PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J R Morton

Publications and source records attributed to J R Morton.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Use of the internal mammary artery graft and in-hospital mortality and other adverse outcomes associated with coronary artery bypass surgery.

BACKGROUND: There is clear evidence that patients having coronary artery bypass graft surgeries with an internal mammary artery (IMA) have better long-term survival. Some studies have suggested a short-term protective effect as well but, because older and sicker patients are less likely to receive an IMA graft, there has been concern that the apparent protective effect of the IMA on short-term mortality has been confounded by other risk factors. This study was intended to examine the independent effect of IMA grafts on in-hospital mortality while adjusting for patient and disease factors. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied the use of the left IMA (LIMA) in 21 873 consecutive, isolated, first-time coronary artery bypass graft procedures from 1992 through 1999. A total of 87% of the patients received a LIMA graft. LIMA graft use was associated with a significantly decreased risk of mortality. The crude odds ratio for death (LIMA versus no LIMA) was 0.26 (95% confidence intervals, 0.22, 0.31; P:<0.001). LIMA grafts were protective across all major patient and disease subgroups. The odds ratios by subgroup ranged from 0.13 to 0.48. After adjustment for all major risk factors, the odds ratio for death was 0.40 (95% confidence intervals, 0.33, 0.48; P:<0.001). Rates of cerebrovascular accident, return to cardiopulmonary bypass, return to the operating room for bleeding, and mediastinitis or sternal dehiscence requiring surgery were also less in the LIMA group, although not significantly so. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that in addition to its well-documented patency and long-term beneficial effect, LIMA grafting has a strong protective effect on perioperative mortality.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

In-hospital outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass procedures: a multicenter experience.

BACKGROUND: Concern about the possible adverse effects of the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) pump and advances in retractors and operative techniques to access all coronary segments have resulted in increased interest in off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) procedures. Four of the Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group centers initiated OPCAB programs in 1998. We compared the preoperative risk profiles and in-hospital outcomes of patients done off-pump with those done by conventional coronary artery bypass (CCAB) with CPB. METHODS: Between 1998 and 2000, 1,741 OPCAB and 6,126 CCAB procedures were performed at these four medical centers. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting procedures were excluded. Data were available for patient and disease risk factors, extent of coronary disease and adverse in-hospital outcomes. RESULTS: The OPCAB and CCAB groups were somewhat different in their preoperative patient and disease characteristics. The OPCAB patients were more likely to be female and to have peripheral vascular disease. The CCAB patients were more likely to have an ejection fraction less than 0.40 and be urgent or emergent at operation. However, overall predicted risk of in-hospital mortality, based on preoperative factors, was similar in the OPCAB and CCAB groups; the mean predicted risk was 2.6% (p = 0.567). Crude rates of mortality (2.54% OPCAB versus 2.57%, CCAB), intraoperative or postoperative stroke (1.33% versus 1.82%), mediastinitis (1.10% versus 1.37%), and return to the operating room for bleeding (3.46% versus 2.93%) did not differ significantly. The OPCAB patients did have a statistically significant reduction in the need for intraoperative or postoperative intraaortic balloon pump support (2.31% versus 3.41%; p = 0.023) and in the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (21.21% versus 26.31%; p < 0.001). Adjustment for preoperative risk factors and extent of coronary disease did not substantially change the crude results. Median postoperative length of stay was significantly shorter (5 days versus 6 days, p < 0.001) for OPCAB patients than for CCAB patients. CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter study showed that patients having OPCAB are not exposed to a greater risk of short-term adverse outcomes. These data also provided evidence that patients having OPCAB have significantly lower need for intraoperative or postoperative intraaortic balloon pump, lower rates of postoperative atrial fibrillation, and a shorter length of stay.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Risks of morbidity and mortality in dialysis patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Although dialysis patients are undergoing CABG with increasing frequency, large studies specifically comparing patient characteristics and procedure-related risks in this population have not been performed. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a regional prospective cohort study of 15,500 consecutive patients undergoing CABG in northern New England from 1992 to 1997. We used multiple logistic regression analysis to examine associations between preoperative dialysis-dependent renal failure and postoperative events and to adjust for potentially confounding variables. The 279 dialysis-dependent renal failure patients (1.8%) were 4.4 times more likely to experience in-hospital mortality than were other CABG patients (12.2% versus 3.0%, respectively; P:<0.001). Dialysis-dependent renal failure patients were older and had more comorbidities and more severe cardiac disease than did other CABG patients. After adjusting for these factors in multivariate analysis, however, dialysis-dependent renal failure patients remained 3.1 times more likely to die after CABG (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3.1, 95% CI 2.1 to 4.7; P:<0.001). Dialysis-dependent renal failure patients compared with other CABG patients also had a substantially increased risk of postoperative mediastinitis (3.6% versus 1.2%, respectively; adjusted OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.2 to 4.7; P:=0.011) and postoperative stroke (4.3% versus 1.7%, respectively; adjusted OR 2. 1, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.9; P:=0.016), even after controlling for potentially confounding variables. Risks of reexploration for bleeding were similar for patients with and without dialysis-dependent renal failure. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative dialysis-dependent renal failure is a strong independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality and mediastinitis after CABG.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Decreasing mortality for aortic and mitral valve surgery in Northern New England. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Although numerous reports have documented declining mortality rates associated with coronary artery bypass surgery in recent years, it is unknown whether similar trends have occurred with valve surgery during this time. METHODS: We conducted a regional, prospective study to assess trends in patient casemix and in-hospital mortality rates over time with aortic valve replacement (AVR), mitral valve replacement (MVR), and mitral valve repair. Data were collected from all patients undergoing AVR (n = 2,596), MVR (n = 759), or mitral valve repair (n = 522) in Northern New England between January 1992 and December 1997. Logistic regression was used to identify significant predictors of in-hospital mortality and to calculate risk-adjusted mortality rates. RESULTS: For AVR, the trend in patient casemix was toward increased risk with increases in patient age and in the proportion of patients with: body surface area less than 1.7, diabetes, coronary artery disease, and prior valve surgery. A decrease was noted in the proportion of patients undergoing additional surgical procedures. For MVR, patient risk improved over the time period with fewer female patients and fewer patients with coronary artery disease. For mitral valve repair patient risk increased over the time period with increases in the proportion of patients with coronary artery disease, diabetes, and whose surgical priority was classified as urgent. In addition, there was a borderline significant increase in the proportion of mitral valve repair patients in New York Heart Association class IV preoperatively. Risk-adjusted mortality decreased 44% from 9.3% in 1992 through 1993 to 5.3% in 1996 through 1997 for patients undergoing AVR (p = 0.01) and decreased 53% from 13.6% in 1992 through 1993 to 8.2% in 1996 through 1997 for patients undergoing MVR (p = 0.01). We observed a statistically insignificant increase in risk-adjusted mortality over the time period for patients undergoing mitral valve repair (from 3.6% in 1992 through 1993 to 5.0% in 1996 through 1997; p = 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: Significant improvement in mortality rates with valve replacement was observed in northern New England during this time period. This improvement persisted following adjustment for changes in patient casemix over this time. These trends mirror improvements in mortality with other cardiac surgical interventions that have been observed in recent years in our region and nationally.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Mediastinitis and long-term survival after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

BACKGROUND: Mediastinitis is a dreaded complication of coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). The long-term effect of mediastinitis on mortality after CABG has not been well studied. METHODS: We examined the survival of 15,406 consecutive patients undergoing isolated CABG surgery from 1992 through 1996. Patient records were linked to the National Death Index. Mediastinitis was defined as occurring during the index admission and requiring reoperation. RESULTS: Mediastinitis occurred in 193 patients (1.25%). Patients with mediastinitis were older and more likely to have had emergency surgery, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and preoperative dialysis-dependent renal failure. Patients with mediastinitis were also more likely to be severely obese and had somewhat lower preoperative ejection fraction. After multivariate adjustment for these factors, the first year post-CABG survival rate was 78% with mediastinitis and 95% without, and the hazard ratio for mortality during the entire follow-up period was 3.09 (CI 95% 2.28, 4.19; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Mediastinitis is associated with a marked increase in mortality during the first year post-CABG and a threefold increase during a 4-year follow-up period.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Effect of preoperative aspirin use on mortality in coronary artery bypass grafting patients.

BACKGROUND: Discontinuing aspirin use in patients before coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has focused on bleeding risks. The effect of aspirin use on overall mortality with this procedure has not been studied. METHODS: We performed a case patient-control patient study of the 8,641 consecutive isolated CABG procedures performed between July 1987 and May 1991 in Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont. Patients included all 368 deaths. Each case patient was paired with approximately two matched survivors (control patients). Aspirin use was defined by identification of ingestion within 7 days before the operation. RESULTS: CABG patients using preoperative aspirin were less likely to experience in-hospital mortality in univariate (odds ratio [OR] = 0.73, 95% confidence interval [0.54, 0.97]) and multivariate [OR = 0.55, (0.31, 0.98)] analysis compared to nonusers. No significant difference was seen in the amount of chest tube drainage, transfusion of blood products, or need for reexploration for hemorrhage between patients who did and did not receive aspirin. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative aspirin use appears to be associated with a decreased risk of mortality in CABG patients without significant increase in hemorrhage, blood product requirements, or related morbidities.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Obesity and risk of adverse outcomes associated with coronary artery bypass surgery. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is frequently cited as a risk factor for adverse outcomes of major surgery. The results of prior studies of the relationship between obesity and risk of adverse outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) have been contradictory because of insufficient power to assess relatively infrequent outcomes or data to adjust for confounding factors. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data on patient age, sex, height, weight, medical history, current clinical status, and treatment factors were assessed prospectively among 11101 consecutive patients undergoing CABG. Body mass index (BMI) was used as the measure of obesity and was categorized as nonobese (1st to 74th percentiles), obese (75th to 94th percentiles), or severely obese (95th to 100th percentiles). Adverse outcomes occurring in-hospital, including mortality, intraoperative/postoperative cerebrovascular accident (CVA), postoperative bleeding, and sternal wound infection, were defined prospectively. Associations between obesity and postoperative outcomes were assessed by use of logistic regression to adjust for potentially confounding variables. Although obesity was not associated with increased mortality (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.16; P=.261) or postoperative CVA (adjusted OR, 1.06; P=.765), risks of sternal wound infection were substantially increased in the obese (adjusted OR, 2.10; confidence interval [CI], 1.45 to 3.06; P<.001) and severely obese (adjusted OR, 2.74; CI, 1.49 to 5.02; P=.001). On the other hand, rates of postoperative bleeding were significantly lower in the obese (adjusted OR, 0.66; CI, 0.49 to 0.90; P=.009) and severely obese (adjusted OR, 0.40; CI, 0.20 to 0.81; P=.011). CONCLUSIONS: With the exception of sternal wound infection, the perception among clinicians that obesity predisposes to various postoperative complications with CABG is not supported by these data. Further work is needed to understand the apparent protective effect of obesity on risks of postoperative bleeding.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Results of a regional study of modes of death associated with coronary artery bypass grafting. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group.

BACKGROUND: It is well known that surgeon-specific in-hospital mortality rates for coronary artery bypass grafting vary, but this aggregate measure does not suggest specific opportunities for improvement. METHODS: We performed a regional prospective study of 8,641 consecutive patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting by all of the 23 cardiothoracic surgeons practicing in northern New England during the study period. Mode of death was assigned by an end points committee using predetermined definitions. Surgeons were ranked according to risk-adjusted mortality rates and grouped in terciles, and cause-specific mortality rates were determined. RESULTS: The mortality rate was 3.3% in the lowest surgeon mortality tercile and 5.8% in the highest tercile. Fatal heart failure accounted for 80.0% of the difference in aggregate mortality rates, ranging from 1.9% in lowest surgeon mortality tercile to 4.0% in the highest tercile (p < 0.001). Rates of other causes did not differ significantly across surgeon mortality terciles. Differences in rates of fatal heart failure could not be explained by differences in preoperative left ventricular dysfunction or other patient characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the difference in observed mortality rates across surgeons is attributable to differences in rates of heart failure.

Cause of Death↗
PubMed1997

Outcomes analysis in cardiac surgery.

Outcomes research is a quantitative assessment of the results of care. Outcomes analysis provides information that benefits the physician, the patient, the institution and the health care purchasers. It provides relevant and timely information for the assessment of the heart centre's performance. Outcomes data have proven to be useful to the attending physicians by providing a basis for clinical decision making. Patients may be appraised of the usual results and the risks of various treatment strategies and make informed decisions on their care. The purchasers of health care will be better informed regarding the costs and effectiveness of the care being delivered. O'Connor et al. have stated that methods of improving care are often discussed but are difficult to achieve due to processes of care being hidden from view. Outcomes research is a comprehensive performance evaluation strategy that may be used to discover the impact of these hidden aspects of care. This technology of the patient's experience is bringing cardiac surgery to a new level of excellence.

Cardiac Surgical Procedures↗
PubMed1996

A regional intervention to improve the hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an organized intervention including data feedback, training in continuous quality improvement techniques, and site visits to other medical centers could improve the hospital mortality rates associated with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. DESIGN: Regional intervention study. Patient demographic and historical data, body surface area, cardiac catheterization results, priority of surgery, comorbidity, and status at hospital discharge were collected on CABG patients in Northern New England between July 1, 1987, and July 31, 1993. SETTING: This study included all 23 cardiothoracic surgeons practicing in Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont during the study period. PATIENTS: Data were collected on 15,095 consecutive patients undergoing isolated CABG procedures in Maine, New Hampshire and Vermont during the study period. INTERVENTIONS: A three-component intervention aimed at reducing CABG mortality was fielded in 1990 and 1991. The interventions included feedback of outcome data, training in continuous quality improvement techniques, and site visits to other medical centers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: A comparison of the observed and expected hospital mortality rates during the postintervention period. RESULTS: During the postintervention period, we observed the outcomes for 6488 consecutive cases of CABG surgery. There were 74 fewer deaths than would have been expected. This 24% reduction in the hospital mortality rate was statistically significant (P = .001). This reduction in mortality rate was relatively consistent across patient subgroups and was temporally associated with the interventions. CONCLUSION: We conclude that a multi-institutional, regional model for the continuous improvement of surgical care is feasible and effective. This model may have applications in other settings.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Effect of coronary artery diameter in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery diameter is known to be inversely associated with perioperative mortality related to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This association is believed to be responsible for increased risk among women and smaller people. However, the associations between sex, body size, and coronary size have not been carefully examined because direct information about coronary size is rarely available. Also, whether sex has an independent effect on vessel size is largely unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Height, weight, sex, age, status at hospital discharge, and luminal diameter of the midleft anterior descending coronary artery (mid-LAD) were recorded prospectively in 1325 patients undergoing CABG. Small vessel size was associated with substantially increased risk of in-hospital mortality (15.8% for 1.0-mm vessels, 4.6% for 1.5- to 2.0-mm vessels, and 1.5% for 2.5- to 3.5-mm vessels, P[trend] < .001). Vessel size was strongly related to both sex and measures of body size. In multiple linear regression analysis, vessel size was positively correlated with body surface area (P[trend] < .01), body mass index (P[trend] = .004), height (P[trend] = .001), and weight (P[trend] = .001). After controlling for differences in age and body size, sex remained an important predictor of coronary size. Within each quartile of each body-size measure, mid-LAD diameter in men was greater than that in women (mean difference [range], 0.14 to 0.23 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Small mid-LAD diameter is associated with substantially increased risk of in-hospital mortality with CABG. Although body size is correlated with mid-LAD diameter, women have smaller coronary arteries than men after controlling for differences in body size. These findings further support the hypothesis that smaller coronary arteries explain higher perioperative mortality with CABG in women and smaller people.

Body Constitution↗
PubMed1996

Aprotinin for primary coronary artery bypass grafting: a multicenter trial of three dose regimens.

BACKGROUND: High-dose aprotinin reduces transfusion requirements in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, but the safety and effectiveness of smaller doses is unclear. Furthermore, patient selection criteria for optimal use of the drug are not well defined. METHODS: Seven hundred and four first-time coronary artery bypass grafting patients were randomized to receive one of three doses of aprotinin (high, low, and pump-prime-only) or placebo. The patients were stratified as to risk of excessive bleeding. RESULTS: All three aprotinin doses were highly effective in reducing bleeding and transfusion requirements. Consistent efficacy was not, however, demonstrated in the subgroup of patients at low risk for bleeding. There were no differences in mortality or the incidences of renal failure, strokes, or definite myocardial infarctions between the groups, although the pump-prime-only dose was associated with a small increase in definite, probable, or possible myocardial infarctions (p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose and pump-prime-only aprotinin regimens provide reductions in bleeding and transfusion requirements that are similar to those of high-dose regimens. Although safe, aprotinin is not routinely indicated for the first-time coronary artery bypass grafting patient who is at low risk for postoperative bleeding. The pump-prime-only dose is not currently recommended because of a possible association with more frequent myocardial infarctions.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

The effect of peripheral vascular disease on in-hospital mortality rates with coronary artery bypass surgery. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of peripheral vascular disease (PVD) on in-hospital mortality rates after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: We performed a regional cohort study of 3003 patients undergoing CABG between 1987 and 1989 at five tertiary care centers in Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont. Data reflecting patient characteristics, severity of heart disease, comorbidity, and in-hospital mortality rates were collected prospectively; the presence of clinical and subclinical indicators of PVD was determined retrospectively. RESULTS: Observed in-hospital mortality rates with CABG were 2.4-fold higher in the 796 patients with indicators of PVD (7.7%) than in the 2207 patients without PVD (3.2%) (crude odds ratio [OR] 2.42 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.73-3.37]). After adjusting for their higher comorbidity scores, more advanced heart disease, and age, patients with PVD remained 73% more likely to die in hospital after CABG (adjusted OR 1.73 [CI 1.19-2.51]). The excess risk of in-hospital death associated with PVD was attributable largely to lower extremity occlusive disease (adjusted OR 2.03 [CI 1.34-3.07]). Subclinical lower extremity occlusive disease (asymptomatic absence of pedal pulses) had the same effect as clinically overt disease. Cerebrovascular disease had a small and statistically nonsignificant effect on CABG-related deaths (adjusted OR 1.13 [CI 0.73-1.74]). Excess mortality rates in patients with PVD were primarily due to increased risk of death from heart failure and dysrhythmias, but not to cerebrovascular accidents or peripheral arterial complications. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of lower extremity arterial occlusive disease is an important, independent predictor of in-hospital mortality rates for patients undergoing CABG. Controlled studies of the long-term effects of CABG in patients with PVD are needed to determine the optimal role of myocardial revascularization in this population.

Aged↗
PubMed1993

Differences between men and women in hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group.

BACKGROUND: A prospective study of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) was conducted to examine differences in hospital mortality by sex. Outcome data on 3055 CABG patients undergoing operation between 1987 and 1989 were examined for differences in patient, disease, and treatment factors. METHODS AND RESULTS: Odds ratios (OR), risk differences, and 95% confidence intervals (CI95%) were calculated. Mortality rates for women (7.1%) and men (3.3%) differed, the OR (women versus men) being 2.23 (CI95%, 1.58 to 3.15). Women were older, more often diabetic, and had more urgent or emergent surgery; adjustment yielded an OR (women versus men) of 1.75 (CI95%, 1.17 to 2.63). Body surface area (BSA) was associated with risk of death in both sexes (P = .007) and positively associated with coronary artery luminal diameters. After adjustment for BSA, sex was no longer significantly associated with mortality (OR [women versus men] of 1.18; CI95%, 0.72 to 1.95). Internal mammary artery (IMA) grafting was performed less frequently among women than men (64.8% versus 78.4%, P < .001). Smaller BSA and absence of IMA grafting were each associated with increased risk of death (RD) from heart failure. Risk of death from heart failure (RD [women minus men] = 2.05; CI95%, 0.89 to 3.22) and hemorrhage (RD [women minus men] = 0.63; CI95%, 0.13 to 1.13) was greater among women; these accounted for 71.1% of the sex-specific difference in mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS: Excess risk of hospital mortality among women having CABG was largely the consequence of death from heart failure and, to a lesser extent, from hemorrhage. Smaller BSA (probably because of its association with coronary artery luminal diameter) and the absence of IMA grafting were each associated with increased risk of death from heart failure.

Aged↗
PubMed1992

Multivariate prediction of in-hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group.

BACKGROUND: A prospective regional study was conducted to identify factors associated with in-hospital mortality among patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). A prediction rule was developed and validated based on the data collected. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from 3,055 patients were collected from five clinical centers between July 1, 1987, and April 15, 1989. Logistic regression analysis was used to predict the risk of in-hospital mortality. A prediction rule was developed on a training set of data and validated on an independent test set. The metric used to assess the performance of the prediction rule was the area under the relative operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Variables used to construct the regression model of in-hospital mortality included age, sex, body surface area, presence of comorbid disease, history of CABG, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, ejection fraction score, and priority of surgery. The model significantly predicted the occurrence of in-hospital mortality. The area under the ROC curve obtained from the training set of data was 0.74 (perfect, 1.0). The prediction rule performed well when used on a test set of data (area, 0.76). The correlation between observed and expected numbers of deaths was 0.99. CONCLUSIONS: The prediction rule described in this report was developed using regional data, uses only eight variables, has good performance characteristics, and is easily available to clinicians with access to a microcomputer or programmable calculator. This validated multivariate prediction rule would be useful both to calculate the risk of mortality for an individual patient and to contrast observed and expected mortality rates for an institution or a particular clinician.

Aged↗
PubMed1991

A regional prospective study of in-hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass grafting. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: A prospective regional study was conducted to determine if the observed differences in in-hospital mortality rates associated with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are solely the result of differences in patient case mix. DESIGN-Regional prospective cohort study. Data including patient demographic and historical data, body surface area, cardiac catheterization results, priority of surgery, comorbidity, and status at hospital discharge were collected. This study presents data for 3055 CABG patients between July 1, 1987, and April 15, 1989. SETTING: This study includes data from all surgeons performing cardiothoracic surgery in Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont; the data were collected from five regional medical centers. PATIENTS: Data were collected from all consecutive isolated CABG surgery patients during the study period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Crude and adjusted in-hospital mortality rates associated with CABG. MAIN RESULTS: The overall crude in-hospital mortality rate for isolated CABG was 4.3%. The rate varied among centers (range, 3.1% to 6.3%) and among surgeons (range, 1.9% to 9.2%). Predictors of in-hospital mortality included increased age, female gender, small body surface area, greater comorbidity, reoperation, poorer cardiac function as indicated by a lower ejection fraction, increased left ventricular end diastolic pressure and emergent or urgent surgery. After adjusting for the effects of potentially confounding variables, substantial and statistically significant variability was observed among medical centers (P = .021) and among surgeons (P = .025). CONCLUSION: We conclude that the observed differences in in-hospital mortality rates among institutions and among surgeons in northern New England are not solely the result of differences in case mix as described by these variables and may reflect differences in currently unknown aspects of patient care. Understanding this variation requires a detailed understanding of the processes of care.

Adult↗