PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J K M Gevers

Publications and source records attributed to J K M Gevers.

9 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Explaining differences between hospitals in number of organ donors.

The shortage of donor organs calls for a careful examination of all improvement options. In this study, 80 Dutch hospitals were compared. They provided 868 donors in a 5-year period, constituting 91% of all donors in that period in The Netherlands. Multilevel regression analysis was used to explain the differences between hospitals. Potential explanatory variables were hospital-specific mortality statistics, donor policy and structural hospital characteristics. Of all donors, 81% came from one quarter of the hospitals, mainly larger hospitals. A strong relationship was found between the number of donors and hospital-specific mortality statistics. Hospitals with a neurosurgery department had additional donors. Seven hospitals systematically underperformed over a period of 5 years. If these hospitals were to increase their donor efficiency to their expected value, it would lead to an increase of 10% in the number of donors. Most donors are found in large hospitals, implying that resources to improve donor-recruitment should be channelled to larger hospitals. This study presents an efficient strategy toward a benchmark for hospitals of their organ donation rates. Some larger hospitals performed less well than others. This suggests that there is still room for improvement. There is no evidence for large undiscovered and unused pools of donor organs.

Hospitals↗
PubMed2005

[Fourth evaluation of the law on the review of termination of life on request and assisted suicide (Euthanasia Act)].

This fall, an extensive study will start to evaluate the Dutch Euthanasia Act. This law was enacted in 2002. According to this law, physicians must report cases of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. The cases are then judged by regional euthanasia review committees consisting of a lawyer, a physician and an ethicist. Only if they conclude that the case does not meet the requirements for prudent practice, it will be sent to the public prosecutor. The study will be focused on the practice of medical end-of-life decision-making, the functioning and effects of the Euthanasia Act, and opinions of physicians about the scope of the law and the demarcation between different end-of-life decisions. The study will comprise 4 sub-studies: a judicial evaluation, a death certificate study, a survey among physicians and a panel study among physicians, nurses, members of euthanasia review committees, lawyers and ethicists. This study is the fourth in a row of nationwide studies into end-of-life practices that have been performed since 1990. The previous studies contributed to the public debate about medical care at the end of life and to the development of policy in this field. It is expected that this study, by providing up-to-date information on and insight into end-of-life care in the Netherlands, will do the same.

Attitude to Health↗
PubMed2005

[Organ Donation Act: against an objection system].

The Organ Donation Act (1998) has not resulted in an increase in donated organs. However, it should not be changed from a system registering consent to post-mortem donation to one in which objection is registered. The consent system is more suitable to ensuring the freedom to donate or not, and a system registering objection may not increase the number of donated organs. More serious implementation of the current system could however achieve this.

Humans↗
PubMed2005

Risky procedures by nurses in hospitals: problems and (contemplated) refusals of orders by physicians, and views of physicians and nurses.

Occurrence of problems with, refusals of orders and contemplated refusals of orders for risky procedures by nurses in Dutch hospitals and views on the safety of performance was studied using postal questionnaires (600 physicians and 3200 nurses, response 60-71%). Of the respondents, 11-30% experienced problems with and (contemplated) refusals of orders for risky procedures in the previous 12 months. Gynaecologists and internists most frequently mentioned problems concerning the practical performance of the procedure (44% and 30%, respectively). The reason for a problem or a contemplated refusal most frequently given by nurses was that they disagreed with the medication policy (34% and 35%, respectively). The reason for a refusal most frequently given by the gynaecologists, internists and nurses was that the nurses themselves were of the opinion that they did not have the necessary authorisation (95%, 67%, and 62%, respectively). With regard to certain procedures, the views of professionals are more strict than the current legal regulations.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2005

Risky procedures by nurses in hospitals: problems and (contemplated) refusals of orders by physicians, and views of physicians and nurses: a questionnaire survey.

Occurrence of problems with, refusals of orders and contemplated refusals of orders for risky procedures by nurses in Dutch hospitals and views on the safety of performance was studied using postal questionnaires (600 physicians and 3200 nurses, response 60--71%). Of the respondents, 11--30% experienced problems with and (contemplated) refusals of orders for risky procedures in the previous 12 months. Gynaecologists and internists most frequently mentioned problems concerning the practical performance of the procedure (44% and 30%, respectively). The reason for a problem or a contemplated refusal most frequently given by nurses was that they disagreed with the medication policy (34% and 35%, respectively). The reason for a refusal most frequently given by the gynaecologists, internists, and nurses was that the nurses themselves were of the opinion that they did not have the necessary authorisation (95%, 67%, and 62%, respectively). With regard to certain procedures, the views of professionals are more strict than the current legal regulations.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2004

Reserved procedures in Dutch hospitals: knowledge, experiences and views of physicians and nurses.

The Individual Health Care Professions Act came into force in The Netherlands in 1997, introducing a mixed system for the regulation of the practice of medicine. One of its components, the reserved procedures regulations, was studied in hospitals to gain insight into the knowledge, experiences and views of physicians and nurses with regard to these regulations. Questionnaires were sent to representative samples of 250 gynaecologists, 350 internists, and 3200 nurses, response rates were 65, 60 and 71%, respectively. Almost all respondents were aware that physicians are authorised to perform reserved procedures on their own initiative (93-99%), and 48-63% knew that nurses are not authorised to do this. A substantial percentage of the nurses performed reserved procedures on their own initiative (17-53%). A majority of gynaecologists and internists presumed that the hospital had ensured the proficiency of the nurses to perform reserved procedures (58% resp. 65%), while 82% of the nurses determined their own proficiency for each procedure. Most respondents felt that the reserved procedures regulations offer adequate protection for patients (58-72%). Although recommendations are made for improvement, the functioning of the reserved procedures regulations in hospitals is considered to be moderately positive.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2004

Genetic databases and consent for use of medical records.

The legislation on the Icelandic genetic database provides for an opting-out system for the collection of encoded medical information from individual medical records. From the beginning this has raised criticism, in Iceland itself and abroad. The Supreme Court has now decided that this approach of presumed consent is not unconstitutional per se, but that there are not sufficient safeguards to ensure that the information collected is not traceable to individuals. The decision of the court is of importance for the debate (at national and international level) on the legal and ethical aspects of population-based genetic databases. Furthermore, it is interesting because it recognizes the right of close relatives of a deceased person to oppose the collection and use of his or her medical data for genetic research, at least as long as these data may still be identifiable.

Databases, Genetic↗