PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

J S Jameson

Publications and source records attributed to J S Jameson.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Oral or intravenous erythromycin has no effect on human distal colonic motility.

Erythromycin is a prokinetic agent for the lower oesophageal sphincter, the stomach, the gallbladder and the small bowel, acting directly on motilin receptors. Its effect on pressure activity of the human colon has not been investigated. Eight healthy volunteers were studied on 2 occasions and given intravenous or oral erythromycin, or placebo in a single-blind, randomized crossover study. Sigmoid pressure activity was measured using a 4-lumen water perfused system placed sigmoidoscopically at 50, 45, 30 and 15 cm from the anal verge. The pressures were analysed for activity index (mmHg.min) for the 35 cm colonic study segment using dedicated software. No significant difference was found in the activity index following oral erythromycin (500 mg) or placebo, or following intravenous erythromycin 1.8 mg/kg or placebo. A further 8 subjects were studied in a single-blind crossover study to determine the effect of oral erythromycin (500 mg) b.d. on colonic transit, measured with radio-opaque markers and a single abdominal X-ray. Mean or segmental colonic transit times were not statistically significantly different (Student's paired t-test) in the subjects on placebo or erythromycin. This lack of effect of erythromycin on the distal large intestine may indicate the absence of receptors for motilin in that part of the gut.

Administration, Oral

Is oropharyngeal anaesthesia with topical lignocaine useful in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy?

The aim of this study was to determine whether patients' tolerance of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is related to the dose of lignocaine spray used for oropharyngeal anaesthesia and to measure plasma concentrations at these doses. Sixty consecutive patients undergoing routine upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation were randomized to receive lignocaine spray 50 mg (Group A), 100 mg (Group B) or 200 mg (Group C). Patient, endoscopist and endoscopy nurse were unaware of the variation in dose used. Each patient's tolerance of the intubation and of the remainder of the gastroscopy was assessed independently by the patient, endoscopy nurse, and endoscopist using a visual analogue scale. Plasma lignocaine concentration was measured at 20, 40, 60 and 80 min after administration of the spray. Fifty (83%) patients were unable to recall either the intubation, or the procedure. On the endoscopy nurse's assessment, the patients in Group B tolerated the intubation better than those in Group A, and Groups B and C tolerated the remainder of the gastroscopy better than those in Group A. On the endoscopist's assessment, Groups B and C tolerated the remainder of the gastroscopy better than Group A. There were fewer gags per min in Groups B and C compared to Group A. Mean plasma lignocaine concentrations showed a dose-dependent absorption of the spray, but none exceeded the potentially toxic level of 5 mg/L.

Administration, Oral