PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J N Mol

Publications and source records attributed to J N Mol.

43 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

The binding of poly(rA) and poly(rU) to denatured DNA. I. Model studies with homopolymers.

We have compared the properties of the poly(rA).oligo(dT) complex with those of the poly(rU).oligo(dA)n complex. Three main differences were found. First, poly(rA) and oligo(dT)n do not form a complex in concentrations of CsCl exceeding 2 M because the poly(rA) is insoluble in high salt. If the complex is made in low salt, it is destabilized if the CsCl concentration is raised. Complexes between poly(rU) and oligo(dA)n, on the other hand, can be formed in CsCl concentrations up to 6.6 M. Second, complexes between poly(rA) and oligo(dT)n are more rapidly destabilized with decreasing chain length than complexes between poly(rU) and oligo(dA)n. Third, the density of the complex between poly(rA) and poly(dT) in CsCl is slightly lower than that of poly(dT), whereas the density of the complex between poly(rU) and poly(dA) in CsCl is at least 300 g/cm3 higher than that of poly(dA). These results explain why denatured natural DNAs that bind poly(rU) in a CsCl gradient usually do not bind poly(rA).

Binding Sites↗

The binding of poly (rA) and poly (rU) to denatured DNA. II. Studies with natural DNAs.

We have studied the interaction of poly(rA) and poly(rU) with natural DNAs containing (dA.dT)n sequences. The results indicate that hybridization of poly(rA) to denatured DNA can be used to estimate the size and frequency of large (dA.dT)n tracts, whereas hybridization with poly(rU) does not give reliable information on these points. In 6.6 M CsCl, poly(rU) can form stable complexes with denatured DNA containing short (dA)n tracts (n less than or equal to 6), whereas binding of poly(rA) to denatured DNA under these conditions requires much larger (dT)n tracts (estimated n greater than 13). Moreover, binding of poly(rA) requires pre-hybridization in low salt, because free poly(rA) precipitates in 6.6 M CsCl.

Base Sequence↗

The presence of (dA.dT)20-25 tracts in the DNA of primitive eukaryotes.

Previous work by Jacobson et al. (1) has shown that the number and distribution of (dA.dT)25 tracts in the nuclear DNA of the slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum reflects the number and the distribution of transcriptional units. To investigate whether this is a general phenomenon we compared the nuclear DNAs of other primitive eukaryotes with respect to their content of large (dA.dT)n tracts via the thermal stability of their hybrids with poly(rA). The results of our analysis indicate that all nuclear DNAs tested have (dA.dT)20-25 tracts, but the frequency of such tracts varies from one per 5.4 X 10(6) daltons in Dictyostelium nuclear DNA to one per 2.8 X 10(8) daltons in Crithidia luciliae nuclear DNA. We conclude that the presence of (dA.dT)20-25 tracts is not an obligatory characteristic of the transcriptional unit in primitive eukaryotes. Chromatography of native DNAs on poly(rU) Sephadex columns shows that the large (dA.dT)n tracts occurring in the genomes of both primitive and higher eukaryotes are widely distributed throught these genomes.

Animals↗