PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Mackey-Hargadine

Publications and source records attributed to J Mackey-Hargadine.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Neuro-otologic evaluation of the patient with acute, severe head injuries: correlations among physical findings, auditory evoked responses, and computerized tomography.

Long-term clinical neurologic and otologic sequelae of traumatic head injury are well recognized. In this article, we describe the relationship among neurophysiologic, neuro-otologic, and neuroradiologic findings in a series of fifty patients with acute, severe head injury. Seventy percent of the patients had one or more otologic abnormalities, of which hemotympanum was most common. Outcome of computerized tomography (CT), auditory brainstem response (ABR), and otologic examination findings were not mutually dependent. For example, otologic disease was found in 50% of the patients with normal ABR. All but one patient in the series showed brain damage by CT; yet only 14% of the series had evidence of temporal bone fracture and, unexpectedly, one third of this group yielded normal otologic findings and a normal ABR. We conclude that combined application of otologic examination, CT scanning, and auditory evoked response assessment provides complementary information on structural and functional neuro-otologic status in persons with acute, severe head injury.

Acute Disease↗

Neuro-otologic applications of simultaneous multi-channel auditory evoked response recordings.

Multichannel auditory brain stem response (ABR) recordings were obtained in 75 acute, severely brain injured patients. The purpose of the study was to assess, in patients with varied neuro-otologic pathology, the clinical feasibility and value of measuring the ABR simultaneously with more than one electrode array. The use of alternative electrode arrays, in addition to the conventional (vertex to stimulus ipsilateral ear) array, augmented confident identification of wave components I through VI, and was particularly useful in patients with marked middle ear pathology which confounded ABR interpretation. The ABR recorded with an indifferent (noncephalic) reference electrode, e.g., was characterized by increased Wave V amplitude, and improved definition of Wave IV vs. V. Case studies are presented to illustrate neuro-otologic applications of the multichannel recording technique.

Adolescent↗