PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Manhart

Publications and source records attributed to J Manhart.

20 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Bond strength of composite to dentin treated by air abrasion.

This study compared the bond strength of composite to dentin produced by an air-abrasive dentin pretreatment and acid etch only. Two hundred sixty extracted human molars were randomly divided into 13 groups (n = 20). An occlusal dentin surface with a defined smear layer was exposed. Dentin was conditioned either with 37% H3PO4 for 20 seconds, or an air-abrasion unit (KCP 1000, ADT) was used with 120 and 160 psi pressure and two different particle sizes, 50 and 27 microns. A combination of both treatments beginning with air abrasion was tested as well as dentin specimens without pretreatment. The dentin adhesive Syntac Single-Component was applied under dry and moist conditions. Composite cylinders with a bond diameter of 2.5 mm were bonded in two increments to the teeth. Specimens were stored for 24 hours at 37 degrees C in distilled water and then thermo-cycled for 1000 cycles (5/55 degrees C). Shear bond strength was tested using a Universal Testing Machine at 0.5 mm/min cross-head speed. Means and standard deviations in MPa were calculated. Analysis of variance and Bonferroni pairwise comparison tests were performed. Lowest bond strengths were obtained in specimens without conditioning the dentin. Air-abraded specimens showed a significantly higher bond strength than the before-mentioned groups. The comparison for acid-etched groups and air-abraded specimens revealed higher values for the abraded groups. Air abrasion with 160 psi pressure produced a significantly higher bond strength than 120 psi. There was no significant difference between the 27 and 50 microns particles. Air abrasion in combination with a self-priming bonding agent produced bond strength on dentin at least comparable to conditioning with 37% H3PO4.

Acid Etching, Dental↗

Marginal quality of tooth-colored restorations in class II cavities after artificial aging.

This in vitro study compared the proximal marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with composite and ceramic inlays inserted with different resin cements. Standardized MOD Class II inlay cavities with one proximal box extending below and the other above the CEJ were cut in 48 extracted human molars and randomly assigned to six groups (n=8). Incrementally layered direct composite restorations (P60), composite inlays (P60) and ceramic inlays (Empress; Cerec Vitablocs Mark II) were placed in the cavities. Three different resin cements (RelyX ARC; Variolink II high viscosity; Panavia 21) were used for luting the composite inlays. All ceramic inlays were cemented with RelyX ARC. After finishing and polishing, the teeth were stored for 24 hours in Ringer solution at 37 degrees C before they were subjected to thermal and mechanical loading (5/55 degrees C, 2000x; 50 N vertical load, 50000x). Margins were evaluated on epoxy replicas using a scanning electron microscope at X200 magnification. Statistical analysis was performed with non-parametric test methods (alpha=0.05). The adhesive interfaces to enamel exhibited high percentages of perfect margins for all groups (91.8% to 96%) and a maximum of 5.2% marginal gap formation. Dentin-limited cavity segments demonstrated more marginal openings and less perfect margins than enamel-bound areas; however, this was only statistically significant for direct composite restorations and composite inlays inserted with Variolink II and Panavia 21. RelyXARC showed a significantly better adaptation to P60 inlays compared with the leucite-reinforced Empress ceramic but not the Vitablocs Mark II ceramic.

Aluminum Silicates↗