PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J S Kühl

Publications and source records attributed to J S Kühl.

12 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

Successful autologous bone marrow rescue in patients who failed peripheral blood stem cell mobilization.

We assessed autologous bone marrow (BM) harvest and hematologic recovery after high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) in patients who failed to achieve peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization. One hundred and ninety-three patients with germ cell tumor, malignant lymphoma, sarcoma or medulloblastoma were scheduled for HDCT. In 123 patients, PBSC were mobilized by disease-specific chemotherapy plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). In 110/ 123 patients (89%) with circulating CD34+ cell counts 2 > or = 10/microl, sufficient hematopoietic autografts were collected (group A). In 13/123 patients (11%) with peripheral CD34 + cell counts < 10/microl, PBSC harvesting was not performed (group B). These latter patients were classified as "poor mobilizers" and underwent second-line BM harvest at a median of 46 (range 10-99) days after mobilization failure. Seventy patients with first-line BM harvest (group C) acted as historical controls. Ten patients from group B proceeded to HDCT and nine were evaluable for hematopoietic reconstitution. Recovery to neutrophils >0.5 x 10(9)/l was comparable with group C patients: 16 (range 9-34) days vs 13 (range 8-98) days. However, platelet (PLT) reconstitution >20 x 10(9)/l was significantly slower, with a median of 35 (range 13-50) days as compared with 19 (range 9-148) days (P = 0.0106) for control patients. Supportive care requirements, febrile days and length of hospital stay were not significantly different between the two groups of patients. We conclude that patients who fail to mobilize PBSC should be evaluated for second-line BM harvest. This approach may preserve the therapeutic option of HDCT for these patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Spontaneous overexpression of the long form of the Bcl-X protein in a highly resistant P388 leukaemia.

A novel resistant variant of murine P388 leukaemia, P388/SPR, was identified by de novo resistance to doxorubicin (DOX) in vivo. This mutant displayed a similar level of cross-resistance to etoposide (VP-16) and other topoisomerase II (topo II) inhibitors. Further analysis of the phenotype revealed a broad cross-resistance to vinca alkaloids, alkylating agents, antimetabolites, aphidicolin and UV light. Low-level expression of mdr1 and P-glycoprotein (P-gp), as well as a modest impairment of cellular drug accumulation and partial reversion of resistance to DOX and VP-16 by cyclosporine, confirmed a moderate role of P-gp in conferring drug resistance in P388/SPR cells. Consistent changes in neither topo II expression or activity nor glutathione metabolism could be detected. Induction of apoptosis was significantly reduced in P388/SPR cells, as indicated by minimal DNA fragmentation. Analysis of oncogenes regulating apoptotic cell death revealed a marked decrease of bcl-2 in combination with a moderate reduction of bax protein, but a striking overexpression of the long form of the bcl-X protein. Transfection of human bcl-X-L into P388 cells conferred drug resistance similar to that of P388/SPR cells. The data suggest that overexpression of bcl-X-L results in an unusual phenotype with broad cross-resistance to non-MDR-related cytotoxins in vitro, and provide an interesting example of spontaneous overexpression of another member of the bcl-2 gene family in cancer.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗
PubMed1996

Differential single- versus double-strand DNA breakage produced by doxorubicin and its morpholinyl analogues.

The morpholinyl analogues of doxorubicin (DOX) have previously been reported to be non-cross-resistant in multidrug resistant (MDR) cells due to a lower affinity for P-glycoprotein relative to the parent compound. In order to further investigate the mechanisms of action of these morpholinyl anthracyclines, we examined their ability to cause DNA single- and double-strand breaks (SSB, DSB) and their interactions with topoisomerases. Alkaline elution curves were determined after 2-h drug treatment at 0.5, 2 and 5 microM, while neutral elution was conducted at 5, 10 and 25 microM in a human ovarian cell line, ES-2. A pulse-field gel electrophoresis assay was used to confirm the neutral elution data under the same conditions. Further, K-SDS precipitation and topoisomerase drug inhibition assays were used to determine the effects of DOX and the morpholinyl analogues on topoisomerase (Topo) I and II. Under deproteinated elution conditions (pH 12.1), DOX, morpholinyl DOX (MRA), methoxy-morpholinyl DOX (MMDX) and morpholinyl oxaunomycin (MX2) were equipotent at causing SSB in the human ovarian carcinoma cell line, ES-2. However, neutral elution (pH 9.6) under deproteinated conditions revealed marked differences in the degree of DNA DSB. After 2-h drug exposures at 10 microM, DSBs were 3300 rad equivalents for MX2, 1500 for DOX and 400 for both MRA and MMDX in the ES-2 cell line. Pulse-field data substantiated these differences in DSBs, with breaks easily detected after MX2 and DOX treatment, but not with MRA and MMDX. DOX and MX2 thus cause DNA strand breaks selectively through interaction with Topo II, but not Topo I. In contrast, MRA and MMDX cause DNA breaks through interactions with both topoisomerases with a predominant inhibition of Topo I.

Antibiotics, Antineoplastic↗
PubMed1994

Mutation rates and mechanisms of resistance to etoposide determined from fluctuation analysis.

BACKGROUND: The major known mechanisms of resistance to etoposide include altered expression of its target enzyme, topoisomerase II (Topo II), and the multidrug-resistant phenotypes encoded by the mdr1 and MRP (multidrug resistance-associated protein) genes. There is little information regarding the distribution, frequency, and origin of these mechanisms in cancer cells. PURPOSE: We performed fluctuation analysis experiments with the human sarcoma cell line, MES-SA, to assess 1) if selection or induction mechanisms are involved in resistance to etoposide, 2) mutation rates for cellular resistance to etoposide, and 3) the nature of the single-step selected surviving clones. METHODS: Three groups of 10 flasks were seeded with more than 2000 cells each and allowed to grow to near confluence (approximately 3 x 10(6) cells per flask). After reseeding, each group received etoposide for 1 week at a final concentration of 0.5 microM (group A), 1.0 microM (group B), and 5.0 microM (group C). Surviving colonies in each of the 30 populations were scored and individually harvested. RESULTS: Mutation rates were estimated at 2.9 x 10(-6) (group A), 5.7 x 10(-7) (group B), and 1.7 x 10(-7) (group C) per cell generation. Of 61 propagated colonies, four of 26 from group A, five of 19 from group B, and none of 16 from group C were stably resistant. Analysis of variance supported the hypothesis of spontaneous mutations rather than induction, conferring etoposide resistance in groups A and B. Five of the stably resistant clones were cross-resistant to doxorubicin. Analysis by polymerase chain reaction failed to detect the expression of the multidrug-resistant gene mdr1 messenger RNA (mRNA) in any of the clones. No increase in expression of the MRP gene was observed. However, a significant decrease in both Topo II alpha and II beta mRNA (30%-70%) was found in six of seven stably resistant and six of six unstably resistant mutants. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that resistance to etoposide arises spontaneously, with most clones surviving either stochastically or through very labile mechanisms of resistance. The experimental design has derived a set of resistant mutants from a single-step selection. In those clones, decreased expression of Topo II is the predominant mechanism selected. IMPLICATIONS: These findings suggest that stable resistance to etoposide chemotherapy may be acquired by selection of spontaneously arising mutants rather than induction by drug exposure. The stably resistant clones may represent descendants from a single mutational event in each population.

DNA, Complementary↗
PubMed1993

Effects of the methoxymorpholino derivative of doxorubicin and its bioactivated form versus doxorubicin on human leukemia and lymphoma cell lines and normal bone marrow.

The methoxymorpholino derivative of doxorubicin (MMDX; FCE 23672) has recently entered clinical trials because of its broad spectrum of preclinical antitumor activity and non-cross-resistance in multidrug-resistant (MDR) tumor models. MMDX is activated in the liver to a > 10 times more potent metabolite that cross-links DNA. To assess the potential of this drug in hematologic malignancies, we studied the myelotoxicity in vitro and antitumor effect of MMDX as well as its bioactivated form (MMDX+) in a panel of 14 different human leukemia and lymphoma cell lines. The tumor specificity of MMDX in CEM and K562 cells was similar to that of doxorubicin (DOX), and that of MMDX+ was slightly superior. All of the 14 cell lines were found to be more sensitive to MMDX and MMDX+ than were granulocyte-macrophage progenitors. On a molar basis, MMDX was approximately 3-100 times more active than DOX, and MMDX+ was 10-1,000 times more potent than DOX. The cytotoxic effect of MMDX and MMDX+ in two P-glycoprotein-positive MDR sublines was greatly improved in comparison with that of DOX. Whereas the response to DOX in the different leukemia and lymphoma cell lines was highly heterogeneous, the response to MMDX and MMDX+ was rather homogeneous. The novel anthracycline MMDX and its bioactivated form MMDX+ are highly active against this panel of human leukemia and lymphoma cell lines and demonstrate potentially greater selectivity for tumor cells in vitro as compared with normal bone marrow precursors.

Biotransformation↗
PubMed1992

Use of etoposide in combination with cyclosporin for purging multidrug-resistant leukemic cells from bone marrow in a mouse model.

Cyclosporin (CsA) is a potent modulator of multidrug resistance (MDR) and has been combined with etoposide (VP-16) to purge MDR leukemic cells from human bone marrow (BM) in vitro. We studied the feasibility of this approach in an in vivo model for autologous BM transplantation using the murine leukemia cell line P388 and its MDR variant P388/ADR. Colony-forming assays with 2-h drug exposure revealed a tumor selectivity of VP-16 for P388 cells compared to normal murine marrow granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming units (CFU-GM), whereas P388/ADR cells were resistant to VP-16. Simultaneous incubation with CsA restored sensitivity in these cells. Almost 4 logs of cell kill were achieved by treating P388/ADR cells with 60 microM VP-16 plus 2.5 microM CsA (combination A) or 40 microM VP-16 plus 10 microM CsA (combination B), whereas there was a 2.5-log reduction of CFU-GM at these doses. Even though the myelotoxicity of VP-16 was increased by the addition of CsA, this effect was nonspecific as shown by a similar chemosensitization in sensitive P388 as well as in P388/VP 2.5 cells, an atypical MDR variant lacking P-glycoprotein. In vivo experiments addressed the ability of BM treated with VP-16 and CsA to rescue lethally irradiated mice and to purge leukemic cells. In total, 1/14 lethally irradiated mice died due to sepsis within 10 days after receiving 15 x 10(6) BM cells treated ex vivo with combination A in contrast to 1/4 for combination B. All 16 surviving animals demonstrated long-term engraftment. When simulated remission marrow contaminated with 0.1% P388/ADR was purged with VP-16 (60 microM) or CsA (2.5 microM) alone, all mice died from leukemia before day 16 after transplantation (median 14.3 and 12.2 days). In contrast, nine of ten animals receiving similar marrow purged with combination A survived > 60 days without any evidence of disease (p < 0.01). We conclude that combining VP-16 and CsA was effective in purging MDR leukemia cells from transplanted BM in this murine model.

Animals↗
PubMed1989

Cytokines and pancreatic cancer. The effect of rIFN-gamma, HuLeIFN, rTNF-alpha, and LAK-cells on pancreatic and other gastrointestinal tumors in vitro.

A panel of 10 digestive tract carcinoma cell lines (6 pancreatic carcinomas) was assayed for their sensitivity to HuLeIFN, human rIFN-gamma, rTNF-alpha and allogeneic human LAK-cells in vitro. In addition, a combination of rIFN-gamma + rTNF-alpha was tested on 3 pancreatic carcinoma cell lines. Whereas 6/7 cell lines were completely resistant to HuLeIFN, rIFN-gamma and rTNF-alpha did inhibit growth of some carcinomas tested. The individual sensitivity was heterogenous as is already known from cytostatics. Response to rIFN-gamma tended to increase with increment of cell doubling time. Only high concentrations (greater than 1000 U/ml) of rIFN-gamma displayed cytotoxicity on sensitive tumors. The antitumoral effect of rIFN-gamma was stimulated by rTNF-alpha. As revealed by isobole analysis this interaction was synergistic in all pancreatic carcinomas tested. In comparison to rIFN-gamma or rTNF-alpha the response to LAK-cells was slightly superior at high effector target ratios, even though heterogenous.

Biological Factors↗
PubMed1989

Cytokines and pancreatic cancer. Sensitivity of xenotransplants of predominantly pancreatic carcinomas to rIFN-gamma and rTFN-alpha in nude mice.

Ten xenotransplants of human gastrointestinal carcinomas (eight human pancreatic carcinomas) were assayed for their sensitivity to human rIFN-gamma and human rTNF-alpha in nude mice. Both substances demonstrated a dose and route dependent antitumoral activity in principle. However, the extent of response varied distinctly between the tested xenografts. rTNF-alpha was clearly superior to rIFN-gamma at systemic application of comparable doses (0.8 mg/kg/d). Intramural administration of both cytokines could cause cytotoxic effects and was significantly more effective than systemic administration that predominantly resulted in antiproliferation. Growth inhibition of rIFN-gamma or rTNF-alpha alone could be clearly enhanced by combining both cytokines. In addition, the results suggest: the possibility to enhance the effects of rIFN-gamma alone also by combination with nIL 2, as well as a decrease of the effects of rTNF-alpha with time of therapy.

Animals↗