PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Lepore

Publications and source records attributed to J Lepore.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Comparison of time spent writing orders on paper with computerized physician order entry.

Computerized physician order entry (CPOE) has been shown to improve quality, and to reduce resource utilization, but most available data suggest that it takes longer to enter orders using CPOE. We had previously implemented a CPOE system, and elected to evaluate its impact on physician time in the new setting. To do this, we performed a prospective study using random reminder methodology. Key findings were that interns spent 9.0% of their time ordering with CPOE, compared to 2.1% before, although CPOE saved them an additional 2% of time, so that the net difference was 5% of their total time. However, this is counterbalanced by decreased time for other personnel such as nursing and pharmacy, and by the quality and efficiency changes. We conclude that while CPOE has many benefits, it represents a major process change, and organizations must factor this in when they implement it.

Hospital Information Systems↗
PubMed1996

An exploratory study of frequent pain measurement in a cancer clinical trial.

The ideal methodology for quality of life (QOL) measurement in cancer clinical trials matches the evaluation to the anticipated outcomes, thereby increasing the likelihood that clinically relevant changes are captured. The present study explored the importance of such methodological 'tailoring' in a phase II trial of paclitaxel and recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) for metastatic breast cancer. Prior to the trial, clinical observation suggested that frequent short-lived episodes of pain might occur during this treatment regimen. Twenty-one patients provided longitudinal data for at least three cycles of chemotherapy. To assess transient pain, a routine QOL assessment at baseline and every third cycle was supplemented with pain measurements twice weekly. The interval assessment included a multidimensional QOL instrument (Functional Living Index-Cancer) and measures of psychological state (Rand Mental Health Inventory), symptom distress (Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale), and performance status (Karnofsky Performance Status Score). The frequent pain measurements were acquired using visual analogue and categorical scales for pain intensity (Memorial Pain Assessment Card). From baseline to the end of cycle three, global pain scores declined and the results on other QOL measures were variable. The data obtained using these measures did not reveal the existence of episodic pains. In contrast, the twice weekly pain measurements clearly demonstrated transient severe pains in approximately half the patients. These data highlight the importance of specific measurement of troubling symptoms or other relevant QOL concerns at clinically appropriate intervals during the routine QOL assessment of clinical trials. The additional burden involved in these assessments is warranted if the information derived is highly relevant, would not be adequately captured otherwise and could improve therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Quality of life in phase II trials: a study of methodology and predictive value in patients with advanced breast cancer treated with paclitaxel plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

BACKGROUND: Despite the clinical benefit that may be associated with reduction of tumor volume, chemotherapy may produce physical or psychological distress that could compromise a patient's quality of life. Although palliation may be as relevant as tumor response in patients with metastatic breast cancer, quality of life is not commonly evaluated in phase II clinical trials of new therapeutic agents. PURPOSE: We evaluated the utility of quality-of-life assessment in two phase II clinical trials of patients receiving paclitaxel (Taxol) and recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) as salvage therapy for metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: A battery of instruments (i.e., Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale [MSAS], Functional Living Index-Cancer [FLIC], Rand Mental Health Inventory [MHI], Brief Pain Inventory [BPI], and Memorial Pain Assessment Card [MPAC]) designed to capture information about social, psychological, and functional aspects of quality of life, as well as symptom prevalence and distress, was completed prior to treatment; serial assessments were obtained at regular intervals during the treatment period. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed evaluating base-line quality-of-life parameters and standard prognostic factors in relation to outcome measures of survival, tumor response, and toxicity. For 30 consecutive patients with extensive prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease, longitudinal data were analyzed associating tumor response to changes in quality-of-life scores throughout the course of treatment with paclitaxel. RESULTS: Base-line scores of two validated quality-of-life instruments, the MSAS and the FLIC, independently predicted the overall survival (P < .01 for each). In this model, however, neither standard prognostic factors nor quality of life instruments predicted the likelihood of tumor response or the probability of encountering grade 3 or grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity. With serial assessments of quality of life, the majority of patients who achieved partial tumor response or stable disease reported improved or unchanged quality-of-life scores, while those patients with progressive disease experienced rapid deterioration in quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Base-line quality-of-life assessment may provide prognostic information distinct from that obtained through standard prognostic indicators alone. The combination of two factors--extent of disease and a base-line quality-of-life assessment--predicted survival more accurately than either used separately. Evaluation of quality-of-life outcomes in relation to tumor response may illuminate previously unmeasured palliative effects of chemotherapy, such as pain relief, as well as the burdens it imposes. IMPLICATIONS: Information obtained from quality-of-life assessment in conjunction with phase II testing of new chemotherapeutic agents for metastatic breast cancer can guide quality-of-life evaluation planned in large, randomized future studies.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Phase II trial of paclitaxel by 3-hour infusion as initial and salvage chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel administered by 3-hour infusion as initial and salvage chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-nine patients with metastatic breast cancer received paclitaxel via 3-hour intravenous infusion after standard premedication. Prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was not used, and chemotherapy was cycled every 3 weeks. For 25 patients who received paclitaxel as initial therapy (group I), the starting dose was 250 mg/m2. Twenty-four patients who had received two or more prior regimens, including an anthracycline (group II), started at 175 mg/m2. Paclitaxel pharmacokinetics were evaluated in 23 patients in group I. RESULTS: Grade 3 and 4 toxicities included (groups I/II) neutropenia (36%/33%), thrombocytopenia (0%/8%), anemia (0%/13%), neuropathy (8%/0%), arthralgia/myalgia (16%/4%), and mucositis (4%/4%). No significant hypersensitivity-type reactions or cardiac arrhythmias were seen. Six patients who received paclitaxel at > or = 250 mg/m2 experienced transient photopsia, without apparent chronic neuro-ophthalmologic sequelae. The mean peak plasma paclitaxel concentration was 5.87 mumol/L (range, 1.99 to 7.89) for these patients, and 6.08 mumol/L (range, 0.81 to 13.81) for 17 of 19 patients who did not experience visual symptoms. In 25 assessable patients in group I at a median follow-up time of 12 months, one complete response (CR) and seven partial responses (PRs) have been observed, for a total response rate of 32% (95% confidence interval [CI], 15% to 53%). In group II, five PRs were noted in 24 assessable patients (20.8%; 95% CI, 7% to 42%). Median response durations were 7 months for group I and 4 months for group II. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel via 3-hour infusion, without prophylactic G-CSF, is active and safe as initial and subsequent therapy for metastatic breast cancer. The transient visual symptoms noted at higher doses seem unrelated to peak plasma paclitaxel concentration. Further studies that compare 3- and 24 hour (or other) infusion schedules are necessary to determine the optimal administration of paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed1988

Factors affecting the ion-pair chromatography of water-soluble vitamins.

Factors controlling the separation of seven water-soluble vitamins on reversed-phase columns were systematically evaluated. Factors studied include both mobile phase constituents and column parameters. Data showed that a mobile phase containing hexanesulfonate (5 mM), methanol (15%), acetic acid (1%), and triethylamine (0.10-0.13%) yielded excellent separations with several C8 and C18 columns. Lowering the methanol concentration in the mobile phase enhanced the resolution of early eluting peaks, while the triethylamine level controlled the peak shape and retention of thiamine. The analytical precision, robustness, and sensitivity of the developed liquid chromatographic (LC) separation were evaluated. The stability of the LC separation was found to be satisfactory for over a 4-month period.

Acetates↗