Biomedical subjects
J Koenderink
Publications and source records attributed to J Koenderink.
Spatial heterogeneity of inhibitory surrounds in the middle temporal visual area.
A recurrent theme in the organization of vertebrate visual cortex is that of receptive fields with an associated "silent" opponency component. In the middle temporal area (area MT), a cortical visual area involved in the analysis of retinal motion in primates, this opponency appears in the form of a region outside the classical receptive field (CRF) that in itself gives no response but suppresses responses to motion evoked within the CRF. This antagonistic motion surround has been described as very large and symmetrically arrayed around the CRF. On the basis of this view, the primary function of the surround has long been thought to consist of simple figure-ground segregation based on movement. We have made use of small stimulus patches to map the form and extent of the surround and find evidence that the surround inhibition of many MT cells is in fact confined to restricted regions on one side or on opposite sides of the CRF. Such regions endow MT cells with the ability to make local-to-local motion comparisons, capable of extracting more complex features from the visual environment, and as such, may be better viewed as intrinsic parts of the receptive field, rather than as separate entities responsible for local-to-global comparisons.
Monocular aniseikonia: a motion parallax analogue of the disparity-induced effect.
Mayhew and Longuet-Higgins have recently outlined a computational model of binocular depth perception in which the small vertical disparities between the two eyes' views of a three-dimensional scene are used to determine the 'viewing parameters' of fixation distance (d) and the angle of asymmetric convergence of the eyes (g). The d/g hypothesis, as it has been called, correctly predicts that a fronto-parallel surface, viewed with a vertically magnifying lens over one eye, should appear to be rotated in depth about a vertical axis. We report here a comparable illusion for surfaces specified by monocular motion parallax information, which can be explained more simply by considering the differential invariants of the optic flow field. In addition, our observations suggest that the disparity-induced effect is not a 'whole field' phenomenon nor one limited to small magnification differences between the eyes.