Infections in the elderly.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to J Samaha.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Despite the proven benefits of thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction, concern for its complications, especially in patients misdiagnosed with myocardial infarction, has led to hesitancy in its use. Historical, clinical and electrocardiographic criteria were developed for enrolling patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction into thrombolytic trials by noncardiovascular specialists. The incidence of misdiagnosis of myocardial infarction and the clinical outcomes when these criteria were used were evaluated for 1,387 consecutive patients given thrombolytic therapy. Twenty-five community hospitals and 7 interventional centers were the sites of enrollment. Most patients (63%) were enrolled from community hospitals. Criteria for thrombolytic therapy included: symptoms of acute myocardial infarction < 6 hours but > 20 minutes, and not relieved by nitroglycerin; and ST-segment elevation > or = 1 mm in 2 contiguous leads or ST-segment depression of posterior myocardial infarction. Exclusion criteria reflecting increased risk of bleeding were used. A final diagnosis of myocardial infarction was based on creatinine kinase-MB, electrocardiographic and ventriculographic evaluation. Acute myocardial infarction was misdiagnosed in 20 patients (1.4%; 95% confidence interval 0.8-2.0%). These patients were demographically similar to those with acute myocardial infarction. All misdiagnosed patients survived; no significant adverse events occurred. Thus, in several clinical settings, a simple algorithm with specific criteria was used for diagnosing acute myocardial infarction and administering thrombolytic therapy. The inclusion criteria used in this study led to a low rate of misdiagnosis.
OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to assess outcome in patients with diabetes who received thrombolytic therapy and to determine whether differences in angiographic characteristics may account for the worse outcome observed in diabetic patients. BACKGROUND: Patients with diabetes are known to have a worse outcome after acute myocardial infarction than that of patients without diabetes. METHODS: Clinical and angiographic characteristics of the 148 patients with diabetes and the 923 patients without diabetes in the Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (TAMI) trials were examined and analyzed. RESULTS: Patients with diabetes tended to be older (median age 59 vs. 56 years) and to have a higher incidence of hypertension and hyperlipidemia and a lower incidence of cigarette smoking. Patients with diabetes had significantly more severe anatomic disease (66% vs. 46% had multivessel disease, p < 0.0001), similar global left ventricular ejection fraction (49% vs. 51%) and worse noninfarct zone ventricular function (-0.13 vs. 0.32 SD/chord, p = 0.02) than that of nondiabetic patients. Angiographic patency rates at 90 min after thrombolytic therapy were similar in patients with and without diabetes (initial 90-min patency 71% vs. 70%). Diabetic patients had nearly twice the in-hospital mortality rate (11% vs. 6%, p < 0.02) and a higher incidence of pulmonary edema (11% vs. 4%, p = 0.001). Diabetic women had an especially high in-hospital mortality rate (21%). No retinal hemorrhages were observed. Although diabetes as an unadjusted variable was predictive of in-hospital (p < 0.02) and long-term (p = 0.003) mortality, after adjustment for baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics, diabetes was not found to have an independent influence on mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with diabetes after myocardial infarction have a worse outcome than that of patients without diabetes despite similar rates of infarct vessel patency. However, diabetes was not found to be an independent risk factor for increased mortality. These findings suggest that diabetes itself is not a major risk factor for poor early outcome after thrombolytic therapy for myocardial infarction; rather, the secondary effects such as more extensive coronary artery disease account for the worse outcome.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the hemorrhagic risk associated with fibrin-specific thrombolytic therapy and invasive procedures with acute myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND: Successful coronary artery reperfusion has important prognostic implications. Because immediate coronary angiography is the only method proved to differentiate early fibrinolytic success from failure, its use may be important for selected patients. METHODS: Five hundred seventy-five patients were evaluated with six combined thrombolytic and catheterization strategies. Patients were randomized to intravenous urokinase alone, recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) alone, or both; simultaneously they were randomized to an immediate versus a deferred catheterization strategy. Hemorrhagic events were assessed. The correlation of hemorrhage with clinical and hemostatic variables was evaluated. Prespecified transfusion criteria were employed. RESULTS: No difference in baseline characteristics or in hemorrhagic complications was noted among the three thrombolytic regimens. Although mild (< 250 ml) bleeding was more common in the group with immediate catheterization, no clinically significant difference among catheterization groups was seen in moderate to life-threatening hemorrhagic events. Most bleeding occurred at vascular access sites, yet severe and life-threatening hemorrhage occurred in < 1% of patients. Baseline and nadir fibrinogen levels, change in baseline fibrinogen levels and peak fibrin and fibrinogen degradation products did not correlate with bleeding risk. A clinical predisposition for bleeding was observed in women as well as older (> or = 65 years) and lighter (< or = 70 kg) patients. With prespecified transfusion criteria, only a minimal increase in blood product usage was noted with immediate catheterization. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate cardiac catheterization can be accomplished without a clinically significant difference in bleeding risk. Fibrin specificity offers no clear advantage in reducing hemorrhagic risk. Bleeding risk correlates best with baseline patient characteristics. Finally, the amount of blood transfused can be reduced with lower transfusion criteria.
Coronary bypass surgery was performed prior to hospital discharge in 303 (22%) of 1387 consecutive patients enrolled in the TAMI 1 to 3 and 5 trials of intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Bypass surgery was of emergency nature (less than 24 hours from treatment with intravenous thrombolytic therapy) in 36 (2.6%) and was deferred (greater than 24 hours) in 267 (19.3%) patients. The indications for bypass surgery included failed angioplasty (12%); left main or equivalent coronary disease (9%); complex or multivessel coronary disease (62%); recurrent postinfarction angina (13%); and refractory pump dysfunction, mitral regurgitation, ventricular septal rupture or abnormal predischarge functional test (1% each). Although patients having bypass surgery were older (59.5 +/- 9.8 versus 56.0 +/- 10.2 years, (p less than 0.0001), had more extensive coronary artery disease (46% with three-vessel disease versus 11%, (p less than 0.0001), had more frequent diabetes mellitus (19% versus 15%, (p = 0.048), had more prior infarctions (p less than 0.0001), had more severe initial depression in global left ventricular ejection fraction (48.0 +/- 11.9% versus 51.8 +/- 11.9%, p = 0.0002), and regional infarct zone (-2.7 +/- 0.94 versus -2.5 +/- 1.1 SD/chord, p = 0.02) and noninfarct zone function (-0.36 +/- 1.8 versus 0.43 +/- 1.6 SD/chord, p less than 0.0001) than patients not having coronary bypass surgery, no difference in the incidence of death in hospital (7% surgical versus 6% nonsurgical) or death at long-term follow-up of hospital survivors (7% surgical versus 6% nonsurgical) was noted between groups. Surgical patients demonstrated a greater degree of recovery in left ventricular ejection fraction (3.4 +/- 9.8% versus 0.16 +/- 8.5%, p = 0.036) and infarct zone regional function (0.71 +/- 1.1 versus 0.34 +/- 0.99 SD/chord, p = 0.001) when immediate (90 minutes following initiation of thrombolytic therapy) and predischarge (7 to 14 days after treatment) contrast left ventriculograms were compared than did patients who received only intravenous thrombolytic therapy with or without coronary angioplasty. These data suggest a beneficial influence of coronary bypass surgery on left ventricular function and possibly on the clinical outcome of patients initially treated with intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction.
To examine the short-term hemodynamic and long-term clinical effects of oral enoximone at low doses, 12 patients with severe, chronic congestive heart failure (CHF) were given 1 mg/kg oral enoximone and followed with serial hemodynamic measurements for 24 hours. Control cardiac index was 1.9 +/- 0.5 liters/min/m2 and it increased significantly by 1 hour, with a peak effect at 2 hours to 2.4 +/- 0.4 liters/min/m2 (p less than 0.05). Similarly, wedge pressure, 22 +/- 8 mm Hg at control, decreased to 16 +/- 10 by 1 hour (p less than 0.05). Six of the 12 patients received 1 mg/kg of enoximone on day 1 and 2 mg/kg on day 2. The higher dose of enoximone caused no further improvement in cardiac performance but prolonged the salutary hemodynamic effect. Subsequently, 79 patients (18 in New York Heart Association class III and 61 in class IV) with CHF (ejection fraction 17 +/- 8%) were followed over a 3 year period; the average enoximone dose was 1.7 +/- 0.7 mg/kg 3 times daily. Improvement of at least 1 functional class occurred in 55 patients (70%) at 1 month, 27 patients (34%) at 6 months and 19 (24%) maintained their improvement for over 1 year. Enoximone was discontinued in 20 patients (25%); in 5 (6%) for adverse effects and in 13 patients because of no clinical benefit. Adverse effects occurred in 14 patients (18%); 6% of all patients required discontinuation of drug. Six month survival was 50%, 42% at 1 year and 30% at 2 years.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)