PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Sønksen

Publications and source records attributed to J Sønksen.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

The effect of penile vibratory stimulation on male fertility potential, spasticity and neurogenic detrusor overactivity in spinal cord lesioned individuals.

PURPOSE: Present the possibility for treatment of male infertility, spasticity, and neurogenic detrusor overactivity in spinal cord lesioned (SCL) individuals with penile vibratory stimulation (PVS). METHOD: Obtaining reflex-ejaculation by PVS, by using a vibrator developed for this purpose. The stimulation was performed with a vibrating disc of hard plastic placed against the frenulum of the penis (amplitude > or = 2.5 mm). The vibration continued until antegrade ejaculation or for a maximum of 3 minutes followed by a pause of 1 minute before the cycle was repeated, maximally 4 times. RESULTS: >80% SCL men are able to obtain ejaculation with PVS. Pregnancy rates obtained with home PVS and intra-vaginal insemination was 22-62% (4 studies), and with PVS or electroejaculation and intrauterine insemination/in-vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmatic sperm injection 39-64% (9 studies). PVS was demonstrated to decrease spasticity significantly when measured by the modified Ashworth scale. In addition, a decrease of the number of spontaneous EMG events which probably indicate spasms was observed. Increase in bladder capacity at leakpoint following 4 weeks of frequent ejaculation with PVS treatment was likewise demonstrated. CONCLUSION: PVS has proved its importance for SCL male fertility, in the years to come its place in treatment of spasticity and neurogenic detrusor overactivity has to be established.

Humans↗
PubMed2001

Canine model of infertility after spinal cord injury: time course of acute changes in semen quality and spermatogenesis.

PURPOSE: We established a canine model of subfertility after spinal cord injury and examined the time course of acute changes in semen quality and spermatogenesis after spinal cord injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven dogs underwent surgical T7 spinal cord injury. Six dogs were used as controls. Electroejaculation and testicular fine needle aspiration were performed at baseline and twice weekly for 3 weeks after spinal cord injury. Semen quality change was examined by standard semen analysis. Spermatogenesis was assessed by flow cytometry of testicular fine needle aspiration in all dogs as well as by testicular histology at study conclusion in 4 controls and 4 spinal cord injured dogs. RESULTS: No significant changes in spinal cord injured dogs were noted before 3 weeks after injury. From baseline to 3 weeks after injury certain changes were evident in spinal cord injured dogs. Mean antegrade sperm motility decreased from 62.9% to 20.1% (p = 0.008), mean total sperm (antegrade plus retrograde total sperm) decreased from 423 to 294 x 106 which was not statistically significant, and the incidence of testicular haploid cells decreased from 75.6% to 48.3% (p = 0.028). No significant change in any parameter was present in control dogs. The mean number of mature spermatids per cross-sectional tubule on final testicular histology was significantly decreased in spinal cord injured dogs compared with controls (13.6 versus 43.9, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In the canine model tested the dogs readily survived spinal cord injury, electroejaculation was effective for obtaining ejaculate and fine needle aspiration allowed serial examination of spermatogenesis. Three weeks after spinal cord injury but not before 3 weeks sperm motility and spermatogenesis were significantly decreased. However, at the same point this decrease in spermatogenesis was not yet reflected in the total ejaculated sperm count.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Sexual function in spinal cord lesioned men.

STUDY DESIGN: Review of literature. OBJECTIVE: To review the physical aspects related to penile erection, ejaculatory dysfunction, semen characteristics, and techniques for enhancement of fertility in spinal cord lesioned (SCL) men. SETTING: Worldwide: individuals with traumatic as well as non-traumatic SCL. RESULTS: Recommendations for management of erectile dysfunction in SCL men: If it is possible to obtain a satisfactory erection but of insufficient duration, then try to use a venous constrictor band to find out if this is sufficient to maintain the erection. Otherwise we recommend Sildenafil. If Sildenafil is not satisfactory then use intracavernous injection with prostaglandin E(1) (some SCL men may prefer cutaneous or intraurethral application). We discourage the implantation of penile prosthesis for the sole purpose of erection. Recommendations for management of ejaculatory dysfunction in SCL men: Penile vibratory stimulation (PVS) to induce ejaculation is recommended as first treatment choice. If PVS fails, SCL men should be referred for electroejaculation (EEJ). Semen characteristics: Impaired semen profiles with low motility rates are seen in the majority of SCL men. Recently reported data gives evidence of a decline in spermatogenesis and motility of ejaculated spermatozoa shortly after (few weeks) an acute SCL. It is suggested that some factors in the seminal plasma and/or disordered storage of spermatozoa in the seminal vesicles are mainly responsible for the impaired semen profiles in men with chronic SCL. Fertility: Home insemination with semen obtained by PVS and introduced intravaginally in order to achieve successful pregnancies may be an option for some SCL men and their partners. The majority of SCL men will further enhance their fertility potential when using either PVS or EEJ combined with assisted reproduction techniques such as intrauterine insemination or in vitro fertilization with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Alprostadil↗
PubMed2001

Sphincteric events during penile vibratory ejaculation and electroejaculation in men with spinal cord injuries.

PURPOSE: We investigate internal and external sphincter responses during penile vibratory stimulation and electroejaculation in men with spinal cord injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ejaculation induction with simultaneous recording of external and internal sphincter pressures was performed in 9 spinal cord injured men. Of the patients with upper motor neuron lesions 3 underwent penile vibratory stimulation and 3 underwent electroejaculation. In 3 men who did not respond to PVS, including 1 with upper motor neuron and 2 with lower motor neuron lesions, penile vibratory stimulation and subsequent electroejaculation were performed. RESULTS: In successful penile vibratory stimulation and electroejaculation upper motor neuron cases external sphincter pressure first reached a peak (average 180 cm. H2O) and subsequently decrease followed in 3 to 10 seconds by a peak in internal sphincter pressure (average 178 cm. H2O), which exceeded external sphincter pressure and ejaculation occurred. During electroejaculation, the pattern progressed, despite complete discontinuation of electrical stimulation. In electroejaculation, there was a trend for a more rapid return of external sphincter pressure greater than internal sphincter pressure, which may explain the electroejaculation retrograde fraction. In nonresponders external sphincter pressure never increased to more than 105 cm. H2O in response to penile vibratory stimulation and no ejaculation was induced. In nonresponders to penile vibratory stimulation, electroejaculation induced a typical sustained increase in internal sphincter pressure and external sphincter pressure but at lower peak pressures. CONCLUSIONS: Forceful contraction of the external sphincter followed by contraction of the internal sphincter always precedes ejaculation during electroejaculation and penile vibratory stimulation. Similarities between penile vibratory stimulation and electroejaculation suggest that the latter induces ejaculation via a complex neurological pathway rather than by simple direct end organ stimulation. The sustained nature of the response to electroejaculation suggests that electrical stimulation should be stopped completely during ejaculation to allow more relaxation of the external sphincter, as this may lead to a decrease in the retrograde fraction.

Ejaculation↗
PubMed2000

Cryopreservation of semen from pubertal boys with cancer.

BACKGROUND: The possibility of cryopreservation of semen from adolescents has until now received only little attention. Therefore, we have investigated the possibility of cryopreservation of semen in adolescent boys with cancer. PROCEDURE: Forty-five boys, aged 13-18 years, admitted because of cancer during the period January 1, 1995 to July 31, 1998 were eligible. Semen was obtained after masturbation in the majority of the cases. In three boys, semen was preserved after penile vibration or electroejaculation in general anaesthesia. The semen samples were analysed for concentration, motility, and morphology according to the WHO guidelines. The sample was transferred into straws prior to cryopreservation at 196 degrees C in liquid nitrogen. RESULTS: Twenty-one boys delivered a semen sample for cryopreservation. Four boys were offered and accepted sperm banking but were not able to produce a sample. In 20 cases time did not allow an attempt of sperm banking, the boy was not assessed to be mature enough to deliver a semen sample, or the procedure was not accepted. The boys delivered 1-3 samples, and the total number of spermatozoa ranged from 0-210 millions. Median percentage of motile sperm was 50% (range 9-86%). Semen quality improved with age; however, a 13- year- old boy produced 75 million spermatozoa with 38% motile cells. CONCLUSIONS: Pubertal maturation should be assessed in all boys admitted for cancer, and the possibility of sperm banking should be discussed with the patient and his parents.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Non-invasive collection of ejaculates from the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) using penile vibrostimulation.

Penile vibrostimulation (PVS), a noninvasive repeatable method, has been shown in the squirrel monkey to yield semen of higher quality than rectal probe electro-ejaculation (RPE). The present study aimed at establishing the conditions for PVS to collect ejaculates from marmoset monkeys. Ten adult males were trained on the appropriate handling before each was subject to six to 12 PVS tests. Ejaculation was stimulated using a FertiCare personal vibrator fitted with a 2 cm x 0.5 cm i.d. glass tube. The stimulus was repeatedly applied over a frequency of 75-95 Hz and amplitude of 1-2 mm for up to 20 min. Ejaculates were analyzed for volume, total sperm number, sperm concentration, and proportion of living and motile sperm. Ejaculates were obtained in 31 of 88 PVS tests; 87.1% of the ejaculations occurred at 80-85 Hz frequency and 1-1.5 mm amplitude. In 18 tests ejaculates were produced within 49.7 seconds. Ejaculates were characterized by (mean values): volume 31.9 microl, total sperm number 34.2 x 10(6)/ejaculate, concentration 1,154.2 x 10(6) sperm/ml, live sperm 74.6%, motile sperm 59.6%. Total number and concentration of spermatozoa were significantly enhanced in singly living males. PVS yielded three to four times more spermatozoa than comparable previously published values for RPE. Enhancing the success rate by preselecting males for responsiveness may render PVS the sperm collection method of choice in marmoset monkeys.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Effect of repeated ejaculation on semen quality in spinal cord injured men.

PURPOSE: We evaluate the effect of repeated ejaculations on semen quality in spinal cord injured men. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 19 spinal cord injured men with anejaculation. Semen was obtained by penile vibratory stimulation in the clinic and patients were instructed in the technique. Optimized vibration parameters were used (2.5 mm. amplitude at 100 Hz.). Penile vibratory stimulation was performed at least once a week for 12 months. Semen quality was examined at baseline and every 3 months during the 1-year study period. Hormonal assays were also performed at each visit. In 9 patients unilateral testicular biopsy was done at baseline and at the end of the 12 months. RESULTS: Normal sperm counts and low motility were seen at baseline. No semen parameter significantly changed during the 12 months of repeated ejaculation. All hormonal assays during the entire study were within normal range and no significant change was observed. Of the 9 biopsies 6 (67%) showed normal spermatogenesis at baseline and no convincing qualitative changes in testicular histology were seen after repeated ejaculation. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated ejaculation in spinal cord injured men does not change the typically poor semen quality. Therefore, stagnation in the seminal ducts due to infrequent ejaculation is not the etiology of the poor semen quality in these patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Seminal plasma PSA in spinal cord injured men: a preliminary report.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of spinal cord injury on seminal plasma PSA concentration. MATERIAL: Semen obtained from normal controls (n = 20) and patients (n = 16) with spinal cord injury. RESULTS: The concentration of prostate specific antigen in seminal plasma depended on the level of spinal cord injury, with significantly lower concentrations in patients with spinal cord lesions below T7 compared to both normal age-matched controls (P = 0.007) and patients with spinal cord injuries at or above T7 (P = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: The results add to the previously reported observations of the possible impact of neurogenic stimulation on prostate activity. More studies of neurogenic stimulation in prostate growth and development are warranted to further elucidate the possible impact of neurogenic factors in the development of prostatic diseases.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Pregnancy after assisted ejaculation procedures in men with spinal cord injury.

OBJECTIVE: To present the results of fertility treatment in 28 men with spinal cord injury (SCI) and their partners. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: University hospital outpatient clinic and home. PATIENTS: Twenty-eight anejaculatory men with SCI and their partners seeking treatment for infertility. INTERVENTION: Penile vibratory stimulation and electroejaculation as semen retrieval methods. Assisted reproductive techniques used: vaginal self-insemination at home, intrauterine insemination, in vitro fertilization with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ejaculation rate; sperm count and motility; pregnancy rates. RESULTS: All of the men were able to ejaculate either by penile vibratory stimulation (79%) or electroejaculation (21%). Median total sperm count was 65 million (range, 0.1 to 480) with a median motility of 13% (range, 1% to 60%). Overall, 9 of 28 couples (32%) achieved 10 pregnancies (4 self-insemination, 3 intrauterine insemination, 1 in vitro fertilization, and 2 intracytoplasmic sperm injection). CONCLUSIONS: An ejaculation rate of 100% was achieved using penile vibratory stimulation as a first treatment option with electroejaculation as a second option. Motivated couples with adequate semen quality may be offered penile vibratory stimulation combined with self-insemination at home. Together with intrauterine insemination or fertilization techniques used in vitro, the pregnancy rate per treatment cycle for SCI couples may approach that of natural procreation in healthy and fertile couples.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Electroejaculation versus vibratory stimulation in spinal cord injured men: sperm quality and patient preference.

PURPOSE: We compared semen quality and patient preference between penile vibratory stimulation and electroejaculation in spinal cord injured men. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We treated 11 spinal cord injured men with penile vibratory stimulation and electroejaculation in random order. End points examined were semen analysis, sperm functional assessment, and patient pain scores (1 to 10) and preferred procedure. Differences between the procedures were determined with the paired Student t test. RESULTS: There was no difference in antegrade sperm count but penile vibratory stimulation specimens had greater motility (26.0 versus 10.7%), viability (25.2 versus 9.7%) and motile sperm count (185.0 x 10(6) versus 97.0 x 10(6)). The retrograde sperm count was greater (but not significant) in electroejaculation patients. The total (antegrade plus retrograde) and motile sperm counts were not different. There was no difference in immunobead test (all negative), cervical mucus penetration or sperm penetration assay, although the percent hamster egg penetration approached significance (53.7% for penile vibratory stimulation versus 22.1% for electroejaculation, p = 0.06). There was no difference in the peak blood pressures and no complications were noted. Pain scores were significantly greater for electroejaculation compared to penile vibratory stimulation (5.2 versus 1.7, respectively). All patients preferred penile vibratory stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: There was a slight advantage in sperm quality and a high patient preference in favor of penile vibratory stimulation. Penile vibratory stimulation should be attempted first to induce ejaculation in spinal cord injured men, with electroejaculation reserved for failures.

Cell Survival↗
PubMed1996

Penile vibratory stimulation in spinal cord injured men: optimized vibration parameters and prognostic factors.

OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy of penile vibratory stimulation (PVS) with optimized vibration parameters in spinal cord injured (SCI) men and to examine prognostic factors for success. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: University hospital outpatient clinic. PATIENTS: Thirty-four consecutive SCI men seeking fertility treatment. INTERVENTION: PVS with optimized vibration parameters to induce reflex ejaculation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ejaculatory response; semen analysis. RESULTS: Antegrade ejaculation was seen in 65% of patients. High rates were seen in lesions above T10 (81%) and in presence of hip flexion and bulbocavernosus reflexes (77%). Of men with lesions above T10, those with a penile prosthesis had lower ejaculation rates (40% vs 90%). Average total sperm counts were 968 million, with 26% motility. CONCLUSIONS: High rates of ejaculation are seen with optimized vibration parameters, especially in men with lesions above T10 and intact lower spinal reflexes. A penile prosthesis may impair success with PVS.

Cohort Studies↗
PubMed1996

Quality of semen obtained by penile vibratory stimulation in men with spinal cord injuries: observations and predictors.

OBJECTIVES: To study the semen quality and to examine prognostic factors that may affect semen quality in men with spinal cord injuries (SCI) who respond to penile vibratory stimulation (PVS). METHODS: Fifty-one PVS responders were prospectively examined. Penile vibratory stimulation was induced with optimized vibration parameters. Semen quality was characterized by semen analysis. The gel agglutination test for the presence of antisperm antibodies and serum hormone assays were performed. Characteristics of the spinal lesions, type of bladder management, and hormone assays were compared to semen quality and incidence of azoospermia or total lack of motility. RESULTS: The mean semen parameters were: volume-1.9 mL (range 0.2 to 7.0); total sperm-457 million (range 0 to 10,900); motility-12.6% (range 0% to 55%); total motile sperm-39.3 million (range 0 to 401); normal morphology-50.1% (range 0% to 90%). Better sperm motility was seen in men with cervical lesions versus those with thoracic lesions (16% versus 7%) and incomplete versus complete lesions (19% versus 10%). There was a higher incidence of azoospermic specimens in men with thoracic lesions versus cervical level (26% versus 3%) and a lower incidence of finding any motile sperm in the specimen (47% versus 81%). Men voiding without catheters had a lower incidence of azoospermia (3% versus 28%). Abnormalities of hormone and antibody tests were rare. CONCLUSIONS: Better sperm specimens from PVS of men with SCI may be expected from men with higher neurologic level, incomplete lesions, and those voiding without the use of a catheter. Hormonal abnormalities and immunologic causes do not explain the poor sperm quality seen in men with SCI.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Seminal somatostatin in men with spinal cord injury.

Somatostatin is present in high concentrations in human seminal plasma. Semen was obtained from men with spinal cord injury by vibratory-and/or electrostimulation. The seminal somatostatin concentration and sperm motility rate depended on the location of the spinal cord lesion. In men with lesions at or above T6 the seminal plasma concentration was significantly decreased compared to healthy men and to patients with lesions below T6 (P < 0.005). The latter group did not differ from healthy men. Men with spinal cord lesions below T6 had significantly decreased sperm motility rates (P = 0.09) compared to patients with lesions at or above T6. Seminal somatostatin concentrations were similar in vibratory- and electrostimulated ejaculates. The seminal somatostatin concentration, semen volume, sperm count, motility and morphology in each patient was not affected when repeated vibratory ejaculations were performed at home.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Ejaculation induced by penile vibratory stimulation in men with spinal cord injuries. The importance of the vibratory amplitude.

A total of 66 men with a spinal cord injury (SCI) and ejaculatory dysfunction were included in two different but comparable study populations I (n = 25) and II (n = 41). The level of lesion ranged from C2 to L1 (44 complete). Penile vibratory stimulation (PVS) to induce ejaculation was performed with two different types of vibrators in population I and considerably different ejaculation rates (antegrade+retrograde) occurred depending on the vibrator used. Our experience suggested discrepancies between the manufacturers' specifications and the actual vibrator outputs concerning frequencies and peak-to-peak amplitudes. Retrospectively performed determinations revealed that the manufacturers' specifications regarding the frequencies were accurate whereas the peak-to-peak amplitudes were inaccurate. With a frequency of 100 Hz and determined peak-to-peak amplitudes of 1 mm and 2.5 mm, ejaculation rates of 32% and 96%, respectively, were obtained in population I. This indicates that an adequate peak-to-peak amplitude is essential to exceed an 'ejaculatory threshold' in the majority of SCI men. Furthermore, an ejaculation rate of 83% obtained in a subsequent prospective study of 41 SCI men (population II) verified that a frequency of 100 Hz and a peak-to-peak amplitude of 2.5 mm seems to approach the ideal vibrator output. The ejaculation responses obtained by JS (first author) were reproduced when the PVS was performed by the patient or his partner, indicating that the vibrator output is more important than PVS experience. No major adverse reactions due to autonomic dysreflexia were observed. The lowest level of SCI where antegrade or retrograde ejaculation occurred was T9 and L1, respectively. No absolute predictors for ejaculatory success or failure in relation to patient age, years since lesion, completeness of SCI, urinary bladder management method, hip flexion and bulbocavernous reflexes were observed. Therefore, most SCI men with ejaculatory dysfunction should be considered candidates for PVS.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Semen quality in the same man before and after spinal cord injury. Case report.

The fertility of spinal cord injured men is severely impaired due to ejaculatory dysfunction and poor semen quality. No previous reports comparing the semen quality in the same man before and after spinal cord injury have been found in the literature. We present a case of a tetraplegic man who 8 months after his spinal cord injury had a deteriorated semen quality compared to a normal semen quality analysed 16 months before the injury.

Adult↗