PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J L Spudich

Publications and source records attributed to J L Spudich.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

The specificity of interaction of archaeal transducers with their cognate sensory rhodopsins is determined by their transmembrane helices.

Chimeras of the Halobacterium salinarum transducers HtrI and HtrII were constructed to study the structural determinants for their specific interaction with the phototaxis receptors sensory rhodopsins I and II (SRI and SRII), respectively. Interaction of receptors and transducers was assessed by two criteria: phototaxis responses by the cells and transducer-modulation of receptor photochemical reaction kinetics in membranes. Coexpression of HtrI with SRII or HtrII with SRI did not result in interaction by either criterion. Each receptor was coexpressed with chimeric transducers in which various domains of the two transducers were interchanged. The results show that the presence of the two transmembrane helices of HtrI in a chimera is necessary and sufficient for functional transducer complexation with SRI, i.e., for wild-type SRI photoreactions and attractant and 2-photon repellent phototaxis responses. Additionally, a previously demonstrated chaperone-like facilitation of SRI folding or stability by HtrI was shown to depend only on the two transmembrane helices of HtrI in chimeric transducers. Similarly, the two transmembrane helices of HtrII specify interaction with the repellent receptor SRII according to motility analysis and laser-flash spectroscopy. The results support a model in which the membrane domains of the receptor/transducer complexes, consisting of the seven helices of the receptor interacting with the four-helix bundle of the transducer dimer, produce SRI- and SRII-specific signals to the flagellar motor by means of interchangeable cytoplasmic domains.

Archaeal Proteins↗

Proton circulation during the photocycle of sensory rhodopsin II.

Sensory rhodopsin II (SRII) in Halobacterium salinarum membranes is a phototaxis receptor that signals through its bound transducer HtrII for avoidance of blue-green light. In the present study we investigated the proton movements during the photocycle of SRII in the HtrII-free and HtrII-complexed form. We monitored sustained light-induced pH changes with a pH electrode, and laser flash-induced pH changes with the pH indicator pyranine using sealed membrane vesicles and open sheets containing the free or the complexed receptor. The results demonstrated that SRII takes up a proton in M-to-O conversion and releases it during O-decay. The uptake and release are from and to the extracellular side, and therefore SRII does not transport the proton across the membrane. The pH dependence of the SRII photocycle indicated the presence of a protonatable group (pK(a) approximately 7.5) in the extracellular proton-conducting path, which plays a role in proton uptake by the Schiff base in the M-to-O conversion. The extracellular proton circulation produced by SRII was not blocked by HtrII complexation, unlike the cytoplasmic proton conduction in SRI that was found in the same series of measurements to be blocked by its transducer, HtrI. The implications of this finding for current models of SRI and SRII signaling are discussed.

Absorption↗

Time-resolved absorption and photothermal measurements with sensory rhodopsin I from Halobacterium salinarum.

An expansion accompanying the formation of the first intermediate in the photocycle of transducer-free sensory rhodopsin I (SRI) was determined by means of time-resolved laser-induced optoacoustic spectroscopy. For the native protein (SRI-WT), the absolute value of the expansion is approximately 5.5 mL and for the mutant SRI-D76N, approximately 1.5 mL per mol of phototransformed species (in 0.5 M NaCl), calculated by using the formation quantum yield for the first intermediate (S610) of Phi610 = 0.4 +/- 0.05 for SRI-WT and 0.5 +/- 0.05 for SRI-D76N, measured by laser-induced optoacoustic spectroscopy and by laser flash photolysis. The similarity in Phi610 and in the determined value of the energy level of S610, E610 = (142 +/- 12) kJ/mol for SRI-WT and SRI-D76N indicates that Asp76 is not directly involved in the first step of the phototransformation. The increase with pH of the magnitude of the structural volume change for the formation of S610 in SRI-WT and in SRI-D76N upon excitation with 580 nm indicates also that amino acids other than Asp76, and other than those related to the Schiff base, are involved in the process. The difference in structural volume changes as well as differences in the activation parameters for the S610 decay should be attributed to differences in the rigidity of the cavity surrounding the chromophore. Except for the decay of the first intermediate, which is faster than in the SRI-transducer complex, the rate constants of the photocycle for transducer-free SRI in detergent suspension are strongly retarded with respect to wild-type membranes (this comparison should be done with great care because the preparation of both samples is very different).

Bacteriorhodopsins↗

Identification of methylation sites and effects of phototaxis stimuli on transducer methylation in Halobacterium salinarum.

The two transducers in the phototaxis system of the archaeon Halobacterium salinarum, HtrI and HtrII, are methyl-accepting proteins homologous to the chemotaxis transducers in eubacteria. Consensus sequences predict three glutamate pairs containing potential methylation sites in HtrI and one in HtrII. Mutagenic substitution of an alanine pair for one of these, Glu265-Glu266, in HtrI and for the homologous Glu513-Glu514 in HtrII eliminated methylation of these two transducers, as demonstrated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis autofluorography. Photostimulation of the repellent receptor sensory rhodopsin II (SRII) induced reversible demethylation of HtrII, while no detectable change in the extent of methylation of HtrI was observed in response to stimulation of its cognate sensory rhodopsin, the attractant receptor SRI. Cells containing HtrI or HtrII with all consensus sites replaced by alanine still exhibited phototaxis responses and behavioral adaptation, and methanol release assays showed that methyl group turnover was still induced in response to photostimulation of SRI or SRII. By pulse-chase experiments with in vivo L-[methyl-(3)H]methionine-labeled cells, we found that repetitive photostimulation of SRI complexed with wild-type (or nonmethylatable) HtrI induced methyl group turnover in transducers other than HtrI to the same extent as in wild-type HtrI. Both attractant and repellent stimuli cause a transient increase in the turnover rate of methyl groups in wild-type H. salinarum cells. This result is unlike that obtained with Escherichia coli, in which attractant stimuli decrease and repellent stimuli increase turnover rate, and is similar to that obtained with Bacillus subtilis, which also shows turnover rate increases regardless of the nature of the stimulus. We found that a CheY deletion mutant of H. salinarum exhibited the E. coli-like asymmetric pattern, as has recently also been observed in B. subtilis. Further, we demonstrate that the CheY-dependent feedback effect does not require the stimulated transducer to be methylatable and operates globally on other transducers present in the cell.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

HtrI is a dimer whose interface is sensitive to receptor photoactivation and His-166 replacements in sensory rhodopsin I.

Single cysteine substitutions were introduced into three positions of otherwise cysteineless HtrI, a phototaxis transducer found in Halobacterium salinarum that transmits signals from the photoreceptor sensory rhodopsin I (SRI) to a cytoplasmic pathway controlling the cell's motility. Oxidative cross-linking of the monocysteine HtrI mutants in membrane suspensions resulted in dimer forms evident in SDS-polyacrylamide gels. The rate of cross-linking of I64C on the cytoplasmic side of HtrI was accelerated by SRI binding in the dark and further increased by SRI photoactivation. Several residue replacements of His-166 in SRI accelerated the cross-linking rate of I64C in the dark and His-166 mutants that exhibit "inverted signaling" (mediating repellent instead of the normally attractant response to orange light) inverted the light effect on the cross-linking rate of I64C. Secondary structure prediction of HtrI indicates a coiled coil structure in the cytoplasmic region following TM2, a dimerization domain found in a diverse group of proteins. We conclude that 1) HtrI exists as a dimer both in the absence of SRI and in the SRI-HtrI complex, 2) binding of SRI in the dark increases reactivity of the two cysteines at position 64 in the dimer by increasing their proximity or mobility, 3) light activation of wild-type SRI further increases their reactivity, 4) His-166 replacements in the SRI receptor have conformational effects on the structure of HtrI at position 64, and 5) inverted signaling by His-166 mutants likely results from an inverted conformational change at this region induced by SRI photoactivation.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

The transducer protein HtrII modulates the lifetimes of sensory rhodopsin II photointermediates.

We studied the photochemical reaction cycle of sensory rhodopsin II (SRII) by flash photolysis of Halobacterium salinarum membranes genetically engineered to contain or to lack its transducer protein HtrII. Flash photolysis data from membranes containing HtrII were fit well in the 10 micros-10 s range by three rate constants and a linear unbranched pathway from the unphotolyzed state with 487 nm absorption maximum to a species with absorption maximum near 350 nm (M) followed by a species with maximum near 520 nm (O), as has been found in previous studies of wild-type membranes. Data from membranes devoid of HtrII exhibited similar M and O intermediates but with altered kinetics, and a third intermediate absorbing maximally near 470 nm (N) was present in an equilibrium mixture with O. The modulation of SRII photoreactions by HtrII indicates that SRII and HtrII are physically associated in a molecular complex. Arrhenius analysis shows that the largest effect of HtrII, the acceleration of O decay, is attributable to a large decrease in activation enthalpy. Based on comparison of SRII photoreactions to those of sensory rhodopsin I and bacteriorhodopsin, we interpret this kinetic effect to indicate that HtrII interacts with SRII so that it alters the reaction process involving deprotonation of Asp73, the proton acceptor from the Schiff base.

Archaeal Proteins↗

Variations on a molecular switch: transport and sensory signalling by archaeal rhodopsins.

The archaeal rhodopsins are a family of seven-transmembrane-helix, visual pigment-like proteins found in Halobacterium salinarum and related halophilic Archaea. Two, bacteriorhodopsin (BR) and halorhodopsin (HR), are transport rhodopsins that carry out light-driven electrogenic translocation of protons and chloride, respectively, across the cell membrane. The other two, sensory rhodopsins I and II (SRI and SRII), are phototaxis receptors that send signals to tightly bound transducer proteins that in turn control a phosphorylation cascade modulating the cell's flagellar motors. Recent progress has cast light on how nature has modified the common design of these proteins to carry out their distinctly different functions: electrogenic ion transport and non-electrogenic signal transduction. A key shared mechanism between BR and SRII appears to be an interhelical salt bridge locked conformational switch that is released by photoisomerization of retinal. In BR disruption of the lock opens a cytoplasmic half-channel that ensures uptake of the transported proton from the cytoplasmic side of the membrane at a critical time in the pumping cycle. Transducer-free SRI uses the same mechanism to carry out light-driven proton transport, but interaction with its transducer blocks the cytoplasmic half-channel thereby interrupting the transport cycle. In SRI, transducer interaction also disrupts the salt bridge in the dark, poising the receptor in an intermediate conformation able to produce opposite signals depending on the colour of the stimulus light. A model for signalling is proposed in which the salt bridge-controlled half-channel is used to modulate interaction with the Htr proteins when the receptor signalling states are formed.

Archaea↗

Suppressor mutation analysis of the sensory rhodopsin I-transducer complex: insights into the color-sensing mechanism.

The molecular complex containing the phototaxis receptor sensory rhodopsin I (SRI) and transducer protein HtrI (halobacterial transducer for SRI) mediates color-sensitive phototaxis responses in the archaeon Halobacterium salinarum. One-photon excitation of the complex by orange light elicits attractant responses, while two-photon excitation (orange followed by near-UV light) elicits repellent responses in swimming cells. Several mutations in SRI and HtrI cause an unusual mutant phenotype, called orange-light-inverted signaling, in which the cell produces a repellent response to normally attractant light. We applied a selection procedure for intragenic and extragenic suppressors of orange-light-inverted mutants and identified 15 distinct second-site mutations that restore the attractant response. Two of the 3 suppressor mutations in SRI are positioned at the cytoplasmic ends of helices F and G, and 12 suppressor mutations in HtrI cluster at the cytoplasmic end of the second HtrI transmembrane helix (TM2). Nearly all suppressors invert the normally repellent response to two-photon stimulation to an attractant response when they are expressed with their suppressible mutant alleles or in an otherwise wild-type strain. The results lead to a model for control of flagellar reversal by the SRI-HtrI complex. The model invokes an equilibrium between the A (reversal-inhibiting) and R (reversal-stimulating) conformers of the signaling complex. Attractant light and repellent light shift the equilibrium toward the A and R conformers, respectively, and mutations are proposed to cause intrinsic shifts in the equilibrium in the dark form of the complex. Differences in the strength of the two-photon signal inversion and in the allele specificity of suppression are correlated, and this correlation can be explained in terms of different values of the equilibrium constant (Keq) for the conformational transition in different mutants and mutant-suppressor pairs.

Archaeal Proteins↗

Constitutive signaling by the phototaxis receptor sensory rhodopsin II from disruption of its protonated Schiff base-Asp-73 interhelical salt bridge.

Sensory rhodopsin II (SRII) is a repellent phototaxis receptor in the archaeon Halobacterium salinarum, similar to visual pigments in its seven-helix structure and linkage of retinal to the protein by a protonated Schiff base in helix G. Asp-73 in helix C is shown by spectroscopic analysis to be a counterion to the protonated Schiff base in the unphotolyzed SRII and to be the proton acceptor from the Schiff base during photoconversion to the receptor signaling state. Coexpression of the genes encoding mutated SRII with Asn substituted for Asp-73 (D73N) and the SRII transducer HtrII in H. salinarum cells results in a 3-fold higher swimming reversal frequency accompanied by demethylation of HtrII in the dark, showing that D73N SRII produces repellent signals in its unphotostimulated state. Analogous constitutive signaling has been shown to be produced by the similar neutral residue substitution of the Schiff base counterion and proton acceptor Glu-113 in human rod rhodopsin. The interpretation for both seven-helix receptors is that light activation of the wild-type protein is caused primarily by photoisomerization-induced transfer of the Schiff base proton on helix G to its primary carboxylate counterion on helix C. Therefore receptor activation by helix C-G salt-bridge disruption in the photoactive site is a general mechanism in retinylidene proteins spanning the vast evolutionary distance between archaea and humans.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

His166 is critical for active-site proton transfer and phototaxis signaling by sensory rhodopsin I.

Photoinduced deprotonation of the retinylidene Schiff base in the sensory rhodopsin I transducer (SRI-Htrl) complex results in formation of the phototaxis signaling state S373. Here we report identification of a residue, His166, critical to this process, as well as to reprotonation of the Schiff base during the recovery phase of the SRI photocycle. Each of the residue substitutions A, D, G, L, S, V, or Y at position 166 reduces the flash yield of S373, to values ranging from 2% of wild type for H166Y to 23% for H166V. The yield of S373 is restored to wild-type levels in Htrl-free H166L by alkaline deprotonation of Asp76, a Schiff base proton acceptor normally not ionized in the SRI-Htrl complex, showing that proton transfer from the Schiff base in H166L occurs when an acceptor is made available. The flash yield and rate of decay of S373 of the mutants are pH dependent, even when complexed with Htrl, which confers pH insensitivity to wild-type SRI, suggesting that partial disruption of the complex has occurred. The rates of S373 reprotonation at neutral pH are also prolonged in all H166X mutants, with half-times from 5 s to 160 s (wild type, 1 s). All mutations of His166 tested disrupt phototaxis signaling. No response (H166D, H166L), dramatically reduced responses (H166V), or inverted responses to orange light (H166A, H166G, H166S, and H166Y) or to both orange and near-UV light (H166Y) are observed. Our conclusions are that His166 1) plays a role in the pathways of proton transfer both to and from the Schiff base in the SRI-Htrl complex, either as a structurally important residue or possibly as a participant in proton transfers; 2) is involved in the modulation of SRI photoreaction kinetics by Htrl; and 3) is important in phototaxis signaling. Consistent with the involvement of the His imidazole moiety, the addition of 10 mM imidazole to membrane suspensions containing H166A receptors accelerates S373 decay 10-fold at neutral pH, and a negligible effect is seen on wild-type SRI.

Bacteriorhodopsins↗

Effects of substitutions D73E, D73N, D103N and V106M on signaling and pH titration of sensory rhodopsin II.

Several mutations in the repellent phototaxis receptor sensory rhodopsin II (SRII), in residues homologous to residues important in the related proton pump bacteriorhodopsin, were expressed in Pho81Wr-, a Halobacterium salinarum strain deficient in production of SRII and its transducer protein HtrII. The lack of production of SRII and HtrII is shown to be due to insertion of an ISH2 transposon into the promoter region upstream of the htrII-sopII gene pair. Near wild-type phototaxis responses are rescued in Pho81Wr- by expression of HtrII with D73E, D103N or V106M receptors. Partial responses are restored by the HtrII-D73N pair. From absorption spectroscopy of his-tag-purified receptor protein from mutants D73N and D73E we conclude that Asp73 is the primary counterion to the protonated Schiff base in SRII, like the corresponding Asp85 in bacteriorhodopsin. The absorption maximum of SRII (487 nm) is shifted to 514 nm in mutant D73N, a 1080 cm-1 shift identical to that caused by D85N in bacteriorhodopsin. Acid titration of SRII also induces the red shift with a pK of 3.0 in wild type. The absorption shift and the pK are nearly the same in V106M and D103N, but the pK is raised to 5.1 in D73E, confirming that Asp73 is the residue responsible for this spectral transition.

Archaeal Proteins↗

Molecular mechanism of photosignaling by archaeal sensory rhodopsins.

Two sensory rhodopsins (SRI and SRII) mediate color-sensitive phototaxis responses in halobacteria. These seven-helix receptor proteins, structurally and functionally similar to animal visual pigments, couple retinal photoisomerization to receptor activation and are complexed with membrane-embedded transducer proteins (HtrI and HtrII) that modulate a cytoplasmic phosphorylation cascade controlling the flagellar motor. The Htr proteins resemble the chemotaxis transducers from Escherichia coli. The SR-Htr signaling complexes allow studies of the biophysical chemistry of signal generation and relay, from the photobiophysics of initial excitation of the receptors to the final output at the level of the flagellar motor switch, revealing fundamental principles of sensory transduction and more broadly the nature of dynamic interactions between membrane proteins. We review here recent advances that have led to new insights into the molecular mechanism of signaling by these membrane complexes.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Protonatable residues at the cytoplasmic end of transmembrane helix-2 in the signal transducer HtrI control photochemistry and function of sensory rhodopsin I.

Neutral residue replacements were made of 21 acidic and basic residues within the N-terminal half of the Halobacterium salinarium signal transducer HtrI [the halobacterial transducer for sensory rhodopsin I (SRI)] by site-specific mutagenesis. The replacements are all within the region of HtrI that we previously concluded from deletion analysis to contain sites of interaction with the phototaxis receptor SRI. Immunoblotting shows plasmid expression of the htrI-sopI operon containing the mutations produces SRI and mutant HtrI in cells at near wild-type levels. Six of the HtrI mutations perturb photochemical kinetics of SRI and one reverses the phototaxis response. Substitution with neutral amino acids of Asp-86, Glu-87, and Glu-108 accelerate, and of Arg-70, Arg-84, and Arg-99 retard, the SRI photocycle. Opposite effects on photocycle rate cancel in double mutants containing one replaced acidic and one replaced basic residue. Laser flash spectroscopy shows the kinetic perturbations are due to alteration of the rate of reprotonation of the retinylidene Schiff base. All of these mutations permit normal attractant and repellent signaling. On the other hand, the substitution of Glu-56 with the isosteric glutamine converts the normally attractant effect of orange light to a repellent signal in vivo at neutral pH (inverted signaling). Low pH corrects the inversion due to Glu-56 -> Gln and the apparent pK of the inversion is increased when arginine is substituted at position 56. The results indicate that the cytoplasmic end of transmembrane helix-2 and the initial part of the cytoplasmic domain contain interaction sites with SRI. To explain these and previous results, we propose a model in which (i) the HtrI region identified here forms part of an electrostatic bonding network that extends through the SRI protein and includes its photoactive site; (ii) alteration of this network by photoisomerization-induced Schiff base deprotonation and reprotonation shifts HtrI between attractant and repellent conformations; and (iii) HtrI mutations and extracellular pH alter the equilibrium ratios of these conformations.

Archaeal Proteins↗

Asp76 is the Schiff base counterion and proton acceptor in the proton-translocating form of sensory rhodopsin I.

Both sensory rhodopsin I, a phototaxis receptor, and bacteriorhodopsin, a light-driven proton pump, have homologous residues which have been identified as critical for bacteriorhodopsin functioning. This includes Asp76, which in the case of bacteriorhodopsin (Asp85) functions as both the Schiff base counterion and the proton acceptor. Sensory rhodopsin I exists in a pH dependent equilibrium between two different forms in the absence of its transducer protein HtrI. At pH below 7, it exists primarily in a blue form (lambda max = 587 nm) which functions as a phototaxis signal transducer when complexed to HtrI, while at higher pH, it converts to a purple proton-transporting form similar to bacteriorhodopsin (lambda max = 550 nm). We report ATR-FTIR difference spectra obtained from both low- and high-pH forms of purified sensory rhodopsin I reconstituted into lipid vesicles. The low-pH species has an ethylenic C = C stretch mode at 1520 cm-1 which shifts to 1526 cm-1 in the high-pH form. No frequency shift was found for the mutant D76N, in agreement with visible absorption measurements. Weak negative/positive bands at 1763/1751 cm-1 previously assigned to a perturbation of the C = O stretch mode of Asp76 during S373 formation in the low-pH form are replaced by a single intense positive band near 1749 cm-1 in the high-pH form. These results along with the effects of H/D exchange show that Asp76 is protonated in the signal-transducing form of sensory rhodopsin I and is ionized and functions as the counterion and Schiff base proton acceptor in the proton-transporting high-pH form of sensory rhodopsin I similar to bacteriorhodopsin.

Aspartic Acid↗

Shuttling between two protein conformations: the common mechanism for sensory transduction and ion transport.

It has recently become known that light-dependent interconversions between two protein conformations underlie both ion transport in bacteriorhodopsin and halorhodopsin and phototaxis signaling by the sensory rhodopsins of halobacteria. In the transport proteins, the two conformations facilitate alternating access of an occluded ion-binding site to the two surfaces of the membrane, and in the sensory receptors the conformations modulate signal-transducer activity. In sensory rhodopsin I, the same conformational equilibrium is implicated in providing both sensory signaling when bound to its transducer and proton transport when free.

Bacteriorhodopsins↗

Deletion mapping of the sites on the HtrI transducer for sensory rhodopsin I interaction.

The phototaxis receptor sensory rhodopsin I (SRI) transmits signals through a membrane-bound transducer protein, HtrI. The genes for the receptor and transducer, sopI and htrI, respectively, are normally cotranscribed; however, previous work has established that fully functional interacting proteins are produced when htrI is expressed from the chromosome and sopI is expressed from a different promoter on a plasmid. In this report we show that in the membrane, concentrations of SRI from plasmid expression of wild-type sopI are negligible in the absence of HtrI protein in the cell. This requirement for HtrI is eliminated when sopI is extended at the 5'-end with 63 nucleotides of the bop gene, which encodes the N-terminal signal sequence of the bacteriorhodopsin protein. The signal is cleaved from the chimeric protein, and processed SRI is stable in the HtrI-free membrane. These results suggest a chaperone-like function for HtrI that facilitates membrane insertion or proper folding of the SRI protein. Six deletion constructs of HtrI were examined to localize the interaction sites for its putative chaperone function and for HtrI control of the SRI photocycle, a phenomenon described previously. The smallest HtrI fragment identified, which contained interaction sites for both SRI stability and photocycle control, consisted of the N-terminal 147 residues of the 536-residue HtrI protein. The active fragment is predicted to contain two transmembrane helices and the first approximately 20% of the cytoplasmic portion of the protein.

Archaeal Proteins↗

Spectral tuning in bacteriorhodopsin in the absence of counterion and coplanarization effects.

The basis for wavelength regulation in bacteriorhodopsin (BR) and retinylidene proteins in general has been studied for decades but is still only partially understood. Here we report the preparation and spectroscopic characterization of BR analogs aimed at investigating the existence of spectral tuning mechanisms other than the two widely accepted mechanisms, weakened counterion interactions and ring/chain coplanarization. We synthesized two novel retinal analogs containing a saturated 13-14 bond, which interrupts the interaction of the protein counterions with the chromophore conjugation system. Furthermore, one of the analogs has a planar polyene system so that the contribution to the red shift of BR by retinal ring/chain coplanarization is also absent. We incorporated these analogs into bacterioopsin and discovered a sizable amount of red shift, which can be accounted for by interactions between the polar or polarizable groups of the protein and the retinal polyene chain. Our results suggest that the wavelength regulation in BR is achieved by synergistic chromophore/protein interactions including ring/chain coplanarization, excited state stabilization by polar or polarizable protein side chains located along the polyene chain, and weakened counterion interactions near the Schiff base positive charge.

Bacteriorhodopsins↗

Chemotactic signal integration in bacteria.

Chemotactic signaling in Escherichia coli involves transmission of both negative and positive signals. In order to examine mechanisms of signal processing, behavioral responses to dual inputs have been measured by using photoactivable "caged" compounds, computer video analysis, and chemoreceptor deletion mutants. Signaling from Tar and Tsr, two receptors that sense amino acids and pH, was studied. In a Tar deletion mutant the photoactivated release of protons, a Tsr repellent, and of serine, a Tsr attractant, in separate experiments at pH 7.0 resulted in tumbling (negative) or smooth-swimming (positive) responses in ca. 50 and 140 ms, respectively. Simultaneous photorelease of protons and serine resulted in a single tumbling or smooth-swimming response, depending on the relative amounts of the two effectors. In contrast, in wild-type E. coli, proton release at pH 7.0 resulted in a biphasic response that was attributed to Tsr-mediated tumbling followed by Tar-mediated smooth-swimming. In wild-type E. coli at more alkaline pH values the Tar-mediated signal was stronger than the Tsr signal, resulting in a strong smooth-swimming response preceded by a diminished tumbling response. These observations imply that (i) a single receptor time-averages the binding of different chemotactic ligands generating a single response; (ii) ligand binding to different receptors can result in a nonintegrated response with the tumbling response preceding the smooth-swimming response; (iii) however, chemotactic signals of different intensities derived from different receptors can also result in an apparently integrated response; and (iv) the different chemotactic responses to protons at neutral and alkaline pH may contribute to E. coli migration toward neutrality.

Bacterial Proteins↗