PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Sperzel

Publications and source records attributed to J Sperzel.

12 recordsLinked to original sources

Inappropriate arrhythmia detection in implantable defibrillator therapy due to oversensing of diaphragmatic myopotentials.

Nonadequate arrhythmia detection and delivery of electrical therapy is still a main problem in current implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy. Besides supraventricular arrhythmias extra-cardiac biosignals also can cause inadequate shock delivery. The present study focuses on nonadequate arrhythmia detection due to oversensing of diaphragmatic myopotentials. Their clinical characteristics, incidence and management are presented. Three-hundred-eighty-four recipients of a transvenous cardioverter-defibrillator who were implanted and followed-up at our institution between October 1991 and June 1999 were enrolled. During a mean follow-up of 32+/-25 months a total number of 139 nonadequate episodes of arrhythmia detection due to oversensing of diaphragmatic myopotentials were observed in 33 patients (8.6%). In 11 patients a total of 32 high energy shock deliveries occurred. Oversensing of diaphragmatic myopotentials was primarily observed in patients implanted with defibrillator leads providing "integrated bipolar" sensing. The vast majority of nonadequate arrhythmia detection were observed during intrinsic bradycardia heart rate and/or antibradycardia pacing. Electrical lead failure was ruled out in every patient. In 90% of the patients with a cardioverter-defibrillator providing programmable maximal sensitivity (n=16), the reduction of maximum sensitivity was effective in preventing further episodes of nonadequate arrhythmia detection. In 48% of the patients with devices without programmable maximal sensitivity (n=17), surgery revision was necessary to solve the problem.

Adult↗

Reduction of pacing output coupling capacitance for sensing the evoked response.

Sensing of the intracardiac evoked response (ER) after a pacing stimulus has been used in implantable pacemakers for automatic verification of capture. Reliable detection of ER is hampered by large residual afterpotentials associated with pacing stimuli. This led to the development of various technological solutions, like the use of triphasic pacing pulses and low polarizing electrode systems. This study investigated the effect of reducing the coupling capacitance (CC) in the pacemaker output circuitry on the magnitude of afterpotential, and the ability to automate detection of ventricular evoked response. A CC of 2.2 microF and four different blanking and recharge time settings were clinically tested to evaluate its impact on sensing of the ventricular ER and pacing threshold. Using an automatic step-down threshold algorithm, 54 consecutive patients, aged 70 +/- 10 years with acutely (n = 27) or chronically (n = 27) implanted ventricular pacing leads were enrolled for measurement testing. Routine measurements, using a standard pacing system analyzer (PSA), were (mean +/- SD) impedance 569 +/- 155 omega, R wave amplitude baseline to peak 9.8 +/- 3.7 mV and threshold 0.9 +/- 0.7 V at 0.4-ms pulse width. This new capture verification scheme, based on a CC of 2.2 microF and recharge/blanking timing setting of 10/12 ms, was successful in 52 patients which is equivalent to a success rate of 96%. In a subgroup of 26 patients implanted with bipolar ventricular leads (10 chronic, 16 acute), data were collected in unipolar (UP) and bipolar (BP) pace/sense configurations. Also, ER signals were recorded with two different band-pass filters: a wider band (WB) of 6-250 Hz and a conventional narrow band (NB) of 20-100 Hz. WB sensing from UP lead configuration yielded statistically significant larger signal to artifact ratios (SAR) than the other settings (P < 0.01). A dedicated unipolar ER sensing configuration using a small output capacitor and a wider band-pass filter enables adequate automatic capture verification, without any restrictions on pacing lead models or pacing/sensing configurations.

Aged↗

Dual-coil vs single-coil active pectoral implantable defibrillator lead systems: defibrillation energy requirements and probability of defibrillation success at multiples of the defibrillation energy requirements.

AIMS: The aim of the study was to compare the defibrillation energy requirements and the probability of successful defibrillation at multiples of the minimum defibrillation energy requirements in active pectoral implantable defibrillators with single- and dual-coil lead systems. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty-three consecutive patients undergoing implantation of an active pectoral cardioverter-defibrillator were randomized to receive a dual- or single-coil lead system. Defibrillators of two manufacturers with a fixed tilt biphasic defibrillation waveform were used. Defibrillation energy requirements were determined using a step-down defibrillation testing protocol. According to the randomization protocol, the patients were assigned to three additional consecutive defibrillation attempts during device implantation and during pre-discharge testing of either 1.0, 1.5 or 2.0 times the determined defibrillation energy requirement. Patients presenting defibrillation energy requirements > 15 J were excluded from analysis. Eighty of 83 patients (96%) completed the study protocol. Three patients were excluded due to elevated defibrillation energy requirements. The defibrillation energy requirements in the dual- and single-coil patient groups were 8.0 +/- 3.6 J and 8.4 +/- 3.7 J (ns), respectively. A comparable percentage of study patients showed defibrillation energy requirements <10 J (dual-coil: 88% vs single-coil: 83%). Defibrillation impedance was significantly different (dual-coil: 50 +/- 5.8 Ohm; single-coil: 39.8 +/- 4.2 Ohm). Regarding the probabilities of successful defibrillation, there were no significant differences between the two patient groups. The probabilities of defibrillation at the three multiples of the defibrillation energy requirement using a dual- and single-coil lead system were 82, 89.7 and 93.6 and 77.8, 94.1 and 95.8%, respectively (P=0.88, P=0.42, P=0.62, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Dual- and single-coil active pectoral defibrillator systems show no difference in defibrillation energy requirements and no difference in the probability of successful defibrillation at multiples of the minimum defibrillation energy requirement. The use of more simplified defibrillator lead systems may contribute to a future lead design focusing on improvement in lead durability.

Aged↗

Pacemaker automaticity.

The automated measurement of the main electrical parameters of pacemakers, such as battery voltage, current drain, pacing impedance, sensing levels, and pacing thresholds enables a continuous monitoring of the adequate functioning of the implanted device. New technologies in device interrogation, data transfer, and patient alert functions will enhance therapy safety significantly by the immediate detection of all, including transient, device malfunctions. The introduction of this technology will result in major changes in follow-up of patients with pacemakers. Technically we are very close to the goal of a fully automated pacemaker, although clinical acceptance lags behind. Clinical studies are necessary to demonstrate the beneficial effects of automated device functions, with regard to the main rationales for pacemaker automatization: increased patient safety, improved quality of life, and an improvement in the cost-benefit ratio in pacemaker therapy.

Arrhythmias, Cardiac↗

[Recurrent syncope of unknown origin. Diagnosis with implantable "loop" recorders].

BACKGROUND: In about a third of cases of recurrent syncope a diagnosis cannot be established despite extensive cardiovascular and neurologic testing. In patients without underlying heart disease the sensitivity of conventional diagnostic testing is low. CASE REPORT: A 33-year-old male patient underwent implantation of a loop recorder (Reveal) after negative neurological and cardiovascular testing. One month after implantation sinus node arrest could be documented during a presyncope. The patient underwent pacemaker implantation and remains asymptomatic since then. CONCLUSION: In patients with syncope and a negative conventional diagnostic workup the implantable loop recorder is a helpful and cost-effective diagnostic tool.

Adult↗

[Recurrent syncope in a 34-year-old woman triathlete].

HISTORY: Some weeks previously a 34-year old athlete, specializing in the triathlon, had 6 syncopes in one day. They had caused abrasions and contusions resulting from the falls. At another hospital paroxysmal atrial fibrillation had been diagnosed and treatment with disopyramide (2 x 200 mg) initiated, but she had about 15 further syncopes within 2 weeks. She was admitted for establishing their cause. INVESTIGATIONS: Initial ECGs and neurological examination failed to provide a diagnosis and she was discharged with an "event recorder". DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT AND COURSE: Three weeks after discharge she had another syncope. The event recorder was activated by the patient's partner and revealed polymorphous ventricular tachycardia. She underwent extensive invasive cardiological tests, including a right ventricular biopsy, but no abnormality was demonstrated. However, a provocation test with ajmaline produced ST segment elevations in V1 and V2 typical of the syndrome previously described by the Brugadas (right bundle branch block, precordial ST elevations in V1-V3 and sudden cardiac death). A cardioverter-defibrillator was implanted. During the subsequent observation period of 2 month the ICD delivered one countershock, triggered by the onset of polymorphous ventricular tachycardia with syncope. CONCLUSION: In patients with serious ventricular arrhythmias but no diagnostic findings, including a normal resting ECG, a drug provocation test should be performed to exclude a Brugada syndrome.

Adult↗

Homogeneity and diameter of linear lesions induced with multipolar ablation catheters: in vitro and in vivo comparison of pulsed versus continuous radiofrequency energy delivery.

BACKGROUND: For invasive treatment of atrial fibrillation, linear lesions induced with multipolar ablation catheters (MAC) are needed to prevent recurrence. The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of pulsed versus continuous radiofrequency (RF)-energy delivery using MAC. METHODS: In vitro tests were performed using endomyocardial preparations of fresh pig hearts in a 10-liter-bath of physiologic saline solution (37 degrees C) at constant flow conditions (1.5 l/min). The MAC were placed with a constant pressure of 20 ponds onto the endocardium. The energy (generator: Osypka HAT 200 S) was delivered either pulsed (4 electrodes simultaneously, 5ms duty-cycle) or continuously (each electrode separately). In vivo experiments were performed in 6 anesthetized pigs using fluoroscopic positioning of MAC at 40 different intracardial positions and with similar conditions as in vitro experiments. Lesion volume (LV) was calculated after measuring lesion diameter with a microcaliper. The homogeneity of the lesions (LH) was classified from 1-4; with 1 as highest homogeneity. RESULTS: Pulsed energy delivery produced more homogeneous linear lesions in significantly less time. There was no difference in electrode temperature values (50.2 +/- 0.8 and 51.3 +/- 1.4 degrees C) in vitro and in vivo. In the in vivo experiments, lesion depth and calculated lesion volume were less in both modes of energy delivery but pulsed energy delivery was superior regarding lesion depth and homogeneity. CONCLUSION: With pulsed energy delivery it is possible to create linear lesions of significantly greater homogeneity. Moreover, larger lesions are induced in less time by pulsed energy delivery in vitro and in vivo.

Animals↗

Detection of ventricular fibrillation in implantable defibrillators with automatic gain control amplifiers: effects of programming sensitivity.

AIMS: In newer implantable cardioverter-defibrillators with automatic gain control amplifiers the maximum possible sensitivity is programmed with the aim of securing optimal detection of ventricular fibrillation. This study was designed to prove that a reduction in maximum sensitivity is safe with respect to appropriate sensing of ventricular fibrillation, while avoiding sensing of extracardiac signals. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-two consecutive patients, undergoing defibrillator implantation/replacement with programmable maximum auto-gain sensing sensitivity (Ventak Mini III, Ventak AV , Guidant, St. Paul, MN, U.S.A.), were prospectively investigated. Thirty-four patients were implanted with a dual-coil lead system, providing integrated bipolar sensing (Endotak, Guidant, St. Paul, MN, U.S.A.), eight patients received a single-coil lead system with true bipolar sensing (Sprint, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, U.S.A.). During device implantation and pre-discharge testing, arrhythmia detection times of induced ventricular fibrillation were compared at programmed maximum (0.18 mV) and minimum (0.43 mV) sensitivity in a randomized manner. Seventy-six induced episodes of ventricular fibrillation were analysed. The mean arrhythmia detection times did not differ between the programmed sensing levels (maximum sensitivity: 1612 +/- 307 ms, vs minimal sensitivity: 1,602 +/- 330 ms; P = ns). The results were not affected by the type of implanted lead system (integrated bipolar versus true bipolar sensing). CONCLUSION: In the implantable defibrillator devices, reduction in maximum sensitivity did not impair the detection of induced episodes of ventricular fibrillation.

Amplifiers, Electronic↗

Comparison of pulsed versus continuous radiofrequency energy delivery: diameter of lesions induced with multipolar ablation catheter.

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of pulsed versus continuous RF energy delivery via multipolar ablation catheters. In vitro tests were performed in endomyocardial preparations of fresh bovine hearts in a both of physiological saline solution (37 degrees C) at constant flow conditions (1.5 L/min). The catheters were applied to the endocardium at a constant pressure. Energy was delivered pulsed (to 4 electrodes simultaneously, 5-ms duty cycle) or continuously (to each electrode separately). In vivo experiments were performed under fluoroscopy in eight anesthetized pigs, guided by endocardial electrograms to place the catheters in 22 different intraatrial positions. Lesion volume was calculated from measurements of the lesion diameter with a microcaliper. The homogeneity of the lesions was classified from 1 (highest) to 4 (least). More homogeneous linear lesions were produced in significantly less time with pulsed than with continuous energy delivery. There were no differences in electrode temperature or impedance values in vitro and in vivo. The results in the in vitro experiments were reproducible in the intact animal experiments. Significantly larger and more homogeneous linear lesions were created more rapidly with pulsed than with continuous energy delivery.

Animals↗

Bipolar atrial sensing thresholds in sinus rhythm and atrial tachyarrhythmias. A comparative analysis in patients with DDDR pacemakers.

UNLABELLED: Automatic mode switching (AMS) function in dual chamber pacemakers depends on adequate detection of atrial tachyarrhythmias. There are few data on showing how intra-operative atrial signal amplititude during sinus rhythm can predict atrial tachyarrhythmias after pacemaker implantation. In 43 patients undergoing DDDR pacemaker implantation and atrioventricular nodal ablation for the treatment of drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, atrial sensing thresholds during sinus rhythm and during induced atrial tachyarrhythmias (24-48 h after device implantation) were analysed. Five different DDDR pacemaker systems were implanted (Chorus 7034, Ela Medical n = 13; Meta DDDR 1254, Telectronics Pacing Systems n = 12; Vigor DR 1230, Guidant n = 6; Trilogy DR 2364, Pacesetter, n = 2; Kappa DR 401, Medtronic USA n = 10). Every patient received a steroid-eluting, screwing, bipolar atrial lead (Medtronic, Capsure-Fix 4068). The mean P wave amplitude during implantation was 3.91 +/- 1.14 mV. The mean atrial sensing threshold during sinus rhythm and during all modes of induced atrial tachyarrhythmias was 3.35 +/- 1.0 mV, and 1.52 +/- 0.92 mV, respectively (P < 0.001). Atrial fibrillation was induced in 36 patients. The mean sensing threshold during sinus rhythm in this patient group was 3.39 +/- 1.01 mV, the mean sensing threshold during atrial fibrillation was 1.27 +/- 0.56 mV, reflecting a 63% reduction of sensing threshold compared with sinus rhythm (P < 0.001). Atrial flutter was induced in seven patients. The mean sensing threshold during sinus rhythm was 2.92 +/- 1.19 mV, the mean sensing threshold during atrial flutter was 2.79 +/- 1.26 mV, reflecting a reduction of 5% (ns) compared with sinus rhythm. Atrial sensing thresholds during sinus rhythm were significantly correlated with sensing thresholds during atrial tachyarrhythmias (r = 0.44; P < 0.002), but there were significant variations in intra-individual results. The reduction of atrial sensing thresholds between sinus rhythm and induced atrial tachyarrhythmias ranged from 30% to 82%. CONCLUSION: Bipolar atrial sensing thresholds during sinus rhythm are correlated with sensing thresholds during atrial tachyarrhythmias, but there is a large degree of variance in individual patients. A 4:1 to 5:1 atrial sensing safety margin based on sensing threshold during sinus rhythm is a predictor for adequate postoperative detection of atrial tachyarrhythmias and the function of AMS devices.

Arrhythmia, Sinus↗

[Therapy with implanted cardioverter-defibrillator: Is a replacement of the impulse generator due to battery depletion also necessary without the occurrence of a tachyarrhythmia episode?].

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the necessity of the replacement of an implantable cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD) in patients with pulse generator battery depletion without an adequate, spontaneous arrhythmia episode during the life-time of the first implanted device. In this study 213 patients with implanted ICDs were enrolled. In 62 patients an elective generator replacement due to battery depletion was performed. Both patient groups (Group A: patients with generator replacement n = 62 and Group B: patients without replacement n = 151) were not different with regard to main clinical characteristics, such as underlying heart disease and left ventricular function. In both groups there was a predominance of male patients (Group A: 89%; Group B: 83%). The mean age was 58 +/- 11 years and 59 +/- 11 years in Group A and Group B, respectively. Coronary artery disease was present in 66% and 68% of the patients. There was a comparable left ventricular ejection fraction: Group A: 30.5 +/- 9% vs Group B: 31.9 +/- 9%. The follow-up time was much longer in Group A patients compared to Group B patients (50.5 +/- 14 vs. 16.5 +/- 11 months). For the total patient group there was a 5 year event-free probability of 23%, no differences were found between both groups. The subanalysis in Group A patients revealed no difference in the probability of ICD-shock occurrence prior to or after the replacement of the pulse generator. In 48/62 (77%) of Group A patients adequate ICD discharges were documented. In 15/62 (24%) patients shock occurred before and after generator replacement. In 6/62 (10%) of Group A patients, the first adequate ICD-therapy was documented after generator replacement. The results of this study indicate the necessity of an ICD-pulse generator replacement even in patients without an adequate device discharge during the life-time of the first implanted device.

Aged↗

[Dysfunctions of transvenous cardioverter/defibrillator electrode systems: clinical significance of system integrated diagnosis and measurement function--possibilities of partially automated system control].

UNLABELLED: The aim of this study is the analysis of electrical failures in transvenous cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD) lead systems with regard to the importance of device implemented diagnostic and measurement functions and the potential role of an automated device-control in the detection of lead failures. METHODS: All consecutive ICD patients at our institution were enrolled in this retrospective investigation. The routine follow-up controls consisted in a complete evaluation of all diagnostic and measurement ICD features and additional controls in case of spontaneous arrhythmia episodes. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty patients, 193 male and 37 female, were enrolled in this study (mean age: 61.5 +/- 10.2 years; mean LVEF 32 +/- 9%). During a mean follow-up period of 29.5 +/- 18.4 (6-76) months, lead failure occurred in 19 patients (8%), 16 patients were implanted with an ICD, capable of diagnostic and measurement functions. All nonadequate device discharges could be classified as sensing-failure by stored electrograms. Device implemented measurement features revealed clinical important information in 13/16 patients (81%). In 14/16 patients, the lead defect could not be detected during routine follow-up. At the time of documented lead failure the safety of the implanted devices was already lost in 6/16 patients (38%). CONCLUSIONS: Device implemented diagnostic and measurement options are of great importance in the early detection of ICD lead failures. The implementation of automated measurements of lead related parameters in connection with a patient alert function may contribute to a further increase in the safety of ICD therapy.

Adult↗