PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Oliván

Publications and source records attributed to J Oliván.

15 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

C34T mutation of the AMPD1 gene in an elite white runner.

The case is reported of an elite, male, white endurance runner (28 years of age), who is one of the best non-African runners in the world despite carrying the C34T mutation in the gene (AMPD1) that encodes the skeletal muscle specific isoform of AMP deaminase, an enzyme that plays an important role in muscle metabolism. The frequency of the mutant allele in sedentary white people is 8-11%. Previous research has shown that this mutation, at least in homozygotes, can impair the exercise capacity of untrained people and their trainability. The maximum oxygen uptake of the study subject was exceptionally high (83.6 ml/kg/min), whereas his ammonia and lactate concentrations at high submaximal running speeds were lower than those of other world class runners who are not carriers of the mutation. The partial metabolic deficiency of the study subject is possibly compensated for by his exceptionally favourable anthropometric characteristics (body mass index 18.2 kg/m2).

AMP Deaminase↗
PubMed2004

Comparison of the antihypertensive effects of the fixed dose combination enalapril 10 mg/nitrendipine 20 mg vs losartan 50 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg, assessed by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, in essential hypertensive patients.

Fixed combinations of calcium channel blockers and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors represent an alternative to diuretic-based combination therapy. The aim of the present study was to compare the antihypertensive efficacy of the combination enalapril 10 mg/nitrendipine 20 mg (E/N) vs losartan 50 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg (L/H), assessed by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. This multicentre, double-blind, parallel study included 97 hypertensive patients (office diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 90-109 mmHg and daytime DBP > 85 mmHg). After a 2- to 3-week period of single-blind placebo, they were randomized to receive double-blind treatment with E/N (n = 48) or L/H (n = 49) for a 4-week period. The primary outcome measure was the difference in 24-h DBP reduction between treatments from randomization to the end of the double-blind period. Secondary efficacy variables included differences in 24-h systolic (S) BP reduction, daytime, night-time and office SBP and DBP reduction, proportion of responders and controlled patients, trough-to-peak ratio and smoothness indexes. Safety was assessed by the proportion of patients with adverse events and the detection of laboratory abnormalities. No significant differences were observed in the primary outcome measure. The group receiving E/N tended to show greater reductions in most measures (24 h, daytime and office SBP and DBP) and higher BP control rates, but only the difference in the rate of office SBP control (< 140 mmHg) reached statistical significance (42.2 vs 22.4%; P = 0.048). The trough-to-peak ratios and smoothness indexes were similar in both groups. The incidence of adverse events related to the treatment was 27.1% (95% CI 14.5-39.6%) in E/N-treated patients and 14.3% (95% CI 4.5-45.8%) in the L/H group, but differences were not significant. The kind of event more frequently observed were flushing and headache in E/N, and dizziness and asthenia in L/H; all observed adverse events were mild. We conclude that E/N and L/H have a similar antihypertensive efficacy, assessed by office or ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. E/N achieved a significantly higher office SBP control rate, but this was accompanied by an apparently higher proportion of mild adverse events.

Antihypertensive Agents↗
PubMed1997

Normal pancreastatin-like and increased post-glucose insulin levels in young offspring of insulin-resistant non-obese essential hypertensive patients.

Pancreastatin is a regulatory peptide known to inhibit insulin secretion and insulin action with a glycogenolytic effect in the liver. This peptide is present in and secreted by many endocrine and chromaffin cells. Abnormalities of glucose, insulin and lipoprotein metabolism are common in patients with hypertension, as well as their first-degree relatives. We have recently studied a group of non-obese hypertensive subjects in which pancreastatin-like levels were increased compared with controls, and correlated with norepinephrine levels. We hypothesized that pancreastatin alongside the sympathoadrenal system might have a part in the insulin resistance of these patients, and this metabolic syndrome could play a role in the pathogenesis and complications of hypertension. In this article, we studied the normotensive offspring of these nonobese hypertensive patients and looked for metabolic abnormalities as well as plasma pancreastatin, glucagon and catecholamine levels. The subjects were separated into two groups: (1) offspring from non-insulin-resistant patients and (2) offspring from insulin-resistant patients. We found that after an intravenous glucose load, offspring from insulin-resistant patients were already hyperinsulinemic, although glucose clearance was normal, suggesting an early alteration in insulin sensitivity, whereas pancreastatin and catecholamine levels were normal compared with matched controls. However, offspring from non-insulin-resistant patients had no differences with controls. These results suggest that pancreastatin and catecholamines may not play an important role in triggering insulin resistance, although they may be important once the syndrome is established.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

[Effect of the treatment with amlodipine on left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients].

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is one of the physiopathological effects of hypertension and one of the main risk factors for sudden death, myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure. Drugs to treat hypertension must not only reduce blood pressure, but also modify the facts which lead to ventricular hypertrophy. This study has been designed to assess the effect of amlodipine, a calcium-antagonist, on LVH in hypertensive patients. METHODS: 20 hypertensive patients (mild to moderate, both sexes, mean age 45.0 yr) were included in a single-blind study. After an initial, four weeks placebo period, active treatment was given (amlodipine 5 mg a day). Dose titration was made after 4-8 weeks to 10 mg a day if necessary and continued until the end of the study. Systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), as well as pulse rate (PR) and adverse events were recorded at every visit. Blood and urine analysis, catecholamine, plasmatic renin activity and Mode M echocardiography were made at the beginning and the end of the study. RESULTS: Only one patient was excluded. SBP and DBP showed a significantly fall (p < 0.001). In 80% of patients DBP fell under 90 mm Hg. Every echocardiographic parameter, but left ventricular diastolic dimension, showed significantly reductions at the end of the study: septum thickness (p = 0.001), posterior wall thickness (p = 0.001), left ventricular systolic dimension (p = 0.014), wall relative thickness (p = 0.015), shortening fraction (p = 0.009), left ventricular mass (p = 0.001) and corrected left ventricular mass (p = 0.001). Blood parameters did not modify. CONCLUSIONS: Amlodipine has a beneficial effect on LVH and also is an effective and safe drug to treat mild to moderate hypertension.

Amlodipine↗
PubMed1995

Increased plasma pancreastatin-like immunoreactivity levels in non-obese patients with essential hypertension.

DESIGN: Pancreastatin, a novel peptide, is known to inhibit insulin secretion and to have a glycogenolytic effect, and is present in many endocrine and chromaffin cells. Both the plasma insulin levels and the adrenergic activity accompanying insulin resistance have been shown to be increased in hypertensive subjects. Our working hypothesis was that pancreastatin might play a role in these pathological phenomena. METHODS: We studied the plasma pancreastatin level in non-obese essential hypertensive patients in response to an intravenous glucose load. We further measured the responses to the glucose challenge of insulin, glucagon, catecholamines and free fatty acids, as well as other factors related to insulin resistance (i.e. lipoproteins and apolipoproteins). We separated the hypertensive patients into three groups according to their response to an oral glucose-tolerance test: normoinsulinaemic, hyperinsulinaemic and glucose-intolerant. Matched normotensive control subjects were also studied. RESULTS: Pancreastatin levels did not change in the control group after the glucose challenge. However, all hypertensive patients showed an increase in plasma pancreastatin levels after glucose loading. The normoinsulinaemic hypertensive patients also had elevated basal pancreastatin levels. The increase in pancreastatin levels was in the ranking: normoinsulinaemic > hyperinsulinaemic > glucose-intolerant. The pancreastatin: insulin ratio showed that the secretion of pancreastatin and insulin may be regulated differently. Basal free fatty acid and glucagon levels were found to be elevated both in the hyperinsulinaemic and in the glucose-intolerant group. Fasting triglycerides levels were increased in all of the hypertensive patients. Other risk factors for coronary artery disease were also found to be altered: elevated very low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and decreased high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, with ranking: normoinsulinaemic < hyperinsulinaemic < glucose-intolerant. CONCLUSIONS: These results show an increase in pancreastatin levels in hypertensive patients, suggesting that pancreastatin might play a role in the pathophysiology of essential hypertension.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

[Focal dystonias and facial hemispasm: treatment with botulinum A toxin].

We report the results of the treatment of 80 patients with various idiopathic focal dystonia and essential hemifacial spasm with Botulinum A toxin. A statistically significant improvement was obtained in our 34 patients with blepharospasm, 19 patients with hemifacial spasm, 59% of 22 patients with cervical dystonia and 60% of 5 patients with hand dystonia. Mean duration of the benefit of each injection was 15.3, 16.3, 7.6 and 8.7 weeks respectively. Adverse effects were local and transient. We concluded that botulinum A toxin is a safe and effective therapy for patients with focal dystonia and hemifacial spasm.

Blepharospasm↗
PubMed1989

[Comparative prospective randomized multicenter study of 2 dosage protocols of nitrendipine in patients with mild to moderate hypertension].

134 patients with mild to moderate hypertension received nitrendipine during 6 months in an increasing fashion. Therapeutic goal was achieved in 92% of the patients (DBP less than 95 mmHg) in which BP decreased from 168.4 +/- 13.7/105.0 +/- 1.1 to 140.9 +/- 12.7/84.4 +/- 6.6 (p less than 0.001). In patients whose BP was not controlled with a single initial doses of 20 mg/day, the degree of control was similar with 40 mg single dose and 20 mg twice a day. The most frequently encountered undesirable effects were those caused by the vasodilator action of the drug. No changes in blood glucose and plasma lipid levels were found.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Focal dystonias and facial hemispasm: treatment with botulinum A toxin].

We report the results of the treatment of 80 patients with various idiopathic focal dystonia and essential hemifacial spasm with Botulinum A toxin. A statistically significant improvement was obtained in our 34 patients with blepharospasm, 19 patients with hemifacial spasm, 59% of 22 patients with cervical dystonia and 60% of 5 patients with hand dystonia. Mean duration of the benefit of each injection was 15.3, 16.3, 7.6 and 8.7 weeks respectively. Adverse effects were local and transient. We concluded that botulinum A toxin is a safe and effective therapy for patients with focal dystonia and hemifacial spasm.

Blepharospasm↗