PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J R Laporte

Publications and source records attributed to J R Laporte.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

European network for the case-population surveillance of rare diseases (Euronet). A prospective feasibility study.

OBJECTIVE: Euronet, a case-population surveillance scheme, aims to estimate the risk of certain rare conditions which are commonly iatrogenic, by comparing drug use amongst non-selective cases with overall drug use in the general population. METHODS: The method is based on three provisos: (1) all incident cases (irrespective of suspected aetiology) should be ascertained and studied; (2) a full drug history should be obtained from cases by direct interview; and (3) drug-use data for the products of interest should be available for this population from which cases are chosen. The feasibility of this problem-oriented approach for the identification of new signals of adverse drug reactions and for risk estimation will be tested in relation to agranulocytosis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in four defined areas in Europe, totalling 19 x 10(6) inhabitants, with these latest two outcomes being studied in only three regions. The design, methods and main limitations of this case-population surveillance approach are described.

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems↗

Trends of prescribing patterns for the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction over a 13-year period.

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of beta-adrenergic blocking agents and acetylsalicylic acid in the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction has been well recognized since the beginning of the 1980s. In a previous paper, however, we reported a lower than expected use of these drugs during the period 1982 1988. In 1989 the results of this survey were presented and discussed with the prescribing physicians. In the present paper we describe the prescription patterns for the same indication and in the same centre over the following 6 years (1989-1994). We also describe the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, for which efficacy in certain subgroups has been recently shown. METHODS: Random samples of patients discharged from our hospital between 1989 and 1994 with a diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction with Q-wave were studied. Information about diagnoses, other clinical variables and treatments prescribed at discharge was obtained from the hospital discharge forms. The results were compared with those obtained in the previous study. RESULTS: We studied 514 patients (80% men) with a median age of 59 years (range 31-89). The proportions of patients prescribed beta-adrenergic blocking agents and acetylsalicylic acid increased from 34% and 28%, respectively, in 1986-1988, to 62% and 75% in 1989 1991. In 1994 they had reached a steady state (63% and 71%). In addition, a continued decrease in the use of calcium channel blockers was noted, from 36% in 1986-1988 to 17% in 1994. The increase in the prescription of beta-adrenergic blocking agents was especially remarkable in the subgroups for which a larger underuse was recorded in the previous study, such as the elderly. The proportion of patients prescribed an ACE inhibitor increased from 14% in 1989-1991 to 23% in 1994. In a multivariate analysis the prescription of ACE inhibitors was associated with female gender, hypertension during admission, heart failure during admission, and previous myocardial infarction. A substantial increase in the prescription of beta-adrenergic blocking agents and acetylsalicylic acid and a decrease in the prescription of calcium channel blockers was recorded between 1982 and 1994. The prescription rate of beta-adrenergic blocking agents has increased substantially in certain subgroups where underuse had been previously recorded. Most of the changes occurred in 1989-1991, and reached a steady state in 1994. In 1994 an increase in the prescription of ACE inhibitors was also recorded.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

Possible association between ocular chloramphenicol and aplastic anaemia--the absolute risk is very low.

AIMS: To determine whether topical ocular chloramphenicol increases the risk of aplastic anaemia and to estimate the magnitude of this risk, if any. METHODS: Population-based prospective case-control surveillance of aplastic anaemia in a community of 4.2 million inhabitants from 1980 to 1995 (67.2 million person-years) plus case-population estimate of the risk, based on sales figures of ocular chloramphenicol in the study area during the study period. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-five patients with aplastic anaemia and 1,226 controls were included in the analysis. Three cases (2.1%) and 5 controls (0.4%) had been exposed to ocular chloramphenicol during the relevant etiological period. The adjusted odds ratio was 3.77 (95% confidence interval, 0.84-16.90). Two cases had also been exposed to other known causes of aplastic anaemia. The incidence of aplastic anaemia among users of ocular chloramphenicol was 0.36 cases per million weeks of treatment. The incidence among non users was 0.04 cases per million weeks. CONCLUSIONS: An association between ocular chloramphenicol and aplastic anaemia cannot be excluded. However, the risk is less than one per million treatment courses.

Administration, Topical↗

[Utilization of thrombolytic drugs in Barcelona. Study Group on Secondary Prevention of Myocardial Infarction].

BACKGROUND: A number of clinical trials including more than 50,000 patients have shown the efficacy of thrombolytic therapy in reducing mortality associated with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, the results of some recently published drug utilization studies have shown that only one third of admitted patients with a diagnosis of AMI receive thrombolytic treatment. The aim of the present study was to quantify and characterize the use of thrombolytic drugs in three hospitals in Barcelona, Spain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We collected retrospective information about some clinical variables and drug prescription of patients discharged with a diagnosis of AMI from three hospitals in Barcelona between January and June 1994. RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty-four patients (247 men, 68%) with a mean age of 68 years (SD 13) were included in the study. The median time from the beginning of clinical symptoms to hospital admission was 3 h (range 1 to 96). One hundred and two patients (28%) were prescribed thrombolytic drugs, and of these, 62%, received streptokinase. No one patient received any thrombolytic treatment before hospital admission. In a multivariate analysis the following variables were negatively associated with thrombolytic use: age over 75 years, more than three hours from the beginning of symptoms to hospital admission and an EKG with bundle-branch block, ST depression or normal. After excluding patients with limitations to thrombolytic use, 18% of all patients could be identified who did not receive any thrombolytic treatment they could have benefited from. CONCLUSIONS: Only one third of admitted patients with a diagnosis of AMI in the three study hospitals receive thrombolytic treatment. One fifth of the study population with AMI does not receive any thrombolytic therapy but could have benefited from it.

Age Factors↗

[Analgesics in the postoperative period of abdominal interventions. The Study Group on Postoperative Analgesia of the Spanish Society of Clinical Pharmacology].

BACKGROUND: Analgesics can avoid postoperative pain. The aim of this study was to evaluate their prescription after abdominal surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective study including patients who had undergone abdominal surgery in two hospitals in Barcelona, in 1993. Prescription and administration of analgesic drugs, and pain severity during the first 48 hours of the postoperative period were evaluated. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-four patients (83 men) were included. The most frequently prescribed drugs were metamizol (111; 68%), pethidine (83, 51%), and diclofenac (44; 27%). A high percentage of analgesic prescriptions on an "as needed" basis was recorded. Administered doses were lower than those recommended, and lower than those prescribed. Fifty-three percent of patients suffered significant pain during the first day. CONCLUSION: A too low proportion of analgesic drugs is prescribed in a predetermined schedule, in contrast to "as needed" prescription. Opiate derivatives are underused. All analgesic drugs are prescribed at inadequate dosage. This prescription pattern is associated with a high prevalence of postoperative pain.

Abdomen↗

From clinical trials to clinical practice: oral anticoagulation among patients with non-rheumatic, atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of the results of clinical trials on the prophylactic treatment of non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation with oral anticoagulants. METHODS: Retrospectively, we studied a random sample of 375 patients discharged from our hospital with a diagnosis of non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation between 1991 and 1993. Information about diagnoses, other clinical variables and treatments prescribed at discharge was obtained from the hospital medical records. RESULTS: During the whole study period, 14% of patients were prescribed an oral anticoagulant agent and 17% were prescribed acetylsalicylic acid. A non-significant increase in the proportion of patients prescribed oral anticoagulant drugs, from 9% to 17%, was observed. Multivariate analysis showed that a history of stroke (OR = 5.96) and younger age were significantly associated with the prescription of oral anticoagulants. ASA prescription was strongly associated with a history of concomitant vascular disease (OR = 5.8), but not with other risk factors for stroke. Sixty-five percent of patients had one or more risk factors for stroke, did not present any contraindications to anticoagulant agents, but nevertheless were not prescribed one of these drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Anticoagulant agents and acetylsalicylic acid were largely underprescribed to patients with non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation, and oral anticoagulants were not prescribed according to the individual patients' risk of stroke.

Acenocoumarol↗

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing pethidine to metamizol for treatment of post-anaesthetic shivering.

1. Shivering is frequent during the post-anaesthetic recovery period, and there is no clear consensus about the best strategy for its treatment. We tested the efficacy of two commonly used analgesic drugs, pethidine and metamizol. 2. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was performed, including 104 adult patients who presented with post-anaesthetic shivering during the recovery from general anaesthesia. They were randomized to receive placebo (n = 32), metamizol 25 mg kg-1 (n = 37), or pethidine 0.4 mg kg-1 (n = 35). The response to treatment was assessed 5, 15 and 45 min after drug administration, and the main outcome variable was complete suppression of shivering. 3. The efficacy at 5, 15 and 45 min was as follows: placebo 6%, 16% and 37%; metamizol 13.5%, 32% and 76%, and pethidine 89%, 91% and 89%. With both active drugs the efficacy at all three time intervals was significantly higher than that with placebo (P < 0.05). The differences (at 5 and 15, but not at 45 min) between pethidine and metamizol were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Both drugs were well tolerated. 4. The persistence of shivering at 45 min in two thirds of placebo-treated patients indicates that drug treatment is worthwhile; metamizol produces a better postanaesthetic shivering response than placebo, especially 15 and 45 min after drug administration; the efficacy of pethidine was the highest and the response to it appeared more quickly; however, at 45 min it was similar to that observed with metamizol. 5. Both metamizol and pethidine suppress postanaesthetic shivering, but the latter induces a quicker and more reliable response.

Adult↗

Clinical trials versus clinical practice in the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction.

To examine whether the results of trials on the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction have led to a change of prescription practice, the discharge forms of a random sample of 737 patients admitted to a university hospital with a diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (MI) with Q wave from 1982 to 1988 were examined. Information about cardiovascular and other risk factors, contraindications, and prescription of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (beta AA), acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and calcium channel blockers (CCB) was collected. The prescription of these drugs was analysed in relation to clinical variables and the date of patients' discharge from hospital. During the 7 years of follow-up, the prescription of beta AA increased gradually from 20% to 30-35%; the prescription of CCB was above 30% during the same period and did not change significantly with time. The prescription of ASA increased from 0% to 30-35% in the last 3 years of follow-up. Contraindications to beta AA were present in 23.2% of cases and contraindications to ASA in 14.4%. In a multivariate analysis, hypertension (odds ratio 2.29, 95% confidence interval 1.55-3.38) and the period 1986-1988 (OR 2.27, 95% CI 1.57-3.30) were associated with the prescription of beta AA, although the prescription of beta AA decreased significantly with advancing age. Other variables inversely associated with the prescription of beta AA were contraindications (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.24-0.66) and the presence of heart failure during admission (OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.03-0.20).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

Multicentre hospital drug utilization study on the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism. The Venous Thromboembolism Study Group of the Spanish Society of Clinical Pharmacology.

1. Thromboembolic disease (TED) is an important cause of in-hospital morbidity and mortality. Although different prophylactic approaches have been shown to be effective and cost-effective, surveys have suggested that they are underused. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of use of TED prophylaxis in our hospitals. 2. All patients admitted on a specified day to the Internal Medicine and General Surgery wards of seven Spanish university hospitals were included in the study. They were identified cross-sectionally and followed up until discharge or for 15 days. Information about the following variables was collected: risk factors for venous thromboembolism, prophylactic measures used (if any), contraindications to the use of each specific drug or other prophylactic measure, and dosage schedule of the drug used, if any. 3. Nine hundred and thirty-nine patients (53% men) were studied. The most common risk factors for venous thromboembolism were: age > or = 40 years (802; 85%), major surgery (298; 32%), immobilization > or = 6 days (285; 30%), obesity (241; 26%), and cancer (202; 22%). 4. Prophylactic measures were used in 320 patients (34%). Of these, 297 (93%) received heparin, mainly as low molecular weight heparins (248, 78%); physical measures were rarely used. 5. Five hundred and eighty-three patients (62%) fulfilled criteria for moderate or high risk of venous thromboembolism; only 275 (47%) of them received any form of prophylaxis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗