PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Sherck

Publications and source records attributed to J Sherck.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Penetrating esophageal injuries: multicenter study of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to define the period of time after which delays in management incurred by investigations cause increased morbidity and mortality. The outcome study is intended to correlate time with death from esophageal causes, overall complications, esophageal related complications, and surgical intensive care unit length of stay. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicenter study involving 34 trauma centers in the United States, under the auspices of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Multi-institutional Trials Committee over a span of 10.5 years. Patients surviving to reach the operating room (OR) were divided into two groups: those that underwent diagnostic studies to identify their injuries (preoperative evaluation group) and those that went immediately to the OR (no preoperative evaluation group). Statistical methods included Fisher's exact test, Student's T test, and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The study involved 405 patients: 355 male patients (86.5%) and 50 female patients (13.5%). The mean Revised Trauma Score was 6.3, the mean Injury Severity Score was 28, and the mean time interval to the OR was 6.5 hours. There were associated injuries in 356 patients (88%), and an overall complication rate of 53.5%. Overall mortality was 78 of 405 (19%). Three hundred forty-six patients survived to reach the OR: 171 in the preoperative evaluation group and 175 in the no preoperative evaluation group. No statistically significant differences were noted in the two groups in the following parameters: number of patients, age, Injury Severity Score, admission blood pressure, anatomic location of injury (cervical or thoracic), surgical management (primary repair, resection and anastomosis, resection and diversion, flaps), number of associated injuries, and mortality. Average length of time to the OR was 13 hours in the preoperative evaluation group versus 1 hour in the no preoperative evaluation group (p < 0.001). Overall complications occurred in 134 in the preoperative evaluation group versus 87 in the no preoperative evaluation group (p < 0.001), and 74 (41%) esophageal related complications occurred in the preoperative evaluation group versus 32 (19%) in the no preoperative evaluation group (p = 0.003). Mean surgical intensive care unit length of stay was 11 days in the preoperative evaluation group versus 7 days in the no preoperative evaluation group (p = 0.012). Logistic regression analysis identified as independent risk factors for the development of esophageal related complications included time delays in preoperative evaluation (odds ratio, 3.13), American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Organ Injury Scale grade >2 (odds ratio, 2.62), and resection and diversion (odds ratio, 4.47). CONCLUSION: Esophageal injuries carry a high morbidity and mortality. Increased esophageal related morbidity occurs with the diagnostic workup and its inherent delay in operative repair of these injuries. For centers practicing selective management of penetrating neck injuries and transmediastinal gunshot wounds, rapid diagnosis and definitive repair should be made a high priority.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Covering the "open abdomen": a better technique.

"Damage control" in severe abdominal trauma, abdominal compartment syndrome, necrotizing fasciitis of the abdominal wall, and necrotizing pancreatitis often preclude closure of the fascia after laparotomy. Many techniques have been reported for temporary coverage of the exposed viscera, but most have had documented problems. We report the successful use, since 1989, of a temporary sutureless coverage. The viscera are covered with omentum when possible, then with a clear plastic sheet. Sump drains are placed over this layer. The entire abdomen is then covered with two layers of iodophor-impregnated adhesive plastic drape. The last 50 patients managed with this technique are reported. The most common indication (27 patients) was for treatment of severe abdominal trauma. There were no wound infections, fasciitis, or bowel obstruction. Eighteen patients died; no deaths were related to abdominal closure. Temporary abdominal covering with adhesive plastic sheeting is a rapid, safe, and readily available method for managing the open abdomen. This technique provides a physiologic milieu for the abdominal viscera, simplifies nursing care, and promotes safe closure of the abdomen at a later time.

Abdomen↗
PubMed1994

The accuracy of computed tomography in the diagnosis of blunt small-bowel perforation.

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) is commonly used to evaluate patients with possible blunt intra-abdominal injury. One of its reported weaknesses is failure to demonstrate intestinal trauma. However, CT accuracy in identifying blunt small-bowel perforation has not been adequately assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We tracked 883 consecutive stable trauma victims who had abdominal CT because of equivocal physical findings. Initial "wet reading" results were compared with laparotomy findings and patient outcome. RESULTS: Small-bowel perforation occurred in 26 patients (3%). Twenty-four had CT abnormalities suggesting the injury. Twelve had CT findings considered diagnostic: contrast extravasation (n = 5) and/or extraluminal air (n = 11). One additional patient was thought to have free air on CT, but had no intestinal injury at laparotomy. Another 12 patients had CT scans that were non-diagnostic but suggestive: free fluid without solid organ injury (n = 10), or small-bowel thickening (n = 4) or dilatation (n = 3). Two patients with small-bowel injuries had normal CT scans. Of 857 patients without small-bowel disruption, 802 had normal abdominal CT scans, and 55 had 67 CT findings suggesting intestinal injury. Thus, CT diagnosed small-bowel perforation with a sensitivity of 92%, a specificity of 94%, and negative and positive predictive accuracies of 100% and 30%, respectively. The test had an overall accuracy (validity) of 94%. CONCLUSIONS: Blunt small-bowel injury is uncommon. When it is present, abdominal CT is usually abnormal. CT findings in intestinal perforation can be subtle and nonspecific. Any unexplained abnormality on CT after blunt abdominal trauma may signal the presence of intestinal perforation and warrants close clinical observation or further diagnostic tests.

Adolescent↗