PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J R Stellar

Publications and source records attributed to J R Stellar.

43 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Reward and aversive effects of lateral hypothalamic stimulation in rats measured by a modified runway and reward summation technique.

This report presents a refinement of the reward summation technique which has seen increasing use as a measure of the reward and performance factors associated with studies of the anatomical and neurochemical mechanisms of lateral hypothalamic stimulation. The technique involves determining the vigor of reward seeking behavior at a number of stimulation levels and making calculations upon this behavior/stimulation relationship. The refinement involves separating out the behavioral consequences of aversiveness which is often mixed with hypothalamic reward, particularly at high levels of stimulation. Specifically, it is shown that total running speed, the conventional measure of reward seeking behavior in a runway, is made of two components: running the runway and latency to press the reward lever. Furthermore, the latency-to-press the lever for any brain stimulation is positively correlated with latency to escape the same stimulation in an ON-OFF apparatus. Thus, latency-to-press likely is attributable to the aversiveness of the stimulation. Measuring only the first component is a more refined measure of the reward of brain stimulation.

Animals↗

Role of ipsilateral forebrain in lateral hypothalamic stimulation reward in rats.

The forebrain was ablated unilaterally to a level dorsal to the thalamus and anterior commissure. Ipsilateral lateral hypothalamic electrodes were then implanted and the animal was tested for self-stimulation behavior. Tests included an initial test for behavioral reactivity to changes in reward level and then two estimates of the quantitative relationships between stimulation parameters: the number-current and charge-duration relationships. Comparison between these findings and those known for intact rats suggest that the substrate for unilateral hypothalamic stimulation reward is not impaired by removal of the ipsilateral tissue.

Animals↗

Approach and withdrawal analysis of the effects of hypothalamic stimulation and lesions in rats.

In a paradigm in which rats would both initiate and terminate hypothalamic stimulation, "purely" rewarding lateral hypothalamic and "purely" aversive medial hypothalamic electrodes were identified. Subjects were then given a series of tests designed to assess the effects of brain stimulation on approach and withdrawal behaviors. Lateral hypothalamic stimulation facilitated approach behavior and suppressed withdrawal behaviors, whereas medial hypothalamic stimulation produced largely the opposite effects. No serious motor deficits due to stimulation were detected with either type of electrode. In a second experiment, the approach-withdrawal effects of bilateral lateral hypothalamic lesions were tested and found to suppress approach behaviors and facilitate withdrawal behaviors. Other neurological examinations revealed motor deficits, but these deficits do not account for the specific pattern of results observed on the approach-withdrawal tests. These approach-withdrawal phenomena are interpreted in terms of altering a natural balance between approach and withdrawl behavior facilitating systems in the lateral and medial hypothalamus, respectively.

Ammonia↗

Runway performance of rats for brain-stimulation or food reward: effects of hunger and priming.

In a runway paradigm, pretrial electric stimulation of the brain (ESB), food deprivation, and to a lesser extent water deprivation increased the running speed of rats to an ESB reward. The trial-by-trail course of the change in running speed after the manipulation of food deprivation resembled the steplike performance effect seen when pretrial priming ESB is changed rather than the incremental learning effect seen when the response contingent ESB is changed. In a second experiment, pretrial ESB enhance rats' performance for an ESB reward, but act in opposing directions rats' performance for a food reward. Implications for Deutsch's model of self-stimulation are discussed.

Animals↗