PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J K Shallop

Publications and source records attributed to J K Shallop.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1999

Summary of results using the nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential.

OBJECTIVE: This study outlines a series of experiments using the neural response telemetry (NRT) system of the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant to measure the electrically evoked compound action potential (EAP). The goal of this investigation was to develop a protocol that allows successful recording of the EAP in a majority of CI24M cochlear implant users. DESIGN: Twenty-six postlingually deafened adults participated in this study. A series of experiments were conducted that allowed us to examine how manipulation of stimulation and recording parameters may affect the morphology of the EAP recorded using the Nucleus NRT system. RESULTS: Results of this study show consistent responses on at least some electrodes from all subjects. Cross-subject and cross electrode variations in both the growth of the response and the temporal refractory properties of the response were observed. The range of stimulus and recording parameters that can be used to record the EAP with the Nucleus NRT system is described. CONCLUSIONS: Using the protocol outlined in this study, it is possible to reliably record EAP responses from most subjects and for most electrodes in Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users. These responses are robust and recording these responses does not require that the subject sleep or remain still. Based on these results, a specific protocol is proposed for measurement of the EAP using the NRT system of the CI24M cochlear implant. Potential clinical implications of these results are discussed.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Facial nerve stimulation after Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implantation.

OBJECTIVE: To review the clinical features, radiographic findings, and programming strategies used in our population of patients who developed facial nerve stimulation after cochlear implantation. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Patients referred to our nonprofit, outpatient facility were studied prospectively. PATIENTS: The study consisted of 14 patients with facial nerve stimulation after placement of the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant. INTERVENTIONS: Records were reviewed retrospectively, and patients were studied with three-dimensional computed tomographic scanning techniques. Electrical testing was performed, and various cochlear implant programming strategies were evaluated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Important clinical features were reviewed. The radiographic and anatomical relationships of the facial nerve to the cochlea were evaluated, and the programming strategies used to effectively control facial nerve stimulation were reviewed. RESULTS: Prevalence of facial nerve stimulation in our population was 7%. The most common cause was otosclerosis. Anatomical data confirmed the close proximity of the basal turn of the cochlea and the labyrinthine segment of the facial nerve. There was a high correlation between the electrodes causing symptoms and those found radiographically to be closest to the labyrinthine segment of the facial nerve. We were able to control facial nerve stimulation in all patients through programming mode changes. CONCLUSIONS: Otosclerosis appears to be a risk factor for developing facial nerve stimulation after cochlear implantation, and the site of stimulation appears to be the labyrinthine segment of the facial nerve. Familiarity with more elaborate programming techniques is critical to managing patients with this complication.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Cochlear implantation in the elderly.

The purpose of this study was to compare the audiologic and surgical results of elderly patients receiving cochlear implants with other adult patients, and to evaluate the benefit of cochlear implantation in the geriatric population. Twenty-eight patients, aged 60 to 80 years, who received the Nucleus 22 channel cochlear implant were studied retrospectively. Mean audiologic test scores increased significantly after implantation. Postoperative audiologic test scores of this elderly population are comparable to those of a matched group of younger adult patients. The surgical procedure was well tolerated in all elderly patients, and there were two postoperative complications requiring revision procedures. A questionnaire was used to assess implant use and the impact of cochlear implantation on the quality of life in this elderly population. Average implant use per day was 13.8 hours, and 65% of patients were able to recognize voices over the telephone. More than 80% of patients believed that their quality of life had improved significantly, that their self-confidence had increased, and that their decision regarding implantation was correct. The results of this study indicate that elderly patients with bilateral, profound, sensorineural hearing loss should not be denied consideration for cochlear implantation based on age alone.

Aged↗
PubMed1994

Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 Channel Cochlear Implant System.

Sixty-three postlinguistically deaf adults from four English-speaking countries participated in a 17-week field study of performance with a new speech coding strategy, Spectral Peak (SPEAK), and the most widely used strategy, Multipeak (MPEAK), both of which are implemented on wearable speech processors of the Nucleus 22 Channel Cochlear Implant System; MPEAK is a feature-extraction strategy, whereas SPEAK is a filterbank strategy. Subjects' performance was evaluated with an experimental design in which use of each strategy was reversed and replicated (ABAB). Average scores for speech tests presented sound-only at 70 dB SPL were higher with the SPEAK strategy than with the MPEAK strategy. For tests in quiet, mean scores for medial vowels were 74.8 percent versus 70.1 percent; for medial consonants, 68.6 percent versus 56.6 percent; for monosyllabic words, 33.8 percent versus 24.6 percent; and for sentences, 77.5 percent versus 67.4 percent. For tests in noise, mean scores for Four-Choice Spondees at +10 and +5 dB signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) were 88.5 percent versus 73.6 percent and 80.1 percent versus 62.3 percent, respectively; and for sentences at +15 dB, +10, and +5 dB S/N, 66.5 percent versus 43.4 percent, 61.5 percent versus 37.1 percent, and 60.4 percent versus 31.7 percent, respectively. Subjects showed marked improvement in recognition of sentences in noise with the new SPEAK filterbank strategy. These results agree closely with subjects' responses to a questionnaire on which approximately 80 percent reported they heard best with the SPEAK strategy for everyday listening situations.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Combined electrical and acoustical stimulation using a bimodal prosthesis.

A new device incorporating a cochlear implant speech processor and a speech-processing hearing aid for the unimplanted ear has been designed and tested with four severely hearing-impaired patients. The aim of the device is to provide a more acceptable and effective combination of electrical and acoustic signals to the two ears. When used monaurally, and binaurally in conjunction with the cochlear implant, the speech-processing hearing aid mean scores for open-set sentences, words, and consonants were as good as or better than the mean scores for the patients' own conventional hearing aids. Some patients improved much more than did others. Although not conclusive, these results are encouraging, especially as they were achieved with a laboratory prototype that did not allow the patients to become accustomed to the processor in everyday situations.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Objective electrophysiological measures from cochlear implant patients.

Various objective electrophysiological techniques have been used to supplement the behavioral measurements for cochlear implant patients. This report summarizes various studies of these measurements, including stimulus artifact, averaged electrode voltages, electrical stapedius reflexes, electrical auditory brain stem responses, electrical middle latency responses, and cortical auditory responses. These techniques have been shown to provide valuable information in the evaluation of device and electrode integrity in addition to correlated values to behavioral thresholds and comfort levels.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Feasibility of multichannel human cochlear nucleus stimulation.

Bipolar electrical stimulation of the brainstem cochlear nucleus (CN) following acoustic tumor removal in an only-hearing ear can provide beneficial hearing. However, the benefits of multichannel stimulation have yet to be defined. Following removal of a second acoustic tumor in a patient with neurofibromatosis 2, a Nucleus mini-22 channel implant device was inserted with the electrode array tip from the foramen of Luschka cephalad along the root entry zone of the eighth nerve, secured by a single suture superficially in the brain stem. Initial stimulation on the sixth postoperative day indicated that electrodes 18 to 22 were capable of CN stimulation without seventh nerve stimulation. Presumed electrode migration precluded further CN stimulation 1 month later. This report illustrates the feasibility of brainstem CN stimulation with an existing multichannel system.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Prediction of behavioral threshold and comfort values for Nucleus 22-channel implant patients from electrical auditory brain stem response test results.

We have studied the prediction of behavioral threshold and comfort values for 11 patients who use the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant by means of the results of electrical auditory brain stem response (EABR) procedures. For prediction purposes, EABR and behavioral testing were done in the same electrode mode configuration for three specific electrodes. The results of this investigation suggest that EABR threshold current level is consistently near the behavioral comfort current level, rather than the patient's behavioral threshold level.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses (EABR) and middle latency responses (EMLR) obtained from patients with the nucleus multichannel cochlear implant.

Electrical auditory brain stem responses (EABR) and electrical middle latency responses (EMLR) were recorded from patients who had received the Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant system. Twenty-five sequential patients had either intraoperative or outpatient EABR testing. We also recorded EMLRs from several outpatients. EABR results were consistent among all patients tested. Wave V mean latencies were the shortest (3.82 msec) for the most apical electrode (E20) and increased slightly for the medial (E12) and basal (E5) electrodes (3.94 and 4.20 msec, respectively). Absolute latencies for all EABR component waves were observed to be 1 to 1.5 msec shorter than typical acoustic auditory brain stem response (ABR) mean latencies. We have examined the relationships between patients' EABR/EMLR and their behavioral responses to electrical stimulation. Generally, the behavioral threshold and comfort current levels were lower than the predicted values based on EABR/EMLR findings. This observation may be due in part to psychophysical loudness differences noted for pulse rates of 10 to 500 pulses per second in some of the patients that we have studied in greater detail.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

Characteristics of electrically evoked 'auditory' brainstem responses elicited with the nucleus 22-electrode intracochlear implant.

Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABRs) were measured in cochlear implant patients fitted with the Nucleus 22 electrode system. The typical response waveform consisted of a series of two to three peaks. The largest peak was similar in form to the wave V of acoustically evoked ABRs and was most prominent for stimulus intensities nearly equal to the patients' maximum comfortable (MC) behavioural stimulus level for the test electrode. The first identifiable wave V amplitude was observed at stimulus levels greater than the patients' psychophysical threshold. With increasing stimulus intensity, wave V amplitude increased rapidly to plateau at a level highly correlated with the patients' MC level at the EABR stimulus rate of 17/s. Wave V peak latency was generally shorter than normal ABRs (4.0 cf. 5.5 ms) and varied with electrode position: apical electrodes had shorter latencies than basal electrodes by approximately 0.4 ms. These results suggest that EABRs can be used as an objective estimate of a patient's electrode-specific MC level, once the correlation of EABR growth functions at 17/s to those at clinically employed rates of 250/s has been determined. EABRs may indicate differences in nerve action potential generation for apical and basal electrodes.

Cochlea↗
PubMed1985

The effect of sleep on the auditory brainstem response (ABR) and the middle latency response (MLR).

The ABR and the MLR were measured without interruption in 4 subjects during a whole night of natural sleep and compared with the awake responses. The conventional EEG activity was monitored during the whole procedure, which permitted a precise rating of the sleep stage during each recording period. Only minor changes were found in the latencies for the ABR during sleep. The MLR responses showed quite dramatic changes in morphology and latencies. Our results appear to indicate that the 40/sec stimulus presentation mode of the MLR will not be very effective during sleep due to the pronounced latency shifts of the different peaks in the MLR. The 40/sec response is based on an inter-peak latency of 25 msec. If this presumption is not fulfilled the different waves in the 40/sec response will not be superimposed and consequently enhanced in the averaging procedure.

Acoustic Stimulation↗