PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Leeson-Dietrich

Publications and source records attributed to J Leeson-Dietrich.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Bioprosthetic valve tissue viscoelasticity: implications on accelerated pulse duplicator testing.

Most of our knowledge of heart valve mechanics has been gained from low strain-rate studies much lower than physiologic levels. Using a high-speed materials testing system, we compared the low and high strain-rate viscoelastic behavior of porcine aortic valve cusps at extension rates of up to 40 mm/s. Circumferential and radial strips were stretched and then held in their stretched configuration to measure their "stress-relaxation" behavior. During low strain-rate stretching, only 6% of the initial stress dissipated or relaxed after 1 second, whereas 25% of the stress dissipated during high strain-rate stretching. This considerable difference in stress relaxation suggests a rate-dependent viscoelastic behavior that has not been accounted for in valve design and may have important implications for accelerated pulse testing. Even though the valve cusp is loaded for only 0.4 seconds during each heartbeat, at least 15% of the stress may relax over that period. During accelerated pulse testing, however, sufficient time may not be available to allow the tissue fibers to relax back to their natural state before the subsequent loading cycle, leading to a higher baseline preload. In addition, because valve tissue is not given sufficient time to relax before the next cycle, pulse testing subjects the valves to lower-magnitude cyclic stresses than does physiologic loading. Because both the baseline preload and the magnitude of cyclic stresses may lead to early fatigue failure, accelerated wear testing may either overestimate or underestimate valve durability. Clearly, the mechanism of stress-induced failure of biologic tissues must be elucidated before too much validity is placed on pulse duplicator studies.

Animals↗

Porcine pulmonary and aortic valves: a comparison of their tensile viscoelastic properties at physiological strain rates.

Pulmonary valve autografts and allografts have been recently reported as being clinically effective for the replacement of the diseased aortic valve. While the biomechanics of the aortic valve have been widely studied, there is little information available about the mechanical properties of the pulmonary valve. We felt that it was necessary to investigate the mechanical properties of the pulmonary valve to determine if it is mechanically suitable as a long term replacement for the aortic valve. We employed physiological strain rate tensile testing to investigate the stress-strain and stress relaxation behaviour of 44 aortic and 40 pulmonary valve cusp strips cut in the radial and circumferential directions, in fresh and glutaraldehyde fixed states. Stress-strain and stress relaxation tests were performed on each test strip at extension rates of 40 mm/s, 4 mm/s and 0.4 mm/s. In all but one mechanical parameter, we found no difference between aortic and pulmonary valve tissues. The extensibilities and relaxation rates were similar, but the aortic valve tissue had a greater average modulus (p = 0.0005) than the pulmonary valve tissue (i.e. 7.41 MPa vs. 5.86 MPa respectively). Since bioprostheses are often constructed from materials with mechanical properties very different from those of the aortic valve, like pericardium, the slight difference between aortic and pulmonary valves is unlikely to affect the operation of the pulmonary valve in the aortic position. The pulmonary valve could therefore be considered mechanically acceptable as a replacement for the aortic valve.

Animals↗