 (47.9%) of patients with a pre MRI management plan of surgery were changed to conservative management following the MRI. The diagnosis altered in 50 % of cases with the largest change in diagnosis occurring in 13 patients where MRI did not confirm the clinical impression of nerve root compression. Seventeen patients with no abnormality of neurological testing were subsequently treated by surgery which included all 12 patients treated by spinal fusion. CONCLUSIONS: The major impact of MRI was to move patients towards conservative treatment. A variety of features in the history and physical examination as well as MRI findings are predictors for surgical treatment. The variety of diagnoses and surgical options available make it difficult to define clear clinical guidelines for the use of MRI.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

MRI of lumbar spondylosis: a comparison of sagittal T2 weighted and three sequence examinations.

The aim of this study was to determine whether a single T2 weighted sagittal sequence could replace the conventional three sequence examination of the lumbar spine. The T2 weighted sagittal image of 79 lumbar spine MRI examinations were retrospectively reported by three radiologists. Features relating to degenerative disease were recorded and an assessment made of whether further sequences were likely to add information. On a separate occasion the T1 weighted and T2 weighted sagittal and T2 weighted axial sequences were reported blind in relation to the initial assessment. Areas of disagreement were resolved by consensus opinion. The T2 weighted sequence was compared with the three sequences, taking the three sequence examination as the standard. Disc protrusions were diagnosed from the T2 weighted sagittal images with a sensitivity of 38% and a specificity of 97%. 22 discs reported as a disc bulge on the T2 weighted sequence were re-classified as a disc protrusion on axial images because of their focal nature. Central canal stenosis was diagnosed on the T2 weighted sagittal sequence with a sensitivity of 60% and a specificity of 95%. After assessing the T2 weighted sequence, it was thought unlikely that further sequences would add extra information in 60% of cases (48/79). However, further information was obtained in 21% of these cases (10/48) when all the sequences were assessed. The extra information gained by using all three sequences was considered to be of greater benefit than the time saved by using a single T2 sagittal sequence. Other diagnoses where the additional sequences proved helpful are discussed.

Female↗