PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J L Gutmann

Publications and source records attributed to J L Gutmann.

125 records · Page 7Linked to original sources
PubMed1978

Prevalence, location, and patency of accessory canals in the furcation region of permanent molars.

One hundred and two extracted permanent molars were debrided in 3% H2O2, sealed at the apex, and placed in a vacuum chamber. Safranin dye was introduced into the teeth that were placed in a vacuum of 525 mm of Hg. Observations were made of the external root surface to determine any staining due to patent accessory canals. Accessory canals were demonstrated in the "furcation region" in 28.4% of the total sample; 29.4% in mandibular molars, and 27.4% in maxillary molars. Of the total sample 25.5% exhibited canals in the "furcation" only, while 10.2% exhibited canals on the lateral root surface. Communication between the pulp chamber and the external surface was noted via dentinal tubules, especially when the cementum was denuded. The salient biologic and pathologic ramification of these aberrant canals were discussed along with the need to establish a differential diagnosis in order to determine the proper sequence of treatment should pulpal-periodontal disease exist.

Dental Pulp Cavity↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Restoring teeth that are endodontically treated through existing crowns. Part I: Survey of pulpal status on access.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify the pulpal findings encountered by practitioners when accessing complete-coverage crowns that require nonsurgical root canal treatment and the relevance of coronal leakage to the success of the RTC. METHOD AND MATERIALS: The survey package consisted of a cover letter stating the instructions, rationale, and purpose for the questionnaire, a questionnaire with 8 short-answer questions, and a stamped, self-addressed envelope. A randomized sample of active dentists (300 general practitioners, 300 prosthodontists, and 300 endodontists) was selected. Collected data were analyzed with the chi-square test. RESULTS: A 60% response rate was obtained. Statistically significant differences were found among the practitioner groups, depending on the question. General practitioners and endodontists obtain access through crowns and maintain these crowns as final restoration significantly more often than do prosthodontists. Practitioners responded that teeth with complete crowns require nonsurgical root canal treatment after 5 to 10 years. CONCLUSION: Respondents believe that leakage must be addressed when endodontic access cavities in artificial crowns are restored after nonsurgical root canal treatment. General practitioners perform nonsurgical root canal treatment more frequently than do prosthodontists. Practitioners indicated that when teeth with complete crowns require nonsurgical root canal treatment, treatment is most often performed 5 to 10 years after placement of the crown.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Restoring teeth that are endodontically treated through existing crowns. Part II: Survey of restorative materials commonly used.

OBJECTIVE: A survey was undertaken to categorize the materials used for the restoration of endodontic access openings through complete-coverage crowns after completion of nonsurgical root canal treatment. METHOD AND MATERIALS: The survey package consisted of a cover letter stating instructions, rationale, and purpose for the questionnaire, a questionnaire of 8 short-answer questions, and a stamped, self-addressed envelope. A randomized sample of active dentists (300 general practitioners, 300 prosthodontists, and 300 endodontists), was selected. Collected data were analyzed with the chi-square analysis. RESULTS: Most general practitioners (93%), endodontists (61%), and prosthodontists (75%) reported that they frequently or always permanently restore teeth after nonsurgical root canal treatment. Empress was the all-ceramic system used most commonly by prosthodontists (42%) and general practitioners (38%). A statistically significant difference in restorative material preference was found (P < 0.0001), depending on the type of crown used. CONCLUSION: Amalgam alone and in combination with bonding agents are materials of choice for restoration of access openings through all-metal complete crowns, while resin composite is the choice for all types of complete crowns involving porcelain. Endodontists preferred "other" materials.

Aluminum Silicates↗
PubMedDate not supplied

When to use posts.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Crowns↗