PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Pater

Publications and source records attributed to J Pater.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Determinants of postchemotherapy nausea and vomiting in patients with cancer. Quality of Life and Symptom Control Committees of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.

PURPOSE: To assess whether prechemotherapy health-related quality-of-life (HQL) variables are associated with postchemotherapy nausea and vomiting (PCNV), and to determine their relationship to patient and treatment variables. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eight hundred thirty-two chemotherapy-naive patients scheduled to receive antiemetic regimens containing a 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT3) antagonist with or without dexamethasone for moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy were enrolled. HQL was measured by the self-report European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Care Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) within 7 days before chemotherapy. Prechemotherapy HQL scores, as well as other patient, disease, and treatment variables were compared in the groups of patients who had PCNV and those who did not have PCNV. All variables were assessed initially in a univariate analysis and then together in a multivariate analysis using step-wise logistic regression. The final model generated by the multivariate analyses was used in a risk factor analysis to predict PCNV. RESULTS: Univariate analyses identified 10 HQL variables and five patient and treatment characteristics that were associated with PCNV. In the multivariate analysis, the variables remaining in the final model included low social functioning, prechemotherapy nausea, female gender, highly emetogenic chemotherapy, and the lack of maintenance antiemetics (5-HT3 antagonists with or without dexamethasone) after chemotherapy. A history of low alcohol use was also associated with PCV, whereas increased fatigue and lower performance status were associated with PCN. In the risk factor analysis, the incidence of PCV increased from 20% in those having no risk factors to 76% in those having any four of the six risk factors. CONCLUSION: Several pretreatment HQL, patient, and treatment characteristics are associated with the occurrence of PCNV. Patients about to receive moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy should be screened for these factors and additional measures, such as behavior modification and modification of antiemetic therapy, should be considered in attempts to improve the control of PCNV.

Analysis of Variance↗

Treatment of advanced Hodgkin's disease with chemotherapy--comparison of MOPP/ABV hybrid regimen with alternating courses of MOPP and ABVD: a report from the National Cancer Institute of Canada clinical trials group.

PURPOSE: This randomized, prospective trial compares outcomes for patients with advanced Hodgkin's disease treated with mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (MOPP)/doxorubicin, bleomycin, and vinblastine (ABV) hybrid regimen or alternating MOPP/doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD). METHODS: Three hundred one patients with advanced Hodgkin's disease were randomized to receive MOPP/ ABV hybrid regimen or alternating MOPP/ABVD after stratification for prior treatment, B symptoms, and treatment center. Eligible patients were either previously untreated and found to have stage IIIB, IVA, or IVB disease or previously treated with wide-field irradiation. Responding patients received a minimum of eight cycles of chemotherapy. Those with residual disease in a localized region received irradiation between the sixth and seventh cycle of treatment. RESULTS: Response rates to the two regimens were similar. Five-year overall survival rates were 81% and 83% for MOPP/ABV hybrid and alternating MOPP/ ABVD, respectively (P = .74; 95% confidence interval [CI] for the difference, -11% to 7%). Five-year failure-free survivals were 71% and 67% for MOPP/ABV hybrid and alternating MOPP/ABVD, respectively (P = .87; 95% CI for the difference, -9% to 17%). Significantly more episodes of febrile neutropenia and stomatitis were observed with the MOPP/ABV hybrid regimen; there was no significant difference in fatal toxicity. Patients with predefined, high-quality partial responses (PR-1s) had results similar to those with complete responses (CRs). Planned subset analysis showed no significant difference in outcome between the two arms of the trial for patients with newly diagnosed disease (5-year failure-free survival rates were 70% for MOPP/ABV hybrid and 59% for alternating MOPP/ABVD; P = .180), but superiority of alternating MOPP/ABVD for patients with prior irradiation (5-year failure-free survival 94% v 73%; P = .017). CONCLUSION: MOPP/ABV hybrid and alternating MOPP/ABVD regimens are equally effective for patients with advanced Hodgkin's disease.

Actuarial Analysis↗

Erythropoietin in the management of patients with nonhematologic cancer receiving chemotherapy. Systemic Treatment Program Committee.

GUIDELINE QUESTIONS: 1) Does erythropoietin (EPO) reduce the need for transfusion of red blood cells in patients receiving chemotherapy for a nonhematologic cancer? 2) Does the administration of EPO improve the quality of life of these cancer patients? OBJECTIVE: To make recommendations regarding the use of EPO to reduce the need for transfusion of red blood cells in patients receiving chemotherapy for a nonhematologic cancer. OUTCOMES: First transfusion requirement from the start of chemotherapy is the main outcome of interest. Quality of life and costs are also considered. PERSPECTIVE (VALUES): Evidence was selected and reviewed by 5 members of the Ontario Cancer Treatment Practice Guidelines Initiative (OCTPGI) and the Systemic Treatment Program Committee (STPC). Drafts of this document have been circulated to and reviewed by members of the STPC. The STPC comprises medical oncologists, pharmacists, supportive care personnel and administrators. No community representative participated in the development of this practice guideline. QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: Eleven randomized controlled trials (RCTs), most placebo-controlled, were available for review. A meta-analysis was performed with 8 trials that shared a clinically relevant outcome measure. Only 1 trial assessed quality of life. BENEFITS: The meta-analysis showed a relative risk for transfusion among EPO patients of 0.64 (95% confidence interval 0.53-0.78), which translates into a 36% relative reduction in the proportion of patients requiring transfusion (p = 0.00001). Reduction in transfusion requirements was similar across strata defined by methodological quality, EPO dose, hematologic status, tumour type at trial entry and chemotherapy regimen. In the 1 trial that assessed quality of life, EPO was associated with improved quality of life. HARMS: Hypertension has been noted rarely in EPO-treated cancer patients. The RCTs did not report adverse effects in EPO-treated patients compared with control patients during the follow-up period. Long-term adverse effects are unknown. EPO is more costly than transfusion, but formal cost-effectiveness studies are unavailable. PRACTICE GUIDELINE: For patients receiving chemotherapy for nonhematologic cancer in whom symptoms of anemia are expected and in whom transfusion of red blood cells is not considered an acceptable treatment option, EPO can be recommended as a safe, effective treatment alternative. The evidence in support of using EPO is stronger for patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy regimens that for those receiving non-platinum-based regimens. CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE DATE: Apr. 4, 1997.

Anemia↗

Association between capsule diameter, adequacy of encapsulation, and survival of microencapsulated rat islet allografts.

As a consequence of its large volume, a microencapsulated islet graft can be implanted only into the peritoneal cavity. The graft volume can be reduced by using small capsules. However, reduction of the diameter of the capsules holds a certain risk, because with smaller capsules, more islets may be found to protrude from the capsules. We have developed a lectin binding assay which, after encapsulation, specifically labels islets or parts of islets that are insufficiently immunoprotected as a consequence of inadequate, and particularly incomplete, encapsulation. With this assay, we found that a reduction of the capsule diameter from 800 micrometers to 500 micrometers was associated with an increase in the percentage of inadequately encapsulated islets from 6.3+/-1.2% to 24.2+/-1.5%. The in vivo significance of this finding was investigated by performing allotransplantations with large diameter (700-800 micrometers) and small diameter (400-500 micrometers) capsules. With large-capsule islet grafts, all recipients (n=5) became normoglycemic for 7-16 weeks, whereas with small-capsule islet grafts, only one of seven recipients became normoglycemic. The in vivo significance of inadequate encapsulation was further substantiated by our finding that most large capsules were floating freely in the peritoneal cavity without any cell adhesion, whereas the vast majority of small capsules was found to be adherent to the surface of intra-abdominal organs and infiltrated by immune cell elements characteristic of both an allograft reaction and a foreign body reaction. We conclude that successful use of capsules with small diameters requires further study to determine which factors in the encapsulation procedure should be modified to reduce the number of inadequate small capsules.

Animals↗

Quinolone-based antibacterial chemoprophylaxis in neutropenic patients: effect of augmented gram-positive activity on infectious morbidity. National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether augmented quinolone-based antibacterial prophylaxis in neutropenic patients with cancer reduces infections caused by gram-positive cocci and preserves the protective effect against aerobic gram-negative bacilli. DESIGN: Open, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial. SETTING: Centers participating in the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. PATIENTS: 111 eligible and evaluable patients hospitalized for severe neutropenia (neutrophil count < 0.5 x 10(9)/L lasting at least 14 days) who were receiving cytotoxic therapy for acute leukemia or bone marrow autografting. INTERVENTION: One of three oral antibacterial prophylactic regimens (norfloxacin, 400 mg every 12 hours; ofloxacin, 400 mg every 12 hours; or ofloxacin, 400 mg, plus rifampin, 300 mg every 12 hours) beginning with cytotoxic therapy. MEASUREMENTS: Incidence and cause of suspected or proven infection. RESULTS: Microbiologically documented overall infection rates for norfloxacin, ofloxacin, and ofloxacin plus rifampin were 47%, 24%, and 9%, respectively (P < 0.001). Corresponding rates were 24%, 13%, and 3%, respectively for staphylococcal bacteremia (P = 0.03) and, 21%, 3%, and 3%, respectively for streptococcal bacteremia (P < 0.01). The pattern of bacteremia suggested that rifampin played a role in suppressing staphylococcal infection. Both ofloxacin alone and ofloxacin plus rifampin had a clinically significant antistreptococcal effect. Aerobic gram-negative rods were cleared from rectal surveillance cultures in all patients after a median of 5.5 days and caused infection in only one patient (0.9%). The reductions in the number of microbiologically documented infections among ofloxacin recipients and ofloxacin plus rifampin recipients were offset by concomitant increases in the number of unexplained fevers (24% of norfloxacin recipients, 53% of ofloxacin recipients, and 49% of ofloxacin plus rifampin recipients; P = 0.02). No statistically significant difference was found among the treatment arms with respect to the overall incidence of febrile neutropenic episodes as defined for this trial (79% for the norfloxacin group, 82% for the ofloxacin group, and 77% for the ofloxacin plus rifampin group). CONCLUSIONS: Quinolone-based antibacterial chemoprophylaxis protected patients from aerobic gram-negative bacillary infections. Augmentation of the gram-positive activity reduced the incidence of gram-positive infections but did not influence the overall incidence of febrile neutropenic episodes.

Adult↗

An empirical approach to informed consent in ovarian cancer.

The study was designed to define and compare the professional and the reasonable-person standards for provision of information to ovarian cancer patients, and to determine if patient information priorities could be anticipated by surrogate patients. Physicians treating ovarian cancer patients, women treated for the disease, and well lay women imagining themselves to have the disease used a visual analog scale to judge the importance of 57 questions that they might want answered before treatment decisions are made. On the basis of median importance scores, all groups judged questions relating to life expectancy as most important. Overall, judgments of the patient groups agreed well with one another; doctor-patient agreement was significant but smaller than between-patient agreement. Predicting an individual's judgments from his/her group, however, was very poor for all groups. Life experience and demographic characteristics rarely improved our ability to predict an individual's judgments.

Adult↗

Quality of life studies in chemotherapy-induced emesis.

Health-related quality of life (HQL) was assessed before and after either moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy. When the pretreatment HQL in patients who did not vomit after chemotherapy (n = 203) was compared to those who vomited (n = 230), it was found that patients who did not vomit had better physical, role, and social function scores as well as a better global quality of life score than did patients who had one or more episodes of vomiting. Furthermore, in patients who did not vomit, the pretreatment fatigue and anorexia scores were better than in patients who did vomit. Thus, pretreatment HQL scores appear to have value in predicting which patients will experience chemotherapy-induced emesis. In the week following chemotherapy, HQL change scores from prechemotherapy values for cognitive function, global quality of life, fatigue, anorexia, insomnia and dyspnea were significantly worse in the group experiencing emesis than in the group who remained completely free of emesis. There were no differences in physical, role, emotional and social function attributable to chemotherapy-induced vomiting.

Antiemetics↗

Increased thromboembolic complications with concurrent tamoxifen and chemotherapy in a randomized trial of adjuvant therapy for women with breast cancer. National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Breast Cancer Site Group.

PURPOSE AND METHODS: Associations between thromboembolism and malignancy, usually widespread, and between thromboembolism and hormonal and/or chemotherapy have been previously reported. We performed a randomized trial of tamoxifen 30 mg/d for 2 years (T) versus T plus 6 months of intravenous chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) for postmenopausal women with involved axillary nodes and positive estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PgR) status following primary therapy for breast cancer. RESULTS: We observed one or more thromboembolic events in 48 of 353 women (13.6%) allocated to receive T plus CMF in comparison to five of 352 women (2.6%) randomized to receive T alone (P < .0001). Six women in the T plus CMF arm, but none randomized to receive T alone, suffered two thromboembolic events while an study therapy. There were also significantly more women who developed severe (grade 3 to 5) thromboembolic events in the T plus CMF arm than in the T arm (34 v five; P < .0001). Most thromboembolic events (39 of 54) occurred while women were actually receiving chemotherapy (P < .0001). Thromboembolic complications resulted in more days in hospital and more deaths than any other complication of therapy, including infection, in this trial. CONCLUSION: Thromboembolism related to the addition of CMF chemotherapy to tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy in this group of women represents a relatively common and serious complication that may outweigh any benefits offered by this additional therapy.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

Improved local control of invasive bladder cancer by concurrent cisplatin and preoperative or definitive radiation. The National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.

PURPOSE: A prospective randomized trial was conducted to determine whether the addition of concurrent cisplatin to preoperative or definitive radiation therapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer improved local control or survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-nine eligible patients with T2 to T4b transitional cell bladder cancer participated, 64% with cT3b or cT4. Patients and their physicians selected either definitive radiotherapy or precystectomy radiotherapy; patients were then randomly allocated to receive intravenous cisplatin 100 mg/m2 at 2-week intervals for three cycles concurrent with pelvic radiation, or to receive radiation without chemotherapy. Patients were stratified by clinical tumor stage and by radiation plan. The median follow-up duration is 6.5 years. RESULTS: The occurrence of distant metastases was the same in both study arms. However, 25 of 48 control patients have had a first recurrence in the pelvis, compared with 15 of 51 cisplatin-treated patients (P = .036). The pelvic relapse rate in the two groups was significantly reduced by concurrent cisplatin (P = .038, log-rank test) and this effect was preserved in a stepwise Cox regression model of prognostic factors (hazards ratio, 0.50; 90% confidence interval [CI], 0.29 to 0.86; P = .036). The hazard reduction was similar for both radiation plans. Pretreatment leukocytosis and high clinical stage were independent adverse factors in a Cox model of overall survival, but the effect of cisplatin was not significant. CONCLUSION: Concurrent cisplatin may improve pelvic control of locally advanced bladder cancer with preoperative or definitive radiation, but has not been shown to improve overall survival. The use of concurrent cisplatin had no detectable effect on distant metastases.

Adult↗

Influence of age on the treatment of limited-stage small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic importance of age on response rate and survival in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), and to determine the effect of age on chemotherapy dose delivery and toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We undertook a retrospective analysis of data from two multicenter, randomized trials conducted by the National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC) in which 608 SCLC patients who presented with limited disease (LD) all received the same chemotherapy. Treatment consisted of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine (CAV), and etoposide plus cisplatin (EP) administered in an immediate or delayed alternating fashion, plus cranial and thoracic irradiation. RESULTS: There were 520 patients aged less than 70 years, and 88 > or = 70. No significant differences existed between the two age groups in baseline characteristics, including treatment protocol, performance status, and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level. There were more men in the older group (P = .05). Overall response rates were comparable (78% v 82%, P = .50), and 5-year survival rates were also similar (P = .14), with 11% alive in the younger group and 8% in the older group. Age was a significant predictor of overall survival when analyzed as a continuous variable in a univariate model (P = .01), but it was no longer an independent prognostic factor in our multivariate regression analysis. An analysis of chemotherapy delivery between the two age groups showed that patients aged > or = 70 years received lower total doses of each drug compared with the intended full protocol dose, primarily as a result of dose omissions, rather than dose reductions. The frequency of dose delays was not different between groups. No significant differences were seen in the incidence of either hematologic or most nonhematologic toxicities. CONCLUSION: Age is not a significant adverse prognostic variable in SCLC patients with LD. Moderately aggressive chemotherapy may be delivered safely to elderly patients with a good performance status, although modest attenuation of therapy through either dose reduction or omission may occur more frequently in this population.

Adolescent↗

Health-related quality-of-life studies of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.

Since 1989, the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG) has been successful in implementing and completing health-related quality-of-life (HQL) assessments as part of phase III clinical trials. Compliance rates for completing HQL instruments remain high, with a minimal amount of missing data. It is believed that this success is attributable not only to the high degree of commitment to measuring HQL by clinical trials investigators, nurses, data managers, and central office administrative staff, but also to the educational process that was instituted after the development of a CTG policy for measuring HQL. From inception to May 1995, a total of 27 clinical trials with HQL assessment have been initiated or completed. In the majority of trials, the core HQL instrument is the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). In addition to answering specific questions about HQL in these clinical trials, the trials provide the opportunity to do research into the measurement of HQL. Thus, current clinical trials include research questions about the appropriate timing of assessments, the reliability and validity of the QLQ-C30 and other instruments, the role of HQL data in assessing toxicity, and the significance of the results of HQL assessments. It is anticipated that this activity not only will be a rich source of information about the effects of cancer and its treatment on HQL but also will lead to improvements in measuring HQL in oncology.

Canada↗

Are long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids essential nutrients in infancy?

We investigated whether the disparity in neural maturation between breastfed and formula-fed term infants could be corrected by the addition of fish oil, a source of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, 22:6 omega 3), to infant formula. Healthy, term infants were randomised at birth to receive either a supplemented or placebo formula if their mothers had chosen to bottle feed. Breastfed term infants were enrolled as a reference group. Infant erythrocyte fatty acids and anthropometry were assessed on day 5 and at 6, 16, and 30 weeks of age. Visual evoked potential (VEP) acuity was determined at 16 and 30 weeks. VEP acuities of breastfed and supplemented-formula-fed infants were better than those of placebo-formula-fed infants at both 16 and 30 weeks of age (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01). Erythrocyte DHA in breastfed and supplemented-formula-fed infants was maintained near birth levels throughout the 30-week study period but fell in placebo-formula-fed infants (p < 0.001). Erythrocyte DHA was the only fatty acid that consistently correlated with VEP acuity in all infants at both ages tested. A continuous supply of DHA may be required to achieve optimum VEP acuity since infants breastfed for short periods (< 16 weeks) had slower development of VEP than infants receiving a continuous supply of DHA from either breastmilk or supplemented formula. Erythrocyte arachidonic acid (20:4 omega 6) in supplemented-formula-fed infants was reduced below that of infants fed breastmilk or placebo formula at 16 and 30 weeks (p < 0.001), although no adverse effects were noted, with growth of all infants being similar. DHA seems to be an essential nutrient for the optimum neural maturation of term infants as assessed by VEP acuity. Whether supplementation of formula-fed infants with DHA has long-term benefits remains to be elucidated.

Adult↗

Does knowledge guide practice? Another look at the management of non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To describe Canadian doctors' beliefs about the appropriate role of chemotherapy and radiotherapy in the management of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: A mail survey of a random sample of Canadian respirologists, thoracic surgeons, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists was performed. Three cases of NSCLC were described and respondents were asked to estimate the prognosis in each case and to give their treatment recommendations. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 234 of 330 eligible subjects (74%). Doctors' treatment recommendations varied widely. After a complete resection for stage II NSCLC, 68% recommended no adjuvant treatment, 28% recommended radiotherapy, 1% recommended chemotherapy, and 3% recommended both radiotherapy and chemotherapy. For an asymptomatic patient with stage IIIb NSCLC, 17% recommended no active treatment, 65% recommended radiotherapy alone, 16% recommended radiation and chemotherapy, and 2% recommended chemotherapy alone. For an asymptomatic patient with a stage IV NSCLC, 80% recommended no active treatment and 20% recommended chemotherapy. Doctors' beliefs about the natural history of NSCLC and its response to treatment varied widely. Seventy-five percent of respondents believed that adjuvant radiotherapy did not increase survival in stage II disease, but 25% believed that it did. Thirty percent believed that the addition of chemotherapy to radiotherapy in stage III increased survival, but 70% believed that it did not. Fifty-five percent believed that chemotherapy increased the median survival in stage IV, but 45% believed that it did not. Doctors' beliefs about the efficacy of treatment were strongly associated with their treatment recommendations. CONCLUSION: Personal beliefs, rather than universal knowledge, currently guide the management of NSCLC in Canada.

Aged↗

Inconsistency of prognostic factors for post-chemotherapy nausea and vomiting.

A number of prognostic factors have been reported to influence the probability of developing nausea and vomiting after cytotoxic chemotherapy. This study used data collected in four randomized anti-emetic trials conducted by the Clinical Trials Group of the National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC-CTG) to assess the consistency of the effects of these prognostic factors. A total of 582 patients, all of whom had received moderately emetogenic chemotherapy for the first time, but who were assigned to different anti-emetics, were included in the analysis. The major findings was that the probability of post-chemotherapy nausea and vomiting was much more strongly influenced by the type of chemotherapy given and the type of anti-emetic used than by patient (e.g., age, gender) or environmental (e.g., treatment location, time of administration) characteristics. Further, patient-related factors had different, and sometimes opposite, effects in different anti-emetic and chemotherapy subgroups. Finally, the relative potency of anti-emetics appeared to vary with chemotherapy regimens. Implications of these findings for future studies are discussed.

Antiemetics↗

Psychometric properties and responsiveness of the EORTC quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in patients with breast, ovarian and lung cancer.

The QLQ-C30, a health-related quality of life questionnaire developed for use in patients with cancer, has been previously validated in patients with lung cancer and head and neck cancer. In this study, further validation was carried out for 535 patients, including patients with breast cancer (n = 143) and ovarian cancer (n = 111) for whom there is no previously published validation, as well as patients with lung cancer (n = 160) and a heterogeneous group of other cancers (n = 121). All patients were entered in one of two trials of anti-emetics to prevent chemotherapy-induced emesis. The QLQ-C30 was completed before chemotherapy and on day 8 after chemotherapy. The factor structure in patients with breast and ovarian cancer was similar to that previously described. Interdomain correlations, in the entire group, were strongest for the physical and role function domains and the fatigue, pain and global quality of life domains before and after chemotherapy. In addition, after chemotherapy, social function was also strongly correlated with fatigue and global quality of life. These correlations were not always of equal strength in the breast, ovarian and lung groups, suggesting that there may be differences between these groups. The responsiveness of the QLQ-C30 in the presence of widely metastatic, as compared with locoregional, disease showed changes in the expected directions (i.e., diminished function in physical and social role functions and in global quality of life, with greater fatigue and pain in patients with metastatic disease). Eight days after chemotherapy, decreases were seen in physical, role and social functioning and in global quality of life, and there was greater fatigue, nausea and vomiting compared with before chemotherapy. Patients with breast cancer had better physical, role and social functioning and less fatigue and pain than patients with ovarian cancer. This result is expected, since many of the patients with breast cancer had early stage disease, whereas those with ovarian cancer had advanced stage disease. Mean scores for patients with lung cancer were between the other two groups, in keeping with the mixture of early and advanced stage disease in these patients. There was a strong correlation between ECOG performance status scores and several domains of the QLQ-C30; these were all in the expected directions. The results of this study confirm those in earlier studies on patients with lung cancer, and provide new information on patients with breast and ovarian cancer. In addition, the QLQ-C30 is responsive to the effects of chemotherapy and of metastatic disease.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Drug delivery analysis of the Canadian multicenter trial in non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: The Canadian multicenter trial for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) reported survival benefit for chemotherapy when best supportive care was compared with vindesine-cisplatin (VP) and the combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (CAP). We examined received drug delivery to document dose-intensity (DI) and total dose of drugs given to various groups in this patient population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Plots of cumulatively received chemotherapy against time were used to evaluate drug delivery by regimen, major prognostic factors, and response status. RESULTS: Individual CAP patients show a narrow range of received DI, with the median similar to protocol. Drug delivery analysis exposed a wide range of received DI for both drugs in the more intensive VP regimen, and the median received DI was below protocol. The median received DI for cisplatin was still higher for VP than CAP, but only during the first 8 weeks of protocol treatment (20 v 10 mg/m2/wk); thereafter, the ongoing received cisplatin DI was the same (10 mg/m2/wk). The median received DI for cisplatin in each regimen was not influenced by stage, performance status, prior weight loss, sex, or response status. VP-treated patients received a higher total dose of cisplatin than CAP patients (median, 255 mg/m2 v 112.5 mg/m2; P < .0001). Median cisplatin total dose was similar for patients with a chemotherapy response or stable disease and threefold greater than for patients with progressive disease for both regimens. Although patients with chemotherapy response and stable disease had similar survival outcomes for both CAP and VP, the VP regimen had a higher proportion of patients without progressive disease (P = .004), which resulted in an overall survival advantage (P = .01). CONCLUSION: The major prognostic factors for advanced NSCLC do not exert their influence on outcome by affecting deliverable chemotherapy DI. Regimen and treatment response determined total dose. Because stable disease patients usually outnumber responding patients in advanced NSCLC trials, controlled studies should be performed that allow assessment of the impact of total received dose on outcome according to response status.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Effect of schedule and maintenance on the antiemetic efficacy of ondansetron combined with dexamethasone in acute and delayed nausea and emesis in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: a phase III trial by the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.

PURPOSE: This study examines whether the schedule of ondansetron significantly influences its antiemetic efficacy in the first 24 hours after chemotherapy, whether the administration of oral ondansetron after 24 hours is effective in preventing delayed emesis, and whether the efficacy of ondansetron is preserved over multiple courses of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicenter double-blind study randomized 302 cancer patients to one of three treatment arms. Arm A received dexamethasone 10 mg intravenously (i.v.) plus ondansetron (Zofran; Glaxo Canada Inc, Toronto, Canada) 8 mg i.v. prechemotherapy plus ondansetron 8 mg orally every 12 hours postchemotherapy for nine doses. Arm B received dexamethasone 10 mg i.v. plus ondansetron 16 mg i.v. prechemotherapy plus placebo orally postchemotherapy in the same schedule as arm A. Arm C received dexamethasone 10 mg i.v. plus ondansetron 8 mg prechemotherapy plus ondansetron 8 mg orally postchemotherapy for one dose followed by placebo orally every 12 hours for eight more doses. Response was assessed by the number of reported episodes of vomiting and by severity of nausea measured on a visual analog scale (VAS). RESULTS: The two schedules of ondansetron used in the first 24 hours were no different in their antiemetic efficacy, with similar rates for complete responses (76.7% v 72.0%, P = .472), complete plus major responses (90.2% v 82.0%, P = .135), and severity of nausea (P = .348). Oral ondansetron after 24 hours was more effective than placebo in preventing delayed nausea and emesis, with superior rates of complete responses (59.6% v 42.1%, P = .012 by one-sided test), complete plus major responses (80.9% v 66.3%, P = .018 by one-sided test), and less severe nausea (9.2 mm v 18.6 mm on a 100-mm VAS, P = .002). The efficacy of ondansetron was maintained over subsequent courses of chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: The schedule of ondansetron in the first 24 hours does not influence its efficacy. The use of oral maintenance ondansetron is effective in preventing delayed maintenance ondansetron is effective in preventing delayed nausea and emesis after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

Antineoplastic Agents↗