PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Loughrey

Publications and source records attributed to J Loughrey.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Autoimmune progesterone dermatitis in a parturient for emergency caesarean section.

A parturient with a 14-year history of autoimmune progesterone dermatitis presented in labour at 36 weeks' gestation. She had suffered recurrent episodes of angioedema over a long period and had been scheduled for elective caesarean hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy at 37 weeks' gestation. In most cases surgical oophorectomy provides prolonged relief from the recurrent angioedema and dermatological manifestations that are typical of autoimmune progesterone dermatitis. Spinal anaesthesia was chosen in order to avoid airway manipulation, a factor frequently implicated in the development of angioedema. Delivery was uneventful and the obstetricians proceeded to hysterectomy and oophorectomy. Forty minutes after delivery the patient experienced an attack of angioedema, she was markedly hypotensive and was given fluids, ephedrine and phenylephrine with good effect. As she remained normotensive, she was given intramuscular rather than intravenous epinephrine to provide a slower release. She recovered well and stabilised without the need for intubation or ventilation. This case reinforces the rationale for regional anaesthesia in these patients and demonstrates how intramuscular epinephrine contributed towards a positive outcome.

Adult↗

Medical decision making and the Human Rights Act 1998.

At present in the UK, when there is conflict of opinion between relatives and health care professionals regarding the treatment of incompetent patients, the courts generally support the latter over the former. This article examines the potential impact of the Human Rights Act 1998, which incorporates the European Convention on Human Rights into UK law, on this position. The possibility of challenges by relatives to disputed decisions on the grounds of Articles 2,3,8 and 14 is examined in the light of relevant Convention jurisprudence. It concludes that the Act will not necessarily result in relatives' views taking priority over doctors', given that the domestic test of the patient's best interests may not infringe the Convention. However, more account will have to be taken of relatives' views given the requirement for the courts to adopt a rights based analysis and to take a more pro-active role in scrutinising medical decision making.

England↗