PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J N Ingle

Publications and source records attributed to J N Ingle.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Evaluation of continuous infusion suramin in metastatic breast cancer: impact on plasma levels of insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) and IGF-binding proteins.

Suramin represents a new class of antitumor drugs that targets growth factor networks. In this Phase II trial, suramin was administered by continuous infusion to 10 patients with advanced breast cancer. The target level of 280 microgram/ml suramin was achieved in a median of 10 days; toxicities in this patient group were low. We monitored the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) network in these patients because of the previously defined growth-promoting role of the IGFs in breast cancer. Plasma levels of total IGF-I and total IGF-II showed variable responses to suramin with median decreases of 24 and 23%, respectively, for the 10 patients; for total IGF-I levels, this did not reach statistical significance. On the other hand, free IGF-I plasma levels were consistently and dramatically increased (over 250%) after suramin infusion. IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs), modulators of IGF bioavailability, were also measured. Levels of IGFBP-3, the major carrier of IGFs in the circulation, were decreased 21% after suramin treatment when measured by immunoradiometric assay. However, the majority of the plasma IGFBP-3 remaining after suramin was not the intact high-affinity IGF-binding form but rather a 30-kDa fragment with markedly reduced affinity for IGF-I. IGFBP-3 protease activity was evident in the plasma of 3 of 10 patients after suramin. Measurements of plasma IGFBP-1, IGFBP-2, and IGFBP-4 revealed no significant changes in response to suramin. The dramatic increase in active free IGF-I seen after suramin raises concern and underscores the importance of measuring relevant biomarkers in clinical trials.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Comparison of estrogen receptor determinations by a biochemical ligand-binding assay and immunohistochemical staining with monoclonal antibody ER1D5 in females with lymph node positive breast carcinoma entered on two prospective clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: The measurement of estrogen receptors (ER) in breast cancer specimens has traditionally been assessed with a dextran-coated charcoal assay (DCCA). More recently the immunohistochemical staining (IHC) method has gained increasing popularity because of its ability to use fixed tissue, assess needle biopsies, and reduce cost. Controversy exists over the accuracy of IHC compared with that of DCCA in determining ER. We compared these two techniques using tumor tissue obtained from a large group of females with lymph node positive breast carcinoma with long term follow-up. METHODS: Breast carcinoma tissue was obtained from a large group of females with node positive breast carcinoma participating in two adjuvant chemotherapy trials. ER was determined by the traditional DCCA method and by IHC using the ER1D5 antibody. Disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by each of these methods. RESULTS: ER status was determined by DCCA and IHC in tumor tissue obtained from 316 females. A concordance of 79% was observed for the determination of ER-positive tumors. Of the discordant results, the majority of DCCA-negative, IHC-positive tumors could be explained by a low level of DCCA positivity (< 10 fmol) or IHC staining of nonmalignant cells. A much higher rate of discordant results was observed in premenopausal females. Of the DCCA-negative, IHC-positive patients 97% were premenopausal and of the DCCA-positive, IHC-negative patients 79% were premenopausal. ER by DCC appears to perform better than ER by IHC as a prognostic factor in terms of DFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with DCCA, IHC with monoclonal antibody ER1D5 appears to be a reasonable substitute for the determination of ER. Although DCCA appeared to perform better as a determinant of prognosis, ER detection is used primarily for deciding on hormonal therapy. Review of discordant cases indicates IHC may more accurately reflect the ER status of malignant cells in some patients. Attention must be paid to quality control considerations in performance of IHC staining.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1996

A pilot evaluation of alternating preoperative chemotherapy in the management of patients with locoregionally advanced breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: This prospective trial was conducted to evaluate the outcome of patients treated with preoperative and post operative chemotherapy, mastectomy, and irradiation for locoregionally advanced breast carcinoma. METHODS: Between June 1986 and September 1990, 71 patients received 2 cycles of doxorubicin that alternated with 2 cycles of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil prior to mastectomy; irradiation was administered when the tumor was not amenable to surgical resection. Additional chemotherapy and tamoxifen, in hormone receptor-positive tumors, was used after mastectomy. Post-operative irradiation was given on a selective basis for patients at high risk for locoregional disease recurrence. RESULTS: Although 5 patients (7%) had disease progression, clinical partial or complete tumor response to preoperative chemotherapy was noted in 46 patients (65%). Sixty-eight patients (96%) underwent mastectomy. With a median follow-up of 52 months, the relapse-free and overall survival rates at 5 years were 42% and 57% respectively. Locoregional tumor recurrence occurred in 14 patients (20%), and 28 patients (39%) developed metastatic disease. Menopausal status, clinical presentation (noninflammatory vs. inflammatory), and American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical stage were independent covariates associated with patient outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative alternating chemotherapy, with the selective use of irradiation, resulted in significant locoregional disease regression and the successful integration of mastectomy into the therapeutic strategy. Locoregional tumor control and relapse-free and overall survival estimates for the approach described herein compared favorably with other comtemporary reports for this condition.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Prognostic factors in elderly women with metastatic breast cancer treated with tamoxifen: an analysis of patients entered on four prospective clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Information regarding prognostic factors and survival in elderly women with metastatic breast cancer treated with tamoxifen is limited. METHODS: The data from 4 prospective clinical trials were analyzed, including information on 396 postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer who received tamoxifen as initial therapy for metastatic disease. Emphasis was placed on 184 elderly patients (age greater than 65 years) to characterize the response to therapy, time to progression TTP), overall survival (OS), prognostic factors, and treatment-related toxicity. RESULTS: Among 363 patients with measurable or evaluable disease, the objective response rates were higher in the elderly patients (46% versus 33%, P = 0.06); but age did not achieve significance in a logistic regression analysis (P= 0. 1). The median TTP (10.5 months versus 6.2 months, log rank P = 0.002) and OS (35.7 months versus 28.8 months, log rank P = 0.02) were superior in the elderly cohort. In multivariate analysis, age at diagnosis approached statistical significance (P = 0.055) for TTP but was not significant for OS (P = 0.17). Among elderly patients, disease free interval (DFI) (greater than 5 years), dominant disease site (soft tissue), prior adjuvant chemotherapy, positive estrogen/progesterone receptor (ER/PgR) and performance status (PS) were independent prognostic factors. Hot flashes were common in both younger and older cohorts (25% versus 33%, P = 0.14), while anorexia (14% versus 22%, P = 0.04) and mood changes (2% versus 6%, P = 0.03) were more common in the elderly patients. CONCLUSIONS: There was no indication that elderly women with metastatic breast cancer treated with tamoxifen have a poorer outcome with regard to response rate, TTP or OS; in fact, they appeared to have a slightly better prognosis although this was not significant after adjustment for other prognostic factors. In elderly patients, DFI, PS, positive ER or PGR, and dominant disease site are independent prognostic factors.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1996

A randomized trial of megestrol acetate with or without premarin in the treatment of potentially responsive metastatic breast cancer. A Study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (E2185).

BACKGROUND: Human breast cancer cells in vitro exhibit increased levels of progestin receptors (PgR) after brief exposure to physiologic concentrations of estrogens. Prior clinical studies have positively correlated the responsiveness of metastatic breast cancer to progestin therapy with the level of PgR in the tumor cells. METHODS: These observations were used as the scientific basis for a randomized clinical trial by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) to compare the effectiveness of megestrol acetate (MEG) alone in a daily dose of 160 mg with MEG alternated with premarin in a dose of 1.25 mg/day on the first 3 days of a 14 day cycle (PRE/MEG). From 1985 through 1989, 266 eligible and fully evaluable patients were randomized to 1 of the treatment arms and accrued to this trial. All patients were postmenopausal with biochemical estrogen cytosol protein receptor (ER) positive (> or = 10 fm/mg) tumors. The treatment groups were balanced with respect to performance status, number of involved organ systems, and PgR levels. RESULTS: Forty-five of 135 (33%) (95% confidence interval [CI], 25-42%) patients receiving MEG experienced a partial (PR) or complete (CR) response. Thirty-one of 131 (23%) (95% CI, 17-32%) patients receiving PRE/MEG achieved a PR or CR. Survival was not influenced by treatment selection. However, median time to progression was seven months for patients receiving MEG and four months for the group receiving PRE/MEG (P = 0.03). The treatment failure hazard rate was higher for patients with a short disease free interval after primary treatment of the breast cancer, poor performance status, non-white race, and visceral disease. Survival was negatively impacted by short disease free interval, administration of prior radiation therapy, prior treatment for metastatic disease, and hepatic involvement. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential treatment with premarin and megestrol acetate is not superior to treatment with megace alone in potentially hormone responsive patients with advanced breast cancer.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗
PubMed1996

Octreotide as first-line treatment for women with metastatic breast cancer.

Octreotide is a synthetic somatostatin analogue which has shown inhibitory activity against human breast cancer cells in culture. Ten patients with metastatic breast cancer and no prior hormonal therapy exposure received octreotide at 150 micrograms subcutaneously thrice daily. No objective responses were observed and the median time to treatment failure was short at 57 days.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Influence of patient characteristics, socioeconomic factors, geography, and systemic risk on the use of breast-sparing treatment in women enrolled in adjuvant breast cancer studies: an analysis of two intergroup trials.

PURPOSE: To investigate the frequency of breast-sparing treatment among breast cancer patients subsequently enrolled in national cooperative group studies of adjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A data base was formed of 5,172 patients randomized onto two intergroup trials. Lumpectomy rates were analyzed within study-defined risk strata and across geographic regions. Significant predictors of lower lumpectomy usage were determined in multivariate analyses with variables that described patient and disease characteristics, systemic risk strata, geographic region, and socioeconomic indicators based on zip code of residence. RESULTS: Breast-conservation rates were 30% in the node-negative and 15% in the node-positive trials, with a wide geographic variation within each study (range, 14% to 49% and 9% to 31%, respectively). Lumpectomy use declined with increasing tumor size and did not exceed 40% even for tumors < or = 1 cm with negative nodes. With increasing risk of systemic relapse, frequency of lumpectomy declined (rates for five strata in order of increasing systemic risk: 41%, 33%, 24%, 18%, and 11%), even though these strata were not known at the time of the surgical decision. A logistic model confirmed the joint significance of geographic region and systemic risk. An exploratory model that adjusted for all important variables identified the following significant predictors of lower lumpectomy use: positive nodes; many positive nodes, increased systemic risk; tumor size > or = 2.0 cm; older age; South, Central or non-New England regions; and either lack of college degree or lower income levels. CONCLUSION: Breast-sparing therapy was used in the minority of women subsequently accrued to two national adjuvant breast cancer studies, even though this cohort and their referring surgeons represented a select population. Although multiple concrete factors were independent predictors of lower lumpectomy rates, prospective research is needed into how patients and their physicians approach the mastectomy versus lumpectomy decision.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Estrogen replacement therapy withdrawal and regression of metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Data regarding the effects of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) and its withdrawal in patients with breast cancer are limited. METHODS: Four cases were observed involving estrogen replacement therapy withdrawal as management of metastatic breast cancer. RESULTS: Three patients with a history of primary breast cancer developed metastatic disease while on ERT. A fourth patient presented with metastatic breast cancer while on ERT. Withdrawal of this "physiologic" ERT alone as the only therapeutic intervention resulted in regression of metastatic disease in all four patients. CONCLUSIONS: In patients receiving ERT who develop metastatic breast cancer, withdrawal of ERT alone is a therapeutic option. Awareness of this phenomenon may be of value in management of these patients. The role of ERT and value of ERT withdrawal in patients with breast cancer deserve further study.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1995

Evaluation of ifosfamide plus mesna as first-line chemotherapy in women with metastatic breast cancer.

Ifosfamide is an oxazaphosphorine analogue of cyclophosphamide with proven activity in breast cancer but substantial urotoxicity. The introduction of mesna as a uroprotective agent provided a stimulus for reexamination of ifosfamide for therapy of women with metastatic breast cancer. Twenty women with measurable (18 patients) or evaluable (2 patients) disease were entered into a phase II clinical trial of ifosfamide plus mesna as first-line chemotherapy. Ifosfamide was administered i.v. at a dose of 1,800 mg/m2 in 1 L D5W over 2 h on five consecutive days. Mesna was administered i.v. at a dose of 400 mg/m2 over 15 min immediately before and 1 h after ifosfamide, and then every 4 h for three more doses. The last three doses could be given either i.v. or orally. The planned cycle length was 28 days. Three patients (15%), all with measurable disease, achieved a partial response (95% confidence interval: 3 to 38%). Median time to progression was 137 days and median survival was 407 days. Toxicities included cumulative myelosuppression and substantial nausea and emesis. Four patients were removed from treatment because of toxicity alone and a fifth refused further therapy. We conclude that ifosfamide, plus mesna, as given in this protocol has definite but limited antitumor activity and poor tolerability.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Uranium dust exposure and lung cancer risk in four uranium processing operations.

We examined the relation between uranium dust exposure and lung cancer mortality among workers employed in four uranium processing or fabrication operations located in Missouri, Ohio, and Tennessee. Among workers who had at least 30 years of potential follow-up, we identified 787 lung cancer cases from death certificates and matched one control to each case. Health physicists estimated individual annual lung doses from occupational exposure primarily to insoluble uranium compounds, using contemporary monitoring data. With a 10-year lag, cumulative lung doses ranged from 0 to 137 centigrays (cGy) for cases and from 0 to 80 cGy for controls. Health physicists assigned annual external radiation doses to workers having personal monitoring records. Archivists collected smoking information from occupational medical records. Odds ratios for lung cancer mortality for seven cumulative internal dose groups did not demonstrate increasing risk with increasing dose. We found an odds ratio of 2.0 for those exposed to 25 cGy and higher, but the 95% confidence interval of 0.20 to 20 showed great uncertainty in this estimate. There was a suggestion of an exposure effect for workers hired at age 45 years or older. Further analyses for cumulative external doses and exposures to thorium, radium, and radon did not reveal any clear association between exposure and increased risk, nor did dichotomizing workers by facility.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Prognostic value of c-erbB2 overexpression in axillary lymph node positive breast cancer. Results from a randomized adjuvant treatment protocol.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate the prognostic importance of c-erbB2 overexpression in a standardized cohort of patients with axillary lymph node positive breast cancer. METHODS: Paraffin embedded primary breast cancers from 354 patients with axillary lymph node positive breast cancer, treated on a North Central Cancer Treatment Group adjuvant protocol, were studied immunohistochemically. c-erbB2 staining was classified as negative, weak (1+), moderate (2+), or strong (3+) and was assessed for effectiveness as a predictor of outcome in univariate and Cox model multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Twenty percent of specimens exhibited moderate or strong c-erbB2 staining. The median disease free survival period of the strong staining group was 2.9 years, compared with 7.1 years for all other patients (P = 0.01). The median overall survival for the strong staining group was 5 years, compared with 12 years for all other patients (P = 0.03). A definite correlation was noted between degree of nodal involvement and the likelihood of strong c-erbB2 staining (P = 0.001). There was also a significant correlation between c-erbB2 staining and higher nuclear grade and estrogen receptor negativity. In a multivariate analysis, c-erbB2 staining was not a significant predictor of either disease free survival or overall survival. CONCLUSION: According to this analysis, the strong correlation between c-erbB2 expression and degree of nodal involvement, higher grade disease, and estrogen receptor negativity suggests expression of this protooncogene product in a biologically more aggressive form of breast cancer. In a multivariate analysis, c-erbB2 expression was not an independent prognostic factor. Thus, c-erbB2 assessment did not appear to add significantly to the information provided by currently available standard disease parameters.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1994

Evaluation of piroxantrone in women with metastatic breast cancer and failure on nonanthracycline chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Doxorubicin generally is considered to be the most effective single chemotherapeutic agent for the treatment of breast cancer. The major cumulative dose-limiting toxicity is cardiac toxicity, which may be related to the formation of free radicals with subsequent lipid peroxidation, leading to membrane damage. The anthrapyrazoles, of which piroxantrone is a member, were synthesized in an attempt to eliminate this toxicity. METHODS: A Phase II clinical trial was conducted in 30 women with metastatic breast cancer in whom piroxantrone was administered at a dose of 160 mg/m2 by 1-hour infusion. The planned cycle length for retreatment was 3 weeks. Measurable metastatic disease and failure on one prior chemotherapy regimen, but no prior anthracycline exposure, were required for response evaluation. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were evaluable for response, and 6 (21% and 95% confidence intervals: 10-43%) achieved an objective response (1 complete, 5 partial responses), with a median response duration of 244 days. The median time-to-disease progression for all patients was 124 days. Eight patients received cumulative doses of piroxantrone approaching or exceeding 1000 mg/m2, and all had reductions in the resting left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The estimated median decrease in LVEF at 1000 mg/m2 was 16%, with a range of 10-28%. Clinical findings of congestive heart failure developed in two patients. CONCLUSIONS: Piroxantrone had definite antitumor activity in women who had metastatic breast cancer and failure on prior chemotherapy that did not include an anthracycline. The 95% confidence interval for response probability was broad, but the level of activity observed was relatively low. The clear association with cardiac toxicity combined with the relatively low efficacy led to the conclusion that piroxantrone cannot be recommended for further development as therapy for women with breast cancer. Further study of other anthrapyrazoles is necessary to determine if the promise of this new class of agents can be fulfilled.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

DNA ploidy and the percentage of cells in S-phase as prognostic factors for women with lymph node negative breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Previous cell kinetic studies have shown that the percentage of cells in S-phase (%S) of the tumor may be an important prognostic factor for relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with resected lymph node negative breast cancer. METHODS: This study examined DNA ploidy and %S from the paraffin embedded primary tumors of 265 patients who had surgery between 1975 and 1981, had lymph node negative cancer, and had no adjuvant therapy. The %S and %G2M values were calculated using a debris and aggregate subtraction model. RESULTS: The results of the DNA ploidy analysis revealed 130 (49%) DNA diploid tumors and 135 (51%) DNA nondiploid tumors. Ploidy was not significant for either RFS (P = 0.20) or OS (P = 0.13). The total %S (using a cutoff of 8%) was a statistically significant prognostic factor for RFS (P = 0.003) and borderline for OS (P = 0.08). The proliferation fraction (%S + %G2M), using a cutoff of 12.5, was a statistically significant prognostic factor for RFS (P = 0.01) and for OS (P = 0.01). In a Cox multivariate analysis for RFS, the total %S remained significant (P = 0.05) along with tumor size. In the analysis of OS, the proliferation fraction remained significant (P = 0.03) along with tumor size and age. DNA ploidy was not significant in any multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that tumor size and cell proliferation parameters are independent prognostic factors for patients with resected lymph node negative breast cancer. However, the clinical usefulness of the cell kinetic parameters appears limited.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Randomized trial of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil with or without estrogenic recruitment in women with metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The fraction of breast cancer cells undergoing DNA synthesis at any one time is relatively low, which is problematic because most chemotherapeutic agents are most effective against dividing cells. Estrogens administered in vitro and in vivo can increase breast cancer cell proliferation. A randomized clinical trial was performed to determine if estrogenic recruitment could increase the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy. METHODS: One hundred sixty-five women were randomized, with two excluded from these analyses, to either an intravenous cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) regimen alone (cyclophosphamide, 600 mg/m2; methotrexate, 40 mg/m2; 5-fluorouracil, 600 mg/m2) or CMF preceded by 3 days of diethylstilbestrol (DES) at a dose of 1 mg orally per day. The planned cycle length was 3 weeks. RESULTS: Objective responses were seen in 20 of 80 patients (25%) treated with CMF and 32 of 83 patients (39%) treated with DES-CMF, and this difference almost achieved statistical significance (chi-square, two-sided P = 0.06). However, duration of response, time to disease progression, and survival time were similar for the two regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Estrogenic recruitment with DES as used in this study does not substantially increase the efficacy of a CMF regimen administered intravenously every 3 weeks.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Breast conservation therapy for invasive breast cancer: a review of prior trials and the Mayo Clinic experience.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the role of breast conservation therapy in the management of early-stage invasive breast cancer. DESIGN: We reviewed the results of previously published trials and summarized 165 cases of breast conservation surgical procedures and irradiation at the Mayo Clinic between January 1979 and September 1989. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From the prior clinical trials, the criteria for selection of patients, the surgical and radiation techniques used, the complications of treatment, the cosmetic results, and the follow-up assessment and survival were analyzed. The 165 Mayo patients were also characterized, and their results were described. RESULTS: Breast conservation therapy consists of excision of the primary tumor followed by irradiation. A coordinated multidisciplinary approach should be used for selection of patients. Several large-scale clinical trials have demonstrated that breast conservation therapy is an appropriate option for most women with early-stage breast cancer and provides tumor control and survival rates equivalent to mastectomy. With a collaborative treatment program and judicious application of contemporary standards of practice, a good-to-excellent cosmetic outcome can be achieved in most patients, and the risk of treatment-related sequelae is minimal. The Mayo Clinic experience with breast conservation therapy is consistent with these observations and compares favorably with other institutional and clinical trial results. CONCLUSION: Patients should be fully educated about the options for primary management of early-stage breast cancer because the selection of therapy may profoundly influence psychologic adjustment and acceptance of the treatment program.

Breast Neoplasms↗