PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J P Rihoux

Publications and source records attributed to J P Rihoux.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1995

Cetirizine reduces inflammatory cell recruitment and ICAM-1 (or CD54) expression on conjunctival epithelium in both early- and late-phase reactions after allergen-specific challenge.

BACKGROUND: Allergen-specific conjunctival challenge (ASCC) is a safe and reproducible experimental model of allergic conjunctivitis and a useful tool in the evaluation of effectiveness and possible mechanisms of action of drugs commonly used in the treatment of allergic diseases. OBJECTIVE: The protective effect of cetirizine on inflammatory changes after ASCC was assessed in 12 patients with rhinoconjunctivitis caused by Parietaria judaica in a double-blind study. METHODS: After a screening ASCC was performed, patients were randomized into two treatment groups; each patient was given cetirizine (oral tablets) 10 mg twice daily, or matching placebo for 3 1/2 days in off-pollen season. Clinical evaluation (itching, hyperemia, lacrimation, and swelling of eyelids) and cytologic assessment (number of inflammatory cells in conjunctival scraping and evaluation of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1)/CD54 expression on epithelial cells) were performed at baseline, 30 minutes (i.e., early-phase reaction [EPR]), 6 hours, and 24 hours (i.e., late-phase reaction [LPR]) after ASCC, before and after treatment. RESULTS: The EPR clinical events and the EPR total number of inflammatory cells were significantly reduced by cetirizine compared with placebo. The LPR clinical events and inflammatory cell recruitment were reduced by cetirizine in a similar manner. Both eosinophil and neutrophil numbers were decreased by active drug in EPR and LPR. Furthermore, ICAM-1/CD54 expression was significantly reduced by cetirizine in both the EPR and LPR compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that cetirizine has a protective effect on clinical and cellular EPR and LPR events (including ICAM-1/CD54 expression on epithelium) induced by ASCC.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Leukotriene B4 production by blood neutrophils in allergic rhinitis--effects of cetirizine.

BACKGROUND: Mucosal inflammatory processes in late phase of allergic diseases involve cytokine production, cell adhesion molecule overexpression and release of inflammatory mediators with chemotactic activity, such as leukotriene B4 (LTB4). We had previously observed increased production of LTB4 by neutrophils in patients with allergic rhinitis and discussed the role of granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) priming. Some antihistaminic compounds were shown to diminish the production of leukotrienes by neutrophils. OBJECTIVES: In a first step, we evaluated in ex vivo and in vitro studies, the effects of cetirizine on LTB4 production by blood neutrophils from allergic and healthy subjects. In a second step, we studied the in vitro effect of cetirizine on LTB4 production by neutrophils from healthy subjects during GM-CSF priming of these cells. METHODS: Neutrophils from both populations were purified from venous blood and LTB4 production was measured using high performance liquid cromatography (HPLC) method. RESULTS: In ex vivo studies, cetirizine treatment induced a decreased LTB4 production by neutrophils in allergic rhinitis. This effect of decreased LTB4 production was reproduced in vitro with 10(-8)-10(-6)M cetirizine. Nevertheless, this anti-H1 compound had no effect on neutrophil priming with GM-CSF. CONCLUSION: As LTB4 is an important chemotactic factor, Cetirizine could act on inflammatory cell recruitment by inhibiting LTB4 production by neutrophils.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Efficacy of cetirizine in cholinergic urticaria.

In order to examine the efficacy of cetirizine in cholinergic urticaria, we studied 24 patients in a double-blind crossover design during 3-week treatment periods, with either 10 or 20 mg/d cetirizine or placebo. The placebo period was always placed in between the two verum treatments to allow for a washout of the drug. Evaluation of the patients' daily symptom scores based on itching, erythema and whealing showed a highly significant improvement (p < 0.01). The percentage of days with mild or no symptoms was also increased significantly with the drug (p < 0.05). Except for whealing (p < 0.05), no significant differences between the two dosages of cetirizine could be determined. Since antihistamines have previously been shown to be frequently unsatisfactory in the treatment of cholinergic urticaria, the present data are encouraging regarding the control of symptoms in this condition.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Quantitative determination of skin reactivity by two semiautomatic devices for skin prick test area measurements.

For quantitative use of skin prick tests (SPTs), the circumference of the wheal and/or the flare is outlined by a pen, and transferred to a paper by adhesive tape. The biological response is considered proportional to this area. We have previously developed software, the SPT-scanner, for determination of SPT areas (5-500 mm2) by a hand-held scanner and a personal computer. This study is aimed at comparing the SPT-scanner with another semiautomated system, where the outline of the wheal is followed by a digitizer pen. Comparing 2080 SPT areas from a pharmacological study of cetirizine, the two systems correlated well (r = 0.980, p < 0.001), the digitizer generally giving larger areas than the SPT-scanner. Probably, the line is considered as a part of the wheal/flare in the digitizing system, whereas the scanner only detects areas within the circumference. In conclusion, the SPT scanner is objective and reproducible for rapid SPT area determination.

Cetirizine↗
PubMed1993

Dynamics of the skin blood flow response to histamine. Comparison of the effects of cetirizine and loratadine on the skin response to a histamine dry prick test monitored with laser-Doppler flowmetry.

In previous studies, we noticed that intradermal injection of histamine solutions might significantly complicate the interpretation of clinical data and of laser-Doppler flowmetry recordings (LDF). Therefore, we used the histamine dry skin prick test (HPT) for pharmacological studies. In this study, LDF monitoring of the physiological skin response to histamine was made in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study comparing the in vivo anti-H1 activity of cetirizine (10 mg) or loratadine (10 mg), 6 h after a single oral intake. As compared with responses recorded after intake of placebo, LDF readings performed at HPT sites (increase in LDF signal) and at 1 cm from HPT (reduction of LDF signal) conclusively illustrate the stable and almost complete blockade of H1 receptors by cetirizine. In vivo effects obtained with loratadine were considered weaker because (1) there was no significant influence of loratadine on the blood flow recorded at HPT sites, (2) a significant reduction at 1 cm from HPT sites was observed only after a lag phase (> or = 10 min) and (3) there were significantly higher skin perfusion levels at 1 cm from HPT sites between 6 and 10 min after the test under loratadine as compared with cetirizine. Hence, multipoint probing with LDF over time appears as a sensitive method for discriminating response profiles between two anti-H1 agents. Furthermore, this is the first time that anti-H1-related changes of the dynamics of expansion of the flare response have been demonstrated.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Suppression by cetirizine of pleurisy triggered by antigen in actively sensitized rats.

The efficacy of cetirizine in comparison with meclizine, another piperazine H1 receptor antagonist, in rat pleurisy caused by allergen or autacoid was investigated. Sensitization was achieved by subcutaneous injection of a mixture of ovalbumin and aluminium hydroxide. Fourteen days later, the animals were challenged with an intrathoracic injection of ovalbumin (12 micrograms/cavity), which caused drastic mast cell degranulation, followed by pleural oedema and leucocyte influx. Cetirizine and meclizine (2.5-30 mg/kg i.p.), 1 h before challenge, inhibited the exudatory response evoked by antigen, under conditions where neutrophil and eosinophil accumulation was affected only by the former. When administered intrathoracically 22 h after allergen, i.e. using a curative approach, cetirizine (15 micrograms/cavity) drastically reduced the pleural eosinophilia noted 24 h post-challenge, indicating that this drug can reverse an already established eosinophilia. Cetirizine (15 mg/kg i.p.) also restored, to about 39% (P < 0.001), the number of uninjured mast cells recovered from the pleural cavity following allergen stimulation. In normal rats, cetirizine (5-15 micrograms/cavity) completely inhibited the pleural exudation elicited by histamine and only partially the exudation caused by 5-hydroxytryptamine or bradykinin, but was quite inactive against platelet-activating factor. We conclude that the pleural exudation triggered by allergen, vasoactive amines or bradykinin is clearly sensitive to cetirizine. In addition, the ability of the drug to interfere with pleural neutrophil or eosinophil mobilization and mast cell degranulation seems not to be associated with its ability to block the histamine H1 receptor.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Agonist-antagonist interactions in the skin: comparison of effects of loratadine and cetirizine on skin vascular responses to prick tests with histamine and substance P.

The skin vascular responses (weal, flare, blood flow measurements) elicited by intradermal administration by pricking of histamine (HS) and substance P (SP) were evaluated 6 h after a single intake of anti-H1 agents displaying different activity profile on skin tests at currently recommended dosages (loratadine 10 mg, cetirizine 10 mg) as compared to placebo (P). The weal and flare response and the increases of blood flow occurring in the usual flare area after HS and SP were almost completely abolished by cetirizine. Inhibition of HS- and SP-induced weal and flare reactions was less marked after loratadine and blood flow in the expanding flare after HS and SP showed significant fluctuations over time. In view of the present results and of data obtained in previous experiments with intradermal injection of agonists, we hypothesize that mode of administration of agonists significantly influences the size of the residual weal after anti-H1 agents. We demonstrate that SP weals induced by pricking are largely inhibited by a potent H1 blockade which supports the view that this phenomenon, as well as the SP-flare, is due to SP-induced histamine liberation. We also, for the first time, report on fluctuations recorded at the edge of the developing flare with laser Doppler flowmetry early after prick testing with a weak H1 blockade. This opens up new avenues in dynamically testing H1-receptor occupancy in vivo and in situ in human skin.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Interference of cetirizine with the late eosinophil accumulation induced by either PAF or compound 48/80.

1. The effect of topical or systemic treatment with the histamine H1-receptor antagonist, cetirizine, on the rat pleural eosinophil accumulation induced by PAF or compound 48/80 was investigated. The number of pleural resident eosinophils increased 6 h after the intrathoracic (i.t.) injection of PAF (1 microgram/cavity), peaked within 24 h and persisted significantly augmented for at least 96 h. Compound 48/80 (25 micrograms/cavity) also produced a long lasting pleural eosinophilia but this was first noted only 24 h after stimulation. 2. Intraperitoneal pretreatment with cetirizine inhibited eosinophilia induced by either PAF (ED50 = 19 mg kg-1) or compound 48/80 (ED50 = 14 mg kg-1) whereas meclizine, another histamine H1-receptor antagonist, was inactive. 3. Administered locally, cetirizine (5 and 15 micrograms/cavity) also dose-dependently inhibited both PAF- and compound 48/80-induced eosinophilia, providing evidence that its inhibitory effect is not due to any action upon circulating eosinophils. Consistent with this result, incubation of isolated peritoneal eosinophils with cetirizine failed to modify in vitro eosinophil migration caused by PAF. 4. Since the late eosinophilia induced by PAF may depend on the synthesis of a transferable protein mediator, cetirizine was administered to donor or recipient rats in order to determine whether it interferes with the generation or with the expression of this protein. We showed that only the treatment of recipient rats abolished the transfer of the eosinophilotactic activity, indicating that cetirizine does not modify the generation but inhibits the expression of this activity. 5. Our findings indicate that cetirizine is able to inhibit eosinophil accumulation by acting locally. The mechanism is neither related to its recognized ability to antagonize histamine H,-receptors nor to a direct action upon circulating eosinophils.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed1992

The skin as a target organ for the investigation of antiallergic drugs: comparison between cetirizine and terfenadine.

Two double-blind clinical pharmacology studies were performed in atopics in order to compare the inhibitory effects of cetirizine (CTZ) 2 HCl and terfenadine (TER) on histamine and antigen-induced skin reactions. In the first study, the subjects took single intakes of CTZ 10 mg and TER 60 mg. In the second study, they took CTZ 10 mg once a day and TER 60 mg b.i.d. for 3 weeks. CTZ was more effective than TER in inhibiting histamine skin reactivity. CTZ and TER were equally effective in inhibiting antigen-induced reactions. There was no tachyphylaxis, either for CTZ or for TER.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Cetirizine does not influence the immune response.

Antihistamines are frequently employed in the treatment of allergic rhinitis and urticaria-angioedema syndrome. We analyzed the in vitro effects of cetirizine on the immune response. To this end the proliferation of peripheral mononuclear cells induced by mitogen and by -CD3, -CD2, or -CD28 monoclonal antibodies has been studied. Since the plasma peak of cetirizine following ingestion of 10 mg is about 1 microgram/mL, the drug was tested in the cultures at the concentration of 0.1, 1, or 10 micrograms/mL. No influence of cetirizine on T cell proliferation was detected. We also evaluated the effect of cetirizine on the expression of the following markers expressed by T cells upon activation: lymphocyte markers ICAM-1, HLA-DR, and CD25 surface expression, alpha-1-acid glycoprotein has been also studied. There was no effect of cetirizine on the investigated immunologic parameters; these data acquire clinical relevance when related to previous reports showing a depression of the immunologic response exerted by other compounds such as ketotifen and theophylline and when related to the recent data about the modulation of ICAM-1 expression on eosinophils by cetirizine. Cetirizine does not affect ICAM-1 expression of lymphocyte membrane.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

The inhibiting effect of cetirizine 2 HC1 on eosinophil migration and its link to H1 blockade.

Since the demonstration of an inhibiting effect of cetirizine on an antigen induced eosinophils' migration in the skin of atopic subjects, a series of in vitro and in vivo studies were performed in order to clarify the mechanism of action of this new H1-blocker. The studies used FMLP and PAF as agonists, and BN 52021, dexchlorpheniramine, terfenadine and loratadine as reference compounds. The results suggest that the inhibiting effect of cetirizine on the eosinophils' migration is independent of its specific H1 blocking activity.

Cetirizine↗
PubMed1991

Eosinophil infiltration: effects of H1 antihistamines.

This article reviews the contribution of cell-mediated inflammatory responses to the immediate immunoglobulin E-dependent allergic reaction. Apparently eosinophils play an important part in the pathogenesis of allergic reactions. Some new H1 antihistamines may also have non-H1-mediated antiinflammatory properties. In two double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover studies of allergic and normal subjects, we showed that oral cetirizine, at dosages of 10 and 20 mg/day, significantly inhibited wheal-and-erythema reactions induced by grass pollen, 48/80, histamine, platelet-activating factor acether, and N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine. In the first study, cutaneous eosinophil migration was significantly inhibited by cetirizine at pollen and 48/80 skin test sites (61%, p less than 0.01, and 53%, p less than 0.01, respectively), although no change was observed at histamine skin test sites. Inhibition of neutrophil accumulation was also observed at pollen and 48/80 sites (41%, p less than 0.1, and 31%, p less than 0.1, respectively). Monocyte accumulation was not affected by cetirizine. In the second study, cetirizine suppressed the eosinophil influx induced by pollen, platelet-activating factor, 400 ng, and platelet-activating factor, 40 ng (63%, p less than 0.001; 58.5%, p less than 0.001; and 57.8%, p less than 0.01, respectively). This inhibition was effective 2 hours after challenge and persisted through hours 4, 8, and 24. N-Formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine induced a weak eosinophil accumulation that was inhibited by cetirizine.

Cell Movement↗
PubMed1991

Platelet-activating factor-induced immediate and late cutaneous reactions.

In atopic subjects, intradermal injection of platelet-activating factor (PAF), 40 and 400 ng, resulted in an immediate edema reaction markedly blocked by cetirizine, 10 mg twice a day. PAF challenge also induced a significant eosinophil accumulation evidenced by a skin window technique at 2, 4, 8 and 24 h. This inflammatory phenomenon was significantly inhibited by cetirizine. In patients with chronic urticaria, PAF, 100 micrograms intradermally, induced immediate and late cutaneous reactions (LCR) also blocked by cetirizine, 10 mg twice a day. These LCR were accompanied by an infiltration of the deep dermis by degranulated eosinophils. The pathophysiological mechanism of the PAF-induced skin reactions is discussed as well as the mechanism of action of cetirizine.

Cetirizine↗
PubMed1991

Pharmacological modulation by cetirizine and ebastine of the cutaneous reactivity to histamine.

The peripheral H1-inhibiting effects of cetirizine 10 mg and ebastine 10 mg were compared at the skin level after single oral administration. The study was performed in 9 healthy subjects under double-blind randomized crossover conditions. Both drugs were significantly effective up to 24 h. The suppressive effect of cetirizine was significantly more rapid and more marked.

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMed1990

In vivo effects of cetirizine on cutaneous reactivity and eosinophil migration induced by platelet-activating factor (PAF-acether) in man.

The aim of the study was to determine the effect of cetirizine, a new potent H1 antihistamine, on acute cutaneous inflammatory response and eosinophil accumulation induced in vivo by platelet-activating-factor (PAF-acether) and allergen. In a double-blind, crossover study, seven subjects allergic to grass pollen and three nonallergic control subjects received orally either cetirizine, 20 mg/day, or placebo for 4 days. On day 4, the subjects were skin tested with grass pollen and PAF-acether (400 and 40 ng per site). After the challenge, an evaluation of time-course cutaneous eosinophil infiltrations by a skin window technique was performed. Cetirizine pretreatment reduced skin wheal and erythema elicited by allergen and PAF, 400 and 40 ng, by 74.6% (p less than 0.001), 53.9% (p less than 0.001), and 47% (p less than 0.01), respectively. Skin reactivity induced by PAF-acether was also significantly reduced by cetirizine in nonallergic subjects. Cetirizine reduced at hour 24 eosinophil infiltrations induced by allergen and PAF, 400 and 40 ng, by 63% (p less than 0.001), 58.5% (p less than 0.001), and 57.8% (p less than 0.01), respectively. This inhibitory effect of cetirizine on allergen and PAF-induced eosinophil infiltration was already effective 2 hours after the challenge. PAF induced a nonsignificant eosinophil influx in all nonallergic subjects. In conclusion, cetirizine inhibited both the immediate cutaneous response and the eosinophil influx induced by allergen and by a potent eosinophil chemotactic factor, such as PAF-acether. Therefore, cetirizine, besides its anti-H1 effect, has the potential to modulate the allergic inflammatory response.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

The effect of 2 weeks treatment with cetirizine on bronchial reactivity to methacholine in asthma.

1. We investigated the effect of 2 weeks therapy with oral cetirizine (10 mg twice daily) on methacholine bronchial reactivity in 14 asthmatics. All had bronchial hyperreactivity to methacholine on entry to the study, with a geometric mean cumulative PC20 of 0.83 mg ml-1 (range 0.1-3.61 mg ml-1) and eight were atopic on skin prick testing. 2. The study was placebo-controlled and in randomised order, with a minimum 1 month washout period between cetirizine and placebo study periods. Four methacholine challenges were performed in all, at the beginning and at the end of each study period. 3. No significant change in methacholine reactivity was found following 2 weeks therapy with cetrizine. The repeatability coefficient for the PC20 methacholine over 2 weeks was found to be 2.90 doubling dilutions for the placebo period and 1.73 doubling dilutions for the cetirizine period. The study had a 80% power at the 5% significance level (two-tailed) to detect a 1.16-doubling concentration change in methacholine reactivity. 4. We conclude that 2 weeks therapy with cetirizine has no significant effect on non-specific bronchial hyperreactivity.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Does reversed-type anaphylaxis in healthy subjects mimic a real allergic reaction?

Immediate and late cutaneous reactions were induced in healthy and atopic subjects by anti-IgE challenge and a skin-window technique was used in order to verify if the pattern of cells observed at 24 hr was similar in both groups. The study was first performed under basal conditions, and in a second double-blind cross-over step, it was performed again during treatment with cetirizine 10 mg b.i.d. and terfenadine 60 mg b.i.d. Anti-IgE challenge was followed by a significant eosinophil accumulation in atopic subjects only. Cetirizine significantly inhibited this phenomenon while terfenadine showed a mild non-significant inhibitory effect.

Adolescent↗