PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J N Cashman

Publications and source records attributed to J N Cashman.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Tolerability of acute postoperative pain management: nausea, vomiting, sedation, pruritus, and urinary retention. Evidence from published data.

This review examines the evidence from published data concerning the tolerability (indicated by the incidence of nausea, vomiting, sedation, pruritus, and urinary retention), of three analgesic techniques after major surgery; intramuscular analgesia (i.m.), patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), and epidural analgesia. A MEDLINE search of publications concerned with the management of postoperative pain and these indicators identified over 800 original papers and reviews. Of these, data were extracted from 183 studies relating to postoperative nausea and vomiting, 89 relating to sedation, 166 relating to pruritus, and 94 relating to urinary retention, giving pooled data which represent a total of more than 100,000 patients. The overall mean (95% CI) incidence of nausea was 25.2 (19.3-32.1)% and of emesis was 20.2 (17.5-23.2)% for all three analgesic techniques. PCA was associated with the highest incidence of nausea but the emesis was unaffected by analgesic technique. There was considerable variability in the criteria used for defining sedation. The overall mean for mild sedation was 23.9 (23-24.8)% and for excessive sedation was 2.6 (2.3-2.8)% for all three analgesic techniques (significantly lower with epidural analgesia). The overall mean incidence of pruritus was 14.7 (11.9-18.1)% for all three analgesic techniques (lowest with i.m. analgesia). Urinary retention occurred in 23.0 (17.3-29.9)% of patients (highest with epidural analgesia). The incidence of nausea and excessive sedation decreased over the period 1980-99, but the incidence of vomiting, pruritus, and urinary retention did not. From these published data it is possible to set standards of care after major surgery for nausea 25%, vomiting 20%, minor sedation 24%, excessive sedation 2.6%, pruritus 14.7%, and urinary retention requiring catheterization 23%. Acute Pain Services should aim for incidences less than this standard of care.

Analgesia↗

Respiratory and haemodynamic effects of acute postoperative pain management: evidence from published data.

BACKGROUND: This study examines the evidence from published data concerning the adverse respiratory and haemodynamic effects of three analgesic techniques after major surgery; i.m. analgesia, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), and epidural analgesia. METHODS: A MEDLINE search of the literature was conducted for publications concerned with the management of postoperative pain. Information relating to variables indicative of respiratory depression and of hypotension was extracted from these studies. Over 800 original papers and reviews were identified. Of these papers, 212 fulfilled the inclusion criteria but only 165 provided usable data on adverse effects. Pooled data obtained from these studies, which represent the experience of a total of nearly 20,000 patients, form the basis of this study. RESULTS: There was considerable variability between studies in the criteria used for defining respiratory depression and hypotension. The overall mean (95% CI) incidence of respiratory depression of the three analgesic techniques was: 0.3 (0.1-1.3)% using requirement for naloxone as an indicator; 1.1 (0.7-1.7)% using hypoventilation as an indicator; 3.3 (1.4-7.6)% using hypercarbia as an indicator; and 17.0 (10.2-26.9)% using oxygen desaturation as an indicator. For i.m. analgesia, the mean (95% CI) reported incidence of respiratory depression varied between 0.8 (0.2-2.5) and 37.0 (22.6-45.9)% using hypoventilation and oxygen desaturation, respectively, as indicators. For PCA, the mean (95% CI) reported incidence of respiratory depression varied between 1.2 (0.7-1.9) and 11.5 (5.6-22.0)%, using hypoventilation and oxygen desaturation, respectively, as indicators. For epidural analgesia, the mean (95% CI) reported incidence of respiratory depression varied between 1.1 (0.6-1.9) and 15.1 (5.6-34.8)%, using hypoventilation and oxygen desaturation, respectively, as indicators. The mean (95% CI) reported incidence of hypotension for i.m. analgesia was 3.8 (1.9-7.5)%, for PCA 0.4 (0.1-1.9)%, and for epidural analgesia 5.6 (3.0-10.2)%. Whereas the incidence of respiratory depression decreased over the period 1980-99, the incidence of hypotension did not. CONCLUSIONS: Assuming a mixture of analgesic techniques, Acute Pain Services should expect an incidence of respiratory depression, as defined by a low ventilatory frequency, of less than 1%, and an incidence of hypotension related to analgesic technique of less than 5%.

Analgesia↗

In-hospital cardiac arrest: what happens to the false arrests?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the events surrounding false cardiac arrest calls and subsequent outcome in patients who were the subjects of such calls. METHODS: A retrospective review of the cardiac arrest audit database pertaining to all false cardiac arrest calls logged by the hospital telephone switchboard at a London Teaching Hospital over a 22-month period. RESULTS: There were 59 false cardiac arrest calls. Of these 30 calls were immediately rescinded and 29 calls were erroneous. An abnormality of heart rhythm was the commonest cause for an erroneous call. Other important causes included epileptic seizure and hypovolaemia secondary to blood loss (whether due to medical or surgical causes). Three patients who were the subject of a rescinded call and 4 patients who were the subject of an erroneous call died in hospital without going home. Life table analysis revealed that for every 10 false arrests, eight patients were alive at 24 h, six patients were alive at 6 weeks, four patients were alive at 6 months and three patients were alive at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for a wider appreciation of the significance of false cardiac arrest calls.

Adolescent↗

Effectiveness of acute postoperative pain management: I. Evidence from published data.

BACKGROUND: This review examines the evidence from published data concerning the incidence of moderate-severe and of severe pain after major surgery, with three analgesic techniques; intramuscular (i.m.) analgesia, patient controlled analgesia (PCA), and epidural analgesia. METHODS: A MEDLINE search of the literature was conducted for publications concerned with the management of postoperative pain. Over 800 original papers and reviews were identified. Of these 212 papers fulfilled the inclusion criteria but only 165 provided usable data on pain intensity and pain relief. Pooled data on pain scores obtained from these studies, which represent the experience of a total of nearly 20,000 patients, form the basis of this review. RESULTS: Different pain measurement tools provided comparable data. When considering a mixture of three analgesic techniques, the overall mean (95% CI) incidence of moderate-severe pain and of severe pain was 29.7 (26.4-33.0)% and 10.9 (8.4-13.4)%, respectively. The overall mean (95% CI) incidence of poor pain relief and of fair-to-poor pain relief was 3.5 (2.4-4.6)% and 19.4 (16.4-22.3)%, respectively. For i.m. analgesia the incidence of moderate-severe pain was 67.2 (58.1-76.2)% and that of severe pain was 29.1 (18.8-39.4)%. For PCA, the incidence of moderate-severe pain was 35.8 (31.4-40.2)% and that of severe pain was 10.4 (8.0-12.8)%. For epidural analgesia the incidence of moderate-severe pain was 20.9 (17.8-24.0)% and that of severe pain was 7.8 (6.1-9.5)%. The incidence of premature catheter dislodgement was 5.7 (4.0-7.4)%. Over the period 1973-1999 there has been a highly significant (P < 0.0001) reduction in the incidence of moderate-severe pain of 1.9 (1.1-2.7)% per year. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the UK Audit Commission (1997) proposed standards of care might be unachievable using current analgesic techniques. The data may be useful in setting standards of care for Acute Pain Services.

Analgesia↗

Addition of droperidol to morphine administered by the patient-controlled analgesia method: what is the optimal dose?

Eighty patients were recruited into a double-blind, randomized trial to find the optimal dose of droperidol for addition to the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine infusate for female patients undergoing gynaecological surgery. A standardized anaesthetic technique was employed. Post-operative analgesia was provided by PCA morphine. Patients were allocated at random into one of four treatment groups receiving with each PCA morphine bolus: (1) droperidol 0.05 mg; (2) droperidol 0.10 mg; (3) droperidol 0.15 mg; and (4) droperidol 0.20 mg, respectively. The incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV), requests for rescue anti-emetic medication, and incidence of side effects were recorded. The number of symptom-free patients in each group increased as the droperidol dose increased, but although there was a significant inverse association between the total dose of droperidol received and the severity of PONV (P < 0.05), there were no significant differences between individual groups. In each group, patients were significantly less sedated at 24 h compared with 12 h (P < 0.01). However, after 24 h, patients in group 4 were significantly more sedated than patients in groups 1 and 2 (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of the incidence of anxiety or other side effects attributable to droperidol. The present authors suggest that, although the results demonstrate few statistically significant differences between the four groups, a PCA bolus dose of droperidol of 0.10 mg mL-1 appears to provide the optimal balance between anti-emetic efficacy and an acceptable incidence of side effects.

Adolescent↗

The mechanisms of action of NSAIDs in analgesia.

Traditionally, the analgesic action of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) has been explained on the basis of their inhibition of the enzymes that synthesise prostaglandins. However, it is clear that NSAIDs exert their analgesic effect not only through peripheral inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis but also through a variety of other peripheral and central mechanisms. It is now known that there are 2 structurally distinct forms of the cyclo-oxygenase enzyme (COX-1 and COX-2). COX-1 is a constitutive member of normal cells and COX-2 is induced in inflammatory cells. Inhibition of COX-2 activity represent the most likely mechanism of action for NSAID-mediated analgesia, while the ratio of inhibition of COX-1 to COX-2 by NSAIDs should determine the likelihood of adverse effects. In addition, some NSAIDs inhibit the lipoxygenase pathway, which may itself result in the production of algogenic metabolites. Interference with G-protein-mediated signal transduction by NSAIDs may form the basis of an analgesic mechanism unrelated to inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis. These is increasing evidence that NSAIDs have a central mechanism of action that augments the peripheral mechanism. This effect may be the result of interference with the formation of prostaglandins within the CNS. Alternatively, the central action may be mediated by endogenous opioid peptides or blockade of the release of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT). A mechanism involving inhibition of excitatory amino acids of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor activation has also been proposed.

Analgesia↗

Recovery from neuromuscular blockade: residual curarisation following atracurium or vecuronium by bolus dosing or infusions.

We conducted a survey of the incidence of Postoperative Residual Curarisation (PORC) in two groups of patients following the use of atracurium or vecuronium. In the first group (B) the neuromuscular blocking drugs were administered by bolus dosing, and in the second group (I) by continuous fusion. On arrival in the recovery room, neuromuscular function was assessed both by compound evoked electromyogram (EMG) in a train of four pattern and also clinically, by the ability to sustain a headlift for > 5 seconds, and to cough. Results were obtained from 150 patients (100 in group B and 50 in group I). The incidence of PORC, as defined by a train of four ratio of < 0.7, on arrival in the recovery room was 12% in group B, and 24% in group I. Clinical criteria of adequate neuromuscular reversal revealed different results, with the majority of patients being unable to perform either clinical test on arrival in recovery. Those patients in whom a peripheral nerve stimulator was used intra-operatively did not have a reduced incidence of PORC. We have demonstrated that PORC is still a common occurrence even with intermediate duration of action neuromuscular blocking drugs.

Adolescent↗

Anaesthesia: cheap at twice the price? Staff awareness, cost comparisons and recommendations for economic savings.

We questioned 50 anaesthetic staff about the costs of consumables used in routine anaesthetic practice. By means of a questionnaire staff were asked for estimates of the cost of 28 drugs, fluids and disposables. The responses were more accurate than in previous surveys; 47% of all the estimated costs were within 50% of the actual costs and 75% were within 100%. The costs of relatively expensive items such as blood, laryngeal mask airways, enflurane and isoflurane were consistently underestimated whereas cheaper items such as disposable syringes and electrocardiograph electrodes were consistently overestimated. Using 'state of the art' consumables, an hour-long anaesthetic in 1992 cost 14.02 pounds compared with 1.24 pounds in 1959. However, allowing for inflation, the cost today is actually equivalent to the cost in 1959. Since 1980 there has been no consistent pattern in drug prices, with some prices remaining the same, others falling and some increasing; all are, however, cheaper in real terms. It is possible to make substantial savings by using the more expensive drugs judiciously and by encouraging the use of low-flow, closed-circuit anaesthetic systems.

Anesthesia↗

Recovery characteristics using isoflurane or propofol for maintenance of anaesthesia: a double-blind controlled trial.

We studied 114 female patients (ASA 1 or 2) who were within 20% of ideal body weight and who were scheduled to undergo gynaecological laparoscopy which required supplementation with an opioid (groups IA and PA), or dental procedures which did not require opioid supplementation (groups IO and PO). A computerised package of psychomotor tests was performed before surgery. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol 2.5 mg.kg-1 and all patients received atracurium 0.3 mg.kg-1 and 67% nitrous oxide in oxygen. Patients in group IA received isoflurane 1% (inspired), and alfentanil 10 micrograms.kg-1 as a bolus and 10 micrograms.kg-1.h-1 as an infusion. Patients in group PA received propofol 9 mg.kg-1.h-1 as an infusion, decreasing to 6 mg.kg-1.h-1 after 15 min, together with alfentanil 10 micrograms.kg-1.h-1. Patients in groups IO and PO received isoflurane and propofol in the regimens described for groups IA and PA, but without alfentanil. Recovery was assessed by a blinded observer who recorded times to awakening (eye opening) and orientation (giving date of birth), and who repeated the psychomotor tests at 1, 3 and 5 h. Linear analogue scales of mood, nausea and pain were obtained and other side effects were noted in the succeeding 48 h. A matched control group of 25 females (who were not anaesthetised) underwent psychomotor testing on four occasions in order to assess the 'learning effect' of repeated recovery testing. The analysis of recovery tests did not assume a normal distribution.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

Anaesthesia and congenital agranulocytosis: influence of anaesthetic agent on neutrophil numbers in a patient with Kostmann's syndrome.

We describe a 14-month-old male patient with congenital agranulocytosis who received general anaesthesia on three separate occasions during a 6-week period for minor surgery. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor was commenced after the second anaesthetic. Each anaesthetic was followed by profound reductions in neutrophil numbers, irrespective of the agent used. Even the third anaesthetic, which avoided all the common agents thought to have a marrow suppressant effect and given during granulocyte colony stimulating factor therapy, was associated with a marked decrease in neutrophil numbers.

Agranulocytosis↗

Repair of traumatic transection of the thoracic aorta: esmolol for intraoperative control of arterial pressure.

We report the intraoperative use of esmolol for control of arterial pressure during repair of a traumatic transection of the descending thoracic aorta. A mean infusion rate of esmolol 50.5 micrograms kg-1 min-1 resulted in a decrease in mean arterial pressure to 63 mm Hg and heart rate to 99 beat min-1 and was associated with excellent surgical conditions. The infusion rate of esmolol was titrated easily against mean arterial pressure, which increased rapidly on discontinuing its infusion. Control of arterial pressure with esmolol was comparable to that achieved with sodium nitroprusside, but without the reflex tachycardia or decrease in Pao2 associated with the latter agent.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

Clinical impressions and cardiorespiratory effects of a new fluorinated inhalation anaesthetic, desflurane (I-653), in volunteers.

The new volatile anaesthetic, desflurane (I-653), was administered to 10 healthy, unpremedicated young male volunteers in order to determine its cardiorespiratory effects and the characteristics and acceptability of its inhalation. All volunteers breathed either sub-anaesthetic (1.8% inspired) or anaesthetic (5.4% inspired) concentrations of the anaesthetic without coughing, breath-holding, salivation or other untoward respiratory response. Respiratory minute volume and alveolar ventilation decreased and ventilatory rate increased. Systemic arterial pressure decreased (diastolic more than systolic) and heart rate remained unchanged. Cardiac rhythm remained unaltered, except in one volunteer who experienced a single premature atrial contraction. Volunteers stated that the odour of desflurane was not irritating or unpleasant. Exposure to the agent for approximately 90 min resulted in rapid and clear-headed recovery.

Anesthesia Recovery Period↗

Neuromuscular block with doxacurium (BW A938U) in patients with normal or absent renal function.

The characteristics of neuromuscular block induced by doxacurium were compared in patients with and without renal function. Seventeen patients with end stage chronic renal failure and 18 patients with normal renal function were anaesthetized with 0.5% halothane and nitrous oxide in oxygen and received doxacurium in an initial dose of 25 micrograms kg-1 (estimated from available data as an ED95 dose), with incremental doses of 5 micrograms kg-1. At the end of surgery, residual neuromuscular block was antagonized with either edrophonium 1.0 mg kg-1 or neostigmine 0.08 mg kg-1. There was no significant difference between the mean maximum blocks achieved with doxacurium: 17.4% (renal failure group) and 11.6% (control group) of control twitch heights, or between the mean times to achieve maximum block (10.9 min and 10.8 min, respectively). The mean duration of action of doxacurium, indicated by the time for twitch height to recover to 25% of control, was longer in the renal failure group (120.8 min vs 66.7 min in the control group) (ns). Similarly, the mean duration of action of increments was longer in the renal failure group (27.4 min vs 20.5 min in the control group). The rate of spontaneous recovery from doxacurium as indicated by the time for twitch height to recover from 0 to 5%, 5 to 10% and 10 to 25%, was not significantly different in the two groups. Antagonism of doxacurium was achieved more reliably with neostigmine than with edrophonium in both groups. The administration of doxacurium was associated with minimal cardiovascular effects.

Adult↗