Biomedical subjects

J M Fujimoto

Publications and source records attributed to J M Fujimoto.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed1994

[D-Pen2-D-Pen5]enkephalin, a delta opioid agonist, given intracerebroventricularly in the mouse produces antinociception through medication of spinal GABA receptors.

Intracerebroventricular (ICV) administration of [D-Pen2-D-Pen5]enkephalin (DPDPE), a delta opioid receptor agonist, activates a descending antinociceptive pathway that inhibits the tail-flick response in mice. Involvement of spinal GABA receptors in this response was studied by giving GABA antagonist intrathecally. First, antinociception produced by intrathecally administered isoguvacine, a GABAA agonist, was inhibited by intrathecal bicuculline (GABA receptor antagonist) or picrotoxin (chloride channel antagonist). Then, antinociception induced by ICV DPDPE was antagonized by intrathecal picrotoxin and bicuculline in a dose-and time-dependent manner. Second, intrathecal administration of 2-hydroxysaclofen, a GABAB antagonist (which inhibited antinociception induced by a GABAB agonist, baclofen, given IT), produced a shift of the dose-response curve for ICV DPDPE to the right. GABAA agonist, baclofen, given IT), produced a shift of the dose-response curve for ICV DPDPE to the right. GABAA and B antagonists given together intrathecally produced a greater than additive antagonistic effect against ICV DPDPE-induced antinociception. Thus, the delta agonist action of DPDPE in the brain leads to activation of descending spinal pathways which involve mediation by spinal GABAA and GABAB receptors in the antinociceptive response.

Analgesics↗

PubMed1994

Elimination of the antianalgesic action of dynorphin A by spinal transsection in barbital-anesthetized mice.

Previous studies in mice demonstrate that, when dynorphin A (1-17) (Dyn A) is administered intrathecally (i.t.) or released spinally (by administration of clonidine or midazolam i.c.v.), i.t. morphine-induced analgesia was reduced. The present aim was to determine whether this antianalgesic action of Dyn A was the result of a spinal or supraspinal site of action by performing studies in spinally transsected mice. The approach was to use anesthetized, acute spinally transsected mice rather than chronic spinally transsected animals to avoid the need for long-term special animal care. The first part of the study evaluated four nonvolatile general anesthetic agents in an attempt to obtain one that did not affect the antianalgesic action of Dyn A, the release of Dyn A, the analgesic action of i.t. morphine (inhibition of the tail-flick response) or the tail-flick latency by itself. alpha-Chloralose (120 mg/kg), urethane (1 g/kg) and pentobarbital (20 or 40 mg/kg) given i.p. did not meet one or more of these requirements. Barbital 400 mg/kg i.p. met the requirements. In the second part of the study, barbital combined with halothane anesthesia was used to perform acute spinal transsection experiments. As in sham controls, the analgesic action of i.t. morphine was undiminished in spinally transsected animals, which indicated that the inhibition of the tail-flick response produced by i.t. morphine was on a spinal reflex response. On the other hand, spinal transsection produced a loss of the action of i.t. Dyn A to antagonize i.t. morphine-induced analgesia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Analgesia↗

PubMed1994

The heroin metabolite, 6-monoacetylmorphine, activates delta opioid receptors to produce antinociception in Swiss-Webster mice.

Heroin activates delta receptors, whereas morphine activates mu receptors, in the brain of Swiss-Webster mice, to produce antinociception. The present study determined the type of opioid receptor activated by 6-monoacetylmorphine (MAM), a metabolite of heroin. Intracerebroventricular MAM-induced inhibition of the tail-flick response was reduced by coadministration of naltrindole (a delta opioid receptor antagonist), suggesting that i.c.v. MAM, like i.c.v. heroin, acted on delta receptors. This delta receptor-mediated response was not affected by intrathecal (i.t.) administration of yohimbine and methysergide. Thus, the descending noradrenergic and serotonergic neuronal pathways, which are activated by i.c.v. morphine, were not involved in MAM antinociception. In the spinal cord, coadministration of naltrindole with MAM, i.t., decreased antinociception suggesting that MAM acted on spinal delta receptors. This finding is in contrast to i.t. heroin which acts on mu receptors in the spinal cord. These receptor selectivities were also demonstrated for systemically administered MAM and heroin. Thus, i.c.v. naltrindole inhibited both MAM- and heroin-induced antinociception, but i.t. naltrindole only inhibited the MAM response. The following results in ICR mice contrast with those above. Antinociception induced by i.c.v. MAM was decreased by coadministration of naloxone, but not naltrindole, suggesting that MAM, like morphine and heroin, acted on supraspinal mu receptors. Also, this MAM response was inhibited by i.t. administration of methysergide which is consistent with supraspinal mu receptor activation. Furthermore, i.t. MAM acted on spinal mu receptors because i.t. administration of naloxone, but not naltrindole, produced inhibition. In conclusion, the ability to ascribe delta receptor selectivity to the action of heroin and MAM in Swiss-Webster mice served to reinforce the concept that heroin and MAM act primarily on their own and not through formation of morphine. Further elucidation of the difference in heroin and MAM receptor selectivities between Swiss-Webster and ICR mice might contribute to a better understanding of opioid receptor mechanisms.

Analgesics↗

PubMed1993

Opioid antagonists: indirect antagonism of morphine analgesia by spinal dynorphin A.

Naloxone and norbinaltorphimine when given ICV to mice can antagonize IT morphine-induced analgesia indirectly by releasing spinal dynorphin A(1-17) (Dyn A). Dyn A produces an antianalgesic action against IT morphine. In the present study, drugs with varying amounts of opioid antagonist to agonist action (nalbuphine, levallorphan, naltrexone, and naltrindole) were given ICV to determine whether they antagonized IT morphine-induced inhibition of the tail-flick response as an indication of spinal Dyn A release. Additional pharmacological tests were used as criteria for Dyn A release: a) Small doses of the opioid antagonists naloxone and norbinaltorphimine administered IT inhibited the antagonistic action; b) dynorphin antiserum given IT blocked the action of Dyn A; c) desensitization to the effect of Dyn A was produced by 3-h pretreatment with morphine, 10 mg/kg SC, or by pretreatment with the agents themselves. When given ICV, nalbuphine, levallorphan, and naltrexone released Dyn A in the spinal cord to produce an antianalgesic effect. Naltrindole, a delta-receptor antagonist, did not release Dyn A. Dyn A release did not appear to involve delta-receptors. Thus, a number of opioid antagonists inhibit the analgesic action of opioid agonists indirectly through Dyn A release.

Analgesia↗

PubMed1993

Dynorphin A(1-17) mediates midazolam antagonism of morphine antinociception in mice.

Studies have shown that midazolam acts in the brain to antagonize the antinociception produced by morphine. The purpose of this study was to determine if spinal dynorphin A(1-17) (Dyn) was involved in the antagonistic effects of midazolam. A number of drugs when administered intracerebroventricularly (ICV) to mice release Dyn in the spinal cord to antagonize morphine-induced antinociception. In the present study using the mouse tail-flick test, midazolam administered ICV produced a dose related reduction of the antinociception induced by morphine given intrathecally (IT). The antagonistic action of midazolam against morphine-induced antinociception involved the release of Dyn in the spinal cord, as evidenced by the following results. 1) Administration of naloxone, nor-binaltorphimine and dynorphin antiserum, IT, eliminated the antagonistic effect of midazolam, given ICV, against morphine. Treatment with these opioid antagonists and dynorphin antiserum is known to inhibit the action of spinally released Dyn. 2) Production of desensitization to the effect of spinal Dyn by pretreating with morphine, 10 mg/kg subcutaneously 3 h before the tail-flick test, abolished the antagonistic action of midazolam given ICV. A 3-h pretreatment with midazolam, ICV, also produced desensitization to the antianalgesic action of Dyn given IT. 3) Elimination of the Dyn component of action of midazolam by administration of naloxone, nor-binaltorphimine and dynorphin antiserum, IT, uncovered slight antinociceptive activity of midazolam, given ICV. Coadministration of flumazenil (a benzodiazepine antagonist), bicuculline (a GABA antagonist) and picrotoxin (a chloride ion channel blocker) inhibited the midazolam effect.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Analgesics↗

PubMed1993

Inhibition of the antianalgesic action of dynorphin A in mice by cholera toxin.

Dynorphin A-(1-17) (Dyn A) administered intrathecally (IT) or released spinally in the mouse produces an antianalgesic action. The present experiments indicate that IT administration of cholera toxin inhibited the antianalgesic action of Dyn A. When clonidine was administered intracerebroventricularly (ICV) to release spinal Dyn A, IT cholera toxin inhibited the antianalgesic action of Dyn A so that the analgesic component of action of clonidine became evident. Dyn A given IT inhibited the analgesic action of morphine given ICV. Cholera toxin given IT eliminated the antagonistic action of Dyn A. These results, in addition to others, indicate that IT cholera toxin antagonized the action of Dyn A. When the antianalgesic action of Dyn A was attenuated by pretreatment with dynorphin antiserum or by pretreatment that produced desensitization to Dyn A, cholera toxin had no effect. These results suggested that the antianalgesic action of Dyn A is mediated by activation of opioid receptors that are positively coupled to adenylate cyclase through a Gs regulatory protein.

Analgesics↗

PubMed1993

Inhibiting a spinal dynorphin A component enhances intrathecal morphine antinociception in mice.

Morphine given intracerebroventricularly releases spinal dynorphin A (Dyn) in mice. The present study was undertaken to determine whether morphine given intrathecally (IT) released Dyn. We demonstrated that the antinociceptive action of morphine was enhanced by procedures that are known to attenuate Dyn action. First, coadministration of the opiate antagonists, naloxone (5 fg), norbinaltorphimine (5 fg) or beta-funaltrexamine (0.25 ng) with IT morphine (0.15 microgram, 5 min) increased antinociceptive percentage maximum possible effect (%MPE) from 30% to 65%. Second, dynorphin antiserum (5 micrograms, 1 h, IT), which neutralizes Dyn action, enhanced morphine (0.2 microgram, 5 min, IT) action; MPE of 27% was increased to 60%. Third, production of desensitization to the antagonistic action of Dyn, IT, by pretreatment with morphine [10 mg/kg, 3 h, subcutaneously (SC)], or 2 micrograms, 3 h, IT) or Dyn (1 ng, 1 h, IT) increased the 30% MPE of IT morphine to 60%. Naloxone [1 ng/kg, intraperitoneally (IP)] enhanced IT morphine at a peak time of 20 min. Nalmefene [1 to 100 ng/kg, per os (PO)] enhanced IT morphine action. In conclusion, the present study showed that IT morphine putatively released spinal Dyn.

Analgesics↗

PubMed1993

Pentobarbital administered intracerebroventricularly antagonizes morphine-induced antinociception in mice.

The purposes were to show that pentobarbital administered intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) antagonized the antinociceptive action of morphine given intrathecally in the tail-flick test in mice, determine whether this antagonistic action involved spinal release of dynorphin A (Dyn A) and demonstrate whether the mechanism involved gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors. Previously, it was shown that midazolam given i.c.v. antagonizes morphine-induced antinociception by release of Dyn A in the spinal cord. This antagonism by midazolam is reversed by a variety of benzodiazepine/GABAA receptor complex antagonists given i.c.v. The results indicated that the antagonistic action of pentobarbital given i.c.v. was not due to release of Dyn A based on presumptive tests for Dyn A release. 1) In the tail-flick test, the opioid receptor antagonists, naloxone and nor-binaltorphimine intrathecally, did not reverse the antagonism. 2) Pretreatment with dynorphin antiserum and morphine had no effect. The effect of pentobarbital was inhibited by a benzodiazepine receptor antagonist, flumazenil, given i.c.v. but not by a GABA antagonist, bicuculline s.c. or a chloride ion channel antagonist, picrotoxin, i.c.v. In contrast, the duration of loss of the righting reflex from systematically administered pentobarbital was shortened by bicuculline and picrotoxin but not by flumazenil. These results taken together with the previous results on midazolam suggested that the antagonistic action of pentobarbital on morphine-induced antinociception appeared to involve different GABA receptors from those involved in release of Dyn A by midazolam and those involved in the pentobarbital-induced loss of the righting reflex.

Animals↗

PubMed1993

Differential response of the permeability of the rat liver canalicular membrane to sucrose and mannitol following in vivo acute single and multiple exposures to microwave radiation (2.45 GHz) and radiant-energy thermal stress.

Both acute and chronic exposures to microwave radiation altered the function of the rat canalicular membrane. A single acute exposure to microwave radiation [80 mW/cm2, 2.45 GHz, continuous wave, 30 min exposure (SAR approximately equal to 72 W/kg)] or a matched radiant-energy thermal load, both designed to raise core body temperature approximately 3 degrees C, decreased the permeability of the canalicular membrane of male Sprague-Dawley rats to sucrose. The change in canalicular membrane permeability was demonstrated by a significant increase in the percentage of [3H]sucrose recovered in bile following its administration by a segmented retrograde intrabiliary injection. Similar acute exposures to microwave and radiant-energy thermal sources produced no significant alterations in canalicular membrane permeability to [14C]mannitol. In both acute exposure protocols, a rapidly reversible increase in bile flow rate was observed. Four exposures (30 min/day x 4 days) to either microwave radiation (80 mW/cm2) or a matched radiant-energy thermal load resulted in a significant depression in bile flow rate at normothermic temperatures. Animals receiving multiple exposures to microwave radiation had significant decreases in canalicular membrane permeability to both [3H]sucrose and [14C]mannitol, while similar exposure to radiant-energy thermal load alone altered canalicular membrane permeability to [3H]sucrose. An examination of the hepatic clearance of sucrose and mannitol following acute microwave exposure demonstrated no significant differences. Thus acute single exposure to microwave and radiant-energy thermal loads produced similar alterations in canalicular membrane permeability. Conversely, multiple exposures produced nonreversible changes in bile flow rate and canalicular membrane permeability, with microwave exposure producing greater alterations in the function of the canalicular membrane than an equivalent radiant-energy thermal load.

Animals↗

PubMed1992

Different radiant heat intensities differentiate intracerebroventricular morphine- from beta-endorphin-induced inhibition of the tail-flick response in the mouse.

The antinociceptive effects of morphine and beta-endorphin given intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) or intrathecally (i.t.) were evaluated by inhibition of the tail-flick and hot-plate paw-licking responses evoked by three different intensities of heat stimulation (low, intermediate and high) in male ICR mice. Morphine given i.c.v. was more potent in inhibiting the tail-flick response evoked by low than high intensity of heat stimulus. beta-Endorphin given i.c.v., on the other hand, was equally potent in inhibiting the tail-flick response evoked by different intensities of heat. This differential effect of morphine and beta-endorphin was not shown when morphine and beta-endorphin were given i.t. Morphine and beta-endorphin given i.c.v. or i.t. were equally potent in inhibiting the paw-licking response at different intensities of hot-plate temperature. Our results suggest that morphine given i.c.v. may inhibit high intensity heat-evoked tail-flick response spinally and inhibits low intensity heat-evoked tail-flick response supraspinally. Our results also provide additional evidence for different neural mechanisms of antinociceptive action of morphine and beta-endorphin.

Analgesia↗

PubMed1992

Involvement of supraspinal epsilon and mu opioid receptors in inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by etorphine in the mouse.

Etorphine, a potent opioid agonist, has been reported to bind to both mu and epsilon opioid receptors. The present studies were designed to determine what types of opioid receptors and neurotransmitters for descending pain control systems were involved in antinociception induced by etorphine in mice. Morphine, a typical mu opioid receptor agonist, and beta-endorphin, an epsilon opioid receptor agonist, were used for comparison. Antinociceptive response induced by etorphine (20 ng) given i.c.v was blocked by i.c.v administration of D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Tyr-Orn-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH2 (CTOP, 25 ng) and beta-endorphin-(1-27) [beta-EP-(1-27)] (6 micrograms), but not ICI 174,864 (ICI, 5 micrograms) or norbinaltorphimine (N-BNI, 5 micrograms). The antinociception induced by i.c.v. etorphine was also antagonized by the i.c.v. pretreatment of beta-funaltrexamine (beta-FNA, 50 ng, 24 hr). Intracerebroventricular administration of beta-EP-(1-27) (3 micrograms) caused a further attenuation of the i.c.v. etorphine-induced antinociception in mice pretreated with beta-FNA. The antinociceptive response induced by morphine (2 micrograms) given i.c.v. was blocked by i.c.v. administration of CTOP (25 ng) or beta-FNA (50 ng), but not beta-EP-(1-27) (6 micrograms), ICI (5 micrograms) or N-BNI (5 micrograms). These results indicate that the antinociception induced by etorphine given i.c.v. is mediated by the stimulation of both mu and epsilon opioid receptors whereas the antinociception induced by morphine given i.c.v. is mediated by the stimulation of mu, but not epsilon opioid receptors at supraspinal sites.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Analgesics↗

PubMed1992

Naloxone and norbinaltorphimine administered intracerebroventricularly antagonize spinal morphine-induced antinociception in mice through the antianalgesic action of spinal dynorphin A (1-17).

Previously, a number of analgesic agonists, when administered i.c.v. to mice, were shown putatively to activate the release of dynorphin A (1-17) (Dyn A) in the spinal cord. Whether released endogenously or administered i.t., Dyn A produces an antianalgesic action against i.t. administered morphine. In the present study, the opioid antagonists, naloxone and norbinaltorphimine (N-BNI), were shown to activate the Dyn A system. Intracerebro-ventricular administration of both naloxone and N-BNI antagonized the antinociceptive effect of i.t. morphine in the mouse tail-flick test, an effect designated as an antianalgesic action. This antianalgesic action was demonstrated to be mediated by spinal Dyn A in the following ways: 1) the antagonistic effect of i.c.v. naloxone and N-BNI was eliminated by administration of small doses of i.t. naloxone and N-BNI, a unique situation where administration of the opioid antagonists at a second (i.t.) site reversed the antagonistic effect of opioid antagonists administered at the other (i.c.v.) site; 2) i.t. pretreatment with dynorphin antiserum prevented the antianalgesic effect; 3) morphine pretreatment (s.c., 10 mg/kg), which produces desensitization to the effect of spinal Dyn A, eliminated the antianalgesic effect; and 4) pretreatment with i.c.v. naloxone (3 hours) and N-BNI (24 hours) which presumably releases Dyn A produced desensitization to the antagonistic effect of i.c.v. naloxone and N-BNI as well as to the antianalgesic action of i.t. Dyn A. Taken together, the results indicate that both i.c.v. naloxone and N-BNI produced indirect antagonistic actions which were mediated at the spinal cord by the antianalgesic action of Dyn A.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Analgesia↗

PubMed1992

Involvement of dynorphin A and not substance P in the spinal antianalgesic action of capsaicin against morphine-induced antinociception in mice.

In previous publications we proposed that dynorphin A (1-17) (Dyn) functions as an antianalgesic agent in the spinal cord of mice. Whether endogenously released or administered directly to the spinal cord, this antianalgesic action attenuates the antinociceptive effect of morphine (Mor) in the mouse tail-flick test. Because this action of Dyn in the spinal cord appeared to be congruous with the function of substance P (SP), experiments were designed to compare the actions of the two on Mor-induced antinociception. Inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by i.c.v. administration of Mor was attenuated by intrathecal (i.t.) administration of SP or Dyn. This antianalgesic effect of Dyn (5 fmol) but not SP (74 pmol) was antagonized by naloxone and nor-binaltorphimine administered i.t. Capsaicin (Cap) i.t. at a 0.1-microgram dose, like SP and Dyn, antagonized the antinociceptive effect of Mor given i.c.v. Excellent evidence exists to indicate that, in rats, Cap (30-70 micrograms i.t.) releases SP in the spinal cord and that Mor inhibits this release. Present experiments indicated, however, that i.t. administration of low doses of Cap (0.05-0.5 microgram) in mice preferentially released Dyn and not SP as based on the following results. 1) The antianalgesic action of Cap i.t. against Mor i.c.v. was antagonized by naloxone and nor-binaltorphimine i.t. as was Dyn i.t. (but not SP i.t.). 2) A SP antagonist, (D-Pro2, D-Phe7, D-Trp9)-SP, did not reverse the effect of Cap or Dyn given i.t., even though it antagonized the effect of SP.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Analgesia↗

PubMed1991

Isobolographic analysis of analgesic interactions between intrathecally and intracerebroventricularly administered fentanyl, morphine and D-Ala2-D-Leu5-enkephalin in morphine-tolerant and nontolerant mice.

Concurrent administration of morphine sulfate i.c.v. and i.t. produces a multiplicative interaction for analgesia in the tail flick response in mice. This interaction decreases to an additive interaction in mice which are tolerant to s.c. morphine. To test the responses of opioids selective for mu or delta receptors, the present study examined the interactions between fentanyl citrate (mu agonist) and D-Ala2-D-Leu5 enkephalin (DADLE, a relatively selective delta agonist) administered i.c.v. and i.t. using the tail flick test in control and morphine pellet-implanted mice. A method was developed for assigning statistical significance to the resulting ED50 values when analyzed isobolographically. When fentanyl or DADLE was administered i.c.v. plus i.t., an additive interaction between sites occurred in control animals, which changed to an antagonistic interaction for fentanyl and a multiplicative interaction for DADLE after morphine pellet treatment. When morphine was given i.c.v. along with i.t. fentanyl or DADLE in control animals, multiplicative interactions occurred when equipotent doses were given. Thus, opioids which were more receptor-selective than morphine did not produce multiplicative interactions, but were multiplicative when given with morphine. These results suggest that activation of combinations of receptors (by morphine) was required for the multiplicative interaction. The supraspinal site involved mu receptors (which are not self-sufficient and require an additional component) and the spinal site involved mu or delta receptors. The use of isobolographic analysis required that the drugs, when administered concurrently at two sites, be given in a constant dose ratio.

Animals↗

PubMed1991

Dynorphins other than dynorphin A(1-17) lack spinal antianalgesic activity but do act on dynorphin A(1-17) receptors.

In recent publications we have proposed that dynorphin (Dyn) A(1-17) functions as an antianalgesic modulator to oppose opioid-induced antinociception in mice. In the present experiments using the tail-flick response in mice, other Dyns [Dyn A(1-8), Dyn A(1-13), Dyn A(2-17), Dyn B and alpha- and beta-neoendorphin] when administered intrathecally (i.t.) were shown not to have antianalgesic activity even at high doses (0.5-1 pmol). These Dyns, i.t., did not antagonize the antinociception produced by physostigmine administered i.c.v. or morphine given i.t. These Dyns lacked the intrinsic antianalgesic activity of Dyn A(1-17). However, they had affinity for Dyn A(1-17) receptors as shown in several ways. 1) The antagonism of physostigmine antinociception produced by Dyn A(1-17) given i.t. was reversed by these Dyns given together with Dyn A(1-17). 2) The effect of endogenously released Dyn A(1-17) was reversed. Administered i.c.v., clonidine simultaneously activates antinociceptive and antianalgesic systems [latter mediated spinally by Dyn A(1-17) release]. Thus, these Dyns given i.t. inhibited the action of endogenously released Dyn A(1-17) and allowed the full manifestation of the antinociceptive action of clonidine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗

PubMed1991

Heroin acts on different opioid receptors than morphine in Swiss Webster and ICR mice to produce antinociception.

The opioid receptor types involved in supraspinal and spinal heroin-induced analgesia in Swiss Webster and ICR mice were determined by intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) and intrathecal (i.t.) administration of opioid agonists and antagonists. Also, comparisons were made with morphine. Antinociception was measured by changes in tail-flick latency. In Swiss Webster mice, i.c.v. heroin like [D-Pen2-D-Pen5]enkephalin, a delta receptor opioid agonist, activated supraspinal delta opioid receptors as evidenced by inhibition of analgesia by coadministration of naltrindole, a delta receptor antagonist. Lack of effect of i.t. yohimbine and methysergide vs. i.c.v. heroin indicated that spinal descending noradrenergic and serotonergic systems were not involved. Heroin and [D-Pen2-D-Pen5]enkephalin were also matched in producing additive interactions with i.t. opioids. Also, i.c.v. heroin like [D-Pen2-D-Pen5]enkephalin did not activate a dynorphin-mediated antianalgesic system. In ICR mice, i.c.v. heroin receptor selectivity matched that of i.c.v. Tyr-D-Ala2-Gly-NMePhe4-Gly-ol5, a selective mu receptor opioid agonist. Analgesia was inhibited by pretreatment with i.c.v. beta-funaltrexamine, a nonequilibrium mu receptor antagonist. Intrathecal administration of methysergide inhibited i.c.v. heroin-induced analgesia whereas i.t. yohimbine had no effect, which indicated that a descending serotonergic system but not a noradrenergic system was involved. Low doses of i.t. naloxone and nor-binaltorphimine increased the analgesic effect. This effect was consistent with activation of an antianalgesic system by i.c.v. heroin, which was mediated by dynorphin A in the spinal cord. Desensitization of the antianalgesic system also resulted in increased analgesia. In both Swiss Webster and ICR mice, i.t. heroin-induced analgesia involved spinal mu receptors like those stimulated by Tyr-D-Ala2-Gly-NMePhe4-Gly-ol5. Analgesia was inhibited by i.t. naloxone. In both strains, i.t. heroin, like i.t. Tyr-D-Ala2-Gly-NMePhe4-Gly-ol5, produced an additive interaction with i.t. clonidine. In conclusion, the supraspinal receptors activated by heroin are different between Swiss Webster and ICR mice. In both strains, the receptor selectivities assigned to heroin did not match those for morphine. Heroin did not act by being biotransformed to morphine.

Analgesia↗

PubMed1991

Differential contribution of descending serotonergic and noradrenergic systems to central Tyr-D-Ala2-Gly-NMePhe4-Gly-ol5 (DAMGO) and morphine-induced antinociception in mice.

Differences in antinociceptive (inhibition of tail-flick response) action of morphine and Tyr-D-Ala2-Gly-NMePhe4-ol5 (DAMGO) were demonstrated by intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of these agonists along with intrathecal (i.t.) administration of a variety of antagonists: yohimbine, methysergide, naloxone and nor-binaltorphimine. Intracerebroventricular morphine analgesia was antagonized by either i.t. yohimbine or methysergide, whereas i.c.v. DAMGO analgesia was only antagonized by i.t. methysergide. Thus, for i.c.v. morphine-induced analgesia, descending spinal noradrenergic and serotonergic systems were involved, whereas for DAMGO analgesia, only the serotonergic system was involved. The dose-response curve for i.c.v. morphine reached a plateau at high doses, whereas i.c.v. DAMGO analgesia peaked at 10 ng and then decreased thereafter, producing a bell-shaped dose-response curve. This decrement in analgesic response could be reversed by low doses of i.t. methysergide and i.t. pindolol. It was concluded that activation of serotonin-1 (5-HT1) receptors plays a role in the decrease in analgesia from high doses of DAMGO. Combinations of i.t. morphine with i.t. 5-HT or i.t. clonidine produced additive or greater analgesic responses. Combinations of i.t. DAMGO with i.t. 5-HT or i.t. clonidine produced less than additive interactions. Part of the latter responses appeared to be due to activation of 5-HT1 receptors; blockade of these receptors by pindolol enhanced i.t. DAMGO-induced analgesia. Morphine and DAMGO differ further because i.c.v. morphine activated a descending antianalgesic pathway mediated by spinal dynorphin A(1-17), whereas i.c.v. DAMGO at a high dose did not. Thus, morphine and DAMGO differ in their modes of antinociceptive action as measured by the tail-flick response.

Analgesia↗

PubMed1990

Spinal dynorphin A (1-17): possible mediator of antianalgesic action.

Earlier studies from this laboratory indicated that intracerebroventricular administration of physostigmine and clonidine activated both a spinal descending analgesic and antianalgesic system. It was proposed that the latter was mediated spinally by dynorphin A (1-17), because small intrathecal doses (fmol) of dynorphin A (1-17) antagonized analgesia, while intrathecal administration of naloxone and nor-binaltorphimine (at doses which had no effect on spinal mu and kappa receptors) enhanced analgesia by attenuating the antianalgesic component. In the present studies in mice, using the tail-flick response, intrathecal administration of dynorphin antibody (antiserum to dynorphin) enhanced the analgesic effect of (10 min) physostigmine and clonidine given intraventricularly. Peak effect for the antiserum was at 1 hr. Inhibition of the tail-flick response, induced by DAMGO (Tyr-D-Ala2-Gly-NMePhe4-Gly-ol5, a mu agonist), U50, 488 H (trans-3,4-dichloro-N-methyl-N-[2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-cyclohexyl]- benzeneacetamide methanesulfonate hydrate, a kappa agonist) and morphine was also enhanced by intrathecal administration of dynorphin antiserum. Thus, a variety of analgesic agonists appear to activate a dynorphin-mediated antianalgesic system. Such a system appears not to be activated by intraventricular administration of beta-endorphin and DPDPE (D-Pen2-D-Pen5-enkephalin, a delta agonist) because neither beta-endorphin- nor DPDPE-induced analgesia was enhanced by intrathecal administration of antiserum. The results of the experiments with the antibody provide further evidence to support the role of dynorphin A (1-17), as a putative endogenous opioid, which mediates an antianalgesic descending system in the spinal cord.

3,4-Dichloro-N-methyl-N-(2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-cycloh↗