PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J R Benson

Publications and source records attributed to J R Benson.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Management of the axilla in women with breast cancer.

There remain several outstanding questions relating to management of the axilla in women with early stage breast cancer. This paper summarises the outcome of a national debate aimed at discussing certain key issues including a) whether axillary dissection has any survival advantage b) is an axillary staging procedure always necessary c) what is the optimum method of staging the axilla and d) whether an axillary dissection is always necessary in cases of a positive sentinel node. Electronic voting was undertaken at the beginning and end of the debate and results are compared and presented herein.

Axilla↗
PubMed2006

Axillary staging in women with small invasive breast tumours.

AIMS: To identify a group of women with small breast cancers of favourable histological grade for whom observation alone may be an acceptable approach for management of the axilla. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis the incidence of nodal metastases was examined in a group of 355 consecutive patients over 55 years of age who underwent mastectomy or breast conserving surgery. All patients had either grade I (<20 mm) or grade II (<15 mm) oestrogen receptor positive tumours without lymphovascular invasion (LVI). In a related study on 173 clinically node negative patients, the rate of axillary recurrence was assessed in patients with small (<10 mm), non-high grade (I and II), ER-positive invasive ductal carcinomas without LVI. Axillary surgery was either omitted (135 patients) or delayed (38 patients) at the time of wide local excision or mastectomy. RESULTS: The overall incidence of positive nodes in this good prognostic group of patients was 13% (95% confidence interval 9.5-16.5). When the analysis was confined to grade I (< or =20 mm) and grade II (< or =10 mm) the overall incidence of nodal metastases was 10%. Rates of axillary recurrence at a median follow up of 49 months were only 1% when axillary surgery was omitted according to patient choice/departmental policy with no cases of uncontrolled axillary recurrence. CONCLUSION: The risk:benefit ratio for detection of node positive cases in a selected group of older patients does not justify any form of axillary procedure at the time of primary surgery.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

A critique of the sentinel node concept.

The concept of "the sentinel node" is false. In the axilla, the lymphatic system usually first drains into a group of low axillary nodes (level 1). The validity, as a staging procedure, of a 4 node axillary sample was demonstrated 30 years ago by Prof. Sir Patrick Forrest. Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) should not become the standard of care for all breast cancer patients. All the various options (axillary sampling, SNB, axillary dissection or simply a watchful attitude) are acceptable and to be advised according to the patient's wishes and conditions and to the tumour characteristics. We would also propose the change of the terminology from SNB to "guided axilary sampling" (GAS).

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2004

Can breast MRI help in the management of women with breast cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy?

Contrast-enhanced (CE) MRI was used to monitor breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients underwent CE MRI before and after therapy, together with conventional assessment methods (CAM). CE MRI was carried out at 1.5 T in the coronal plain with 3D sequences before and after bolus injection. An expert panel determined chemotherapy response using both CE MRI and CAM. Histopathological response in the surgical specimen was then used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of CE MRI and CAM. In total, 67 patients with 69 breast cancers were studied (mean age of 46 years). Tumour characteristics showed a high-risk tumour population: median size 49 mm: histopathological grade 3 (55%): oestrogen receptor (ER) negative (48%). Histopathological response was as follows: - complete pathological response (pCR) 17%; partial response (pPR) 68%; no response (NR) 15%. Sensitivity of CAM for pCR or pPR was 98% (CI 91-100%) and specificity was 50% (CI 19-81%). CE MRI sensitivity was 100% (CI 94-100%), and specificity was 80% (CI 44-97%). The absolute agreement between assessment methods and histopathology was marginally higher for CE MRI than CAM (81 vs 68%; P=0.09). In 71%, CE MRI increased diagnostic knowledge, although in 20% it was judged confusing or incorrect. The 2nd MRI study significantly increased diagnostic confidence, and in 19% could have changed the treatment plan. CE MRI persistently underestimated minimal residual disease. In conclusion, CE MRI of breast cancer proved more reliable for predicting histopathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy than conventional assessment methods.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Eyelid metastasis.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Breast Neoplasms↗