If facilities for recovery are limited, shortening the recovery time from general anaesthesia is important. A comparative study on the effect of 3 mg.kg-1 aminophylline or 0.04 mg.kg-1 physostigmine on duration and quality of the recovery time from nitrous oxide-enflurane anaesthesia is presented. Three groups of 35 patients were observed, placebo being included for comparison in this double-blind study. Without treatment, recovery from nitrous oxide-enflurane inhalation anaesthesia lasted 18.8 +/- 5.80 min. Aminophylline considerably shortened the recovery time (12.06 +/- 3.52 min), whereas physostigmine did not (18.97 +/- 9.18 min). In the physostigmine group, however, a remarkably calm recovery and early return of protective reflexes was observed. Although aminophylline shortens the recovery time, due to earlier incidence of pain and other disturbances, it cannot be recommended for general improvement of recovery, whereas physostigmine clearly improves the quality of recovery from nitrous oxide-enflurane anaesthesia.

Adult↗

PubMed1990

No effect of doxapram during enflurane-nitrous oxide anesthesia.

Doxapram was administered to 50 spontaneously breathing patients receiving enflurane and nitrous oxide for surgical anesthesia. A similar group acted as control. Significant depression of ventilation did not occur in the control group of patients, nor did doxapram produce a reduction of end tidal CO2 concentrations. It is suggested that surgical stimulation and concomitant nitrous oxide administration reduced the ventilatory depressant effect of enflurane and that the effect of doxapram was attenuated by the actions of enflurane on the peripheral chemoreceptors.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Hemodynamic effects of intermittent manual lung hyperinflation in patients with septic shock.

OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to investigate the hemodynamic changes induced by intermittent manual lung hyperinflation (MHI) and to assess if these changes are adverse enough to warrant prohibition of MHI as a routine procedure in the care of patients with septic shock. DESIGN: The study's design was experimental prospective. SETTING: The settings were university hospital intensive care units. PATIENTS: Subjects included 13 consecutive mechanically ventilated patients with septic shock who met the inclusion criteria. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Phasic MHI-related increments in mean inspiratory airway pressure were concordant to changes in mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP) (r(2) = 0.67) with a 0.6 mm Hg rise in MPAP per cm H(2)O airway pressure. The magnitude of MPAP changes was not reflected in magnitude of stroke volume index (SVI) (r(2) = 0.06). On average, MHI did not induce statistically significant hemodynamic changes and mean values returned to baseline level within 15 minutes. SVI during MHI increased slightly in 9 patients, from 37 +/- 15 (mean +/- SD) to 41 +/- 17 mL/m(2) (P <.05), and decreased in 4, from 60 +/- 10 to 50 +/- 14 mL/m(2) (not significant). Patients with an increase in SVI had lower baseline values for SVI, cardiac index, and left ventricular stroke work index (P <.05) and higher values for systemic vascular resistance index compared with patients with a decrease in SVI (P <.05). Left ventricular stroke work index was higher in patients with a decrease in SVI than in patients with an increase in SVI (52 +/- 9 vs 34 +/- 8; P <.05). Tidal volume increased from 499 +/- 176 mL before MHI to 587 +/- 82 mL, 5 minutes after MHI (P <.05) with a return to baseline values within 15 minutes after the procedure. CONCLUSION: The hemodynamic effects of intermittent MHI in patients with septic shock are relatively small and insignificant and seem to be related to the cardiovascular state before the procedure. The risk of inducing hemodynamic changes with MHI should not be considered as a contraindication in patients with septic shock who are mechanically ventilated.

Adult↗