When acquired thrombophilia mattered.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to J S Hammond.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: The most effective treatment for traumatic injuries is to prevent them from occurring. Currently, few surgeons receive any formal training in injury' control and prevention. This study was designed to test the knowledge of injury prevention principles among practicing surgeons, in order to identify areas in need of intensified educational efforts. STUDY DESIGN: Survey questions designed by members of the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma were programmed into a specialized touch-screen computer, which was displayed at four different surgery and trauma meetings, including the ACS Clinical Congress in 1999 and 2000. Participants were questioned about their knowledge of trauma epidemiology, bicycle helmet effectiveness, child safety seat usage, suicide, and domestic violence. RESULTS: Seventy-nine surveys were completed by surgeons, including 33 specializing in trauma care, and by 106 nurses attending trauma courses. Overall, the percentage of correct answers was 50%. There were no significant differences in survey scores between trauma surgeons and general surgeons, although both scored higher than trauma nurses. Areas where knowledge deficits were the most apparent included proper use of child safety seats, the effectiveness of airbags, the prevalence of suicide, and the annual cost of injury in America. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of practicing surgeons and nurses, including those working at trauma centers, are unaware of the basic concepts of injury prevention. Advancements in the field of injury control will require efforts to educate medical professionals and the public.
The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of operative versus nonoperative management of blunt hepatic trauma in children including transfusion practices. We reviewed the experience at our American College of Surgeons-verified Level I trauma center with pediatric commitment over a 5-year period. Children < or = 16 years of age suffering blunt liver injury as documented on admission CT scan were included in the study. Liver injuries identified on CT scan were classified according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma's Organ Injury Scaling system. All data are presented as mean +/- standard error. One case of pediatric liver trauma not identified on CT was excluded (prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation). Twenty-seven patients were included [age 9.3 +/- 1.0 years (range 3-16)]. Mechanisms of injury included motor vehicle crash (14), pedestrian struck by motor vehicle (7), bicycle crash (4), fall from height (1), and pedestrian struck by falling object (1). Trauma Score was 11.5 +/- 0.3. Distribution of Liver Injury Grade was as follows: grade I, 13; grade II, 9; grade III, 3; grade IV, 2; and grade V, 0. All five patients who underwent operative management had multiple organ injuries; three had concomitant splenic injury requiring operative repair; the remaining two had small bowel injury requiring repair. Hepatorrhaphy did not correlate with severity of liver injury: grade I, n = 1; II, n = 2; III, n = 1; and IV, n = 1. Three operated patients received blood transfusions. Twenty-two patients were managed with nonoperative treatment, of these only one required blood transfusion. No patients in the study died, three were transferred to subacute rehabilitation, one was transferred to another hospital, and 23 were discharged home. Our findings indicate that a majority of children with blunt hepatic injury as documented on CT scan can be managed with nonoperative treatment, and few require blood transfusions. Patients with multiple organ injury including simultaneous splenic injury are likely ideally managed through operative exploration and repair, whereas those with isolated liver injuries can be successfully managed nonoperatively.
BACKGROUND: Injury prevention is not routinely taught in medical school or surgical residency curricula. Because of the integral role surgeons play in the diagnosis and treatment of trauma, we sought to determine the knowledge base of injury prevention concepts of surgical residents training in a state's level 1 trauma centers. METHODS: A written survey was given to general surgery residents at our state's three level 1 trauma centers. Twenty-one questions related to injury prevention were asked in addition to demographic data. Basic concepts of injury prevention, statistical knowledge of injury patterns, and knowledge of intentional violence were tested. RESULTS: Sixty-two residents completed the survey. Only 9 respondents reported prior formal instruction in injury prevention. Overall performance was (mean +/- SD) 10.6 +/- 2.5 of 31 possible points, for a mean average score of 34% correct answers. Postgraduate year level, prior medical school instruction in injury prevention or months of experience on a trauma service did not correlate with improved scores. Specific question performance ranged from 2% to 82% correct responses. Questions regarding domestic violence (60%), risk of burns (65%), and incidence of trauma deaths (82%) were answered correctly most often, while injury prevention theory questions, such as components of the Injury Prevention Triangle (5%), definition of YPLL (2%), and annual cost attributable to injury (19%) were least often answered correctly. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that general surgery residents are poorly educated regarding basic concepts of injury prevention. Importantly, a majority of respondents (69%) felt formal instruction in injury prevention should be included in their surgical residency curriculum.
BACKGROUND: There have been no quantitative, longitudinal studies on the effect of Level 1 Trauma Center (TC) designation on a facility. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of such designation. STUDY DESIGN: In September 1990, a 416-bed core affiliate hospital of the state medical school system was state-designated as the Level 1 TC for 6 counties. Data collected from five concurrent 1-year periods after TC designation included case number and acuity of condition, length of hospital and ICU stays, preventable death rates, financial coverage, and neurosurgery and orthopaedic volume. No registry data were available before TC designation. RESULTS: While the yearly number of cases remained stable, the overall severity of cases increased coincident with a 50% reduction in overtriage. The need for ICU services increased over 50%. Mean Injury Severity Score increased from 11.0 in year 1 to 13.8 in year 5. There was a 25% to 30% increase in severe neurosurgery injuries and in major orthopaedic trauma. There was no change in the "self-pay" financial category (12% to 16%) or the ratio of blunt to penetrating trauma (90:10). CONCLUSIONS: With Level 1 TC designation in a noninner city setting, planners can expect a shift to more severely injured patients, but should not expect an increase in nonpaying patients. Increases in severe injuries will continue to place strain on the ICU. Impact on neurosurgeons and orthopaedic surgeons mandates their support in TC planning.
BACKGROUND: The nature of functional deficit after mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) defined by Glasgow Coma Score of 13-15 is not fully described. This study explored the sensitivity of several neuropsychological tests to identify sequelae of mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: Eleven adult patients with mild TBI admitted to a Level 1 trauma center were studied. The battery of tests included the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children -Revised: Mazes Subtest, Trails A and B, the Boston Naming Test, The Multilingual Aphasia Examination: Controlled Oral Word Association Test, and the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task. RESULTS: Control subjects performed significantly better than patients with mild TBI on Trails A and B, the Controlled Oral Word Association Test, and Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task (subtests 2-4). No significant differences in performances between patients and controls was found for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children -Revised: Mazes Subtest, Boston Naming Test, and Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task Subtest 1. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that tests of specific frontal lobe executive functions are valuable in diagnosing and monitoring recovery from mild TBI.
Severely injured trauma patients are at increased risk of pulmonary embolism (PE). Certain injuries may preclude the use of standard prophylactic measures, and even when used, these measures may be ineffective in the trauma population. We defined a group of trauma patients who are at statistically elevated risk of venous thromboembolic events. We then adopted an aggressive approach to the placement of prophylactic inferior vena cava (IVC) filters in these high-risk patients. Between January 1994 and January 1996 we treated 250 trauma patients who met our high-risk criteria. Prophylactic IVC filters were placed in 99 of these patients, and 151 received deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis with either heparin, sequential compression stockings, or a combination of these modalities. High-risk patients did not receive filters if they were unlikely to survive or showed rapid clinical improvement and were felt to not remain at high risk. The incidence of pulmonary embolism in this high-risk population was 1.6%. This is a significant reduction (p = 0.045, Fisher exact test) from the 4.8% incidence of PE in high-risk historical control patients with similar injury profiles. No patient with a prophylactic IVC filter suffered a clinically evident PE and there were no complications associated with placement of these filters. We conclude that the placement of prophylactic IVC filters in high-risk trauma patients is a safe and effective method of reducing the incidence of pulmonary embolism.
A retrospective review of the medical records of blunt trauma patients with sternal fracture admitted to a level 1 trauma center from June 1990 to June 1993 was undertaken to determine the relationship between sternal fractures and clinically significant myocardial injury, and to assess the usefulness of cardiac evaluation and monitoring in these patients. Of 33 patients with sternal fracture, 31 were in motor vehicle crashes and 2 were pedestrians struck. All had Glasgow Coma Scale score = 15. No patient had a severe, life-threatening, associated injury (Abbreviated Injury Score of >3). No electrocardiogram or echocardiogram showed evidence of acute injury or ischemia. No arrhythmias requiring treatment were noted. No CPK-MB fraction was >5%. These results show that sternal fracture is not a marker for clinically significant myocardial injury. The management of sternal fracture patients should be directed toward the treatment of associated injuries.
BACKGROUND: Air bags (ABs) may be perceived by the public and physicians as protection for thoracoabdominal injuries. This study compares injury patterns when air bags are used alone with injury patterns when air bags plus mechanical restraints (MRs) are used. METHODS: Patients treated over a 4-year period with emergency medical services-documented AB deployment alone (n = 16) or AB plus MR (n = 22) were identified by trauma registry query. Medical records were reviewed and injuries recorded. RESULTS: Air bag-alone users had more severe overall (injury severity score > or = 15:9 vs 5), chest (abbreviated injury score [AIS] > or = 3:5 vs 1), and abdominal injuries (AIS > or = 3:6 vs 0). They required more tube thoracostomies (5 vs 0) and laparotomies (6 vs 0), longer hospitalizations (11.9 +/- 3.2 vs 5.3 +/- 1.4 days), and more intensive care unit admissions (8 vs 1). Craniofacial injuries (AIS > or = 3:6 vs 6) and fractures were similar. More victims using air bags alone required impatient rehabilitation and some patients died (6 vs 1). CONCLUSIONS: Crash victims using air bags alone (vs AB plus MR) had increased injury severity, hospitalizations, thoracoabdominal procedures, and rehabilitation. Physicians must be aware of the incomplete protection by air bags alone.
OBJECTIVE: This review focuses on how patients' recall of their stay in the ICU can be modified pharmacologically. DATA SOURCES: Computerized MEDLINE and PAPERCHASE searches of English- and foreign-language published research from 1966 to 1995, bibliographies, pharmaceutical and personal files, and conference abstract reports. STUDY SELECTION: All abstracts from uncontrolled and controlled clinical trials were reviewed. DATA EXTRACTION: Study design, population, results, and safety information were retained. Efficacy conclusions were drawn from controlled trials. DATA SYNTHESIS: Patients without cerebral injury may recall mental and physical discomfort during their stay in the ICU. All benzodiazepines produce amnestic effects, but the short duration of action, lack of long-acting metabolites, and potent amnestic effects make lorazepam and midazolam preferable in this setting. Infusions of propofol for conscious sedation produce concentrations below those required for consistent amnesia. Opioids generally do not produce amnesia; however, end-organ failure and use of high doses of opioids may increase plasma concentrations to levels that produce impairment of learning and various degrees of amnesia. High infusion rates of ketamine may be required for satisfactory amnesia and pain control (with coadministration of benzodiazepine). Barbiturates and haloperidol do not impair memory in patients who are not critically ill. Antihistamines and anticholinergics that do not penetrate the central nervous system do not produce amnesia. Flumazenil may induce recall. CONCLUSIONS: Patients may remember their stay in the ICU, depending on the type of injury and the drug therapy. Of the drugs presented, benzodiazepines most reliably provide anterograde amnesia, whereas ketamine and propofol exhibit dose-dependent effects on memory.
Nonoperative management (NOM) of adult splenic injury is evolving. Economic aspects of NOM have not been examined. We hypothesize that NOM reduces hospital and professional charges. Surgeon, radiologist, and hospital charges and reimbursements, and clinical outcome were obtained for 77 consecutive adult splenic injury patients (> or = 15 years old) over a 3-year period. NOM succeeded in 30 of 31 patients. NOM was associated with lower surgeon fee ($1,148 vs $4,452; P < 0.0001), surgeon reimbursement ($587 vs $2,773; P = 0.0001), and hospital charge ($18,982 vs $48,790; P = 0.001) relative to operative management. Radiologist fee ($1,776 vs $2,285) and reimbursement ($1,069 vs $1,537) were not significantly affected. No significant difference existed between surgeon (primary care provider) and radiologist reimbursement for NOM. ISS poorly correlated with economic variables. We conclude that cost reductions are another potential advantage of NOM. Surgeon reimbursement for the cognitive skills involved in NOM is minimal. Future health finance policy should recognize the cognitive aspects of trauma care.
Current diagnostic modalities for traumatic diaphragmatic hernia (TDH) have limitations. Prior models differ from human injury. This study evaluates peritoneoscintigraphy in a rabbit model of TDH simulating human blunt injury. Ten adult New Zealand rabbits (two control, eight experimental) underwent tracheostomy and left thoracotomy under anesthesia. Experimental animals received a radial phrenotomy (1.0 to 3.5 cm). Incisions were closed over thoracostomy tubes, and ventilation was discontinued. Catheters were inserted intraperitoneally, and radiotracer in saline was injected. A gamma counter was used to take sequential images. Transdiaphraghmatic isotope was seen in only two animals. Both had large injuries; in one, the catheter was directed toward the diaphragmatic defect. We conclude that peritoneoscintigraphy is insensitive in the detection of TDH. It is unlikely to be an effective technique coupled with diagnostic peritoneal lavage. Further efforts to refine diagnostic capability for TDH should be directed elsewhere, such as laparoscopy.
Computed tomography (CT) is increasingly utilized in evaluation of adult splenic injury (SI). CT correlation with operative findings, CT relationship to successful nonoperative (NO) management, and CT reading reproducibility were examined. Records of patients > or = 15 years old admitted over a 3-year period were reviewed. Computed tomography scans were graded by two radiologists blinded to clinical results. Computed tomography scans were performed on 49 of 77 patients with SI. Eighteen underwent initial operation (OR) and 31 initial NO. Operative patients had higher Injury Severity Scores and Abdominal Abbreviated Injury Scale scores (p < 0.0001). Grade II readings predominated in the NO group (55%). Nonoperative management was successful for 9 grade III and 3 grade IV readings. Computed tomography matched OR grade in 10 readings, underestimated it in 18, and overestimated it in 6. Computed tomography missed SI in five patients. Radiologists disagreed on 9 of 45 (20%) scans. Computed tomography poorly predicted operative findings. Interobserver variability was common. SI management should not be based solely on CT severity.
Pediatric trauma care by "adult" surgeons is debated, despite the paucity of pediatric trauma surgeons; 424 patients < or = 17 admitted to a Level I Center run by "adult" surgeons were analyzed. Demographics mirrored NPTR (mean ISS 11.5; mean age 10). "Adult" critical care surgeons treated MTOS-comparable patients with outcomes comparable to MTOS. Among other specialists, only neurosurgeons saw a MTOS-comparable population. Nonoperative protocols for solid organ injury were used appropriately. Z for all patients was +0.17 with M 0.908. Ps was 0.951; acute survival was 0.958 with 18 deaths (mean Ps 0.158). There were two unexpected survivors and one unexpected death; 73% of survivors had age-appropriate locomotion. Pediatric trauma outcomes by "adult" surgeons compare favorably to national standards. The recommendation that pediatric trauma care be directed by pediatric surgeons should be qualified in view of such outcomes and the paucity of pediatric trauma surgeons.
Fungal infections (FI) in surgical patients are increasing; mortality approaches 50 per cent. Prior studies identified factors predicting fungal colonization (FC) including broad spectrum antibiotics (BSA). This study investigates antibiotic patterns predicting FC. Other risk factors and outcomes are analyzed. A total of 72 consecutive SICU patients receiving > or = 7 days BSA were followed. None received prophylactic antifungals. Input data: Age, APACHE II, surgical procedure, lines, ulcer prophylaxis, TPN duration, antibiotic/antifungal regimen. Outcome data: FC, FI, length of SICU and hospital stay, mortality. A total of 32 patients (44%) developed FC; five (16%) developed FI (P = 0.08). All infected patients died (P = 0.0002). FC of GU (25%), respiratory (19%), and GI (19%) tracts were common. Multiple site colonization occurred in 25 per cent of colonized patients. Metronidazole and duration of ventilation predicted FC. APACHE II and TPN duration predicted mortality. Mortality occurred exclusively among patients requiring systemic antifungals. Among BSA, only metronidazole independently predisposed to FC. Other predictors of colonization and mortality agree with prior studies. The high mortality among patients requiring systemic antifungals implies that a more aggressive approach to prophylaxis may be warranted.
Forty-three trauma patients underwent tracheostomy (TRACH) and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) over 21 months. Thirty-one patients had a head injury with Abbreviated Injury Scale > or = 3 associated with multi-trauma. This study was undertaken to analyze demographic and outcome variables with respect to timing of TRACH/PEG in this population. Patients were divided into EARLY (< or = 7 days) and LATE (> 7 days) groups and were analyzed for admission Glasgow Coma Scale, Apache II, Injury Severity Score, and [(A-a)DO2] at time of TRACH/PEG. Outcome variables were ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, days of mechanical ventilation (MV) post-TRACH/PEG, complications, and mortality. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy findings with PEG and days to full enteral nutrition were recorded. All demographic variables were statistically similar between the EARLY and LATE groups. The EARLY group had shorter hospital LOS (P < 0.05), total Intensive Care Unit LOS (P < 0.05), ICU LOS post-TRACH/PEG (P < 0.05), and fewer days of MV post-TRACH/PEG (P < 0.05). There were no procedure-related complications of TRACH/PEG in either group. Full Esophagogastroduodenoscopy performed at the time of PEG had a high diagnostic yield in both groups. We conclude that TRACH/PEG performed within the first 7 days of injury in the head trauma patient is the procedure of choice for long-term airway protection, mechanical ventilation, and enteral nutrition. Combined use of these procedures reduces ICU and hospital LOS and shortens the course of MV.
OBJECTIVES: Medical decisions concerning the prolongation of life, the right to die, and euthanasia are among the most extensively discussed decisions within medicine and law today. The responses of 360 physicians, housestaff, and medical students to a questionnaire were analyzed to identify attitudes toward these issues. DESIGN: Case vignettes were utilized to simulate the clinical context within which to survey decisions regarding whether or not to allow and assist patients requesting to die. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The majority of respondents (76%) consider withholding and withdrawing life-support therapy consistent with passive euthanasia. Passive euthanasia is more acceptable to the majority of the respondents (77%) and all three groups (physicians, housestaff, and students) are similarly more disturbed by active euthanasia. Of all respondents, 51% would accede to the patient's wishes when lifesaving treatment is refused, but only 16% would do so when a patient requested assistance in dying. Despite the fact that a majority (68%) agree that there is a moral justification for assisting patients to die and feel "understanding" for a physician who assists a patient in dying, only 6% of those persons surveyed were willing to deliberately terminate the life of a patient by administering medication to cause respiratory arrest, and only 1.1% of those persons surveyed were willing to do so to cause cardiac arrest. In the case vignettes, the faculty placed their highest value on disease-based information as strongly determinative to their decisions, while students and housestaff preferred quality-of-life factors. Respondents uniformly found it easier to perform "passive" actions; they were more willing to perform "active" actions in case vignettes where patients had terminal illnesses. CONCLUSIONS: Socially and legally created "shades of gray" have blurred the distinctions between withholding or withdrawing therapies and euthanasia and have left physicians without guidelines. Health ethics education should focus on case-based teaching and on reducing the uncertainty at the bedside.
The medical, legal, and ethical problems associated with routine HIV screening have led to the recommendation that all patients should be presumed to be seropositive and thus protective measures should be taken by all health care workers. This philosophy, termed "universal precautions," has been difficult to adhere to or enforce, however. Nevertheless, in some trauma population subsets, the prevalence of HIV seropositivity runs as high as 19%, and thus presents an occupational hazard to the trauma health care worker. The mainstays of universal precautions (UP) are barrier techniques against body fluid contact and protection from inadvertent needlestick. To judge compliance with a strict UP protocol, surgical residents engaged in trauma room resuscitations were observed on a random basis by trauma nurse coordinators. Previously, UP had been discussed in conferences and by memo. Over 2 months, 81 trauma rooms were observed, involving 18 house officers. Overall, there was only 16% compliance with strict UP. The most common protocol variations involved sharps technique. While glove use was nearly universal, protective eye wear, ankle and foot protection, and body protection such as gowns or aprons were commonly ignored. Even in the presence of invasive procedures such as endotracheal intubation or insertion of chest tubes, compliance was less than 40%. The reasons most commonly given by house officers for the lapse in UP were not knowing the protocol, forgetting the protocol, or not having time to implement the protocol. Even for the nine patients residents identified as suspected of being in a high-risk category, UP was strictly adhered to only once. Compliance with universal precautions is difficult to achieve under the best of circumstances. It cannot be assumed that passive informational measures can achieve this goal. Active infection control surveillance and ongoing housestaff inservice are required to minimize the risk of inadvertent injury or contamination.