Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to J S Kutner.
This consensus paper describes the essential skills that clinicians need to help persons who are experiencing grief after the death of a loved one. Four aspects of the grieving process are reviewed: anticipatory grief, acute grief, normal grief reactions, and complicated grief. Techniques for assessment and recommendations about interventions and indications for referral are provided for each aspect.
Many previous studies have assessed the aging process by measuring clinical and functional variables. To supplement that quantitative understanding, we asked older people what constitutes their health and contributes to it. Using grounded theory-type methods, we analyzed semi-structured interviews with 22 study subjects, who were randomly selected from among those whose reported perceived health differed from that predicted by a regression model constructed from data from a randomized trial of a primary care intervention. We focused on disparate cases to identify factors that best discriminate between more and less healthy aging. Interview questions targeted perceptions of health; well-being; valued abilities, activities, and relationships; social support; control; sense of coherence; and personal outlook. A model of healthy aging emerged. To these older people health meant going and doing something meaningful, which required four components: something worthwhile to do, balance between abilities and challenges, appropriate external resources, and personal attitudinal characteristics (e.g., positive attitude vs. "poor me"). By reframing healthy aging in older people's own terms, this model encourages interdisciplinary support of their desired goals and outcomes rather than only medical approaches to deficits and challenges.
To describe symptom prevalence, frequency, and severity among hospice patients, from the perspective of hospice providers, a cross-sectional study was conducted among 16 hospices participating in the Population-based Palliative Care Research Network (PoPCRN). Hospice staff estimated symptom presence, frequency, and severity, using the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale. Among the 348 patients (median age 78 years, 55% female, 55% cancer diagnosis), the most common symptoms noted by hospice staff were lack of energy (83%), pain (76%), lack of appetite (63%), drowsiness (61%), difficulty concentrating (60%), and sadness (51%). When present, lack of energy was rated by hospice providers as both frequent (75% "frequently" or "almost constantly") and severe (46% "severe" or "very severe"). Symptoms varied by care setting and by diagnosis. Hospice staff often lacked sufficient information to rate potentially important symptoms, such as problems with sexual interest or activity (63%), change in self image (30%), and worrying (26%). This study identifies a significant burden of unrelieved symptoms among hospice patients, suggesting a need for more widespread institution of symptom management strategies with proven effectiveness and additional investigation into treatment of common symptoms for which few effective treatment strategies are known.
CONTEXT: It is unclear how well prepared U.S. senior medical students are to handle end-of-life issues as they reach the end of medical school. Additionally, the most optimal way of providing medical student end-of-life education has not been adequately defined. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine the preparedness of senior medical students at U.S. medical schools regarding end-of-life issues. DESIGN: A self-administered survey. SETTING: Six medical schools throughout the United States, two of which have a formal curriculum on end-of-life issues, and four of which do not. PARTICIPANTS: Fourth-year medical students during November through February of their senior year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Self-reported preparation on a number of end-of-life competencies. RESULTS: Of the 757 surveys sent out, 262 responses were received (34.6%). Only 22% to 53% of students (varying by topic) felt prepared by their education in the selected end-of-life competencies. Students attending medical schools with a formal end-of-life curriculum were more likely to feel prepared than students with no formal curriculum to address psychosocial issues (21% higher, p = 0.008), cultural/spiritual issues (21% higher, p = 0.005), technical aspects of end-of-life care (18% higher, p = 0.001), and treatment of common symptoms (34% higher, p = 0.001). Students who had more clinical experiences in palliative care were more likely to feel prepared to discuss end-of-life issues with patients (p = 0.013) and to treat common symptoms (p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates support for development of formal curriculum on end-of-life issues, and emphasizes the importance of clinical exposure to terminally ill patients to prepare medical students to provide quality end-of-life care.
Stimulated by support from an R25 grant from the National Cancer Institute, we assembled a multidisciplinary team to design, implement, evaluate, and institutionalize in our medical school curriculum a training program to enable all students to graduate with basic competency in palliative and end-of-life care. In the fall of 1994, we reviewed the medical curriculum extensively to determine the need and optimal sites for integration of new educational modules. The freshman and junior years were found most suitable for our purposes; hence, behavioral objectives targeted at the freshman and junior medical student as learner were designed for the domain of palliative and end-of-life care. By 1996, negotiations with the medical school curriculum committee and with individual course masters secured permission and time allotments to include new coursework as required elements. We integrated approximately 20 hours of required training into the medical school curriculum, accomplished by modules that utilized small group learning, didactic presentations, out-of-classroom assignments, and practicum/experiential teaching methods. Freshman year curriculum consisted of a 3-hour module that considers the role of the physician in end-of-life care. Junior year training included a 1-hour module on advance directives and a 16-hour classroom and practicum course on hospice and end-of-life care. Performance-based assessment revealed that the students achieved the behavioral objectives. Furthermore, the students perceived benefit from the training and concluded that palliative care education should be a required part of their medical school experience. In September 2000, the medical school's Clinical Years Committee officially designated the palliative and end-of-life care training modules a mandatory part of the curriculum, with satisfactory completion a requirement for graduation.
Despite evidence that doctor-patient communication affects important patient outcomes, patient expectations are often not met. Communication is especially important in terminal illness, when the appropriate course of action may depend more on patient values than on medical dogma. We sought to describe the issues important to terminally ill patients receiving palliative care and to determine whether patient characteristics influence the needs of these patients. We utilized a multimethod approach, first conducting interviews with 22 terminally ill individuals, then using these data to develop a more structured instrument which was administered to a second population of 56 terminally ill patients. Patient needs and concerns were described and associations between patient characteristics and issues of importance were evaluated. Seven key issues were identified in the initial interviews: change in functional status or activity level; role change; symptoms, especially pain; stress of the illness on family members; loss of control; financial burden and conflict between wanting to know what is going on and fearing bad news. Overall, respondent needs were both disease- and illness-oriented. Few easily identifiable patient characteristics were associated with expressed concerns or needs, suggesting that physicians need to individually assess patient needs. Terminally ill patients receiving palliative care had needs that were broad in scope. Given that few patient characteristics predicted responses, and that the majority opinion may not accurately reflect that of an individual patient, health care providers must be aware of the diverse concerns among this population and individualize assessment of each patient's needs and expectations.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine patient and physician factors influencing the decision to use adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer in elderly persons. DESCRIPTION OF STUDY: A cross-sectional mailed population-based survey of patients 65 years of age and older who had undergone surgical resection of stage III colon cancer in Colorado between August 1995 and December 1997 were identified by the statewide cancer registry (n = 276) and their treating physicians (n = 232). A questionnaire about the determinants of colon cancer treatment decisions was mailed to all patients for whom physician permission was granted (n = 119). A similar questionnaire was sent to treating physicians. RESULTS: Ninety-two physicians (internal medicine 23%; family medicine 12%; surgery 37%; and oncology 24%) and 67 patients (mean age 75.8 years; 55% women) completed surveys. Fifty-four (80.6%) of the patients had received adjuvant chemotherapy. The major determinants of receiving adjuvant chemotherapy were having seen an oncologist (P = .003), being younger (P = .003), and being married (P = .021). After controlling for other potential influences, only having seen an oncologist (odds ratio 8.0; confidence interval 1.5-43.1) remained significantly associated with the receipt of chemotherapy. Physicians were more likely than patients to rank comorbid conditions (39.1% versus 3.0%, respectively; P < .001) and the medical literature (20.7% versus 4.5%, respectively; P = .004) as important factors in making treatment decisions, while patients were more likely than physicians to rank physician opinion (73.1% versus 26.1%, respectively; P = .001), family preference (31.3% versus 9.8%, respectively; P = .001), and family burden (10.4% versus 2.2%, respectively; P = .038). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: In this elderly population, patient age is not recognized by patients or physicians as affecting the decision to use adjuvant chemotherapy. Other biologic and social factors are important, however, and the perspectives of physicians and patients differ regarding their relative importance.