PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J K Böhlke

Publications and source records attributed to J K Böhlke.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

Regional patterns in the isotopic composition of natural and anthropogenic nitrate in groundwater, High Plains, U.S.A.

Mobilization of natural nitrate (NO3-) deposits in the subsoil by irrigation water in arid and semiarid regions has the potential to produce large groundwater NO3-concentrations. The use of isotopes to distinguish between natural and anthropogenic NO3- sources in these settings could be complicated by the wide range in delta15N values of natural NO3-. An approximately 10 000 year record of paleorecharge from the regionally extensive High Plains aquifer indicates that delta15N values for NO3- derived from natural sources ranged from 1.3 to 12.3 per thousand and increased systematically from the northern to the southern High Plains. This collective range in delta15N values spans the range that might be interpreted as evidence for fertilizer and animal-waste sources of NO3-; however, the delta15N values for NO3- in modern recharge (< 50 years) under irrigated fields were, for the most part, distinctly different from those of paleorecharge when viewed in the overall regional context. An inverse relation was observed between the delta15N[NO3-] values and the NO3-/Cl- ratios in paleorecharge that is qualitatively consistent with fractionating losses of N increasing from north to south in the High Plains. N and O isotope data for NO3- are consistent with both NH3 volatilization and denitrification, having contributed to fractionating losses of N prior to recharge. The relative importance of different isotope fractionating processes may be influenced by regional climate patterns as well as by local variation in soils, vegetation, topography, and moisture conditions.

Bromine↗

Assessment of nitrification potential in ground water using short term, single-well injection experiments.

Nitrification was measured within a sand and gravel aquifer on Cape Cod, MA, using a series of single-well injection tests. The aquifer contained a wastewater-derived contaminant plume, the core of which was anoxic and contained ammonium. The study was conducted near the downgradient end of the ammonium zone, which was characterized by inversely trending vertical gradients of oxygen (270 to 0 microM) and ammonium (19 to 625 microM) and appeared to be a potentially active zone for nitrification. The tests were conducted by injecting a tracer solution (ambient ground water + added constituents) into selected locations within the gradients using multilevel samplers. After injection, the tracers moved by natural ground water flow and were sampled with time from the injection port. Rates of nitrification were determined from changes in nitrate and nitrite concentration relative to bromide. Initial tests were conducted with (15)N-enriched ammonium; subsequent tests examined the effect of adding ammonium, nitrite, or oxygen above background concentrations and of adding difluoromethane, a nitrification inhibitor. In situ net nitrate production exceeded net nitrite production by 3- to 6- fold and production rates of both decreased in the presence of difluoromethane. Nitrification rates were 0.02-0.28 mumol (L aquifer)(-1) h(-1) with in situ oxygen concentrations and up to 0.81 mumol (L aquifer)(-1) h(-1) with non-limiting substrate concentrations. Geochemical considerations indicate that the rates derived from single-well injection tests yielded overestimates of in situ rates, possibly because the injections promoted small-scale mixing within a transport-limited reaction zone. Nonetheless, these tests were useful for characterizing ground water nitrification in situ and for comparing potential rates of activity when the tracer cloud included non-limiting ammonium and oxygen concentrations.

Bromides↗

Denitrification across landscapes and waterscapes: a synthesis.

Denitrification is a critical process regulating the removal of bioavailable nitrogen (N) from natural and human-altered systems. While it has been extensively studied in terrestrial, freshwater, and marine systems, there has been limited communication among denitrification scientists working in these individual systems. Here, we compare rates of denitrification and controlling factors across a range of ecosystem types. We suggest that terrestrial, freshwater, and marine systems in which denitrification occurs can be organized along a continuum ranging from (1) those in which nitrification and denitrification are tightly coupled in space and time to (2) those in which nitrate production and denitrification are relatively decoupled. In aquatic ecosystems, N inputs influence denitrification rates whereas hydrology and geomorphology influence the proportion of N inputs that are denitrified. Relationships between denitrification and water residence time and N load are remarkably similar across lakes, river reaches, estuaries, and continental shelves. Spatially distributed global models of denitrification suggest that continental shelf sediments account for the largest portion (44%) of total global denitrification, followed by terrestrial soils (22%) and oceanic oxygen minimum zones (OMZs; 14%). Freshwater systems (groundwater, lakes, rivers) account for about 20% and estuaries 1% of total global denitrification. Denitrification of land-based N sources is distributed somewhat differently. Within watersheds, the amount of land-based N denitrified is generally highest in terrestrial soils, with progressively smaller amounts denitrified in groundwater, rivers, lakes and reservoirs, and estuaries. A number of regional exceptions to this general trend of decreasing denitrification in a downstream direction exist, including significant denitrification in continental shelves of N from terrestrial sources. Though terrestrial soils and groundwater are responsible for much denitrification at the watershed scale, per-area denitrification rates in soils and groundwater (kg N x km(-2) x yr(-1)) are, on average, approximately one-tenth the per-area rates of denitrification in lakes, rivers, estuaries, continental shelves, or OMZs. A number of potential approaches to increase denitrification on the landscape, and thus decrease N export to sensitive coastal systems exist. However, these have not generally been widely tested for their effectiveness at scales required to significantly reduce N export at the whole watershed scale.

Agriculture↗

Methods for measuring denitrification: diverse approaches to a difficult problem.

Denitrification, the reduction of the nitrogen (N) oxides, nitrate (NO3-) and nitrite (NO2-), to the gases nitric oxide (NO), nitrous oxide (N2O), and dinitrogen (N2), is important to primary production, water quality, and the chemistry and physics of the atmosphere at ecosystem, landscape, regional, and global scales. Unfortunately, this process is very difficult to measure, and existing methods are problematic for different reasons in different places at different times. In this paper, we review the major approaches that have been taken to measure denitrification in terrestrial and aquatic environments and discuss the strengths, weaknesses, and future prospects for the different methods. Methodological approaches covered include (1) acetylene-based methods, (2) 15N tracers, (3) direct N2 quantification, (4) N2:Ar ratio quantification, (5) mass balance approaches, (6) stoichiometric approaches, (7) methods based on stable isotopes, (8) in situ gradients with atmospheric environmental tracers, and (9) molecular approaches. Our review makes it clear that the prospects for improved quantification of denitrification vary greatly in different environments and at different scales. While current methodology allows for the production of accurate estimates of denitrification at scales relevant to water and air quality and ecosystem fertility questions in some systems (e.g., aquatic sediments, well-defined aquifers), methodology for other systems, especially upland terrestrial areas, still needs development. Comparison of mass balance and stoichiometric approaches that constrain estimates of denitrification at large scales with point measurements (made using multiple methods), in multiple systems, is likely to propel more improvement in denitrification methods over the next few years.

Acetylene↗

Using dual-bacterial denitrification to improve delta15N determinations of nitrates containing mass-independent 17O.

The bacterial denitrification method for isotopic analysis of nitrate using N(2)O generated from Pseudomonas aureofaciens may overestimate delta(15)N values by as much as 1-2 per thousand for samples containing atmospheric nitrate because of mass-independent (17)O variations in such samples. By analyzing such samples for delta(15)N and delta(18)O using the denitrifier Pseudomonas chlororaphis, one obtains nearly correct delta(15)N values because oxygen in N(2)O generated by P. chlororaphis is primarily derived from H(2)O. The difference between the apparent delta(15)N value determined with P. aureofaciens and that determined with P. chlororaphis, assuming mass-dependent oxygen isotopic fractionation, reflects the amount of mass-independent (17)O in a nitrate sample. By interspersing nitrate isotopic reference materials having substantially different delta(18)O values with samples, one can normalize oxygen isotope ratios and determine the fractions of oxygen in N(2)O derived from the nitrate and from water with each denitrifier. This information can be used to improve delta(15)N values of nitrates having excess (17)O. The same analyses also yield estimates of the magnitude of (17)O excess in the nitrate (expressed as Delta(17)O) that may be useful in some environmental studies. The 1-sigma uncertainties of delta(15)N, delta(18)O and Delta(17)O measurements are +/-0.2, +/-0.3 and +/-5 per thousand, respectively.

Air Pollutants↗

Oxygen isotopes in nitrate: new reference materials for 18O:17O:16O measurements and observations on nitrate-water equilibration.

Despite a rapidly growing literature on analytical methods and field applications of O isotope-ratio measurements of NO(3)(-) in environmental studies, there is evidence that the reported data may not be comparable because reference materials with widely varying delta(18)O values have not been readily available. To address this problem, we prepared large quantities of two nitrate salts with contrasting O isotopic compositions for distribution as reference materials for O isotope-ratio measurements: USGS34 (KNO(3)) with low delta(18)O and USGS35 (NaNO(3)) with high delta(18)O and 'mass-independent' delta(17)O. The procedure used to produce USGS34 involved equilibration of HNO(3) with (18)O-depleted meteoric water. Nitric acid equilibration is proposed as a simple method for producing laboratory NO(3)(-) reference materials with a range of delta(18)O values and normal (mass-dependent) (18)O:(17)O:(16)O variation. Preliminary data indicate that the equilibrium O isotope-fractionation factor (alpha) between [NO(3)(-)] and H(2)O decreases with increasing temperature from 1.0215 at 22 degrees C to 1.0131 at 100 degrees C. USGS35 was purified from the nitrate ore deposits of the Atacama Desert in Chile and has a high (17)O:(18)O ratio owing to its atmospheric origin. These new reference materials, combined with previously distributed NO(3) (-) isotopic reference materials IAEA-N3 (=IAEA-NO-3) and USGS32, can be used to calibrate local laboratory reference materials for determining offset values, scale factors, and mass-independent effects on N and O isotope-ratio measurements in a wide variety of environmental NO(3)(-) samples. Preliminary analyses yield the following results (normalized with respect to VSMOW and SLAP, with reproducibilities of +/-0.2-0.3 per thousand, 1sigma): IAEA-N3 has delta(18)O = +25.6 per thousand and delta(17)O = +13.2 per thousand; USGS32 has delta(18)O = +25.7 per thousand; USGS34 has delta(18)O = -27.9 per thousand and delta(17)O = -14.8 per thousand; and USGS35 has delta(18)O = +57.5 per thousand and delta(17)O = +51.5 per thousand.

Mass Spectrometry↗

Two new organic reference materials for delta13C and delta15N measurements and a new value for the delta13C of NBS 22 oil.

Analytical grade L-glutamic acid is chemically stable and has a C/N mole ratio of 5, which is close to that of many of natural biological materials, such as blood and animal tissue. Two L-glutamic acid reference materials with substantially different 13C and 15N abundances have been prepared for use as organic reference materials for C and N isotopic measurements. USGS40 is analytical grade L-glutamic acid and has a delta13C value of -26.24 per thousand relative to VPDB and a delta15N value of -4.52 per thousand relative to N2 in air. USGS41 was prepared by dissolving analytical grade L-glutamic acid with L-glutamic acid enriched in 13C and 15N. USGS41 has a delta13C value of +37.76 per thousand and a delta15N value of +47.57 per thousand. The delta13C and delta15N values of both materials were measured against the international reference materials NBS 19 calcium carbonate (delta13C=+1.95 per thousand ), L-SVEC lithium carbonate (delta13C=-46.48 per thousand ), IAEA-N-1 ammonium sulfate (delta15N=0.43 per thousand ), and USGS32 potassium nitrate (delta15N=180 per thousand ) by on-line combustion continuous-flow and off-line dual-inlet isotope-ratio mass spectrometry. Both USGS40 and USGS41 are isotopically homogeneous; reproducibility of delta13C is better than 0.13 per thousand, and that of delta15N is better than 0.13 per thousand in 100-microg amounts. These two isotopic reference materials can be used for (i) calibrating local laboratory reference materials, and (ii) quantifying drift with time, mass-dependent fractionations, and isotope-ratio-scale contraction in the isotopic analysis of various biological materials. Isotopic results presented in this paper yield a delta13C value for NBS 22 oil of -29.91 per thousand, in contrast to the commonly accepted value of -29.78 per thousand for which off-line blank corrections probably have not been quantified satisfactorily.

Journal Article↗

Measurement of the oxygen isotopic composition of nitrate in seawater and freshwater using the denitrifier method.

We report a novel method for measurement of the oxygen isotopic composition (18O/16O) of nitrate (NO3-) from both seawater and freshwater. The denitrifier method, based on the isotope ratio analysis of nitrous oxide generated from sample nitrate by cultured denitrifying bacteria, has been described elsewhere for its use in nitrogen isotope ratio (15N/14N) analysis of nitrate. (1) Here, we address the additional issues associated with 18O/16O analysis of nitrate by this approach, which include (1) the oxygen isotopic difference between the nitrate sample and the N20 analyte due to isotopic fractionation associated with the loss of oxygen atoms from nitrate and (2) the exchange of oxygen atoms with water during the conversion of nitrate to N2O. Experiments with 18O-labeled water indicate that water exchange contributes less than 10%, and frequently less than 3%, of the oxygen atoms in the N20 product for Pseudomonas aureofaciens. In addition, both oxygen isotope fractionation and oxygen atom exchange are consistent within a given batch of analyses. The analysis of appropriate isotopic reference materials can thus be used to correct the measured 18O/16O ratios of samples for both effects. This is the first method tested for 18O/16O analysis of nitrate in seawater. Benefits of this method, relative to published freshwater methods, include higher sensitivity (tested down to 10 nmol and 1 microM NO3-), lack of interference by other solutes, and ease of sample preparation.

Algorithms↗

Determination of the total oxygen isotopic composition of nitrate and the calibration of a delta 17O nitrate reference material.

A thermal decomposition method was developed and tested for the simultaneous determination of delta 18O and delta 17O in nitrate. The thermal decomposition of AgNO3 allows for the rapid and accurate determination of 18O/ 16O and 17O/16O isotopic ratios with a precision of +/- 1.5 per thousand for delta 18O and +/- 0.11 per thousand for delta 17O (delta 17O = delta 17O - 0.52 x delta 18O). The international nitrate isotope reference material IAEA-NO3 yielded a delta 18O value of +23.6 per thousand and delta 17O of -0.2 per thousand, consistent with normal terrestrial mass-dependent isotopic ratios. In contrast, a large sample of NaNO3 from the Atacama Desert, Chile, was found to have delta 17O = 21.56 +/- 0.11 per thousand and delta 18O = 54.9 +/- 1.5 per thousand, demonstrating a substantial mass-independent isotopic composition consistent with the proposed atmospheric origin of the desert nitrate. It is suggested that this sample (designated USGS-35) can be used to generate other gases (CO2, CO, N2O, O2) with the same delta 17O to serve as measurement references for a variety of applications involving mass-independent isotopic compositions in environmental studies.

Journal Article↗

A bacterial method for the nitrogen isotopic analysis of nitrate in seawater and freshwater.

We report a new method for measurement of the isotopic composition of nitrate (NO3-) at the natural-abundance level in both seawater and freshwater. The method is based on the isotopic analysis of nitrous oxide (N20) generated from nitrate by denitrifying bacteria that lack N2O-reductase activity. The isotopic composition of both nitrogen and oxygen from nitrate are accessible in this way. In this first of two companion manuscripts, we describe the basic protocol and results for the nitrogen isotopes. The precision of the method is better than 0.2/1000 (1 SD) at concentrations of nitrate down to 1 microM, and the nitrogen isotopic differences among various standards and samples are accurately reproduced. For samples with 1 microM nitrate or more, the blank of the method is less than 10% of the signal size, and various approaches may reduce it further.

Fresh Water↗