PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J L Raoul

Publications and source records attributed to J L Raoul.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Induction cisplatin-irinotecan followed by concurrent cisplatin-irinotecan and radiotherapy without surgery in oesophageal cancer: multicenter phase II FFCD trial.

A recent phase I study showed that weekly cisplatin, irinotecan and concurrent radiotherapy can be administered with moderate toxicity in patients with oesophageal cancer. Patients with no prior treatment and oesophageal cancer stage I to III, performance status <3, caloric intake >1,500 kcal day(-1) were included. Chemotherapy, with cisplatin 30 mg m(-2) and irinotecan 60 mg m(-2), was administered at days 1, 8, 22, 29, and concurrently with radiotherapy at days 43, 50, 64 and 71. Radiotherapy was delivered with 50 or 50.4 Gy in 25 fractions/5 weeks. Forty-three patients were included, 10 stage I, 19 stage II and 14 stage III. Mean age was 59.2 years (range 44-79). A total of 30 out of 43 (69.8%) patients underwent all planned treatment. During induction chemotherapy, 14 severe toxicities of grade 3 or 4 in 10 patients (23.3%) were reported with 57.1% due to haematoxicity. During chemoradiotherapy, 31 severe toxicities of grade 3 or 4 with 64.5% due to haematotoxicity were reported in 18 patients. One toxic death occurred (diarrhoea grade 4). The complete clinical response rate was 58.1% (95% CI: 43.4-72.8%). Overall survival rate at 1 and 2 years was 62.8%, (95% CI, 58.3-77.3%) and 27.9% (95% CI, 13.4-41.3%), respectively. In conclusion, cisplatin-irinotecan-radiotherapy is an active and well-tolerated regimen feasible in out-patients.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2006

Randomised trial comparing three different schedules of infusional 5FU and raltitrexed alone as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. Final results of the Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive (FFCD) 9601 trial.

LV5FU2 with high-dose leucovorin (LV), weekly infusional 5-fluorouracil (5FU) (AIO schedule) and raltitrexed have been demonstrated to be active agents in first-line treatment of colorectal cancer. We performed a 4-arm randomised trial to compare (1) a low-dose intravenous bolus of LV (20 mg/m2), followed by an intravenous bolus of 5FU (400 mg/m2), followed by a 22-hour continuous infusion of 5FU (600 mg/m2) on day 1 and day 2/2 weeks (ldLV5FU2 arm), (2) a weekly continuous infusion of high-dose 5FU (2.6 g/m2/week) for 6 weeks followed by a rest week (HD-FU arm) and (3) raltitrexed (Tomudex arm; 3 mg/m2/3 weeks) to standard LV5FU2. From 1997 to 2001, 294 patients were included. The 4 arms were well balanced for sex ratio, age, WHO performance status, the primary tumour site and prior adjuvant chemotherapy. Treatment was stopped due to low accrual. Two toxicity-related deaths were observed in the Tomudex arm. The treatments gave rise to different rates of grade 3-4 neutropenia (3, 4, 11 and 14% of the patients in the LV5FU2, ldLV5FU2, HD-FU and Tomudex arms, respectively, p = 0.028), leucopenia and vomiting. At least one episode of grade 3-4 toxicity was observed in 27, 25, 38 and 47% of the patients in the LV5FU2, ldLV5FU2, HD-FU and Tomudex arms, respectively (p = 0.016). An objective response was observed in 28, 21, 22 and 10% of the patients in the LV5FU2, ldLV5FU2, HD-FU and Tomudex arms, respectively (p = 0.04). Progression-free survival (PFS) of the patients in the Tomudex arm was statistically lower compared to that of patients treated with LV5FU2 or ldLV5FU2 (combined group; p = 0.013, log rank test). In conclusion, Tomudex is more toxic and yields shorter PFS than infusional 5FU. Despite the early closure of the study and the lack of power of the comparison, it seems that ldLV5FU2 could be considered as an active, easier and less expensive option for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer compared to classic LV5FU2 or weekly HD-FU.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Glufosfamide administered using a 1-hour infusion given as first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer. A phase II trial of the EORTC-new drug development group.

The activity of glufosfamide (beta-D-glucopyranosyl-N,N'-di-(2-chloroethyl)-phosphoric acid diamide) against pancreatic cancer was investigated in a multicentre, phase II clinical study. Chemotherapy-nai;ve patients with advanced or metastatic disease were treated with glufosfamide (5 g/m(2)) using a 1-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion every 3 weeks. Patients were randomised between active-hydration and normal fluids to evaluate the nephroprotective effect of forced diuresis. Patients experiencing >0.4 mg/dl (>35 micromol/l) increase in serum creatinine compared with their baseline value were taken off treatment for safety reasons. The evaluation of response was according to the Response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST). Blood sampling was performed for pharmacokinetic analyses. 35 patients from 13 institutions were registered over a 13-month period. A total of 114 treatment cycles (median 3, range 1-8) were administered to 34 patients; 18 patients were allocated to the hydration arm. Overall haematological toxicity was mild. Metabolic acidosis occurred in 2 patients treated in the active-hydration arm, grade 3 hypokalaemia was recorded in 5 patients and grade 3 hypophosphataemia in 4 patients. One patient had a grade 4 increase in serum creatinine level, concomitantly to disease progression. Active-hydration did not show a nephroprotective effect and the plasma pharmacokinetics (Pk) of glufosfamide was not significantly influenced by hydration. Two confirmed partial remissions (PR) were reported (response rate 5.9%, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.7-19.7%) and 11 cases obtained disease stabilisation (32.4%). An extra mural review panel confirmed all of the responses. Median overall survival was 5.3 months (95% CI 3.9-7.1) and time to progression (TTP) was 1.4 months (95% CI 1.3-2.7). In conclusion, glufosfamide administered using a 1-h infusion every 3 weeks has a modest activity in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Haematological toxicity is particularly mild, but regular monitoring of renal function is recommended.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2002

High-dose, single-agent irinotecan as first-line therapy in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: The efficacy and safety of single-agent, high-dose irinotecan (CPT-11, Campto) 500 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks were investigated as first-line treatment for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were enrolled into the study to receive a first cycle of therapy with irinotecan at a dose of 350 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks, which could be escalated to 500 mg/m(2) for the second and subsequent cycles depending on toxicity. Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics were determined in the intent to treat (ITT) population and the high-dose population (i.e. patients who had received at least three cycles of irinotecan, the second and third at 500 mg/m(2)). RESULTS: Of 49 patients enrolled into the study (ITT population), 31 (63%) received at least three cycles of treatment with cycles 2 and 3 at an irinotecan dose of 500 mg/m(2) (the high-dose population). The response rates (RR) for the ITT and high-dose populations were 24.5% and 35.5%, respectively. The main grade 3/4 toxicities per cycle in the ITT and high-dose populations were neutropenia 22% and 17%, febrile neutropenia 5% and 3%, and diarrhoea 12% and 7%, respectively. The pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolite SN-38 were investigated in 31 patients in cycle 1 and 22 patients in cycle 2. Irinotecan clearance and SN-38 exposure were not sufficiently correlated with toxicity in cycle 1 to identify patients for dose increase in subsequent cycles. The exposure to irinotecan and SN-38 increased in proportion to dose from 350 to 500 mg/m(2). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that high-dose irinotecan can be safely administered as first-line monotherapy to approximately two-thirds of patients who present with advanced CRC following a selective first cycle.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2001

Randomized multicenter phase II study comparing a combination of fluorouracil and folinic acid and alternating irinotecan and oxaliplatin with oxaliplatin and irinotecan in fluorouracil-pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To assess antitumor activity and safety of two regimens in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with proven fluorouracil (5-FU) resistance in a randomized phase II study: 5-FU/folinic acid (FA) combined with alternating irinotecan (also called CPT-11) and oxaliplatin (FC/FO tritherapy), and an oxaliplatin/irinotecan (OC) combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-two patients were treated: arm FC/FO (32 patients) received, every 4 weeks, FA 200 mg/m(2) followed by a 400-mg/m(2) 5-FU bolus injection, then a 600-mg/m(2) continuous infusion of 5-FU on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks administered alternately with irinotecan (180 mg/m(2) on day 1) and oxaliplatin (85 mg/m(2) on day 15). Arm OC (30 patients) received oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 200 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks. RESULTS: In an intent-to-treat analysis, two partial responses lasting 10.7 and 16 months were observed with the tritherapy regimen, and seven (median duration, 11 months; range, 10.6 to 11.4 months) were observed with the bitherapy regimen. Median progression-free and overall survival times were 8.2 and 9.8 months, respectively, in the FC/FO arm and 8.5 and 12.3 months, respectively, in the OC arm. Main grade 3/4 toxicities were, respectively, neutropenia, 53% and 47%; febrile neutropenia, 13% and 3%; diarrhea, 19% and 10%; vomiting, 6% and 13%; and neurosensory toxicity, 3% and 3%. No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: The every-3-weeks OC combination is safe and active in advanced 5-FU-resistant CRC patients. The lower activity data seen with the tritherapy regimen may be related to the lower dose intensities of irinotecan and oxaliplatin in this schedule.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

A new mutation of E-cadherin gene in familial gastric linitis plastica cancer with extra-digestive dissemination.

Over a 12-month period, we diagnosed poorly differentiated infiltrative independent-cell gastric adenocarcinoma in two brothers and one sister aged 41 to 47 years. Their father had died from antral cancer at the age of 34 years. These cancers had two characteristic clinical features: rapid course and distant malignant dissemination. In all three patients, polymerase chain reaction-sequencing of the E-cadherin (CDH1) gene of white blood cells identified a heterozygous nonsense mutation of exon 3, producing a stop codon at position 95 (Q95X), resulting in a truncated protein. The alteration of this protein, which plays a crucial role in epithelial cell adhesion, probably explains the clinical expression in this type of familial diffuse gastric cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

[Neoadjuvant treatment in surgery of esophageal cancer].

We conducted a prospective study on neoadjuvant treatment for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus, modifying the chemotherapy protocol by adding l-folinic acid and giving bifractionated radiotherapy with a cis-diaminedichloroplatinum (CDDP) injection before each fraction. Thirty-two patients, 30 men, 2 women, mean age 56.2-8.9 years, with resectable squamous celi carcinoma of the esophagus (TNM stage I = 4, IIA = 4, IIB = 13, III = 11) were included. Chemotherapy, CDDP (80 mg/m2: D2), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; 600 mg/m2, D1-4), and 1-folinic acid (200 mg/m2, DI-4), was given in two sessions with a 3-week interval during which the patients received radiotherapy (45 Gy), two fractions per day (150 cGy/fraction). A 3-mg Injection of CDDP was given prior to each fraction. Patients underwent surgery 4 to 7 weeks after neoadjuvant therapy. No severe side effects were observed in 12 patients. Grade 3 effects (WBC, platelests, mucosite's) occurred in 16 patients and grade 4 effects (platelets, mucositis) in four including 1 death due to septicemia with an infected catheter. Surgery was performed in 29 patients; 26 had resectable tumors (81%). Operative mortality was 10%. The 26 surgical specimens showed complete response (n = 18), persistent microscopic residues (n = 4), or not significant modification (n = 4). Survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 82, 47, and 47% and disease-free survival was 77, 47, and 47% respectively. This new therapeutic combination is aggressive and associated with a high postoperative mortality but has a remarkable histological effect since complete response was achieved in 56% (95% CI: 39-73%) of the patients and 5-year survival reached 47%, a very high rate in our experience.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1999

[Nonsurgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma].

Hepatocellular carcinoma is responsible in France for approximately 5,500 deaths per year. Incidence rates are growing and the general status of patients is improving mainly because of earlier diagnosis and improvement in the treatment of complications of liver cirrhosis. In most of the cases the severity of the underlying liver disease is the prominent prognostic factor. Its treatment remains a difficult challenge for oncologists. Unfortunately surgery is usually contraindicated. Most trials of systemic chemotherapy are disappointing with poor response rates and severe side effects; new drugs and direct delivery in the hepatic artery appear to be of interest. Results with interferon are interesting but requires more studies. The lack of efficacy of antiandrogenic and antiestrogenic treatments were recently demonstrated; a recent randomized study showing the interest of somatostatin requires confirmation. Reports on radiotherapy are anecdotals. A lot of studies using liver directed therapies were conducted worldwide. Percutaneous ethanol injections (PEI) are well tolerated and are highly effective in small solitary tumors (> 70% of complete necrosis) but less in larger tumors; recurrences are frequent. No randomized trial have been performed concerning PEI but survival rates seem similar to those of surgery. A randomized controlled trial recently demonstrates that injection of acetic acid is more effective than injection of ethanol. Chemoembolization was extensively studied because of the demonstration of objective responses but all trials failed to demonstrate an improvement in survival. Intraarterial injection of radioactive Lipiodol achieves the same response rate and the same survival than chemoembolization but is significantly best tolerated. This treatment is superior to best supportive cares in patients with portal vein thrombosis. In conclusion, despite the fact that this disease is very frequent we have currently too many treatment options and are lacking of simple rules. The best treatment remains prevention, and the efficacy of hepatitis B vaccination was recently demonstrated in Taiwan.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1998

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and hyperfractionated radiotherapy with concurrent low-dose chemotherapy for squamous cell esophageal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: We conducted a prospective study of neoadjuvant treatment for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus, modifying the chemotherapy protocol by adding l-folinic acid and giving bifractionated radiotherapy with a cis-diaminedichloroplatinum (CDDP) injection before each fraction. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-two patients, 30 men, 2 women, mean age 56.2+/-8.9 years, with resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (TNM stage I=4, IIA=4, IIB=13, III=11) were included. Chemotherapy, CDDP (80 mg/m2 D2), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; 600 mg/m2, D1-4), and l-folinic acid (200 mg/m2, D1-4), was given in two sessions with a 3-week interval during which the patients received radiotherapy (45 Gy), two fractions per day (150 cGy/fraction). A 3-mg injection of CDDP was given prior to each fraction. Patients underwent surgery 4 to 7 weeks after neoadjuvant therapy. RESULTS: No severe side effects were observed in 12 patients. Grade 3 effects (WBC, platelets, mucositis) occurred in 16 patients and grade 4 effects (platelets, mucositis) in four including 1 death due to septicemia with an infected catheter. Surgery was performed in 29 patients; 26 had resectable tumors (81%). Operative mortality was 10%. The 26 surgical specimens showed complete response (n=18), persistent microscopic residues (n=4), or not significant modification (n=4). Survival at 1, 2, and 3 years was 81, 61, and 51.6% and disease-free survival was 75, 59, and 54% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This new therapeutic combination is aggressive and associated with a high postoperative mortality but has a remarkable histological effect since complete response was achieved in 56% (95% CI: 39-73%) of the patients and 3-year survival reached 52%, a very high rate in our experience.

Antidotes↗
PubMed1998

Gastric bypass for malignant esophagotracheal fistula: a series of 21 cases.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with cancer of the esophagus who develop an esophagotracheal fistula die within 1 month in dramatic conditions of malnutrition and asphyxia. We assessed the beneficial palliative effect of the Kirschner operation in the treatment of esophagotracheal fistula. METHODS: Between January 1980 and August 1995, 21 patients among a continuous series of 847 with cancer of the esophagus developed an esophagotracheal fistula. Prior to surgery, 2 patients had an esophageal prosthesis followed by radio- and/or radiochemotherapy and 6 had radio- and/or chemotherapy at curative doses. The Kirschner operation was carried out in all patients with exclusion of the lower end of the esophagus using a Roux-en Y-loop (n = 19) or ligature (n = 2). RESULTS: Within 1 month of surgery, 8 patients (38%) died. Median length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospitalization was 6 days (1-30) and 17 days (3-57), respectively. Among the 13 survivors, pulmonary infections (n = 2) and cervical fistulae (n = 5) complicated the postoperative period. Among the cervical fistula, 3 of them resolved favorably. Radio- and/or chemotherapy was given postoperatively in 7 patients without any improvement in survival. Among the 13 patients surviving beyond the postoperative period, median survival was 109 days; 7 were able to resume oral nutrition and quality of life was assessed as excellent in 6 of them. CONCLUSION: The Kirschner operation can provide a beneficial palliative effect in patients with an esophagotracheal fistula despite the high risk of operative mortality. Ideally, the Kirschner should be carried out in young patients who are still in good general health, before the development of respiratory complications compromises surgery.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1998

Is chemoembolisation of value in inoperable primary hepatocellular carcinoma.

Chemoembolisation has been extensively used as primary treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this unit, 185 patients with a new diagnosis of HCC not amenable to surgery were seen between 1988 and 1991. Intended therapy for these patients was chemoembolisation with doxorubicin (60 mg/m2) and lipiodol, repeated at six week intervals until it was technically no longer possible or until complete tumour response had been obtained. Chemoembolisation was possible in 67 of the 185 (37%). Reasons for exclusion were portal vein occlusion (n = 36), decompensated cirrhosis (n = 44), distant metastases (n = 5), diffuse tumour or unsuitable anatomy (tumour or vasculature) (n = 11), patient refusal (n = 11), and other (n = 11). Patients excluded from treatment survived for a median of 10 weeks (range 3 days-19 months). In patients treated, 18 had small HCC (4 cm) and 49 had large or multifocal HCC. Chemoembolisation was carried out a median of two sessions for small and three sessions for large tumours. Ten of 18 patients with small HCC showed a 50% or greater reduction in tumour size. Five of 49 patients with large or multifocal tumours showed a response to treatment. Median overall survival for treated patients was 36 weeks (range 3 days-4 years). One patient has subsequently undergone liver transplantation with no recurrence and minimal residual disease at transplantation. Two other patients are alive three years after chemoembolisation, one with no evidence of recurrent disease. No patient was thought suitable for surgery after their response to chemoembolisation. Chemotherapy related complications were seen in 22%. Complications were significantly more common in patients with larger tumours and poor liver reserve. Five patients died as a result of chemotherapy related complications. In conclusion, only one third of UK patients with unresectable HCC are treatable by chemoembolisation. Results with small tumours are encouraging, with a high response rate and the possibility of surgical intervention in previously inoperable disease. Large tumours, however, show a poor response and significant incidence of side effects, suggesting that this treatment offers little benefit in advanced disease.

Antibiotics, Antineoplastic↗