PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J M Neutel

Publications and source records attributed to J M Neutel.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Effects of a structured treatment algorithm on blood pressure goal rates in both stage 1 and stage 2 hypertension.

This study analysed the efficacy of an angiotensin receptor blocker-based treatment algorithm for achieving goal blood pressure (BP) in patients with stage 1 (systolic BP (SBP) 140-159 mmHg or diastolic BP (DBP) 90-99 mmHg) or stage 2 (SBP > or = 160 mmHg or DBP > or = 100 mmHg) hypertension. In this 24-week, open-label, multicentre study, patients followed a six-step algorithm until goal BP (< or = 130/85 mmHg) was attained. Initially, olmesartan medoxomil 20 mg/day was administered for 4 weeks. The regimen was modified every 4 weeks until goal BP was attained: increase olmesartan medoxomil to 40 mg/day; add hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg/day; increase HCTZ to 25 mg/day; add amlodipine besylate 5 mg/day; increase amlodipine besylate to 10 mg/day. In patients with stage 1 hypertension, 80% (63/79) and 56% (44/79) achieved BP goals of < or = 140/90 mmHg and < or = 130/85 mmHg, respectively, with olmesartan medoxomil monotherapy (94% (74/79) and 89% (70/79) with olmesartan medoxomil/HCTZ double therapy, and 96% (76/79) and 98% (77/79) with addition of amlodipine besylate (triple therapy)). Mean SBP/DBP reductions were 16.7/11.6, 24.8/15.8, and 26.4/16.5 mmHg for mono-, double-, and triple-therapy, respectively. In patients with stage 2 hypertension, 42% (42/100) and 19% (19/100) achieved BP goals of < or = 140/90 mmHg and < or = 130/85 mmHg, respectively, with monotherapy (75% (75/100) and 54% (54/100) with double therapy, and 90% (90/100) and 81% (81/100) with triple-therapy). Mean SBP/DBP reductions in stage 2 patients were 18.4/10.0, 32.7/16.3, and 39.1/19.4 mmHg for mono-, double, and triple therapy, respectively. Overall, most patients with stage 1 or stage 2 hypertension achieved goal BP.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Effect of the renin--angiotensin system on the vessel wall: using ACE inhibition to improve endothelial function.

Plasma renin activity and cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence correlate closely in people with hypertension. The effects of angiotensin II (Ang II) on blood pressure (BP) are important in hypertensive patients; accumulating data suggest that the growth effects of Ang II in the cardiovascular system play a critical role in the development of atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis development in hypertensive patients requires fundamental changes in endothelial structure and function. Key among the factors that may affect the endothelium is the renin--angiotensin--bradykinin system. Ang II, independent of other environmental and neurohormonal factors, mediates the vessel wall changes critical for the development of atherosclerotic disease. A strong correlation appears to exist between Ang II and CVD. Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system has a major impact on arterial structure and function independent of BP. Certain angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors produce significant improvements in arterial compliance, which may yield a reduction in cardiovascular events. Blockade of the neurohormonal system may be a critical first-line approach to management of hypertension in an effort to prevent or reverse endothelial dysfunction. Moreover, the effects of ACE inhibition, in addition to its effect on BP, suggest that this therapeutic approach may be appropriate for managing patients at risk of CVD who do not yet have hypertension. The ideal antihypertensive agent should yield smooth, consistent BP control over the entire 24-hour period, both to avoid BP variability that places patients at increased risk of cardiovascular events and to offer protection during the vulnerable early morning hours when patients are well known to be at high risk.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗
PubMed2003

Telmisartan vs losartan plus hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of mild-to-moderate essential hypertension--a randomised ABPM study.

The objective of this prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded-end point parallel-group, multicentre study was to show that telmisartan 80 mg is not inferior to a fixed-dose combination of losartan 50 mg/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. The criterion for noninferiority was a treatment difference of < or =3.0 mmHg in the reduction of 24-h mean ambulatory diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from the end of the 4-week placebo washout period to the end of the 6-week active treatment period. In the intent-to-treat analysis, the mean reduction in 24-h DBP was 8.3+/-6.7 mmHg among telmisartan-treated patients (n=332) and 10.3+/-6.3 mmHg among losartan/HCTZ-treated patients (n=350). The mean adjusted difference in 24-h DBP between the two treatment groups was 1.9 mmHg, allowing rejection of the a priori null hypothesis of a treatment difference of >3 mmHg. The reduction in mean 24-h systolic blood pressure was 13.2+/-10.2 mmHg with telmisartan and 17.1+/-10.3 mmHg with losartan/HCTZ. Both drugs provided effective control over the 24-h dosing interval. Analyses of morning (0600-1159) ambulatory blood pressure monitoring DBP means and trough cuff DBP confirmed the noninferiority hypothesis of the protocol for telmisartan 80 mg vs losartan 50 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg. The reductions in office blood pressures measured at trough in patients treated with telmisartan were -16.3/-9.6 and -18.5/-11.1 mmHg in the patients treated with losartan/HCTZ (difference -2.4/-1.2 mmHg). There were no differences between the side-effect profiles of the two treatments.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Clinical studies of CS-866, the newest angiotensin II receptor antagonist.

Angiotensin II receptor blockers have shown widespread efficacy as antihypertensive medications. These agents bind selectively to angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptors, specifically blocking the renin-angiotensin system at the last step in its cascade. CS-866 is the most recently introduced drug in this class. This article presents integrated safety and efficacy data from 7 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group studies in which once-daily CS-866 monotherapy was used in the treatment of patients with essential hypertension (sitting diastolic blood pressure > or =100 mm Hg and < or =115 mm Hg). Data from a total of 2,145 CS-866-treated patients were included in the efficacy analysis. Safety data were available from 2,540 CS-866-treated patients, with a cumulative exposure of 5,888 patient-months. The antihypertensive efficacy of the drug was assessed using both cuff blood pressure measurements and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. The data show that CS-866 is effective and safe for the treatment of hypertension. Dose-dependent reductions in both diastolic and systolic blood pressures occurred within 1 week of initiating treatment, and the response was almost maximal within 2 weeks. There was no difference in efficacy between younger (<65 years) and older (> or =65 years) groups of patients. Trough-to-peak ratios showed that CS-866 retains the majority of its peak effect 24 hours after treatment, and is therefore suitable for once-daily dosing. Dizziness was the only treatment-emergent adverse event with which CS-866 was associated.

Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists↗
PubMed2001

Contrasting clinical properties and exercise responses in obese and lean hypertensive patients.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to test whether the differences in activity of the renin-angiotensin and sympathetic nervous systems at rest or during exercise can explain the differing cardiovascular properties and outcomes of lean and obese hypertensive patients. BACKGROUND: Although lean hypertensive patients have fewer metabolic abnormalities than obese hypertensive patients, paradoxically they appear to have a poorer cardiovascular prognosis. METHODS: To evaluate the heightened risks in lean hypertensive patients, this study compared metabolic, neuroendocrine and cardiovascular characteristics at rest and during a standardized treadmill protocol in obese (body mass index [BMI] = 32.5 +/- 0.3 kg/m2, n = 55) and lean (BMI = 24.3 +/- 0.2 kg/m2, n = 66) hypertensive patients. Normotensive obese (n = 21) and lean (n = 55) volunteers served as control subjects. RESULTS: Compared with the lean normotensive subjects, the lean and obese hypertensive patients had greater left ventricular mass index (LVMI) values, but on multivariate analysis, LVMI correlated with plasma renin activity (p < 0.001) and plasma norepinephrine (PNE) (p < 0.01) in the lean but not the obese hypertensive patients. Arterial compliance (stroke volume/pulse pressure ratio) was reduced in the lean hypertensive patients, in whom it correlated (p = 0.033) with PNE. The PNE rose less (22%) in the obese than in the lean (55%) hypertensive patients in response to standing (p < 0.05). Likewise, during treadmill exercise, there were lesser increases in renin (65% vs. 145%, p < 0.01) and epinephrine (200% vs. 500%, p < 0.05) in the obese hypertensive patients. These changes were also less in obese patients than in lean control subjects, indicating attenuated neurohormonal responses to stress in obesity. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with obese hypertensive patients, cardiovascular properties in lean hypertensive patients are more dependent on catecholamines and the renin system. The different neuroendocrine responses to dynamic stimuli in lean and obese patients also might help to explain the disparity in their cardiovascular outcomes.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

A new chronotherapeutic oral drug absorption system for verapamil optimizes blood pressure control in the morning.

A novel verapamil chronotherapeutic oral drug absorption system (CODAS-Verapamil) designed for bedtime dosing and with controlled onset and extended-release properties was evaluated in 257 patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension in an 8-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. After bedtime dosing (9 PM to 11 PM, this delivery system delays drug release for 4 to 5 h, and provides the highest concentrations of verapamil between 6 AM and noon. The study results showed that CODAS-verapamil produced its greatest antihypertensive effect during this morning period (6 AM to 12 noon) and also provided effective trough diastolic blood pressure reductions at 200, 300, and 400 mg. Significant trough systolic blood pressure reductions were achieved only with the 300- and 400-mg doses. The nighttime dosing regimen was not associated with excessive blood pressure (BP) reductions during the sleeping hours, when the antihypertensive effect was generally slightly less than that of the 24-h mean reduction. The CODAS-verapamil provides enhanced BP reduction during the morning period when compared with other time intervals of the 24-h dosing period.

Absorption↗
PubMed2001

Efficacy of candesartan cilexetil as add-on therapy in hypertensive patients uncontrolled on background therapy: a clinical experience trial. ACTION Study Investigators.

A large-scale, 8-week, open-label, clinical experience trial evaluated the efficacy of the angiotensin II receptor (AT1 subtype) blocker candesartan cilexetil (16 to 32 mg once daily) either alone or as add-on therapy in 6465 hypertensive patients. The study population was 52% female and 16% African American with a mean age of 58 years. It included 5,446 patients who had essential hypertension (HBP) and 1,014 patients who had isolated systolic hypertension (ISH). These patients had either untreated or uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure [SBP] 140 to 179 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure [DBP] 90 to 109 mm Hg inclusive at baseline) despite a variety of antihypertensive medications including diuretics, calcium antagonists, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and alpha- or beta-blockers, either singly or in combination. The mean baseline blood pressure for the HBP group was 156/97 mm Hg. Candesartan cilexetil as monotherapy (in 51% of HBP patients) reduced mean SBP/DBP by 18.7/ 13.1 mm Hg. As add-on therapy (in 49% of HBP patients) to various background therapies, candesartan cilexetil consistently reduced mean SBP/DBP further, irrespective of the background therapy: diuretics (17.8/11.3 mm Hg), calcium antagonists (16.6/11.2 mm Hg), beta-blockers (16.5/ 10.4 mm Hg), ACE inhibitors (15.3/10.0 mm Hg), alpha-blockers (16.4/10.4 mm Hg). The mean baseline blood pressure for the ISH group was 158/81 mm Hg. Candesartan cilexetil, as monotherapy (in 34% of ISH patients), reduced SBP/DBP by 17.0/4.4 mm Hg. As add-on therapy (in 66% of ISH patients) to various background therapies, candesartan cilexetil consistently reduced mean SBP/DBP further, irrespective of the background therapy: diuretics (17.4/5.1 mm Hg), calcium antagonists (15.6/3.6 mm Hg), beta-blockers (14.0/4.8 mm Hg), ACE inhibitors (13.4/4.3 mm Hg), and alpha-blockers (11.6/4.5 mm Hg). The further blood pressure lowering effects of candesartan cilexetil as add-on therapy were seen regardless of age, sex, and race. Overall, 6.8% of the 6465 patients withdrew because of adverse events, most commonly headache (6.3%) and dizziness (5.0%). Orthostatic hypotension was infrequent; 0.2% with candesartan cilexetil alone, and 0.8% with candesartan cilexetil as add-on therapy. Thus, candesartan cilexetil either alone or as add-on therapy was highly effective for the control of systolic or diastolic hypertension regardless of demographic background when used in typical clinical practice settings.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Valsartan alone or with a diuretic or ACE inhibitor as treatment for African American hypertensives: relation to salt intake.

Previous clinical trials have demonstrated the important influence of ethnicity and dietary salt on the antihypertensive efficacy of drugs that block the renin angiotensin system. Angiotensin II receptor blockers are a new therapeutic entity that have not been widely studied in African American hypertensives, either alone, or in combination with other therapies such as diuretics or angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. We performed a pilot, prospective, open label, randomized design clinical trial to evaluate the effects of the angiotensin II receptor blocker valsartan (160 mg once a day) on systolic and diastolic blood pressure in hypertensive African Americans (n = 88) on a low salt (100 mEq Na+/day) for 2 weeks and the same diet supplemented by 100 mEq Na+ for 4 weeks. After this evaluation, while continuing the Na+ supplementation, patients were randomized to valsartan 320 mg/day (n = 28), or the addition of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg/day (n = 30), or benazepril 20 mg/day to the valsartan 160 mg/day for an additional 6 weeks. Valsartan (160 mg/day) lowered blood pressure significantly in African American patients on both low salt (-6.4/-4.8 mm Hg: P < .001) and a high salt diet (-4.9/-3.8 mm Hg: P = .01). The high salt diet attenuated the antihypertensive effect slightly (1.6/1.3 mm Hg, P = not significant). When comparing the efficacy of the three randomized therapeutic regimens while on the Na+ supplement, the valsartan 160 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg was the most effective therapy with an incremental reduction in blood pressure of -10.5/-6.9 mm Hg (P < .01), compared to valsartan 160 mg/day alone. Doubling the dose of valsartan to 320 mg incrementally lowered blood pressure by -3.8/-3.3 mm Hg (P = not significant). The least effective approach was adding benazepril 20 mg/day to valsartan 160 mg/day with no incremental reduction in systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure reduction of only 1.7 mm Hg (P = not significant). We conclude that in our open label pilot study, the antihypertensive activity of valsartan is not significantly attenuated by supplemented salt diet in hypertensive African Americans. Moreover, adding a low dose of HCTZ appears to be the most effective strategy in enhancing the antihypertensive activity of this angiotensin II receptor blocker in contrast to either doubling the dose or adding an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Beyond the sphygmomanometric numbers: hypertension as a syndrome.

Blood pressure is a critical element of hypertension, but evidence shows that many other interrelated risk factors--such as hypercholesterolemia, left ventricular hypertrophy, insulin resistance, and vascular dysfunction--contribute to form a complex syndrome of hypertension. Studies have demonstrated that these other risk factors often precede the onset of elevated blood pressure (BP). Significantly, this has been shown in the normotensive offspring of hypertensive parents. One factor that the elements of the hypertension syndrome have in common is endothelial dysfunction. An upset in the normal balance of angiotensin II and nitric oxide in the endothelial cell is associated with manifestation of the hypertension syndrome-associated risk factors. Recognition of this fact can and should be constructively incorporated into clinical practice in three ways: earlier identification of patients with the hypertension syndrome, earlier treatment to prevent disease onset/progression, and the use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors to correct the critical imbalance in the endothelial cell.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗
PubMed2001

Arterial compliance abnormalities in isolated systolic hypertension.

Arterial compliance measurements using intraarterial pulse contour analysis and a modified Windkessel model were carried out in 19 patients with isolated systolic hypertension (> or = 160/< or = 90 mm Hg) and compared to measurements in 29 patients with essential hypertension (diastolic blood pressure [BP] > or = 95 mm Hg) and 47 normotensive control subjects. Arterial capacitive compliance was significantly lower in isolated systolic hypertension than in essential hypertension (P < .0002) and significantly lower in essential hypertension than in normotensive control subjects (P < .0001). Although the isolated systolic hypertension group was older than the essential hypertension group, the reduction of capacitive compliance in isolated systolic hypertension persisted even when comparison was made with a more nearly age-matched group of essential hypertension. In contrast, oscillatory compliance was reduced similarly in isolated systolic hypertension and essential hypertension compared to normotensive control subjects (P < .0001). Although pulse pressure was greater in isolated systolic hypertension than in essential hypertension, only a weak correlation (r = -0.34) existed between pulse pressure and capacitive compliance. These data indicate that both essential hypertension and isolated systolic hypertension patients exhibit comparably abnormal structure or tone of the small vessels that are the site of oscillations or reflections in the arterial vasculature. In isolated systolic hypertension there is a profound reduction in large artery or capacitive compliance that accounts for the increase in systolic BP and decrease in diastolic BP. This abnormality cannot be accurately assessed by pulse pressure alone.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to assess the comparative efficacy and duration of action of a novel new angiotensin II receptor blocker--telmisartan.

Although a wide range of antihypertensive agents is available, adequate blood pressure control is achieved in only about 25% of hypertensive patients. Poor control rates are often due to inadequate patient compliance and unacceptable side-effects. The importance of once-daily dosing is now fully acknowledged, but it is crucial that therapy when given once a day must be effective at the end of the dosing interval to order to minimize the likelihood of sudden cardiac death, myocardial infarction and stroke. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) provides a thorough assessment of the blood pressure-lowering characteristics of an antihypertensive agent throughout the dosing interval and can more accurately evaluate differences in the duration of the antihypertensive effect of different agents. Telmisartan, a new angiotensin II receptor antagonist, has been extensively studied in clinical trials using ABPM. When compared with dihydropyridine calcium antagonists, beta-adrenergic blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and other angiotensin II receptor antagonists, telmisartan has proved superior in diminishing ambulatory blood pressure throughout the 24-h period between doses. Telmisartan also has excellent tolerability and in clinical trials demonstrates no increase, irrespective of dose level, over placebo in the incidence of adverse events. Thus, telmisartan given once daily provides high efficacy and tolerability, and will hopefully assist in improving both blood pressure control rates and cardiovascular outcomes in the future.

Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists↗
PubMed2001

The importance of 24-h blood pressure control.

The primary goal of antihypertensive therapy is to restore blood pressure to normal levels and to prevent the complications associated with hypertension. In order to maximize these goals by improving patient compliance, clinical researchers have focused on developing antihypertensive agents that can be given once daily. These agents provide many advantages over multiple-dose daily therapies, but it should not be assumed that they are all equivalent in providing adequate blood pressure control over the full 24-h dosing interval. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring has uncovered important differences in commonly used once-daily therapies and has provided additional insights into the cardiovascular risks associated with high blood pressure loads and blood pressure variability. In addition to ambulatory blood pressure monitoring data, the calculated trough:peak ratio provides useful information on an agent's ability to provide smooth and consistent blood pressure control. Using such assessments, it has been found that agents with a trough:peak ratio > or = 0.50 are better able to control blood pressure over the full 24h while maintaining natural circadian patterns. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring studies assessing a recently introduced class of antihypertensive drugs, the angiotensin receptor blockers, have demonstrated 24-h efficacy with once-daily dosing, particularly with the newer agents.

Antihypertensive Agents↗
PubMed2000

Implications of a health lifestyle and medication analysis for improving hypertension control.

BACKGROUND: National Health and Nutritional Examination surveys have documented poor rates of hypertension treatment and control, leading to preventable morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVES: To examine covariation in the medication and health lifestyle beliefs and behaviors of persons with hypertension to identify and profile distinct subgroups of patients. METHODS: A sample of 727 patients with hypertension, weighted to match the 1992 National Health Interview Survey age and sex distribution of patients with hypertension, was interviewed by telephone about their beliefs and behaviors regarding hypertension and its management. Cluster analysis of key variables was used to identify 4 patient types. RESULTS: Subgroups differed significantly. Group A members use an effective mix of medication and health lifestyle regimens to control blood pressure. Group B members are most likely to depend on medication and have high adherence rates. Yet they also have high rates of smoking (29%) and alcohol use (average, 104 times per year) and are less likely to exercise regularly. Group C members are most likely to forget to take medication, are likely to be obese, and find it most difficult to comply with lifestyle changes (except for very low rates of smoking and alcohol use). Group D members are least likely to take medication, most likely to change or stop medication without consulting their physician (20%), most likely to smoke (40%), and least likely to control diet (29%). Group A and B members have better health outcomes than group C and D members. CONCLUSIONS: Optimal management strategies are likely to differ for the 4 patient types. Further research should be conducted to validate these findings on a separate sample and to devise and test tailored management algorithms for hypertension compliance and control.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Efficacy of valsartan in patients aged > or =65 years with systolic hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter trial investigated the effects of valsartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker, on systolic blood pressure (SBP) in patients aged > or =65 years with systolic hypertension, with or without diastolic hypertension. BACKGROUND: Hypertension in older persons is a public health problem of epidemic proportions. SBP, which increases with age, is a better predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and all-cause mortality than is diastolic blood pressure (DBP). SBP is now thought to be a major modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease. METHODS: The study population consisted of 146 outpatients (74 female and 72 male) with a mean (+/- SD) age of 73.0+/-6.7 years and a trough mean sitting SBP > or =160 mm Hg; 88.4% were white. Patients with clinically relevant cardiac valvular disease, documented or suspected renal artery stenosis, and a serum creatinine level >2.5 mg/dL were excluded from the study. After a 2- to 4-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period, patients were randomly assigned to receive valsartan 80 mg or placebo once daily for 4 weeks and were then force-titrated to valsartan 160 mg or matching placebo once daily for an additional 4 weeks. Median DBP was 90 mm Hg, and >50% of the patients had isolated systolic hypertension. RESULTS: For the primary efficacy variable, the change from baseline to end point in trough mean sitting SBP, treatment with valsartan was superior to placebo, with reductions of 19.2 mm Hg compared with 8.8 mm Hg, respectively (P < 0.001, 95% CI -15.7, -5.5). Valsartan also produced superior reductions in trough mean sitting DBP (5.2 mm Hg and 1.2 mm Hg for valsartan and placebo, respectively; P < 0.001, 95% CI -6.4, -2.3). The tolerability of valsartan was comparable to that of placebo, with adverse events occurring in 31 (42.5%) valsartan-treated patients compared with 28 (38.4%) patients who received placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In this patient population of hypertensive patients aged > or =65 years, valsartan was effective and well tolerated and offers a promising new approach to the treatment of systolic hypertension.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to evaluate the selective angiotensin II receptor antagonist, telmisartan, and other antihypertensive drugs.

Telmisartan (Micardis (R)) is a new, orally active, long-acting angio-tensin (Ang) II receptor antagonist that is effective in the treatment of hypertension. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) has emerged as an important method for evaluating the consistency of the antihypertensive effects of a drug throughout the dosing interval. ABPM was used to evaluate the antihypertensive efficacy of telmisartan in several placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter studies. Patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension were allocated randomly to groups to receive telmisartan 40 or 80 mg, losartan 50 mg, or placebo, once daily in a 6-week, fixed-dose study, or telmisartan 40-120 mg, amlodipine 5-10 mg, or placebo, once daily in a 12-week, dose-titration study. Patients treated with telmisartan 40 and 80 mg or placebo in a separate 4-week, fixed-dose study were included in an additional analysis. Telmisartan 40 and 80 mg significantly decreased mean ambulatory systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) relative to placebo for the entire 24 h period and in the following intervals: day (6 a.m. to 10 p.m.), morning (6 a.m. to noon), night (10 p.m. to 6 a.m), and the last 4 h of the dosing interval (P<0.01). Notably, telmisartan 40 or 80 mg was more effective than losartan, especially during the last 4-6 h of the dosing interval (P<0.05). Telmisartan 40- 120 mg tended to be more effective than amlodipine 5-10 mg in reducing SBP and DBP in each time interval, with significant differences between treatments noted for DBP in the last 4 h of the dosing interval and in the morning (P < 0.05). ABPM also revealed that the magnitude of the blood pressure decreasing effect with telmisartan was consistent throughout the dosing interval. These results demonstrate that telmisartan maintains a normal circadian blood pressure pattern and provides full 24 h blood pressure control with once-daily dosing.

Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists↗