PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Montalar

Publications and source records attributed to J Montalar.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2002

[Study of cancer-associated asthenia: foundation of the ASTHENOS group].

Asthenia in cancer patients is a highly controversial subject. A distinct definition of asthenia in medical literature is lacking as well as its prevalence and incidence. Also, no simple tools for its diagnosis are available. Moreover its etiopathogenesis is complex and multifactorial, thereby making therapeutic approaches difficult. Recently, a Spanish group has been set up for the study and treatment of asthenia in cancer patients. This paper reports on its establishment, objectives and first conclusions.

Asthenia↗
PubMed2002

Cefepime monotherapy as an empirical initial treatment of patients with febrile neutropenia.

Currently, monotherapy is considered a valid alternative to the combination antibiotic treatments used for initial, empirical management of febrile neutropenia. The advent of new cephalosporins warrants assessment. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of cefepime monotherapy in the treatment of cancer patients with febrile granulocytopenia (< 1000 leukocytes/muL and/or < 500 neutrophils/muL). A prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized trial was conducted. Initial treatment consisted of iv cefepime, 2 g every 8 h. If the patient was still febrile after 72 h, amikacin, vancomycin/teicoplanin, and amphotericin B were added sequentially. Response was evaluated according to EORTC criteria. One hundred twenty episodes were analyzed in 81 males and 39 females (median age, 52 yr; range, 15-83). The median leukocyte count at the time of diagnosis was 781 microL(-1) (range, 100-2600) and the median neutrophil count was 173 microL(-1) (range 0-500). The median duration of neutropenia (< 1000 neutrophils/microL) was 4.8 d (range, 3-20). Fifty-two episodes (44%) were confirmed microbiologically (42 presented as bacteremia), 31 with Gram-positive bacteria and 21 with Gram-negative bacteria, 47 (39.3%) were confirmed clinically, 16 (13.3%) were considered as probable infections, and 5 (4.2%) as doubtful infections. Protocol success was achieved in 110 episodes (91.7%), 8 (6.6%) were treatment failures, and 2 (1.7%) were not evaluable. Ninety-nine episodes (83.3%) were controlled with cefepime monotherapy, with 19 other episodes requiring additional antibiotics: amikacin in 7 (5.8%), amikacin + vancomycin/teicoplanin in 12 (10.1%). Three patients (2,5%) died during an episode of neutropenic fever. Cefepime is effective as an initial, empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia. The early addition of amikacin and/or vancomycin resolves most of the monotherapy failures, which seem somewhat lower than with other monotherapies.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Vinorelbine, ifosfamide and cisplatin as first-line treatment in patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer.

To assess, in a multicenter setting, the effectiveness of a combination of vinorelbine, ifosfamide and cisplatin in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, 123 patients (males=116) with a mean age of 60 years (range 27-75) with stage IIIb/IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and performance status <or=2 were treated with vinorelbine (VNR; 25 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8; ifosfamide (IFO; 3 g/m(2)) on day 1; and cisplatin (CDDP; 80 mg/m(2)) on day 1, in repeated cycles of 21 days. Response rates, overall patient survival and toxicity profiles of the three-drug combination were assessed. The number of evaluable patients was 112, with a total of 441 cycles administered (mean=3.6 cycles/patient). Dose intensities (mg/m(2)/week; calculated in patients who concluded the proposed treatment and expressed as mean, median, and standard deviation) were: VNR 13.65, 13.32, 4.7; IFO 918.88, 868.97, 258.1; CDDP 23, 24.68, 6.98. Response rates were: complete response=3 (2.4%); partial response=58 (47.2%%); stable disease=20 (16.3%). The most frequent toxic events were nausea and vomiting (G1=33%, G2=31%, G3=8%). Neutropenia was the dose limiting toxicity (G1=6%, G2=11%, G3=10%, G4=7%). Alopecia G3 was a common undesirable effect in all the patients. Time to progression was 296 days (95% confidence interval 261-332) and the mean survival time was 338 days (95% CI 301-374). We conclude that the described therapeutic schedule is effective with good survival rates and response ratios together with a good tolerance and an acceptable toxicity level.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Long-term results after combined modality treatment for non-metastatic osteosarcoma.

Since the introduction of multimodality treatment, the prognosis of patients with high-grade non-metastatic osteosarcoma has significantly improved. A retrospective review was performed to assess the long-term results of this approach in a single centre setting, and to investigate the impact of potential clinical prognostic factors. Between 1985 and 1993, 35 patients with stage II-A and II-B osteosarcoma underwent preoperative chemotherapy (high-dose methotrexate), wide surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy (cisplatin-doxorubicin/bleo-mycin-cyclophosphamide-dactinomycin) (modified T-10A protocol). There were 19 males and 16 females. Median patient age was 17 y (range 12-42). Primary tumour sites were the extremities (83%) and axial bones (17%). In spite of an unfavourable grade 3-4 histologic response rate to high-dose methotrexate of 12%, 31 (88%) patients were able to undergo limb-sparing surgery and 28 (80%) were rendered disease free after the planned therapy. Median follow-up was 8 y. The actuarial overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 64% and 49% at 5 y, and 59% and 49% at 10 y, respectively. Tumour size and primary site were significant prognostic factors for survival in univariate analyses. In conclusion, long-term survival after combined modality treatment can be achieved in more than 60% of patients with localised osteosarcoma, including non-appendicular lesions. Limb-sparing surgery is a realistic goal for most cases. The prognostic value of tumour necrosis and the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be interpreted according to individual high-dose methotrexate scheduling.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Metastatic follicular thyroid carcinoma to the kidney: a case report.

Clinically detectable well-differentiated metastatic thyroid cancer to the kidney is rare, with only 12 cases reported in the medical literature. The authors report a case of metastatic thyroid carcinoma to the kidney in a patient with widespread dissemination. She underwent total thyroidectomy, radical left nephrectomy, radioactive ablation with I-131, radiotherapy, and thyroid suppression therapy. Well-differentiated thyroid metastatic cancer can be amenable to treatment with successful long-term results.

Adenocarcinoma, Follicular↗
PubMed1999

Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine-cisplatin versus etoposide-cisplatin in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: We conducted a randomized trial to compare gemcitabine-cisplatin with etoposide-cisplatin in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary end point of the comparison was response rate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 135 chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced NSCLC were randomized to receive either gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) days 1 and 8 or etoposide 100 mg/m2 IV days 1 to 3 along with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 IV day 1. Both treatments were administered in 21-day cycles. One hundred thirty-three patients were included in the intent-to-treat analysis of response. RESULTS: The response rate (externally validated) for patients given gemcitabine-cisplatin was superior to that for patients given etoposide-cisplatin (40.6% v 21.9%; P = .02). This superior response rate was associated with a significant delay in time to disease progression (6.9 months v 4.3 months; P = .01) without an impairment in quality of life (QOL). There was no statistically significant difference in survival time between both arms (8.7 months for gemcitabine-cisplatin v 7.2 months for etoposide-cisplatin; P = .18). The overall toxicity profile for both combinations of drugs was similar. Nausea and vomiting were reported more frequently in the gemcitabine arm than in the etoposide arm. However, the difference was not significant. Gemcitabine-cisplatin produced less grade 3 alopecia (13% v 51%) and less grade 4 neutropenia (28% v 56% ) but more grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia (56% v 13%) than did etoposide-cisplatin. However, there were no thrombocytopenia-related complications in the gemcitabine arm. CONCLUSION: Compared with etoposide-cisplatin, gemcitabine-cisplatin provides a significantly higher response rate and a delay in disease progression without impairing QOL in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Phase II trial assessing the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

BACKGROUND: There is need for more active and better tolerated combinations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The Spanish Lung Cancer Group (SLCG) therefore conducted this phase II study to define the efficacy and toxicity profile of the combination of higher doses than usual of gemcitabine along with cisplatin in patients with advanced NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients with pathologically documented advanced NSCLC were included in this trial (34 men, six women; aged 34-74 years; mean 64 years). Twenty-two patients had unresectable stage IIIB disease and 18 had stage IV disease. Karnofsky performance status was > or =70%. In five patients, surgery had previously been performed and four patients had received radiotherapy. Gemcitabine at a dose of 1200 mg/m2 was administered weekly (days 1, 8 and 15) and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 15 of each 28-day cycle. RESULTS: Responses were scored according to standard World Health Organization criteria. Of 40 assessable patients, 19 had a partial response for an overall response rate of 47.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 32-64%). To date, median survival for the whole group is 10.4 months (95% CI 6.2-11.7 months), with a 1-year survival rate of 35%. Toxicity was mainly haematological. Seven patients (18%) had grade 4 neutropenia (one episode of febrile neutropenia). Thrombocytopenia (12.8% grade 3 and 2.6% grade 4) was not associated with clinical bleeding. One patient had a grade 4 transient rise in transaminase. There was no grade 3 or 4 renal toxicity. There was no grade 4 symptomatic toxicity. The most common grade 3 toxicities were nausea and vomiting (28.2%) and alopecia (10.3%) both related to cisplatin. CONCLUSIONS: Gemcitabine can be safely administered at a dose of 1200 mg/m2 in combination with cisplatin. Thrombocytopenia seems to be less than in schedules with cisplatin given on day 1. The results of this studyshow promising activity (47.5% response rate) with modest toxicity. As this combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin deserves further evaluation in prospective randomized trials, the SLCG is comparing gemcitabine-cisplatin with etoposide-cisplatin in a phase III randomized study.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Pretreatment prognostic factors for survival in small-cell lung cancer: a new prognostic index and validation of three known prognostic indices on 341 patients.

AIMS: a) To identify which pretreatment clinical or blood parameters were predictive of patients survival in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) in a retrospective analysis. b) To validate three known prognostic indices: Royal Marsden Model (index 1), London Group (index 2) and Manchester Score (index 3). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1981 to 1993, 341 SCLC patients were treated with chemotherapy with or without surgery or radiotherapy. Univariate and multiple regression analyses of survival were performed and the feasibility of these models was explored, index 1: Karnofsky index, albumin, sodium and alkaline phosphatase; index 2: ECOG performance status (PS), albumin and alanine transaminase; and index 3; lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), disease extent, sodium, Karnofsky index, alkaline phosphatase and bicarbonate. RESULTS: Significant prognostic factors for survival after univariate and multiple regression analysis were: disease extent, PS, creatine kinase, neutrophilia, LDH, hypoalbuminemia, hyperglycemia and bicarbonate. A new prognostic index was performed that included LDH, hypoalbuminemia, neutrophilia, disease extent and PS. It defined three prognostic groups (PG). Median survival and two-year survival for these PG were 12.3, 8 and 3.4 months and 16.5%, 2.3% and 0%, respectively. The following PG were identified after application of the three models proposed: Index 1 identified two PG with 0% and 16.6% two-year survival (P < 0.001); index 2 detected three PG with 0%, 5% and 15.7% two-year survival (P < 0.001) and index 3 detected three PG with 0%, 2.5% and 16.2% two-year survivals, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A new prognostic index is proposed allowing identification of three different PG. The feasibility of three known prognostic models was validated and demonstrated. Variables other than disease extent or PS (albumin or LDH) should be taken into account in designing future clinical trials.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Randomised comparison of ceftazidime and imipenem as initial monotherapy for febrile episodes in neutropenic cancer patients.

With the availability of new, broad-spectrum antibiotics, initial therapy with a single agent has become an alternative to classic combinations in the management of febrile, neutropenic cancer patients. The aims of this study were to compare the efficacy of ceftazidime and imipenem as empirical monotherapy of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients, and to examine the frequency with which second-line antibiotics (amikacin, vancomycin, or both) were required. A prospective clinical trial was carried out in a single centre. Eligible patients with solid tumours or lymphoma were randomised to receive monotherapy with ceftazidime or imipenem. In the event of no response, amikacin and/or vancomycin were added in 48-72 h intervals (sequentially, or according to clinical or microbiological data). Efficacy was evaluable for 111 assessable episodes. Median neutrophil count at entry was 100 cells/microliters and median duration of neutropenia was 4 days. Febrile episodes were classified as microbiologically (34%) or clinically documented (42%), and fever of unknown origin (24%). Gram-negative infections (57%) predominated over gram-positive isolates (30%). The overall success rate with monotherapy (69% versus 70%), or with modification (20% versus 23%) were equivalent for ceftazidime and imipenem (P = 0.75). The mortality in this series was 5%. Single-agent therapy with either ceftazidime or imipenem is effective for the empirical treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients with solid tumours. Early addition of amikacin and/or vancomycin resolves most failures of the first step.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Extragonadal germ cell tumors: prognostic factors and long-term follow-up.

The records of 23 patients (22 male and 1 female, median age 28 years) with extragonadal germ cell tumors (EGCT) treated between 1974 and 1993 were reviewed retrospectively to investigate long-term survival and prognostic factors. Treatment consisted of cisplatin-based chemotherapy plus local irradiation or surgery. There were 7 seminomas, 5 poorly differentiated carcinomas (PDC) with elevated biomarkers, and 11 nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT). The primary sites were retroperitoneum (10 cases), mediastinum (5 cases), pineal gland (4 cases) and other (4 cases). Two partial and 14 complete responses (69.6% overall) were achieved with primary therapy. After a median follow-up of 63 months, 10 (43.5%) patients live disease-free and 5-year survival is 55%. Seminomas showed an excellent outcome. Retroperitoneal NSGCT behaved like testicular neoplasms. Between nonseminoma patients, PDC histology and mediastinal primary were associated with the worst prognoses. EGCT patients should be treated and reported separately according to histology and primary site.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1985

Cytogenetic study in six Spanish patients with Burkitt's lymphoma.

A cytogenetic study carried out on affected tissues of six children with Burkitt's lymphoma revealed five cases with a typical translocation (8q-; 14q+) and one with a variant t(2p-; 8q+). Additional cytogenetic variations were present in three cases. One had two acrocentric marker chromosomes comprised of material from chromosome #1 (1q21----q44) translocated to the Y gonosome. The other two cases had a cytogenetic alteration of chromosome #12. Cytogenetic studies carried out systematically in Burkitt's lymphoma could be a great help in possibly establishing differences in the biologic and clinical aspects of cases presenting with the t(8;14) versus cases with variant translocations, as this would allow for classification of these patients into groups which, at present, cannot be differentiated using other diagnostic methods.

Adolescent↗