Biomedical subjects

J Jailwala

Publications and source records attributed to J Jailwala.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2001

Newer therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease: numb, burn, or stitch?

Preliminary evidence on the efficacy of endoscopically performed interventional techniques for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease has emerged in the last year. Three different techniques--radio frequency- induced thermal injury to the gastroesophageal junction, endoscopic plication of gastric folds, and endoscopic implantation of inert polymers into the gastroesophageal junction--have shown promising short-term results. In this review we describe and critically appraise the available published evidence on the efficacy and safety of these techniques. In addition, we discuss clinical and physiologic aspects that are essential for their evaluation and comparison. The need for well-designed controlled clinical trials that assess the long-term efficacy and safety in a wider spectrum of patients is evident, and hopefully such trials are forthcoming. Operator experience and continued evolution in these techniques are likely to be important determinants.

Burns↗

PubMed2001

Post-fundoplication symptoms: the role for endoscopic assessment of fundoplication integrity.

BACKGROUND: Fundoplication is now almost exclusively a laparoscopic procedure. The aim of this study was the comparison of the diagnostic usefulness of endoscopy and barium esophagram in the detection of fundoplication abnormalities. METHODS: Twenty-two patients presented with symptoms post-laparoscopic (Nissen) fundoplication that included dysphagia (14 patients), heartburn (5 patients), dyspepsia (2 patients), and chest pain (1 patient). Barium esophagram and upper endoscopy were performed in all patients and the results were compared. Key features included presence of esophagitis, resistance to endoscope passage, location of the wrap relative to the diaphragmatic hiatus, location of squamocolumnar junction greater than 1 cm proximal to the wrap zone, and the appearance of the wrap (intact, loose, disrupted, or tight). RESULTS: The key features explained symptoms in 20 of 22 patients. Endoscopy detected twice as many key features as radiography. Disruption of the wrap or excessive proximal location of the squamocolumnar junction proximal to the wrap zone were the most incriminating endoscopic findings. Resistance to endoscope passage was rarely encountered and the esophagram was more accurate in detecting an overly tight wrap. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic evaluation is more accurate than barium esophagram in detecting post-fundoplication abnormalities. The appearance of the fundoplication wrap and an abnormal proximal location of the squamocolumnar junction appear to be major endoscopic clues in diagnosis of post-fundoplication problems.

Barium Sulfate↗

PubMed2000

Pharmacologic treatment of the irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review of randomized, controlled trials.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of pharmacologic agents for the irritable bowel syndrome. DATA SOURCES: Electronic literature search of MEDLINE (1966 to 1999), EMBASE (1980 to 1999), PsycINFO (1967 to 1999), and the Cochrane controlled trials registry and a manual search of references from bibliographies of identified articles. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel, or crossover trials of a pharmacologic intervention for adult patients that reported outcomes of improvement in global or irritable bowel-specific symptoms. DATA EXTRACTION: Qualitative and quantitative data reported on study groups, interventions, treatment outcomes, and trial methodologic characteristics. DATA SYNTHESIS: 70 studies met the inclusion criteria. The most common medication classes were smooth-muscle relaxants (16 trials), bulking agents (13 trials), prokinetic agents (6 trials), psychotropic agents (7 trials), and loperamide (4 trials). The strongest evidence for efficacy was shown for smooth-muscle relaxants in patients with abdominal pain as the predominant symptom. Loperamide seems to reduce diarrhea but does not relieve abdominal pain. Although psychotropic agents were shown to produce global improvement, the evidence is based on a small number of studies of suboptimal quality. Psychotropic drugs, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)-receptor antagonists, peppermint oil, and Chinese herbal medicine require further study. CONCLUSIONS: Smooth-muscle relaxants are beneficial when abdominal pain is the predominant symptom. In contrast, the efficacy of bulking agents has not been established. Loperamide is effective for diarrhea. Evidence for use of psychotropic agents is inconclusive; more high-quality trials of longer duration are needed. Evidence for the efficacy of 5-HT-receptor antagonists seems favorable, although more studies are needed.

Antidiarrheals↗

PubMed2000

Triple-tissue sampling at ERCP in malignant biliary obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Procurement of cytologic samples by brushing is common practice at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) but has low sensitivity for cancer detection. Limited data are available on other techniques, including endoluminal fine-needle aspiration and forceps biopsy. This series reviews the yield of these three stricture sampling methods. METHODS: In this prospective study, patients with biliary obstruction with a clinical suspicion of malignancy underwent triple-tissue sampling at one ERCP session. Final cancer diagnosis was based on all sampling methods plus surgery, autopsy, and clinical follow-up. Tissue specimens were reported as normal, atypia, or malignant. RESULTS: A total of 133 patients were evaluated: 104 had cancer and 29 had benign strictures. Tissue sampling sensitivity varied according to the type of cancer; the highest yield was seen in ampullary cancers (62% to 85%). The cumulative sensitivity of triple-tissue sampling in the cancer patients was as follows: sensitivity was 52% if atypia was considered benign and 77% if it was considered malignant. The addition of a second or third technique increased sensitivity rates in most instances. No serious complications occurred from the tissue sampling methods. CONCLUSIONS: Tissue sampling sensitivity varied according to the type of cancer. Combining a second or third method increased sensitivity; general use of at least two sampling methods is therefore recommended.

Adult↗