PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J J Wenstrup

Publications and source records attributed to J J Wenstrup.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Responses to combinations of tones in the nuclei of the lateral lemniscus.

Combination-sensitive neurons integrate specific spectral and temporal elements in biologically important sounds, and they may underlie the analysis of biosonar and social vocalizations. Combination-sensitive neurons are found in the forebrain of a variety of vertebrates. In the mustached bat, they also occur in the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICC). However, it is not known where combination-sensitive response properties emerge. To address this question, we used a two-tone paradigm to examine responses of single units to combination stimuli in a brainstem structure, the nuclei of the lateral lemniscus (NLL). We recorded and histologically localized 101 single units in the NLL. The majority (82%) of units had a single excitatory frequency tuning curve. Seven units had two separate excitatory frequency tuning curves but displayed no combinatorial interaction. Twelve units were combination-sensitive. Of these, three units were facilitated by the combination of two separate frequency bands and nine units were inhibited by combinatorial stimuli. The three facilitatory neurons had excitatory responses tuned to the second harmonic constant frequency (CF2, 57-60 kHz) component of the biosonar signal and were facilitated by a second signal within the first harmonic (Hl, 24-30 kHz) of the biosonar call. Most of the inhibitory interactions occurred between signals in the frequency bands associated with the frequency-modulated (FM) components of the biosonar call. The strongest combinatorial effects (facilitatory and inhibitory) were elicited by simultaneous onset of the two signals (i.e., 0 ms delay). All combination-sensitive units were in the intermediate nucleus of the NLL (INLL), which in bats is a hypertrophied structure that projects strongly to combination-sensitive neurons in the ICC. Thus, the combination-sensitive neurons in the INLL may impart their response properties onto ICC neurons. However, the small number of facilitatory combination-sensitive neurons in the NLL suggests that the majority of these combinatorial responses originate in the ICC.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed2001

Topographical distribution of delay-tuned responses in the mustached bat inferior colliculus.

In the mustached bat, delay-tuned neurons respond best to specific delays between the first harmonic frequency modulated (FM) component (FM1; 24-29 kHz) of the emitted biosonar pulse and a higher harmonic FM component in returning echoes (e.g. FM3, 72-89 kHz). These delay-tuned, combinatorial responses predominate in the inferior colliculus (IC) of the mustached bat. This study examined the topographical distribution of delay-tuned neurons in the 72-89 kHz frequency representation of the IC. We recorded and histologically localized 163 single units. Ninety units were facilitated and 41 were inhibited by the combination of two frequencies in the 24-29 kHz and 72-89 kHz ranges. The facilitatory responses were selective for delays up to 20 ms between the two signals. To determine if delay-tuned neurons were topographically organized, we plotted the dorsomedio-ventrolateral and caudo-rostral positions of each unit versus its best delay. Best delay was not correlated with either location. Response latency to best frequency tones was topographically organized, but was not correlated with best delay. This indicates that the latency axis in the IC is unrelated to the delay tuning of these combinatorial neurons. Because delay-tuned neurons are not topographically organized in the IC but are in the auditory cortex, our findings suggest that the creation and organization of delay-tuned neurons occur at different stages in the ascending auditory system.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed2000

Spectral integration in the inferior colliculus of the mustached bat.

Acoustic behaviors including orientation and social communication depend on neural integration of information across the sound spectrum. In many species, spectral integration is performed by combination-sensitive neurons, responding best when distinct spectral elements in sounds are combined. These are generally considered a feature of information processing in the auditory forebrain. In the mustached bat's inferior colliculus (IC), they are common in frequency representations associated with sonar signals but have not been reported elsewhere in this bat's IC or the IC of other species. We examined the presence of combination-sensitive neurons in frequency representations of the mustached bat's IC not associated with biosonar. Seventy-five single-unit responses were recorded with the best frequencies in 10-23 or 32-47 kHz bands. Twenty-six displayed single excitatory tuning curves in one band with no additional responsiveness to a second signal in another band. The remaining 49 responded to sounds in both 10-23 and 32-47 kHz bands, but response types varied. Sounds in the higher band were usually excitatory, whereas sounds in the lower band either facilitated or inhibited responses to the higher frequency signal. Interactions were usually strongest when the higher and lower frequency stimuli were presented simultaneously, but the strength of interactions varied. Over one-third of the neurons formed a distinct subset; they responded most sensitively to bandpass noise, and all were combination sensitive. We suggest that these combination-sensitive interactions are activated by elements of mustached bat social vocalizations. If so, neuronal integration characterizing analysis of social vocalizations in many species occurs in the IC.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1999

Inputs to combination-sensitive neurons of the inferior colliculus.

In the mustached bat, combination-sensitive neurons display integrative responses to combinations of acoustic elements in biosonar or social vocalizations. One type of combination-sensitive neuron responds to multiple harmonics of the frequency-modulated (FM) components in the sonar pulse and echo of the bat. These neurons, termed FM-FM neurons, are sensitive to the pulse-echo delay and may encode the distance of sonar targets. FM-FM neurons are common in high-frequency regions of the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICC) and may be created there. If so, they must receive low-frequency inputs in addition to the expected high-frequency inputs. We placed single deposits of a tracer at FM-FM recording sites in the ICC and then analyzed retrograde labeling in the brainstem and midbrain. We were particularly interested in labeling patterns suggestive of low-frequency input to these FM-FM neurons. In most nuclei containing labeled cells, there was a single focus of labeling in regions thought to be responsive to high-frequency sounds. More complex labeling patterns were observed in three nuclei. In the anteroventral cochlear nucleus, labeling in the anterior and marginal cell divisions occurred in regions thought to respond to low-frequency sounds. This labeling comprised 6% of total brainstem labeled cells. Labeling in the intermediate nucleus of the lateral lemniscus and the magnocellular part of the ventral nucleus of the lateral lemniscus together comprised nearly 40% of all labeled cells. In both nuclei, multiple foci of labeling occurred. These different foci may represent groups of cells tuned to different frequency bands. Thus, one or more of these three nuclei may provide low-frequency input to high-frequency-sensitive cells in the ICC, creating FM-FM responses. We also examined whether ICC neurons responsive to lower frequencies project to high-frequency-sensitive ICC regions; only 0.15% of labeling originated from these lower frequency representations. If the spectral integration of FM-FM neurons is created at the level of the ICC, these results suggest that neurons of the anteroventral cochlear nucleus or monaural nuclei of the lateral lemniscus may provide the essential low-frequency input. In contrast, there is little evidence that the low-frequency representation of the ICC contributes to these integrative responses.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1999

Delay-tuned neurons in the inferior colliculus of the mustached bat: implications for analyses of target distance.

We examined response properties of delay-tuned neurons in the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICC) of the mustached bat. In the mustached bat, delay-tuned neurons respond best to the combination of the first-harmonic, frequency-modulated (FM1) sweep in the emitted pulse and a higher harmonic frequency-modulated (FM2, FM3 or FM4) component in returning echoes and are referred to as FM-FM neurons. We also examined H1-CF2 neurons. H1-CF2 neurons responded to simultaneous presentation of the first harmonic (H1) in the emitted pulse and the second constant frequency (CF2) component in returning echoes. These neurons served as a comparison as they are thought to encode different features of sonar targets than FM-FM neurons. Only 7% of our neurons (14/198) displayed a single excitatory tuning curve. The rest of the neurons (184) displayed complex responses to sounds in two separate frequency bands. The majority (51%, 101) of neurons were facilitated by the combination of specific components in the mustached bat's vocalizations. Twenty-five percent showed purely inhibitory interactions. The remaining neurons responded to two separate frequencies, without any facilitation or inhibition. FM-FM neurons (69) were facilitated by the FM1 component in the simulated pulse and a higher harmonic FM component in simulated echoes, provided the high-frequency signal was delayed the appropriate amount. The delay producing maximal facilitation ("best delay") among FM-FM neurons ranged between 0 and 20 ms, corresponding to target distances </=3.4 m. Sharpness of delay tuning varied among FM-FM neurons with 50% delay widths between 2 and 13 ms. On average, the facilitated responses of FM-FM neurons were 104% greater than the sum of the responses to the two signals alone. In comparing response properties of delay-tuned, FM-FM neurons in the ICC with those in the medial geniculate body (MGB) from other studies, we find that the range of best delays, sharpness of delay tuning and strength of facilitation are similar in the ICC and MGB. This suggests that by the level of the IC, the basic response properties of FM-FM neurons are established, and they do not undergo extensive transformations with ascending auditory processing.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Frequency organization and responses to complex sounds in the medial geniculate body of the mustached bat.

The auditory cortex of the mustached bat (Pteronotus parnellii) displays some of the most highly developed physiological and organizational features described in mammalian auditory cortex. This study examines response properties and organization in the medial geniculate body (MGB) that may contribute to these features of auditory cortex. About 25% of 427 auditory responses had simple frequency tuning with single excitatory tuning curves. The remainder displayed more complex frequency tuning using two-tone or noise stimuli. Most of these were combination-sensitive, responsive to combinations of different frequency bands within sonar or social vocalizations. They included FM-FM neurons, responsive to different harmonic elements of the frequency modulated (FM) sweep in the sonar signal, and H1-CF neurons, responsive to combinations of the bat's first sonar harmonic (H1) and a higher harmonic of the constant frequency (CF) sonar signal. Most combination-sensitive neurons (86%) showed facilitatory interactions. Neurons tuned to frequencies outside the biosonar range also displayed combination-sensitive responses, perhaps related to analyses of social vocalizations. Complex spectral responses were distributed throughout dorsal and ventral divisions of the MGB, forming a major feature of this bat's analysis of complex sounds. The auditory sector of the thalamic reticular nucleus also was dominated by complex spectral responses to sounds. The ventral division was organized tonotopically, based on best frequencies of singly tuned neurons and higher best frequencies of combination-sensitive neurons. Best frequencies were lowest ventrolaterally, increasing dorsally and then ventromedially. However, representations of frequencies associated with higher harmonics of the FM sonar signal were reduced greatly. Frequency organization in the dorsal division was not tonotopic; within the middle one-third of MGB, combination-sensitive responses to second and third harmonic CF sonar signals (60-63 and 90-94 kHz) occurred in adjacent regions. In the rostral one-third, combination-sensitive responses to second, third, and fourth harmonic FM frequency bands predominated. These FM-FM neurons, thought to be selective for delay between an emitted pulse and echo, showed some organization of delay selectivity. The organization of frequency sensitivity in the MGB suggests a major rewiring of the output of the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus, by which collicular neurons tuned to the bat's FM sonar signals mostly project to the dorsal, not the ventral, division. Because physiological differences between collicular and MGB neurons are minor, a major role of the tecto-thalamic projection in the mustached bat may be the reorganization of responses to provide for cortical representations of sonar target features.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Hearing and hunting in red bats (Lasiurus borealis, Vespertilionidae): audiogram and ear properties.

We examined aspects of hearing in the red bat (Lasiurus borealis) related to its use of biosonar. Evoked potential audiograms, obtained from volume-conducted auditory brainstem responses, were obtained in two bats, and the sound pressure transformation of the pinna was measured in three specimens. Field-recorded echolocation signals were analysed for comparison. The fundamental sonar search calls sweep from 45 to 30 kHz (peak energy at 35 kHz), approach-phase calls sweep from 65 to 35 kHz (peak 40 kHz) and terminal calls sweep from 70 to 30 kHz (peak 45 kHz). The most sensitive region of the audiogram extended from 10 kHz to 45-55 kHz, with maximum sensitivity as low as 20 dB SPL occurring between 25 and 30 kHz. A relative threshold minimum occurred between 40 and 50 kHz. With increasing frequency, the acoustic axis of the pinna moves upwards and medially. The sound pressure transformation was noteworthy near 40-45 kHz; the acoustic axis was closest to the midline, the -3 dB acceptance angles showed local minima, and the pinna gain and interaural intensity difference were maximal. These results are related to the known echolocation and foraging behavior of this species and match the spectral components of approach- and final-phase calls. We conclude that co-evolution with hearing prey has put a higher selective pressure on optimizing localization and tracking of prey than on improving detection performance.

Animals↗
PubMed1995

Combination-sensitive neurons in the inferior colliculus.

We examined whether neurons in the inferior colliculus of the mustached bat (Pteronotus parnellii) are combination sensitive, responding to both low- and high-frequency components of the bat's sonar signal. These neurons, previously reported in the thalamus and cortex, analyze sonar target features including distance. Of 82 single units and 36 multiple units from the 58-112 kHz representations of the inferior colliculus, most (86%) displayed sensitivity to low-frequency sounds that was tuned in the range of the fundamental biosonar component (24-31 kHz). All histologically localized units were in the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICC). There were two major types of combination-sensitive influences. Many neurons were facilitated by low-frequency sounds and selective for particular delays between the low- and high-frequency components. In other neurons, the low-frequency signal was inhibitory if presented simultaneously or a few milliseconds prior to the high-frequency signal. The results indicate that mechanisms creating specialized frequency comparisons and delay sensitivity in combination-sensitive neurons operate at the ICC or below. Since combination sensitivity or multipeaked tuning curves occur in the auditory systems of many species, ICC neurons in these animals may also respond to species-specific frequency combinations.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1995

Inputs to combination-sensitive neurons in the medial geniculate body of the mustached bat: the missing fundamental.

This study examined projections to combination-sensitive neurons in the medial geniculate body of the mustached bat. These specialized neurons respond to the combination of two temporally and spectrally distinct components of the bat's sonar pulse and echo, encoding target information. Combination-sensitive neurons respond to the bat's sonar fundamental, between 24-31 kHz, in conjunction with a higher harmonic signal. They are thought to be formed in the medial geniculate body (MGB) by convergent input from inferior colliculus representations of 24-31 kHz and higher frequencies. This study used anterograde and retrograde tract-tracing methods in conjunction with physiological recording to test this MGB convergence hypothesis. In anterograde tracing experiments, multiple deposits of two different tracers were placed in the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICC), one tracer in the 24-31 kHz region and another in an ICC representation responding to a higher sonar harmonic. We found only limited overlap in the MGB labeling patterns of the two tracers, and little in many areas where combination-sensitive neurons are common. In retrograde tracing experiments, a single deposit of tracer was placed at a combination-sensitive recording site in the MGB. With the deposit mostly limited to combination-sensitive MGB areas, labeling in 24-31 kHz representations of the ICC was absent or minor. These results suggest that many combination-sensitive neurons in the MGB do not receive 24-31 kHz ICC input. The strongest inputs to combination-sensitive MGB regions originate in high-frequency representations of the ICC and combination-sensitive regions of auditory cortex. Additional projections arrive from the thalamic reticular nucleus, external nucleus of the inferior colliculus, and pericollicular tegmentum. Each projection may contribute to the 24-31 kHz sensitivity of combination-sensitive neurons in the medial geniculate body.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1994

Cytoarchitecture of the medial geniculate body in the mustached bat (Pteronotus parnellii).

The cytoarchitectonic organization of the medial geniculate body and adjoining thalamic nuclei was analyzed in the mustached bat (Pteronotus parnellii). These subdivisions provide a reference for structural, physiological, connectional, and neurochemical work. Most nuclei recognized in other mammals exist in the mustached bat, although the relative volume of the three divisions was species specific. The ventral division contains medium-sized neurons and a few smaller cells and is well developed. Neurons in the lateral part lie in regularly aligned rows corresponding to the laminae in Golgi material; in the medial part, these laminae are obscured by fibers. The dorsal division has at least four nuclei, each with a unique cytoarchitecture and myeloarchitectonic organization. The suprageniculate nucleus is prominent and has many large radiate neurons. Cells in the superficial dorsal nucleus have weekly laminated dendrites, while dorsal nucleus neurons have spherical dendritic fields. There is a wide range of neuropil patterns within the dorsal division. The suprageniculate nucleus has thick myelinated axons, while the fibers in the superficial and dorsal nuclei are much thinner. The rostral pole nucleus becomes prominent in the anterior one-half of the auditory thalamus; its architectonic affiliation is equivocal, and connectional and immunocytochemical studies suggest that it may belong to the dorsal division. The medial division is one nucleus with many types of neurons, and it has coarse axons without laminar orientation. It is the smallest of the divisions and is present throughout the medial geniculate complex, except at the caudal tip and at the rostral pole. Many features of medial geniculate body organization evident in other mammals are recognized in the mustached bat. These include a prominent ventral division, some of whose neurons have a laminar organization, and a comparatively small medial division that is devoid of fibrodendritic laminae. Other features, such as the presence of a large rostral pole nucleus, whose homologue in other species is uncertain, or the sparse number or small cells that may participate in local circuits, set it apart from carnivores and primates and suggest that there are species specific patterns of medial geniculate body organization.

Animals↗
PubMed1994

The neurons of the medial geniculate body in the mustached bat (Pteronotus parnellii).

The neurons in the medial geniculate body were studied in Golgi preparations from adult mustached bats (Pteronotus parnellii). Their somatic and dendritic configurations were compared with those of cells in other, nonecholocating mammals. A second goal was to use the thalamic nuclear subdivisions derived from Golgi material to integrate the findings in parallel studies of cytoarchitecture, immunocytochemistry, and tectothalamic connections. Three primary divisions are defined. The ventral division is large and has a stereotyped neuronal organization. Medium-sized perikarya (about 10 microns in diameter) represent tufted neurons; the fibrodendritic plexus forms laminae in the lateral part along which midbrain axons terminate. A smaller, possibly intrinsic, neuron with thin, sparse dendrites is rarely impregnated. Neurons in the larger, medial part, which represents frequencies of 60 kHz and higher, have more spherical dendritic fields; their branching pattern remains tufted, and the laminar organization was less evident. The dorsal division is about equal in size, and it has many nuclei and a corresponding neuronal diversity. These neurons are medium-sized except in the suprageniculate nucleus, where many cells are larger. Four dorsal division nuclei are recognized. Each has neurons with radiate or weakly tufted dendritic arbors. Superficial dorsal nucleus neurons are oriented from medial to lateral, imparting a slightly laminated appearance to the neuropil. A few smaller, stellate neurons with modest dendritic domains are present. Suprageniculate nucleus neurons have radiating dendritic fields that project spherically; they have fewer branches than dorsal nucleus neurons. The posterior limitans nucleus is dorsomedial to the suprageniculate nucleus; it has small neurons with long, sparsely branched dendrites. The rostral pole nucleus, included in the dorsal division on cytoarchitectonic grounds, had too few neurons impregnated to reveal its neuronal architecture. The medial division, the smallest of the main parts, is one nucleus with at least six types of cells, including the magnocellular, bushy tufted, disc-shaped, medium-sized multipolar, elongated, and small stellate neurons. There is no laminar arrangement. Many of the neurons resemble those in rodent, marsupial, carnivore, and primate auditory thalamic nuclei. Despite such morphological correspondences, functional differences, such as the evolution of combination sensitivity, suggest that structurally comparable auditory thalamic neurons may subserve diverse physiological representations.

Animals↗
PubMed1994

Projections of physiologically defined subdivisions of the inferior colliculus in the mustached bat: targets in the medial geniculate body and extrathalamic nuclei.

This study examined the output of the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus to the medial geniculate body and other parts of the nervous system in the mustached bat (Pteronotus parnellii). Small deposits of anterograde tracers (horseradish peroxidase, [3H]leucine, Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin, wheat germ agglutinin conjugated to horseradish peroxidase, or biocytin) were made at physiologically defined sites in the central nucleus representing major components of the bat's echolocation signal. The topography, frequency specificity, and axonal morphology of these outputs were studied. The medial geniculate body was a major target of inferior collicular neurons, with three distinct input patterns. The projection to the ventral division was tonotopically organized, but had a relatively sparse contribution from neurons representing frequency modulated components of the biosonar pulse. The second input was to the rostral medial geniculate body, in which projections from inferior collicular neurons representing constant frequency sonar components were separated from those representing frequency modulated components. A third input was to the suprageniculate nucleus, which received strong, topographically arranged projections. Inputs to the dorsal nucleus and medial division were also observed. Extrathalamic regions receiving input included the pontine gray, external nucleus of the inferior colliculus, pericollicular tegmentum, nucleus of the brachium of the inferior colliculus, and pretectum. These central nucleus projections differed in organization and the structure of axon terminals, suggesting different physiological influences on their target nuclei. These results demonstrate that the central nucleus has divergent projections to various sensory and premotor nuclei, besides its well-established projection to the medial geniculate body.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1992

Patterns of GABAergic immunoreactivity define subdivisions of the mustached bat's medial geniculate body.

The anatomy and the spatial distribution of neurons and axonal endings (puncta) immunoreactive for glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) or gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) were studied in the medial geniculate body of the mustached bat (Pteronotus parnellii). The principal findings are that: 1) most GABAergic neurons are present in the dorsal and ventral divisions with few, if any, in the medial division; 2) only a small fraction, about 1% or less, of auditory thalamic neurons are immunopositive; 3) the density of immunoreactive puncta is independent on the number of GABAergic neurons in the thalamic divisions, with the ventral division having the largest number/unit area, the medial division about 75% of this value, and the dorsal division only about 50%; and 4) the form of the puncta was unique to each division, those in the ventral division being medium-sized and comparatively simple, those in the medial division predominantly large, coarse, and complex, while dorsal division ending were finer and more delicate. These patterns recapitulate, with some significant exceptions, those found in the rat and cat. The puncta could originate from several sources; while many may arise from intrinsic GABAergic Golgi type II local circuit neurons, these cells may not be the only or even the principal source. Thus, the dorsal division contains comparatively many immunopositive cells though fewer puncta than might be expected if the bulk of these were to arise from auditory thalamic interneurons. This suggests that other, extrinsic sources, such as the thalamic reticular nucleus, may be the source of such endings. A second point is that the form and density of the puncta is regionally specific within the medial geniculate complex. These local patterns might have a significant and regionally specific role in controlling the differential excitability of auditory thalamic neurons. The distribution of presumptive synaptic endings also has implications for the number and arrangement of glomeruli or synaptic nests. Thus, these circuit elements, which are common to the thalamic nuclei in other species, might play an important role in local synaptic circuits between different types of cells. If so, then the structural variations embodied in these patterns could subserve functional arrangements that differ among species. Such patterns might reflect concomitant physiological differences in the organization of local circuits within the microchiropteran medial geniculate body.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Spatial processing within the mustache bat echolocation system: possible mechanisms for optimization.

1. The directionality of an echolocation system is determined by the acoustic properties of both the emitter and receiver, i.e., by the radiation pattern of the emitted pulse and the directionally of the external ears. We measured the directionality of the echolocation system of the greater mustache bat (Pteronotus parnellii) at the 30 kHz, 60 kHz and 90 kHz harmonics of its echolocation pulse by summing, at points throughout the frontal sound field, the echo attenuation due to the spread of pulse energy and the attenuation due to the spread of pulse energy and the attenuation due to the directionality of its external ears. The pulse radiation pattern at the 3 harmonics was measured by comparing the output of a microphone moved throughout the frontal sound field against a second reference microphone at the center of the field. External ear directionality at the 3. harmonics was measured by presenting free-field sounds throughout the frontal sound field, and recording the intensity thresholds of cochlear microphonic potentials, and the intensity thresholds of monaural neurons in the inferior colliculus tuned to one of the 3 harmonics. 2. When compared with ear directionality, the echolocation system was found to be more directional for the center of the sound field in several respects. At all harmonics, attenuation of sounds originating in the peripheral part of the field was increased by 10 to 13 dB. Areas of maximum sound intensity contracted toward the center of the field. Also, the isointensity contours of the echolocation system were more radially symmetrical about the center of the field. 3. At 60 kHz, sound intensity along the azimuth within the echolocation system was nearly constant 26 degrees to either side of the center of the field. This suggests that the radiation pattern of the echolocation pulse and the directionality of the external ears complement one another to produce an acoustic environment at the center of the sound field in which stimulus intensity is stabilized to allow more effective analysis of various aspects of the echolocation target. In particular, we suggest that this intensity stabilization may allow the bat to more effectively resolve the interaural intensity differences it uses to localize prey. 4. Predictions of the azimuthal spatial tuning of binaurally sensitive neurons in the inferior colliculus within the echolocation system were compared with their spatial tuning when only ear directionality is considered.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1990

Determinants of horizontal sound location selectivity of binaurally excited neurons in an isofrequency region of the mustache bat inferior colliculus.

1. The monaural and binaural response properties and the horizontal sound location sensitivity of 78 binaurally excited neurons from 26 bats were examined with a combined closed-field and free-field stimulation paradigm. The aim was to determine how the response properties of these neurons shape their selectivity for auditory space. All neurons were recorded within a single, greatly enlarged isofrequency (60 kHz) region of the mustache bat's central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICC). In this and two companion papers (Wenstrup et al. 1988a,b) that focused on binaurally inhibited neurons in this isofrequency region, our goal was to examine the neural mechanisms for binaural processing within a single frequency channel of the primary auditory system. 2. Binaurally excited neurons were defined as either excited by monaural input from both ears or, if excited by monaural stimulation of only one ear, facilitated by binaural stimulation. Some neurons also exhibited binaural inhibition. These neurons were divided into functional classes based on their responses to monaural and binaural stimulation presented under dichotic, closed-field conditions. The following notation was used: response to contralateral stimulation (E, excitatory; O, no effect), response to ipsilateral stimulation (E, excitatory; O, no effect)/response to binaural stimulation (F, facilitatory; I, inhibitory; O, no effect). Seven functional classes were observed: EE/O, EE/F, EE/I, EE/FI, EO/F, EO/FI, and OO/F. 3. Among EE neurons, thresholds for contralateral monaural stimulation were typically lower than for ipsilateral stimulation, and response magnitudes for contralateral stimulation were typically greater. Among EO/F and EO/FI neurons, only one eye, an OE/FI neuron, was excited by ipsilateral monaural stimulation. These results suggest that contralateral input provides the dominant excitatory influence. EE/FI and EO/FI neurons, which exhibited both binaural facilitation and inhibition, were typically inhibited at interaural intensity differences (IIDs) favoring the ipsilateral ear, suggesting that ipsilateral input provides the dominant inhibitory influence. 4. Neurons were tested over the range of naturally occurring IIDs (+/- 30 dB) at intensities of -20 to 30 dB relative to threshold. The IID functions of these neurons assumed three configurations: flat, with facilitation occurring at all IIDs; stepped, with facilitation occurring over part of the IID range, and peaked, with facilitation occurring over a limited band of IIDs. The majority of cells (90%) exhibited peaked IID functions, and most of these (73%), regardless of functional class, were maximally facilitated at an IID of 0 dB. 5. Neurons differed considerably in the strength of their binaural interactions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Action Potentials↗
PubMed1988

The acoustic role of tracheal chambers and nasal cavities in the production of sonar pulses by the horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus hildebrandti.

The acoustic role of the enlarged, bony, nasal cavities and rigid tracheal chambers in the horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus hildebrandti (Fig. 2) was investigated by determining the effect of their selective filling on the nasally emitted sonar pulse and on the sound traveling backwards down the trachea. Normal sonar signals of this bat contain a long constant frequency component with most energy in the second harmonic at about 48 kHz. The fundamental is typically suppressed 20 to 30 dB below the level of the second harmonic (Fig. 1). None of the experimental manipulations described affected the frequency of the sonar signal fundamental. Filling the dorsal and both lateral tracheal chambers had little effect on the emitted vocalization, but caused the level of the fundamental component in the trachea to increase 15 to 19 dB in most bats (Table 2). When only the dorsal chamber or only the two lateral chambers were filled, the effect was less striking and more variable (Tables 3 and 4), suggesting that the tracheal fundamental is normally suppressed by acoustic interaction between these three cavities. Filling the enlarged dorsal nasal cavities had no effect on the tracheal sound. The effect of this treatment on the nasally emitted sonar pulse was inconsistent. Sometimes the fundamental increased 10 to 12 dB, other times the intensity of all harmonics decreased; in still other cases the second, third or fourth harmonic increased, but the fundamental remained unchanged (Tables 5, 6, and 7). When bats were forced to vocalize through the mouth, by sealing the nostrils, there was a prominent increase in the level of the emitted fundamental (10 to 21 dB) and in the fourth harmonic (6 to 17 dB). In one instance there was also a significant increase in the level of the third harmonic (Tables 8 and 9). The supraglottal tract thus filters the fundamental from the nasally emitted sonar signal, although the role of the inflated nasal cavities in this process is unclear. We conclude that a high glottal impedance acoustically isolates the subglottal from the supraglottal vocal tract. The tracheal chambers do not affect the emitted sonar signal, but may attenuate the fundamental in the trachea and prevent it from being reflected from the lungs back towards the cochlea. It may be important to prevent the reflected fundamental from stimulating the cochlea, via tissue conduction, along multiple indirect pathways which would temporally smear cochlear stimulation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Animals↗
PubMed1988

Binaural neurons in the mustache bat's inferior colliculus. I. Responses of 60-kHz EI units to dichotic sound stimulation.

1. Single-unit responses to closed-field, dichotic sound stimuli were obtained from EI neurons in the mustache bat's inferior colliculus; these neurons are excited by sound to the contralateral ear and inhibited by sound to the ipsilateral ear. All units were tuned to the 60-kHz component of the bat's sonar signal. The goal of the study was to describe basic features of the sensitivity to interaural intensity differences (IIDs) and sound intensity among an isofrequency population of EI neurons. The following paper describes how these features of IID sensitivity shape the response to free-field sounds. 2. Three features of IID sensitivity were considered. The inhibitory threshold (Figs. 1 and 2) described the IID at which inhibitory effects became pronounced; it was defined as the IID at which the excitatory response to contralateral sound was suppressed by 50%. Most units (68%) were inhibited at positive IID values, for which the ipsilateral (inhibitory) sound was more intense. The maximum inhibition (Figs. 1 and 3) described the strength of ipsilateral inhibition; it was defined as the percent that each unit was inhibited below its response to monaural stimulation of the contralateral ear. The majority of units (58%) were almost totally suppressed by a sufficiently intense ipsilateral sound. The IID range (Figs. 1 and 4) described the sharpness or slope of the IID cutoff; it was defined as the IID range over which the response changed from nearly unsuppressed (80% of maximum response) to near maximum suppression (20% of maximum response). Most units (71%) had IID ranges of less than or equal to 15 dB. 3. A significant correlation between the inhibitory threshold and the maximum inhibition (Fig. 5) among the sample of EI units suggests that some common neural mechanisms underlie these features of IID sensitivity. 4. The response of EI neurons to binaural stimuli was a function of sound intensity as well as IID (Fig. 7). In part, this resulted from intensity-dependent changes in properties of binaural inhibition. For most units, basic measures of IID sensitivity changed to a limited extent as the sound intensity changed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1988

Binaural neurons in the mustache bat's inferior colliculus. II. Determinants of spatial responses among 60-kHz EI units.

1. The responses to closed-field and free-field sound stimuli were obtained from EI neurons in the 60-kHz isofrequency representation of the mustache bat's inferior colliculus. The goals of the study were 1) to examine how binaural interactions and the directional properties of the ear shape the spatial response of 60-kHz EI neurons and 2) to examine features of the spatial responses of these isofrequency neurons which may encode the location of a sound. 2. The free-field response of monaural neurons was used to describe directional effects of the head and external ears at 60 kHz. Monaural neurons were most sensitive to sounds originating 26 degrees into the contralateral field, with sharply reduced sensitivity in the ipsilateral field and the lateral extreme of the contralateral field. The interaural intensity difference (IID), computed by assuming that the ears had mirror-image directional sensitivities, was greatest for sounds between 26 and 52 degrees off the vertical midline, where IIDs typically ranged from 20 to 30 dB. These values agree well with previous measures of the directional sensitivity of the ear obtained from cochlear microphonic recordings. 3. The response of a monaural unit to closed-field stimulation was used to predict its response to free-field stimulation. This prediction agreed closely with the observed free-field response, indicating that the monaural unit's free-field response could be explained by the directional sensitivity of the contralateral ear and the unit's response as a function of contralateral sound intensity. 4. EI neurons differed in basic features of their binaural response properties, as described in a companion paper. To examine how these features of binaural inhibition shaped spatial responses, we obtained responses to free-field sounds among neurons whose binaural properties had been thoroughly characterized. We then compared the spatial response to a prediction based upon the directional properties of the ear and the sensitivity of the EI neurons to IIDs and intensity. The close agreement between the observed and predicted spatial responses in 11 of 12 EI units indicated that the spatial responses were determined largely by sensitivity to IIDs and intensity and by the directional properties of the ear. 5. EI neurons in our sample were most sensitive, and responded best, to sounds originating 26-39 degrees into the contralateral field. These spatial response features were independent of the binaural properties of EI neurons. Instead, they depended upon the directional properties of the ears at 60 kHz.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Acoustic Stimulation↗