PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J N Ingle

Publications and source records attributed to J N Ingle.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed1989

Randomized trial of doxorubicin alone or combined with vincristine and mitomycin C in women with metastatic breast cancer.

A randomized clinical trial was performed to determine if combination therapy with doxorubicin, vincristine, and mitomycin C (DVM) was superior to doxorubicin alone in women with metastatic breast cancer for whom prior chemotherapy had failed. A total of 185 women were randomized to monthly courses of D (60 mg/m2, observation after 500 mg/m2); or D (50 mg/m2, maximum cumulative dose 500 mg/m2), V (1 mg/m2), and M (10 mg/m2, given every other cycle). Patients failing after D alone could receive V (1 mg weekly for 5 weeks, then 1.2 mg/m2 every 5 weeks) plus M (12 mg/m2 every 5 weeks). Objective responses were seen in 24 of 95 patients (25%) on D alone and 39 of 90 patients (43%) on DVM (two-sided p = 0.01). The time to disease progression distribution was significantly better for DVM (two-sided p = 0.02), but the magnitude of the advantage was small with the medians being 2.7 months for D and 4.2 months for DVM. There was no significant difference in survival between the two regimens. The degree of leukopenia was greater for DVM both in terms of median white blood cell nadir (1,300/microL versus 1,700/microL) and percentage of patients with a nadir less than 1,000/microL (33% versus 16%). A total of 45 patients received VM following D alone, and only seven (16%) achieved an objective response. We conclude that, despite a significantly higher response rate and longer time to progression, the degree of clinical benefit is not sufficient to recommend the combination of DVM over D alone as second-line therapy for women with metastatic breast cancer. The level of efficacy seen with VM as tertiary therapy is low and is of such a magnitude to suggest that V adds little but toxicity to M.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Principles of therapy in advanced breast cancer.

Advanced breast cancer represents a common clinical problem faced by medical oncologists, internists, surgeons, and radiation oncologists. The medical oncologist or internist is usually the patient's primary physician and is responsible for coordinating the multiple disciplines to optimize the therapeutic management. In the case of locally advanced (stage III) breast cancer, there are far fewer prospective clinical trials on which to base management decisions than are available in the metastatic disease setting. The primary cancer care physician's responsibility is particularly great for coordination of the multidisciplinary approach and integration of medical oncology, radiation oncology, and surgical treatment modalities, however. In the case of metastatic breast cancer, an understanding of the importance of certain clinical factors (that is, hormonal receptors, performance score, disease-free interval, sites and extent of metastasis, and tempo of disease) is crucial to the development of the therapeutic plan in the individual patient. Although entry on a state-of-the-art clinical trial is the appropriate goal, this is not always possible, and an understanding of therapeutic options is essential. Palliation is the key word in the management of metastatic breast cancer, and hormonal therapy is generally the most appropriate course unless the patient is not a hormonal candidate because of sites, extent, or tempo of disease, or because of the known lack of hormonal receptors. Of particular importance is attention to sites of bone metastasis where appropriate radiation therapy and/or surgical intervention can relieve pain or prevent a devastating fracture with resultant loss of mobility and decrease in quality of life.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1988

A design for phase II testing of anticancer agents within a phase III clinical trial.

A design for testing new anticancer agents is proposed such that the initial testing of new agents (phase II trials) is included within the framework of a comparative clinical trial (phase III). Randomization between phase II trials and the treatment groups of the phase III trial enforces consistency of patient selection and evaluation of response criteria. Patients who progress on the phase II trials of the new agents are randomized to one of the treatments of the phase III trial. Design issues, such as sample size and power, and analysis of the proposed design, are discussed. Advantages and disadvantages of the design are illustrated by sample size calculations for a current clinical trial in advanced breast cancer.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1988

Phase II evaluation of menogaril in women with metastatic breast cancer after failure of first-line chemotherapy.

A total of 25 patients with metastatic breast cancer who had failed one prior chemotherapy regimen and had not received prior treatment with doxorubicin were treated with menogaril (200 mg/m2 i.v. over 1 h) every 4 weeks. Four patients (16%) achieved partial regressions lasting a median of 46 days. The median time to progression for all patients was 60 days and the median survival was 264 days. Seventeen patients subsequently received doxorubicin after removal from protocol and six (35%) achieved objective regression. We conclude that menogaril administered by the method that we employed has marginal activity in women with metastatic breast cancer after failure of prior chemotherapy. Failure to respond to menogaril does not preclude response to subsequent treatment with doxorubicin.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1988

Randomized clinical trial of tamoxifen alone or combined with fluoxymesterone in postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer.

A randomized clinical trial was performed to determine if combination hormonal therapy with tamoxifen (TAM) and fluoxymesterone (FLU) was more efficacious than TAM alone for the treatment of postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer. Patients failing TAM could subsequently receive FLU. The dose of both drugs was 10 mg orally twice daily. Objective responses were seen in 50 of 119 TAM patients (42%) and 63 of 119 TAM plus FLU patients (53%) (one-sided P = .05). Time to disease progression distributions were better for TAM plus FLU (median, 350 days v 199 days), but the log rank test only approached statistical significance (one-sided P = .07). Duration of response and survival distributions were similar between the two treatment arms. Toxicities, in terms of androgenic side effects, were greater on the TAM plus FLU regimen. Fifty-two patients are evaluable for response with FLU following TAM and 21 (40%) have achieved a response. We conclude that the advantages in terms of response rate and time to progression observed with TAM plus FLU probably represent a biological effect, but are not of sufficient magnitude to justify the routine clinical use of this combination given the lack of survival advantage and side effects encountered.

Adult↗
PubMed1988

Randomized trial of observation versus adjuvant therapy with cyclophosphamide, fluorouracil, prednisone with or without tamoxifen following mastectomy in postmenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer.

Following mastectomy for node-positive breast cancer, 261 postmenopausal women were randomized to observation or adjuvant treatment with cyclophosphamide, fluorouracil, prednisone (CFP) alone or combined with tamoxifen (T). Doses used were: C, 150 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) days 1 to 5; F, 300 mg/m2 IV days 1 to 5; P, 10 mg by mouth 3 times daily on days 1 to 7; and T, 10 mg by mouth 2 times daily. A total of ten courses of treatment, administered every 6 weeks, was planned and T was stopped 6 weeks after the last course of CFP. Two hundred thirty-four patients were fully eligible and evaluable. With a median observation time slightly in excess of 5 years, the proportion of recurrences on each arm were: CFP, 29 of 75 (39%); CFPT, 29 of 71 (41%); and observation, 50 of 88 (57%). Relapse-free survival distributions for both CFP and CFPT were superior to observation (both two-sided P = .01). Considering prognostic factors in covariate analysis revealed two-sided P = .0006 for CFP v observation and P = .0003 for CFPT v observation. No substantial difference was identified between CFP and CFPT. Survival data are not yet mature with 31% dead; and, although slight separations of the curves exist in favor of the treatment arms, no significant differences in survival have been seen. Both adjuvant therapy programs are well tolerated and there were no treatment-related deaths. Further maturation of the data is required to determine if the advantages in relapse-free survival will be translated into any overall survival benefit which must be considered the goal of primary interest.

Aged↗
PubMed1988

Microassay for nuclear binding of steroid receptors with use of intact cells from small samples of avian and human tissue.

A micro version of a nuclear binding assay to assess the biological activity of receptors for steroid hormones was developed for application to small (needle) biopsies of human tumors for the purpose of predicting responses to steroid therapy. This easier assay requires 10-fold less tissue than the original nuclear binding assay described for progesterone receptors in the avian oviduct, endometrium, and endometrial carcinomas (Spelsberg TC, et al., Endocrinology 1987;121:631). We describe the application of this micro assay to normal avian oviduct and cancers of the human breast, and we demonstrate a tissue specificity and saturation of nuclear binding. The micro assay reliably measured as little as 0.5 mg equivalents of tissue per assay tube. Results for breast tumors determined to be estrogen-receptor-positive by the standard dextran-coated charcoal method were also determined with this nuclear binding assay. As described previously for progesterone receptors in endometrial carcinomas, some receptor-positive breast biopsies displayed negligible capacity for nuclear binding. Therefore, with the present assay we have identified nonfunctional receptors in these biopsies, which may be useful for accurate prediction of patients' responses to therapy with hormones.

Animals↗
PubMed1987

Pericardial effusion in women with breast cancer.

Ninety patients with a history of breast cancer and pericardial effusion detected on echocardiography were identified and divided on a clinical basis into three groups. Group 1 consisted of 20 patients who had progressive metastatic breast cancer and echocardiography performed on a routine basis as a part of a clinical trial involving 38 patients. All 20 had small unexpected effusions, and only one patient developed symptomatic malignant pericardial disease late in her clinical course. Group 2 consisted of 32 patients who were without evidence of metastatic disease at the time of positive echocardiography and the etiology was considered benign in all patients. Six patients required pericardiectomy, five for severe radiation induced pericarditis and one for amyloid. No patient developed proven or suspected malignant pericardial disease. Group 3 comprised 38 patients who had known metastatic disease outside the pericardium at the time of positive echocardiography. Nineteen patients in Group 3 had histologically proven malignant involvement during life or at autopsy, and five more had suspected malignant pericardial disease. Ten patients initially were treated with pericardiectomy and 28 patients were managed with systemic therapy alone (24 patients) or with pericardiocentesis (four patients). Among the 12 patients with malignant effusion treated without surgery, proven local progression of pericardial disease occurred in six, with sudden death in two of those patients. No patient treated initially with surgery suffered progression of her pericardial disease. It was concluded that: small, clinically unsuspected pericardial effusions appear to be relatively common in women with metastatic breast cancer; no patient with clinical pericardial disease confirmed on echocardiography and no evidence of metastatic breast cancer developed malignant pericardial involvement; 50% of patients with known metastatic disease and a clinically apparent pericardial effusion had malignant pericardial disease; and nonsurgical therapy in patients with histologically proven or clinically suspected malignant pericardial effusion was associated with a high incidence of progressive pericardial disease.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

Effect of body weight on the pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide in breast cancer patients.

Cyclophosphamide pharmacokinetics have been studied in 16 female patients with advanced breast cancer. The group included 7 patients who were greater than 20%, less than or equal to 30% over ideal body weight and 5 patients who were greater than 30% over ideal body weight. Cyclophosphamide plasma elimination half-lives ranged between 152 and 984 min (mean 457 min), the apparent volume of distribution between 19.1 and 62.3 1 (mean 36.1 1), and plasma clearance between 25.9 and 166.6 ml/min (mean 69.5 ml/min). There was a significant positive correlation (r = 0.624, P = 0.010) between body weight and plasma elimination half-life, and a significant negative correlation between body weight and cyclophosphamide clearance when normalized to body surface area (r = 0.578, P = 0.019) or normalized to ideal body weight (r = 0.531, P = 0.0345). The apparent volume of distribution did not correlate with body weight. The results show that cyclophosphamide disposition is altered in patients with increased body weight.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1987

The effect on survival of initial chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer: polychemotherapy versus single drug.

Since current clinical trials assessing new agents occur in patients with advanced breast cancer having failed one and sometimes many polychemotherapy programs, these new agents may not be given a fair trial. In an effort to assess the possibility of using an alternative study design, we analyzed older clinical trials that used a controlled study design, randomizing between a single new drug and an established polychemotherapy program with a cross-over design upon failure. We were interested in noting that the pooled data did display a slight survival advantage (median 3.7 months) for the group receiving polychemotherapy as initial therapy. The survival distributions were clearly not significant using the log rank test, but did approach significance using the Smirnov. It is apparent that, while some slight advantage does occur for that group of patients receiving initial polychemotherapy, the magnitude of this effect is not great and is short in duration. Serious consideration should be given to the assessment of new agents as first-line therapy, particularly should they have a unique mode of action or lessened morbidities or toxicities.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1987

A nuclear binding assay to assess the biological activity of steroid receptors in isolated animal and human tissues.

This paper describes a nuclear binding assay (NB assay) which measures not only the presence of a steroid receptor in a tissue, but also the quantity of that receptor which is biologically active or functional, i.e. able to bind to nuclear acceptor sites. The assay involves the isolation viable cells from tissues and their incubation with an excess of radiolabeled steroid to encourage the activation and nuclear binding of all cellular receptors. The nuclei are isolated under conditions that remove unactivated (unbound) steroid-receptor complexes. This NB assay demonstrates, in both animal and human steroid target tissues, a saturable, tissue- and steroid-specific, and temperature- and time-dependent nuclear binding of radiolabeled steroids. These properties support a receptor-dependent nuclear binding of steroids. This assay is reproducible and requires relatively small amounts of tissue. The patterns of nuclear binding of the progesterone receptor, achieved with the assay in the avian oviduct model system, are shown to correlate with the nuclear binding of progesterone in vivo, the ability of the steroid to alter transcription, and the expression of a specific gene product, the protein avidin. The assay has been used to identify the existence of nonfunctional steroid receptors in endometrial and breast carcinomas. Therefore, this NB assay combined with the standard charcoal/hydroxylapatite methods of quantitating total cellular receptors should provide a means of assessing changes in the regulation of the biological activity of steroid receptors. Further, the assay should be useful to assess the ability of steroid analogs to properly activate their respective receptors for subsequent nuclear binding.

Animals↗
PubMed1986

Evaluation of bisantrene administered by 72-hour infusion in women with metastatic breast cancer.

Bisantrene was administered by 72-h continuous infusion at a dosage level of 240 mg/m2 to 17 patients with metastatic breast cancer who had received only one prior chemotherapy regimen and no prior doxorubicin. Three patients (18%) achieved partial regressions lasting 51, 106, and 213 days. For all patients, the median time to disease progression was 83 days and median survival was 280 days. Eleven patients received doxorubicin after removal from protocol and were evaluable for response, and four (36%) achieved a partial regression. We conclude that bisantrene administered by the method we employed is not associated with substantial clinical benefit in this population of patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1986

Randomized trial of bilateral oophorectomy versus tamoxifen in premenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer.

A randomized clinical trial was performed to compare the efficacy of bilateral oophorectomy with that of tamoxifen at a dose of 10 mg twice daily in premenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer, and to examine the efficacy of each as a crossover treatment. Initial treatment responses were seen in ten of 27 patients (37%) treated with oophorectomy and seven of 26 patients (27%) treated with tamoxifen. The difference was not statistically significant. Crossover responses were seen in five of 15 patients (33%) treated with oophorectomy, including three responses in ten prior tamoxifen nonresponders; and two of 18 patients (11%) treated with tamoxifen. Time to progression distributions were not significantly different during initial treatment, and no significant differences in survival were noted. Thus, there was no overall disadvantage to the use of tamoxifen as opposed to oophorectomy as initial hormonal therapy, and a failure to respond to tamoxifen did not preclude a response to subsequent oophorectomy. Exploratory data analysis within subsets indicated consistent differential treatment effects in the visceral dominant patients. Of the 16 such patients treated with oophorectomy, eight (50%) experienced objective responses but there were no responses in the 14 patients treated with tamoxifen. In the nine visceral dominant crossover patients who had not responded to initial tamoxifen, three (33%) subsequently responded to oophorectomy. Time to progression distributions within the visceral dominant subset appeared to be better for the patients treated initially with oophorectomy. However, one must be very cautious in drawing conclusions from exploratory subset analyses, especially with the small sample size. Further studies would be required to test any hypothesis of differential organ site responsiveness.

Adult↗
PubMed1986

Randomized trial of tamoxifen alone or combined with aminoglutethimide and hydrocortisone in women with metastatic breast cancer.

A randomized clinical trial was performed to compare the efficacy of tamoxifen (TAM) alone with that of TAM plus aminoglutethimide (AG) and hydrocortisone (HC). Patients failing TAM could receive AG and HC. Objective responses to therapy were seen in 21 of 49 TAM patients (43%) and 25 of 51 TAM, AG and HC patients (49%). Time to disease progression and survival distributions were not significantly different between the treatment arms. Toxicity was greater for patients treated with TAM, AG, and HC and the trial was discontinued early for this reason. Twenty-four patients received AG and HC after TAM therapy and three (12%) achieved a response. We conclude that the combination of TAM, AG, and HC is not recommended over TAM alone because toxicity appears to outweigh any potential therapeutic advantage.

Adult↗
PubMed1986

Surgical considerations after chemotherapy and radiation therapy for inflammatory breast cancer.

Eighteen patients seen between 1974 and 1982 with the clinical diagnosis of inflammatory breast carcinoma underwent modified radical mastectomy after preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy. In 17 of the 18 patients (94%), residual carcinoma was detected in either the resected breast or the axillary nodes. All mastectomies were accomplished without major technical difficulty. Seven wound complications, including three infections, occurred. Local recurrence was noted in 29% (five of 17 patients) and distant metastasis was detected in 89% (16 of 18 patients). Only three patients are presently alive without evidence of disease 19, 21, and 21 months since the onset of symptoms. Eleven patients have died, the median survival being 23 months since the development of symptoms, and four are alive with distant metastasis. Modified radical mastectomy can be accomplished in patients with inflammatory breast cancer after preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy and may have a role in reducing local tumor burden.

Adult↗
PubMed1985

Randomized clinical trial of doxorubicin alone or combined with mitolactol in women with advanced breast cancer and prior chemotherapy exposure.

One hundred fifty-one women with advanced breast cancer who had failed prior chemotherapy were randomized to monthly courses of doxorubicin (60 mg/m2 I.V. day 1, observation after 500 mg/m2) or doxorubicin (40 mg/m2 I.V. day 1; maximum 500 mg/m2) and mitolactol (135 mg/m2 orally, days 1-10; 180 mg/m2 after maximum doxorubicin). Median survival times were 232 days for doxorubicin and 225 days for doxorubicin + mitolactol, and median times to progression were 112 days and 97 days, respectively. Results are inconsistent with a 25% improvement in survival or time to progression for doxorubicin + mitolactol (p = 0.04 and 0.02, respectively, adjusted for stratification factors but not multiple testing). Regression rates for all patients, both measurable and evaluable, were 30% for doxorubicin alone and 26% for doxorubicin + mitolactol. Regression rates were significantly higher in patients with measurable indicator lesions. Cardiac toxicity was seen in four patients, all of whom were receiving doxorubicin alone. It appears that the combination of doxorubicin + mitolactol is not substantially more effective than doxorubicin alone in women with advanced breast cancer and prior chemotherapy exposure.

Adult↗
PubMed1985

Randomized clinical trial of cyclophosphamide, 5-FU, and prednisone with or without tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.

The purpose of this study was to determine if tamoxifen added to the efficacy of a CFP (cyclophosphamide, 5-FU, and prednisone) regimen. One hundred thirty-one postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer without prior chemotherapy exposure were randomized to receive CFP alone or combined with tamoxifen; six were disqualified because of ineligibility. Objective responses were seen in 68% of the eligible patients receiving CFP and in 61% of those receiving CFP plus tamoxifen. Median times to progression were 287 days for CFP and 158 days for CFP plus tamoxifen (two-sided log-rank test of equality of progression distributions, P = 0.07). Median survival times were 544 days for CFP and 394 days for CFP plus tamoxifen (two-sided log-rank test of equality of survival distributions, P = 0.14). The addition of tamoxifen to CFP was not associated with longer time to progression or survival in any Cox covariate model. On the basis of our data, it can be concluded that the addition of tamoxifen to CFP does not substantially improve either the time to disease progression or survival in women with metastatic breast cancer.

Adult↗