PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

J Sketchley

Publications and source records attributed to J Sketchley.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Condom use among homosexual men.

A postal questionnaire survey of 262 homosexual men was carried out to investigate patterns of sexual behaviour and the use of condoms. Two hundred and twenty-nine of these subjects had been sexually active during the past year, with the mean number of male sexual partners being 8.09. One hundred and eighty men engaged in oral sex, and 117 ejaculated during this activity, of whom 103 (88%) did not use a condom. One hundred and sixteen men had engaged in insertive anal intercourse in the past year, and 102 had ejaculated during this activity. Of these, 32 did not use a condom. Some, however, only engaged in this activity within a monogamous relationship. The overall proportion of men who continued to engage in very high-risk sexual activity was small, however a different picture emerged if the sample was analysed in terms of the number of encounters with different men during the past year. Of the total estimated number of such encounters, almost half involved anal intercourse, and about half of these were unprotected. The reason for the apparent discrepancy is that those who continue to engage in high risk behaviour tend to be particularly sexually active.

Adult

Condom failure among homosexual men.

Following a postal questionnaire survey of 262 homosexual men carried out to investigate condom use during sexual activity, a sample of 97 men who used condoms during anogenital sex was identified. Thirty-one percent of those who had used a condom during anal intercourse reported at least one incident of condom breakage. When looked at in terms of frequency of individual condom use, it was found that 1 in 27 condoms break during this activity. Examination of the reasons for breakage and a review of the literature indicated that physical stress on the condom is likely to be a major factor in these incidents.

Adult

Therapy, counselling and small-group learning: some similarities and differences examined from a linguistic viewpoint.

The growing use of small groups in educational settings, therapy and counselling contains a danger of confusion in the purposes of the three modes. A university course in psychosexual counselling (containing, therefore, elements of education, therapy and counselling) is analysed using a linguistic framework. The similarities the three modes have with each other are examined and the differences between therapy and counselling on the one hand, and education on the other, are illustrated. It is suggested that some understanding of the different linguistic rules used in the three modes will permit students on a university course of this kind to make more rapid progress, and will provide both students and tutors with greater satisfaction.

Counseling