PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J M Sequí Canet

Publications and source records attributed to J M Sequí Canet.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

[Stimulation increase in evoked acoustic otoemissions].

OBJECTIVE: Evoked otoacoustic emissions (OEAE) are an excellent evaluation method of the hearing organ and are principally useful in newborn screening. During the performance of this technique, doubtful cases sometimes exist and they are customarily considered as failures of the test, increasing the group of children to be re-evaluated. The program IL088 has the possibility of increasing the stimulus intensity (gain). We applied this gain to all children with doubtful OEAE in attempts to give a pass or fail score. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The record of OEAE was accomplished with the system IL088 v3.5. It was applied to 70 ears of healthy newborns, a gain of +15 dB initially and/or +21 dB (if a pass score was not obtained). Some normal ears were included in this group as controls. Of the explored ears, 23 had a normal OEAE, 17 presented a doubtful response and in 30 cases the answers were negative (fail). RESULTS: This study demonstrates that in doubtful cases, the usefulness of increasing the gain is very high permitting that these cases accomplish pass criteria (15/17). In the ears with a lack of response there is an increased response, but it usually does not reach a passing level (6/30). In children with normal response the pass rate does not vary. CONCLUSIONS: The increase in gain in ears with a doubtful response offers a high a rentability, reducing the the initial failure rate of OEAE without altering the real failure rate or affecting those that initially pass allowing a reduction in the number of second evaluations.

Cochlea↗

[Evoked otoacoustic emissions in school children].

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to determine the usefulness of evoked otoacoustic emissions (OEAE) as a screening method for the diagnosis of hearing loss in schoolchildren. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To this end and by using this method, we have studied 1,202 ears of 616 children in the 1st and 2nd grades of elementary school with a mean age of 6.2 years. The equipment employed was an Otodynamic Analyzer (ILO 88) by Otodynamics, Ltd and the program ILO 88, version 3.94. RESULTS: The results were OEAE positive in 1,041 ears (86.6% passed the test) and OEAE negative in 161 ears (13.4% failed the test). We have determined the percentiles of all the parameters of the test and of the responses in order to establish the normal values in this age group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the OEAE for the detection of hearing loss should not be restricted to newborns. The OEAE can also be used as an auditive screening test in schoolchildren.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

[Influence of the middle ear on the measurement of otoacoustic emissions].

OBJECTIVE: Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) provide an objective, non-invasive measurement of cochlear function. OAEs have proven to have a high sensitivity and reasonable specificity for hearing impairment diagnosis, especially when used for infant screening. The lower specificity could be due to middle ear function and that this affects otoacoustic emissions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We have carried out a study in 1,202 ears with a mean age of 6.2 years. Clinical otoscopy and OAE measurements were performed in all cases and tympanometry in those cases with a negative result in the recorded emissions. RESULTS: Statistical analysis of tympanogram type indicated significant association with tympanogram type B and the absence of OAEs, as well as with otoscopic findings of secretory otitis media. CONCLUSIONS: Middle ear function must be taken into consideration when OAEs are used in clinical application. The problem of low specificity is mainly due to the fact that middle ear function affects the presence or absence of emissions with normal cochlear function.

Acoustic Impedance Tests↗

[Diagnosis of otitis media with effusion by acoustic reflectometry].

OBJECTIVE: Acoustic reflectometry is a new technique based on a sonar that enables the diagnosis of middle ear effusion. Our objective was to assess its value and to know the cut-off figure for pathology. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 586 children, from 1 month to 14 years of age, we performed bilateral otoscopy looking for signs of middle ear effusion. Afterwards, 3 measurements with the acoustic otoscope (ENT, Inc.) were taken and the results between the two methods compared. RESULTS: There was a significant association (p < 0.0001, Chi-squared) between results > 4 and middle ear effusion with a sensitivity of 84.2% and a specificity of 98.9%. CONCLUSIONS: Acoustic reflectometry has shown to be a very quick (< 10 seconds/ear), accurate and objective technique. It is painless and easy. It can be made in any child, without collaboration (crying or moving) and at any age.

Acoustic Impedance Tests↗