Biomedical subjects

J R Etherton

Publications and source records attributed to J R Etherton.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2002

Dynamic performance of the mechanism of an automatically deployable ROPS.

The mechanism for an automatically deployable ROPS (AutoROPS) has been designed and tested. This mechanism is part of an innovative project to provide passive protection against rollover fatality to operators of new tractors used in both low-clearance and unrestricted-clearance tasks. The device is a spring-action, telescoping structure that releases on signal to pyrotechnic squibs that actuate release pins. Upper post motion begins when the release pins clear an internal piston. The structure extends until the piston impacts an elastomeric ring and latches at the top position. In lab tests the two-post structure consistently deployed in less than 0.3 s and latched securely. Static load tests of the telescoping structure and field upset tests of the fully functional AutoROPS have been successfully completed.

Accidents, Occupational↗

PubMed2002

Static load test performance of a telescoping structure for an automatically deployable ROPS.

The automatically deployable ROPS was developed as part of an innovative project to provide passive protection against overturn fatality to operators of new tractors used in both low-clearance and unrestricted-clearance tasks. The primary objective of this phase of the research was to build a telescoping structure that would prove that a ROPS can be built that will (1) reliably deploy on signal, (2) rise in a sufficiently short amount of time, (3) firmly latch in its deployed position, and (4) satisfy SAE J2194 testing requirements. The two-post structure had previously been found to meet deployment time criteria, and design analyses indicated that neither the slip-fit joint nor the latch pins would fail at test loading. Four directions of static loading were applied to the structure to satisfy SAE requirements. For the series of static loading tests, the raised structure was found to maintain a protective clearance zone after all loads were applied. The structure is overly stiff and should be redesigned to increase its ability to absorb ground-impact energy. Results of dynamic tests and field upset tests are reported in companion articles. The next phase of development is to optimize the structure so that it will plastically deform and absorb energy that would otherwise be transferred to the tractor chassis.

Accidents, Occupational↗

PubMed2001

Preventing tractor rollover fatalities: performance of the NIOSH autoROPS.

Approximately 132 agricultural tractor overturn fatalities occur per year. The use of rollover protective structures (ROPS), along with seat belts, is the best known method for preventing these fatalities. One impediment to ROPS use, however, is low clearance situations, such as orchards and animal confinement buildings. To address the need for ROPS that are easily adapted to low clearance situations, the Division of Safety Research, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), developed an automatically deploying, telescoping ROPS (Auto-ROPS). The NIOSH AutoROPS consists of two subsystems. The first is a retractable ROPS that is normally latched in its lowered position for day-to-day use. The second subsystem is a sensor that monitors the operating angle of the tractor. Ifa rollover condition is detected by the sensor, the retracted ROPS will deploy and lock in the full upright position before ground contact. Static load testing and field upset tests of the NIOSH AutoROPS have been conducted in accordance with SAE standard J2194. Additionally, timed trials of the AutoROPS deployment mechanism were completed. The design of the retractable ROPS and sensor, as well as the results of the different testing phases are discussed.

Accident Prevention↗

PubMed2001

Performance of an automatically deployable ROPS on ASAE tests.

In the U.S., approximately 132 agricultural tractor overturn fatalities occur per year. The use of rollover protective structures (ROPS), along with seat belts, is the best-known method for preventing these fatalities. However, one impediment to ROPS use is low-clearance situations, such as orchards and animal confinement buildings. To address the need for ROPS that are easily adapted to low-clearance situations, the Division of Safety Research, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, developed a prototype automatically deploying, telescoping ROPS (AutoROPS). The NIOSH AutoROPS consists of two subsystems. The first is a retractable ROPS that is normally latched in its lowered position for day-to-day use. The second subsystem is a sensor that monitors the operating angle of the tractor. If an overturn condition is detected by the sensor, the retracted ROPS will deploy and lock in the full upright position before ground contact. Static load testing and field upset tests of the NIOSH AutoROPS have been conducted in accordance with SAE standard J2194. Additionally, timed trials of the AutoROPS deployment mechanism were completed. The results of these tests show that the NIOSH AutoROPS has significant potential to overcome the limitations of current ROPS designs for use in low clearance as well as unrestricted clearance operations.

Accident Prevention↗

PubMed2000

Finite element modeling of ROPS in static testing and rear overturns.

Even with the technological advances of the last several decades, agricultural production remains one of the most hazardous occupations in the United States. Death due to tractor rollover is a prime contributor to this hazard. Standards for rollover protective structures (ROPS) performance and certification have been developed by groups such as the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) and the American Society of Agricultural Engineers (ASAE) to combat these problems. The current ROPS certification standard, SAE J2194, requires either a dynamic or static testing sequence or both. Although some ROPS manufacturers perform both the dynamic and static phases of SAE J2194 testing, it is possible for a ROPS to be certified for field operation using static testing alone. This research compared ROPS deformation response from a simulated SAE J2194 static loading sequence to ROPS deformation response as a result of a simulated rearward tractor rollover. Finite element analysis techniques for plastic deformation were used to simulate both the static and dynamic rear rollover scenarios. Stress results from the rear rollover model were compared to results from simulated static testing per SAE J2194. Maximum stress values from simulated rear rollovers exceeded maximum stress values recorded during simulated static testing for half of the elements comprising the uprights. In the worst case, the static model underpredicts dynamic model results by approximately 7%. In the best case, the static model overpredicts dynamic model results by approximately 32%. These results suggest the need for additional experimental work to characterize ROPS stress levels during staged overturns and during testing according to the SAE standard.

Accidents, Occupational↗

PubMed1991

Agricultural machine-related deaths.

Analysis of 1980-1985 death certificate data for the United States indicated that an average of 369 occupational deaths per year involved agricultural machinery as the external cause of death. Out of all agricultural machine-related deaths, tractors accounted for 69 percent. Over half of these tractor-related deaths were rollovers. There is a need for public health programs to affect greater use of rollover protective structures (ROPS) on farm tractors.

Accident Prevention↗

PubMed1986

Machine-cycling errors with foot switches in repetitive tasks. A workstation design simulation experiment.

In this experiment a non-hazardous industrial machine simulator was used to evaluate errors made when using a foot switch to initiate dangerous, repetitive machine motions. Subjects were experienced employees who normally operated metalworking presses and similar hazardous machines on jobs matching the simulation. Four variables (force needed to push switch to closure, the switch's force feedback felt by the subject, subject working posture, and hand task involved in stamping a simulated workpiece) were evaluated for their main and interactive effects upon frequency of machine-cycling errors in a repetitive task. Equipment problems which required immediate correction were introduced at a rate of 4.9 events/h. Also, three covariables (the rate of repetitive use of the switch to make hits on simulated workpieces, subject age and subject experience at foot switch-controlled workstations) were examined for their contribution to cycling errors. Although hand task was a significant effect in error prediction models containing the four primary variables, it was found that a model containing the hit rate covariate (rate of repeated use of the foot switch) provided the best predictor of the frequency of inadvertent actuation errors. An error threshold was observed at about 17.5 hits/min with a high linear correlation between hit rate and machine-cycling errors at higher hit rates. Based on results of the experiment, this report presents design considerations for workstations which use foot controls to help minimise the chance of machine-cycling errors and injury.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1985

Foreseeable errors in the use of foot controls on industrial machines.

Foot controls are a productive actuator for many tasks on reciprocating action industrial machines such as power presses, spot welders and press brakes. However, amputations sometimes occur when a foot control is inadvertently depressed when an operator reaches into the danger point of the machine. This report uses occupational injury statistics, workplace observations and a review of selected literature to propose a model of inadvertent use of foot controls. This model serves as the basis for conducting a subsequent machine safety simulation experiment in a metal products fabricating factory. Primary model elements are unmediated hand movement, mental slips associated with task rhythm, and loss of balance. To avoid injury due to inadvertent use of pedals, workstation designers may wish to consider using automated or hand control devices in lieu of foot controls. Alternatively, if foot control is the selected method for actuation, then they may wish to consider mitigating the error-inducing effects of machine tooling problems and repetitiveness by using safeguarding which is difficult to circumvent or redundant safeguarding devices at the point of danger.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1983

Investigation of the after-reach hazard in two-hand controlled power press operations.

One hazard inherent to hand-feeding operations at a power press occurs when a worker reaches into the point of operation after initiating the downward stroke of the press ram. One approach for controlling this hazard is to locate a two-hand actuator at a distance sufficiently far from the point of operation to prevent the operator from getting his hand into the die area before the ram completes its descent. In a study of this problem, the activities of a power press were simulated in the laboratory with the use of a model power press and two locations for the actuator controls, an upper and a lower location. The subjects performed simulated work cycles using the laboratory power press. Randomly an after-reach condition was created in which the subjects were to each into the press die area to reposition a dislodged work blank. The after-reach time, ie, the time needed to reach from the actuator controls to the press die area, was measured. The results of this study indicated that there is a difference in hand-reach speed depending upon the location of the actuator controls. It was concluded that, to define hand-reach speed adequately, more research is needed to characterize the effect of other variables.

Accidents, Occupational↗

PubMed1981

The determination of effective injury controls for metal-cutting lathe operators.

Operators of metal-working lathes are one of the largest manufacturing machine worker populations in the United States. Machines (other than vehicular) account for over 10% of occupational injuries each year. An estimated 3,400 operators of metal-working lathes suffer lost-time injuries annually in the United States. Some of these are fatal. Therefore an investigation was undertaken to determine methods for reducing injuries to lathe operators. Three methods were used: (i) review of injury reports, (ii) human factors analysis, and (iii) fault-tree procedures. The investigation followed the man-machine systems approach of looking for injury-producing dysfunctions between the lathe and the lathe operator. The major sources of injury were found to be chips and workholding devices. Secondary tasks were found to be more hazardous than is generally recognized. The use of three methods for approaching the problem was found to be useful in that injury controls were identified which are likely to be adopted because of their potential for improving safety without adversely affecting productivity.

Accidents, Occupational↗