PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J P Windham

Publications and source records attributed to J P Windham.

38 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Calculated neutron dose rates and flux densities from implantable californium-252 point and line sources.

The results of neutron-transport flux-density and dose rate calculations for implantable Californium-252 point and line sources in essentially infinite tissue-equivalent material are presented. The point-source flux densities were obtained from a discrete ordinates calculation, and the point dose rates were established by multiplying the flux densities by their appropriate kerma factors. Line-source dose rates were evaluated by integrating the point dose rates over the length of the line source. Dose-rate data are given within a 20 X 20-cm region from the source center for source lengths of 1.5, 2, and 3 cm. The dose rates established by these calculations showed good agreement with an independent Monte Carlo calculation. Detailed point-source flux-density data as a function of energy and position are also given.

Californium↗

A fast and accurate algorithm for volume determination in MRI.

The determination of volumes in clinical MRI studies are prohibitive because of the time required to compute an accurate volume. Techniques that speed up the calculation are prone to large errors which make most impractical for an accurate diagnosis. A linear filter, called the eigenimage filter, has been developed that separates a desired feature from other features which interfere with its observation in an image. Using the images produced by this technique (eigenimages), the amount of operator interaction required to calculate volumes are significantly reduced. The technique also has the ability to correct for partial volume averaging effects and as a result a more accurate volume can be determined. The technique was applied to a computer simulation and two phantom studies. The time required to calculate the volume was less than 1 min per slice and the errors in accuracy and reproducibility were less than 2% for all studies.

Algorithms↗