PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J R Hüppe

Publications and source records attributed to J R Hüppe.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

[Additional images and subsequent palpation--indispensable conditions for efficient diagnosis using mammography].

As adjuvant to standard two-view mammography with craniocaudad and oblique projection additional mammographic views are required to definitely establish a diagnosis in about 30% of patients. These are further views of the entire breast in other planes, repetition of standard mammographic projections, special views of parts of the breast and of the axillary region and tangential spot films. In case of nonpalpable mammographic abnormalities additional views help to study the constancy of the findings (superimposition effect?), the diagnostic significance (occult carcinoma?, parenchymal asymmetry?, benign or malignant microcalcification?) and to determine the topographical position of the lesion. Not uncommonly palpatory findings can be picked up mammographically only by special views, often they require further views in other planes for better delineation of the lesion. The important correlation of palpatory and mammographic findings is frequently possibly only with tangential spot films. Only personal physical examination by the mammographist will ensure the appropriate use of additional mammographic views. This concomitant palpation should be carried out immediately before mammography and especially after completion of mammography while viewing the mammographic images. Additional mammographic views make it possible to improve the diagnostic accuracy of numerous malignant and benign lesions of the breast and of the axilla. Conclusive proof of the benignity of a lesion and thus prevention of an unnecessary biopsy is mostly only possible by means of additional special views. This includes superimposition effects, tumorlike asymmetry, lipomas, fibroadenolipomas and oil cysts all of which amount to 12% of all patients in our material.

Breast Neoplasms↗

[Mammographic parenchymal pattern and risk of breast cancer (author's transl)].

502 breast cancers with 431 prevalent and 71 incident carcinomas and 3633 patients without breast cancer were classified according to the mammographic parenchymal pattern N1, P1, P2, Dy devised by Wolfe. The percentage of carcinomas in the various parenchymal groups were determined separately for prevalent and incident carcinomas divided by age groups. Risk factors were achieved by comparison of carcinoma prevalence and incidence between N1 and the other parenchymal groups separately for each age group. The mean risk factor of all age groups shows a slight increase for carcinoma prevalence with 1,0 in P1 and N1 to approximately 1,5 in P2 ad 3,0 in Dy. The ascertained risk factors for carcinoma incidence indicate a similar tendency, however in view of the statistically small number of incident carcinomas a final answer cannot yet be given. The risk trend for N1/P1 to P2/Dy as asserted by Wolfe can thus be confirmed qualitatively. However the risk factors seem to be considerably lesser magnitude than assumed by Wolfe.

Adult↗

[Comparative filmmammography and xeromammographie (author's transl)].

Under optimal conditions xeromammography and filmmammography can reach about the same diagnostic accuracy. However because of the difficulty to detect xeroradiographically tiny microcalcifications filmmammography is to be considered as the optimal mammographic method provided it is carried out with rotating molybdenum anode and industrial type film for longer processing time.

Breast Diseases↗

[The appropiate film for mammography (author's transl)].

Comparison of industrial film with long processing time and "90-second-Film" with film-screen combination showed the first type with long processing time to be distinctly superior. Number and shape of tiny clustered microcalcification were taken as criteria for correct visualization. Under present technical and geometrical conditions only industrial type film with long processing time gives high diagnostic accuracy in early breast cancer which depends to a large degree on proper delineation of microcalcifications.

Breast Neoplasms↗

[Problems of image quality in mammography. Avoidable technical errors in performance and evaluation of mammograms (author's transl)].

Frequent serious technical errors in mammorgraphy proved to be due to incomplete outlining of the breast, underexposure and blurring. These errors are in most cases secondary to incorrect positioning, absence or improper adjustment of automatic exposure system, insufficient quality of x-ray tube, and use of inappropriate films. Each mammogram should be exposed in such a way so that the film reading can be done using a bright halogen lamp and a twofold magnifying glass. Grain, blurring and artefacts should not interfere with the visibility of diagnostically important details such as microcalcifications of the size of about 0,1 mm.

Breast Neoplasms↗

[The oblique mediolateral view of the breast (author's transl)].

The oblique mediolateral position provides the single most important view in mammography. It ensures optimal delineation of the largest possible area of the mammary gland including the axilla thus making an additional axillary view unnecessary. In a considerable precentage of cases it is usefull to take a film size of 20 x 30 cm instead of 18 x 24 cm. This view provides better results in radiomammography compared with xeromammography under present technical conditions.

Breast Neoplasms↗

[Efficiency and practicability of the oblique mediolateral view as one-view mammography (author's transl)].

With one-view mammography the detection rate for carcinoma would seem to drop considerably, in the screening situation for early carcinoma (T0 and T1) down to 50 to 60% under unfavourable conditions. The precentage of mammographic findings not completely cleared up by one-view mammography amounts to 54% among our patients. One-view mammography therefore seems to be justified neither as screening nor as routine procedure.

Breast Neoplasms↗