PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Schoenberger

Publications and source records attributed to J Schoenberger.

13 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Thermography - a valuable tool to test hydrocephalus shunt patency.

INTRODUCTION: Shunt-function in hydrocephalic patients is verified by clinical examination and repeated cranial computed tomography (CCT) in most cases. Because of the disadvantages of multiple radiation especially in children it was our aim to introduce video-thermography as a simple and non-invasive methodology to evaluate shunt function. METHODS: 54 patients treated with shunts for hydrocephalus were tested. A ventriculo-peritoneal shunt had been implanted in 38 patients, a ventriculo-atrial shunt in 16 patients. Recent CCT-scans were available for all patients and served as control. None of the patients presented with clinical signs of shunt-dysfunction. The temperature of the skin covering the drainage catheter distal to the valve was recorded real-time by a calibrated infrared camera. After cooling the skin area downstream of the valve for exactly 1 min with an ice pack, changes of the skin temperature in the area downstream were registered by a thermocamera. The signals were transferred to a video screen and recorded on videotape. By off-line analysis of the obtained pseudo colour images variations of 0.1 degrees C in skin temperature could be measured. RESULTS: Temperature distribution of the area under investigation revealed a significant reduction of the skin temperature according to the location of the downstream catheter segment in 48 patients after cooling. In 6 patients skin temperature remained constant, although clinical evaluation and CCT-scan showed no signs of shunt dysfunction. Shunt patency could be verified in more than 85% of the patients by thermal imaging. CONCLUSION: Infrared-thermography is a valuable and promising tool for replacing CCT-scanning as a screening method to test shunt function in hydrocephalic patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Effectiveness of short-course therapy (5 days) with cefuroxime axetil in treatment of secondary bacterial infections of acute bronchitis.

Five hundred thirty-seven patients were enrolled in two independent, investigator-blinded, multicenter, randomized clinical trials comparing the clinical and bacteriologic efficacies and the safety of 5- or 10-day treatment with cefuroxime axetil with those of 10-day treatment with amoxicillin-clavulanate in the treatment of secondary bacterial infections of acute bronchitis. Patients received either 5 or 10 days of treatment (n = 177 in each group) with cefuroxime axetil at 250 mg twice daily or 10 days of treatment (n = 183) with amoxicillin-clavulanate at 500 mg three times daily. Patients in the cefuroxime axetil (5 days) group received placebo on days 6 to 10. Bacteriologic assessments were based on sputum specimen cultures obtained preceding and, when possible, following treatment. Organisms were isolated from the pretreatment sputum specimens of 242 of 537 (45%) patients, with the primary pathogens being Haemophilus influenzae, Haemophilus parainfluenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Staphylococcus aureus (28, 25, 13, 9, and 8% of isolates, respectively). Pathogens were eradicated or presumed to be eradicated in 87% (52 of 60), 91% (53 of 58), and 86% (60 of 70) of bacteriologically evaluable patients treated with cefuroxime axetil (5 days), cefuroxime axetil (10 days), and amoxicillin-clavulanate, respectively. A satisfactory clinical outcome (cure or improvement) was achieved in 82% (107 of 130), 86% (117 of 136), and 83% (130 of 157) of the clinically evaluable patients treated with cefuroxime axetil (5 days), cefuroxime axetil (10 days), and amoxicillin-clavulanate, respectively. Treatment with amoxicillin-clavulanate was associated with a significantly higher incidence of drug-related adverse events than was treatment with cefuroxime axetil for either 5 or 10 days (P = 0.001), primarily reflecting a higher incidence of drug-related gastrointestinal adverse events (37 versus 19 and 15%, respectively; P < 0.001), particularly diarrhea and nausea. These results indicate that treatment with cefuroxime axetil at 250 mg twice daily for 5 days is as effective as treatment for 10 days with either the same dose of cefuroxime axetil or amoxicillin-clavulanate at 500 mg three times daily in patients with acute bronchitis. In addition, treatment with cefuroxime axetil for either 5 or 10 days is associated with significantly fewer gastrointestinal adverse events, particularly diarrhea and nausea, than is 10-day treatment with amoxicillin-clavulanate.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1992

Methods for assessing quality of life in the cardiac arrhythmia suppression trial (CAST).

The CAST was a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre trial of antiarrhythmic medications designed to suppress ventricular arrhythmias in patients after an acute myocardial infarction (MI). A collection of 21 items derived from established scales was used to assess aspects of quality of life in CAST. The questions focused on symptoms, mental health, physical functioning, social functioning, life satisfaction, and life expectancy. Additional aspects included exposure to major stressful life events, and perceived social support and social integration. Work status was also recorded. Using the baseline values of 1465 (98%) out of 1498 patients enrolled in the CAST main study between 15 June 1987 and 19 April 1989, the reliability and validity of the scales used in CAST were computed. High internal consistency reliability (> or = 0.70) was found for Symptoms, Mental Health, and Physical Functioning. The discriminative validity, in particular for Symptoms, Mental Health, Physical and Social Functioning, showed that patients with heart failure and previous MI, as well as those suffering from angina and dyspnea, had a worse quality of life than those patients who were not experiencing these symptoms. It was concluded that the scales selected to form the CAST quality of life questionnaire were both reliable and clinically valid for this patient population and therefore could be used to detect disease progression and treatment effects.

Aged↗
PubMed1990

Characteristics of participants at baseline in the Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study (TOMHS).

The Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study (TOMHS) is a randomized, double-blind clinical trial currently being conducted to compare the effects of nonpharmacologic therapy alone with those of 1 of 5 active drug regimens combined with nonpharmacologic therapy, for long-term management of patients with mild hypertension. Six classes of drugs were studied: (1) acebutolol (beta blocker), (2) amlodipine (calcium antagonist), (3) chlorthalidone (diuretic), (4) doxazosin (alpha 1 antagonist), (5) enalapril (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor) and (6) placebo. All participants received nutritional-hygienic advice to reduce weight and sodium and alcohol intakes and to increase physical activity. End points include blood pressure change, side effects and quality-of-life indices; incidence of electrocardiographic and echocardiographic abnormalities; and incidence of cardiovascular clinical events, including death, among participants receiving drugs as first-step treatment as well as nonpharmacologic treatment compared with incidence among those participants randomized to nonpharmacologic treatment only as the initial step.

Aged↗
PubMed1990

A comparison of the efficacy and safety of a beta-blocker, a calcium channel blocker, and a converting enzyme inhibitor in hypertensive blacks.

A double-blind, positively controlled, forced dose titration study comparing the efficacy and safety of atenolol, captopril, and verapamil sustained release as single agents in the treatment of black patients with mild to moderate hypertension (diastolic blood pressure, 95 to 114 mm Hg) was conducted. A total of 394 patients were randomized to one of the three therapies. Mean blood pressures during a 2- to 4-week placebo treatment period (baseline) ranged from 100.4 to 100.7 mm Hg diastolic and 151.7 to 152.5 mm Hg systolic for the three groups. Of the patients, 355 (of whom 345 had assessable data) completed the first treatment period, which consisted of therapy with either 50 mg/d of atenolol, 25 mg every 12 hours of captopril, or 240 mg/d of verapamil sustained release. During the second 4-week treatment period, which 319 patients completed (307 assessable), half of the patients had their antihypertensive medication increased and the other half continued the same dose. Goal blood pressure was defined as a supine diastolic pressure of less than 90 mm Hg or a 10-mm Hg or greater drop in supine diastolic blood pressure from pretreatment levels. Atenolol, captopril, and verapamil sustained release therapy was associated with goal blood pressure achievement during the first treatment period 55.1%, 43.8%, and 65.2% of the time, respectively, and during the second treatment period 59.6%, 57.1%, and 73.0% of the time. Side effects were minimal and comparable for all three drugs.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Celiprolol in systemic hypertension.

The safety and efficacy of orally administered celiprolol, a new beta 1-selective adrenergic blocking drug with peripheral beta 2-agonist properties, were assessed in 91 patients with mild to moderate systemic hypertension (supine diastolic blood pressure [BP] 95 to 114 mm Hg without medication) using a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, titration-to-effect study design. All patients received placebo for 4 weeks and were then randomized to receive placebo (n = 46) or once-daily celiprolol (n = 45), which was titrated every 2 weeks (200, 400, 600 mg/day) over a 6-week period to achieve a reduction in supine diastolic BP to less than or equal to 90 mm Hg. Plasma lipids and lipoproteins were also assessed at baseline, during placebo and after randomization to active therapy in a subgroup of patients. Compared with placebo, celiprolol reduced supine and standing BP (reduction of supine BP -0.4/-2.1 mm Hg with placebo, -5.7/-6.4 with celiprolol, p less than 0.05; reduction of standing BP -1.7/-1.0 with placebo, -7.2/-4.9 with celiprolol, p less than 0.05). Supine heart rate was reduced by 6.8 beats/min with celiprolol compared with 2.0 beats/min with placebo (p less than 0.05). No differences were seen when the effects of placebo and celiprolol on plasma lipoproteins were compared. Celiprolol is a safe, effective and well tolerated once-daily antihypertensive drug and has no detrimental effects on plasma lipids.

Antihypertensive Agents↗
PubMed1986

Clinical studies of a new, low-dose formulation of metolazone for the treatment of hypertension.

Two multicenter, double-blind, randomized studies were performed to determine the antihypertensive efficacy and effects on laboratory values of a new, shorter-acting formulation of metolazone in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. After baseline placebo-control periods, 105 patients were randomly assigned to receive single daily doses of either placebo or 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 mg of the new formulation of metolazone for six weeks in one study, and 164 patients were randomized to receive 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 mg of the new formulation of metolazone or 2.5 mg of the older, long-acting metolazone in the other. Mean blood pressure reductions in all three metolazone groups were statistically and clinically significant. Blood pressures of 51% to 58% of patients in the 0.5-mg metolazone group were controlled (diastolic blood pressure less than 90 or a fall of greater than or equal to 10 mmHg from baseline). Reductions in mean serum potassium levels were dose-related. We conclude that 0.5 mg of metolazone is safe and effective therapy for hypertension; it will significantly reduce systolic and diastolic blood pressure and minimizes changes in laboratory test values.

Adult↗
PubMed1976

The relationship of education to blood pressure: findings on 40,000 employed Chicagoans.

The relationship of education to both actual blood pressure and the prevalence of high blood pressure, based on a systolic pressure of 160 mm Hg or greater or a diastolic pressure of 95 mm Hg or greater, was analyzed among 27,033 men and women, white and black, age 25-44 and 45-64, from the Chicago Heart Association Detection Project in Industry. The educational status of each individual was categorized as not a high school graduate, high school graduate, some college, or college graduate. A statistically significant inverse association between education and high blood pressure was present in all groups of whites. This association could not be "accounted for" by differences in age, relative weight, and heart rate among the educational strata. Controlling for these variables did, however, lessen the association. Among black males a significant inverse association between education level and blood pressure was found for the younger group. For the older black males there was a clear inverse association although with the small numbers it did not achieve statistical significance. For black females there was no clear association.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Long-term effects on plasma lipids of diet and drugs to treat hypertension. Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study (TOMHS) Research Group.

OBJECTIVE: - To compare long-term plasma lipid changes among 6 antihypertensive treatment interventions for stage I (mild) hypertension. DESIGN: - Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial. SETTING: - Four academic clinical research units in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: - A total of 902 men and women, aged 45 to 69 years, with stage I diastolic hypertension (diastolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg), recruited from 11914 persons screened in their communities. INTERVENTIONS: - Participants were randomized to 1 of 6 treatment groups: (1) placebo, (2) beta-blocker (acebutolol), (3) calcium antagonist (amlodipine), (4) diuretic (chlorthalidone), (5) alpha1-antagonist (doxazosin), and (6) angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (enalapril). All groups received intensive lifestyle counseling to achieve weight loss, dietary sodium and alcohol reduction, and increased physical activity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: - Changes in plasma total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and triglycerides from baseline to annual visits through 4 years. RESULTS: - Mean changes in all plasma lipids were favorable in all groups. The degree of weight loss with fat-modified diet and exercise was significantly related to favorable lipid changes. Significant differences (P<.01) among groups for average changes during follow-up in each lipid were observed. Decreases in plasma total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol were greater with doxazosin and acebutolol (for plasma total cholesterol, 0.36 and 0.30 mmol/L [13.8 and 11.7 mg/dL], respectively), less with chlorthalidone and placebo (0.12 and 0.13 mmol/L [4.5 and 5.1 mg/dL], respectively). Decreases in triglycerides were greater with doxazosin and enalapril, least with acebutolol. Increases in HDL cholesterol were greater with enalapril and doxazosin, least with acebutolol. Significant relative increases in plasma total cholesterol with chlorthalidone compared with placebo at 12 months were no longer present at 24 months and beyond, when mean plasma total cholesterol for the chlorthalidone group fell below baseline. Analyses of participants continuing to receive chlorthalidone throughout the 4 years of follow-up indicated this was not due solely to an increasing percentage of participants changing or discontinuing use of medication during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: - Weight loss with a fat-modified diet plus increased exercise produces favorable long-term effects on blood pressure and all plasma lipid fractions of adults with stage I hypertension; blood pressure reduction is enhanced to a similar degree by addition of a drug from any one of 5 classes of antihypertensive medication. These drugs differ quantitatively in influencing the degree of long-term favorable effects on blood lipids obtained with nutritional-hygienic treatment.

Acebutolol↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Clinical comparison of cefuroxime axetil and amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of patients with secondary bacterial infections of acute bronchitis.

Two independent, investigator-blinded, multicenter, randomized clinical trials compared the clinical and bacteriologic efficacy and safety of two oral antibiotics, cefuroxime axetil and amoxicillin/clavulanate, in the treatment of patients with secondary bacterial infections of acute bronchitis (hereafter denoted acute bronchitis). Three hundred sixty patients with signs and symptoms of acute bronchitis were enrolled at 22 centers and were randomly assigned to receive 10 days of treatment with either cefuroxime axetil 250 mg twice daily (BID) (n= 177) or amoxicillin/clavulanate 500 mg three times daily (TID) (n = 183). Patients were assessed for both clinical and bacteriologic responses once during treatment (at 3 to 5 days) and twice after treatment (at 1 to 3 days and at 13 to 15 days). Bacteriologic assessments were based on sputum specimen cultures obtained before treatment and, when possible, after treatment. Organisms were isolated from the pretreatment sputum specimens of 162 (45%) of 360 patients, with the primary pathogens being Haemophilus influenzae, Haemophilus parainfluenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Staphylococcus aureus (28%, 25%, 11%, 9%, and 8% of isolates, respectively). Thirty-four percent of the H influenzae isolates and 94% of the M catarrhalis isolates that were tested for beta-lactamase production were positive. A satisfactory clinical outcome (cure or improvement) was achieved in 86% (117 of 136) and 83% (130 of 157) of the clinically assessable patients treated with cefuroxime axetil or amoxicillin/clavulanate, respectively (P = 0.45). With respect to the eradication of bacterial pathogens, a satisfactory outcome (cure, presumed care, or cure with colonization) was obtained in 91% (53 of 58) and 86% (60 of 70) of bacteriologically assessable patients treated with cefuroxime axetil or amoxicillin/clavulanate, respectively (P = 0.32). Treatment with amoxicillin/clavulanate was associated with a significantly higher incidence of drug-related adverse events than was treatment with cefuroxime axetil (39% vs 23%; P = 0.001), primarily reflecting a higher incidence of drug-related gastrointestinal adverse events (37% vs 15%; P < 0.001), particularly diarrhea and nausea. Four patients in the cefuroxime axetil group and eight patients in the amoxicillin/clavulanate group withdrew from the study because of drug-related adverse events. These results indicate that cefuroxime axetil 250 mg BID is as effective as amoxicillin/clavulanate 500 mg TID in the treatment of patients with acute bronchitis but produces fewer gastrointestinal adverse events, particularly diarrhea and nausea.

Acute Disease↗