PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Klasen

Publications and source records attributed to J Klasen.

10 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

[Anesthesia and sleep apnea syndrome].

The perioperative risk for patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and the optimal anaesthesiological management of these patients have not been well elucidated. The prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea with significant symptoms is estimated to be 4% in men and 2% in women. However, in 80-95% of patients this syndrome is not sufficiently diagnosed. Thus identification of patients at risk and a thorough multidisciplinary diagnostic approach are essential for optimal perioperative management. The risk of perioperative complications, like cardiopulmonary compromise, and difficulties in airway management is elevated. The most important aspects of perioperative management include evaluation of intubating conditions, careful search for cardiopulmonary morbidity, permanent control of patient airways, sensible use of anaesthetics, sedatives, and narcotics, and strict monitoring of vital signs. If ambulatory nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy has been established preoperatively, this should be continued in the perioperative period. Postoperative monitoring should be performed in an intensive care or intermediate care unit. Controlled clinical studies on the best perioperative management of patients with obstructive sleep apnea are urgently required.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗
PubMed2005

Impact on postoperative pain of long-lasting pre-emptive epidural analgesia before total hip replacement: a prospective, randomised, double-blind study.

Clinical studies on pre-emptive analgesia have produced inconsistent results. We conducted a clinical study investigating the effect of long-lasting pre-emptive epidural analgesia on consumption of analgesics and acute pain. Forty-two patients scheduled for elective hip replacement for osteo-arthritis were randomly assigned to receive, on the day before operation, either 5 ml.h(-1) ropivacaine 0.2% (study group, n = 21) or 5 ml.h(-1) saline (control group, n = 21). Postoperative analgesia was achieved in both groups by patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with ropivacaine 0.2%. The main outcome measure was consumption of local anaesthetics. Additional parameters included visual analogue pain scale (VAS) scores, consumption of rescue analgesics, requests for PCEA boluses, and side-effects. The pre-operative parameters and pain scores were similar in the two groups. Epidural blocks provided sufficient operative analgesia in all patients. Pre-emptive analgesia was continued for 11-20 h and led to significantly decreased pain scores before surgery. The consumption of local anaesthetics was decreased postoperatively in the study group (194 mg vs. 284 mg in the postoperative period). Furthermore, bolus requests occurred more frequently in the control group. VAS scores did not differ significantly between groups. Long-lasting "pre-emptive" epidural analgesia decreases postoperative pain with improved pain control.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Shorter discharge time after regional or intravenous anaesthesia in combination with laryngeal mask airway compared with balanced anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The efficiency of operating room times can be significantly improved using rapid changes between operative procedures. We performed a retrospective analysis using electronic anaesthesia charts that compared anaesthesia-related times between the three most frequently performed types of anaesthesia (for orthopaedic surgery) to evaluate the potential for a quicker turn-around between cases. METHODS: A total of 5614 anaesthetic procedures in trauma-related orthopaedic surgery were performed from 1997 to 1999. All were documented with an automatic record-keeping system. Data were compared for intravenous anaesthesia with the laryngeal mask airway, balanced anaesthesia with tracheal intubation and regional anaesthesia. The primary outcome measure was the time needed for emergence from anaesthesia after the end of surgery. Statistical evaluation was performed with matched triples for all three types of anaesthesia (155 triples for ambulatory surgery, 249 triples for in-patient care). RESULTS: For ambulatory surgery, the induction time was significantly shorter for general anaesthesia (23.7 min for intravenous anaesthesia, 22.7 min for balanced anaesthesia techniques) compared with regional anaesthesia (27.2 min). The time from the end of the surgical procedure to transfer of the patient out of the operating room was shortest for regional anaesthesia (6.3 min) compared with intravenous anaesthesia (9.0 min) and balanced anaesthesia (12.5 min) techniques. Results were comparable for in-patients: regional anaesthesia required significantly longer for its induction, but less time for patient discharge from the operating room. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a regional anaesthesia technique or one involving intravenous anaesthesia in combination with the laryngeal mask airway may lead to a reduction in discharge time compared with a balanced anaesthesia technique with endotracheal intubation. Thus, improved use of resources may be achieved.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

[Registration of material consumption in anesthesia using a data management system].

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate whether an Anesthesia Information Management System (AIMS) can provide reliable data on the consumption of single-use anesthetic material without necessitating an expensive and time-consuming inventory. To this end, the number of selected anesthesia-related materials and the total costs in orthopedic theatres for which the department of anesthesia had been charged in the year 2000 were compared to the data calculated by the AIMS. METHODS: Anesthesia-related material is provided by a computer-based system of storage facilities (KLIMA II) in the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine at the University Hospital Giessen. All costs arising in orthopedic theatres are exclusively charged to one single account. At the same time, the online-documentation software, NarkoData (IMESO GmbH, Hüttenberg, Germany), collects all data on consumption of anesthetic single-use material. The total amount of peripheral (PVC) and central-venous catheters (CVC), urinary catheters (UC) and endotracheal tubes (ET) used in the year 2000 was ascertained by the AIMS and compared to the respective data accounted by the administration. RESULTS: In the year 2000, the number of patients treated in orthopedic theatres totaled 1,865. By means of the AIMS, a consumption of 783 CVCs, 644 UCs and 949 ETs could be documented. In contrast, hospital administration had billed 880 CVCs, 700 UCs, and 1,050 ETs: discrepancies of 11.0 % for CVCs, 8.0 % for UCs and 9.6 % for ETs. Concerning the two most frequently used CVCs, the AIMS failed to document costs of 3,238 DM. For PVCs (16 gauge and 14 gauge), the official cost was 10.8 % and 46.7 % higher compared to the number documented by the AIMS. Since the number of PVCs totaled 3,400, the AIMS failed to document costs of 1,900 DM. CONCLUSION: Comparison of both methods revealed substantial deficits in documenting cost-relevant materials. There were no detailed data available on the whereabouts of the materials used, i.e. whether tubes and catheters were undocumented, used or discarded. However, the AIMS may provide additional valuable information about possible sources of material wastefulness. This is especially true for infrequently used anesthesia-related materials.

Anesthesiology↗
PubMed2001

Factors determining length of stay of surgical day-case patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Factors which lead to prolonged stay in the day-care unit and unplanned admission after day-case surgery are poorly understood. METHODS: Data sets of 3152 day-case patients were collected with a computerized online record keeping system (NarkoData). Predictors of prolonged postoperative stay including unanticipated admission were identified using univariate analysis. Charts of patients, who needed admission, were reviewed. RESULTS: 13.2% of day-case patients had a postoperative stay < or = 3 h, 55.3% 3-6 h and 26.2% > or = 6 h. The rate of unanticipated admission was 5.4%. Intraoperative haemoglobin concentration and blood loss were the best predictors of a prolonged postoperative stay. Other significant predictors were female gender, advanced age, longer duration of surgery, larger volume of infusions, intubation, spinal anaesthesia, intraoperative use of opioids and non-depolarizing muscle relaxants, high pain score, nausea and vomiting and prolonged preoperative waiting time. Chart review of patients admitted to hospital confirmed the validity of the statistically significant predictors. CONCLUSIONS: In day-case surgery, the predictors of prolonged stay in the day-care unit and unplanned Hospital admission are mainly related to the surgical procedure.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗
PubMed2000

[Influences and predictors of unanticipated admission after ambulatory surgery].

UNLABELLED: In order to plan the daily routine of a surgical day care unit optimally and effectively, it is indispensable to know the causes of unanticipated admission of outpatients. The purpose of this experiment was to evaluate the influences and predictors of unanticipated admission of patients in our day care unit for ambulatory surgery. The data sets of 3152 surgical outpatients were evaluated. The duration of stay had been entered online by computers. METHOD: From January 1997 until June 1999, all clinically relevant parameters from any outpatient were entered into an anesthesia information management system (NarkoData, Imeso GmbH, Hüttenberg-Rechtenbach, Germany). The correlation of potential nominal and ordinal scaled predictors of unanticipated admission was tested using the chi-squared test. Univariate analysis was used in determining predictors for the occurrence of unanticipated admission. Pearson's contingency coefficient (CC) was used as a standard for the correlation rigidity in nominal and ordinal scaled parameters. The correlation standard eta was used for metrical parameters. RESULTS: Unanticipated admission occurred in 169 (5.4%) of the 3152 outpatients. The following parameters significantly influenced unanticipated admission: age, ASA status, diagnosis (ICD-9), time of admission, different anesthesia procedures and anesthetics (opioids and non-depolarizing muscle relaxants), surgical department, type of surgery (ICPM), duration of operation, blood loss, intraoperative hemoglobin values, and the administration of colloid and crystalloid solutions. The parameters blood loss, intraoperative hemoglobin values, and administration of colloid solutions were evaluated as being good predictors. CONCLUSION: The causes of unanticipated admission of patients in our day care unit for ambulatory surgery are manifold. Some relate to the patient, the anesthesia, and the organization of the day care unit, whereas lengthy operative trauma leading to intraoperative blood loss also plays a major role.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

The effects of epidural and intravenous lidocaine on somatosensory evoked potentials after stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve.

The measurement of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) after stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve (PTN-SEPs) has been proposed as an objective indicator of the quality of lumbar epidural block. It is unclear whether peak latency increases after epidural application of local anesthetics may be due in part to systemic effects of the drug absorbed from the epidural space. In this clinical study, we compared PTN-SEPs after intravenous and epidural administration of lidocaine to those of a control group who did not receive lidocaine. Plasma concentrations of lidocaine remained within expected ranges for epidural and intravenous administration. No subjects developed signs for overdose or toxicity. After epidural application of 2% lidocaine, mean latencies of peaks P1, N1, and P2 increased significantly in comparison to baseline values. In 3 of 10 patients, latency changes were not observed. Intravenous lidocaine did not produce statistically significant changes in latencies, although a trend toward increasing latencies appeared to be present. In the control group without lidocaine, no statistically significant changes occurred during the 1-h study period. No correlation was found between peak latency changes and plasma concentrations of lidocaine. We conclude that latency increases observed after epidural application of lidocaine are due primarily to local, not systemic, effects of the local anesthetic.

Absorption↗