PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J M Kitchens

Publications and source records attributed to J M Kitchens.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Meta-analysis of highly selective vagotomy versus truncal vagotomy and pyloroplasty in the surgical treatment of uncomplicated duodenal ulcer.

OBJECTIVE: To compare critically by meta-analysis the postoperative outcomes after truncal vagotomy and pyloroplasty (TVP) and after highly selective vagotomy (HSV). DATA SOURCES: A search was conducted on MEDLINE with the keywords "peptic ulcer" and "vagotomy". Bibliographics of the articles retrieved and review articles pertaining to the subject were scanned further. STUDY SELECTION: Included were only published prospective, randomized controlled trials comparing TVP and HSV in the English-language literature up to April 1991. Twelve studies were found. DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors, working independently, abstracted raw data on mortality, recurrence, dumping, diarrhea and postoperative Visick grading. DATA SYNTHESIS: A ratio greater than 1.0 indicates a higher proportion occurring with TVP and less than 1.0 a higher proportion with HSV. [Table: See Text] CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the likelihood of adverse long-term sequelae is higher with TVP whereas the likelihood of recurrence is higher with HSV.

Confidence Intervals↗

Containing Ontario's hospital costs under universal insurance in the 1980s: what was the record?

In recent years the Ontario government has been concerned that the proportion of public expenditures devoted to health care is at an all-time high. In addition, the media have devoted considerable attention to specific incidents that may represent inadequate funding of hospital services. To shed light on the debate on health care expenditures we analysed the trend in expenditures of Ontario's hospital sector in the 1980s in terms of the amount of inputs (e.g., labour) used to produce hospital services (e.g., a patient-day or admission) and after adjustment for general inflation. As in the 1970s the number of inputs grew relatively slowly during the 1980s. Inputs per patient-day grew at an annual rate of 0.46% and inputs per admission at an annual rate of 2.4%. Cost increases were largely accounted for by hospital wage increases; this could have been due to Ontario's rapidly expanding economy. These findings indicate that Ontario has continued to be successful in containing the number of inputs used in the hospital sector. However, after two decades of substantial success with publicly acceptable cost control, the government faces increased scrutiny as the media and the public focus attention on several areas of perceived inadequate funding in health care services.

Costs and Cost Analysis↗

Teaching residents to read the medical literature: a controlled trial of a curriculum in critical appraisal/clinical epidemiology.

OBJECTIVE: To teach internal medicine residents key principles of clinical epidemiology that are necessary to read critically the medical literature. DESIGN: Two-phase, non-randomized, controlled educational trial. SETTING: University-based training program for residents (PGY-l-PGY-3) in internal medicine. PARTICIPANTS: All 83 residents participated in the trial. Seventy residents completed a test in clinical epidemiology at the end of Phases I and II. INTERVENTIONS: Residents were assigned to one of eight ambulatory care clinics for half a day each week. A literature-based curriculum in critical appraisal was the subject of a weekly pre-clinic conference for four clinics (Group A). The other four clinics (Group B) had a weekly conference on topics in ambulatory care medicine. At the end of Phase I, both groups were given a test of basic knowledge of clinical epidemiology. The curriculum was then modified with the addition of written questions to emphasize important educational points and to stimulate resident participation. The modified curriculum became the subject of the pre-clinic conference for Group B, while Group A changed to topics in ambulatory medicine. At the end of Phase II both groups were again tested on basic knowledge of clinical epidemiology. RESULTS: Group B performed significantly better on the second test than on the first, 68.5% vs. 63.3% (p = 0.034), while Group A did not improve (64.5% vs. 65.9%). The differences in test scores for Test II minus Test I were +5.17% in Group B and -1.44% in Group A (p = 0.019). Twenty-one percent of Group B residents vs. 5% of Group A residents improved their scores by 18% or more. CONCLUSIONS: The residency period is a difficult but important time to teach critical appraisal skills. Educational gains may be small and need to be critically evaluated to stimulate the development of more effective educational programs.

Ambulatory Care↗